Intel Releases First Atom ''Cedar Trail'' Processors

btarunr · Sep 27, 2011, 07:49 AM

Intel released its latest generation of Atom processors, codenamed "Cedar Trail". Unlike earlier expected, the portable (netbook) variants of the new Atom processor aren't launched this day, just the low-power desktop (nettop) variants of Atom D2500 and Atom D2700. Cedar Trail is built on the 32 nm fabrication process, it features faster graphics, more graphics connectivity options (such as DisplayPort), hardware HD video acceleration, and a faster integrated memory controller.

Both the D2500 and D2700 are dual-core processors, with two x86-64 cores, and four logical CPUs for the OS to deal with, using HyperThreading technology. The D2500 is clocked at 1.86 GHz, while the D2700 runs at 2.13 GHz. Both chips feature 1 MB of shared L2 cache, the TDP of both are rated at 10W. New features included with the two are Intel Wireless Display Technology, Fast Boot, and PC Sync. The improved embedded graphics core is capable of 1080p video playback, supports hardware acceleration of popular HD video formats, and supports Blu-ray 2.0 format. Available to OEMs, the Atom D2500 and D2700 are BGA chips, priced at $42 and $52 in 1K quantities, respectively. The portable (netbook) variants of this generation, the N2600 and N2800, are expected to arrive a little later.

Source: CPU World

RejZoR · Sep 27, 2011, 08:00 AM

Finally netbook CPU's that went past 2GHz... I was getting tired of crappy repacked 1,6GHz cores...

DanTheBanjoman · Sep 27, 2011, 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RejZoR

Finally netbook CPU's that went past 2GHz... I was getting tired of crappy repacked 1,6GHz cores...

I thought clock speed became irrelevant quite a while ago.

Cuzza · Sep 27, 2011, 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DanTheBanjoman

I thought clock speed became irrelevant quite a while ago.

not these days. with 8 core bulldozers are gonna do 64GHz !!!11!!!! /sic

HalfAHertz · Sep 27, 2011, 08:39 AM

any more info on the graphics? Is it intel powered or imagination tech powered?

Completely Bonkers · Sep 27, 2011, 08:42 AM

It would have been very smart if Intel had included their thunderbolt technology in this new processor lineup. It would have set it apart from Zacate. As is, it remains an equal contender.

RejZoR · Sep 27, 2011, 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DanTheBanjoman

I thought clock speed became irrelevant quite a while ago.

When you're repacking pretty much the same thing over and over again (its what Intel is doing with Atom), clock speed matters as well. It doesn't for AMD Fusion where 1GHz C-50 performs just as good as Intel's 1,6GHz...

NC37 · Sep 27, 2011, 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HalfAHertz

any more info on the graphics? Is it intel powered or imagination tech powered?

But isn't every Intel IGP, powered by imagination? Which makes sense cause they can only imagine good CPUs

.

RejZoR · Sep 27, 2011, 09:49 AM

Not really, most Atom's use a derivate of GMA950 (just again repackaged). Only exception were some CPU's that were using GMA500 which was not an Intel branded GPU. It was just as crappy though from what i heard, but it could accelerate HD videos though...

de.das.dude · Sep 27, 2011, 10:15 AM

i guess it will fail to be effecient as the c-60's? and i am sure the c60's have better graphics capabilities.

faramir · Sep 27, 2011, 10:17 AM

I'm eagerly awaiting the benchmarks. These are the same clockspeeds the 65W TDP Core2 Duo E6300/E6400 ran at (but without hyperthreading) so I'd love to see how them perform head to head.

DanTheBanjoman · Sep 27, 2011, 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cuzza

not these days. with 8 core bulldozers are gonna do 64GHz !!!11!!!! /sic

Yeah... but no.

RejZoR · Sep 27, 2011, 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by de.das.dude

i guess it will fail to be effecient as the c-60's? and i am sure the c60's have better graphics capabilities.

AMD will always have better GPU part...

micropage7 · Sep 27, 2011, 11:11 AM

tdp 10w?
wow imagine what we gonna have in the future
could be below 1w with multi cores, multi thread and (i hope) its still cheap

de.das.dude · Sep 27, 2011, 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by micropage7

tdp 10w?
wow imagine what we gonna have in the future
could be below 1w with multi cores, multi thread and (i hope) its still cheap

e350's alone do 14W total with CPU+GPU. this is a not much of a feat really. but yes i guess the 2.0ghz does count

pr0n Inspector · Sep 27, 2011, 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by de.das.dude

e350's alone do 14w total with cpu+gpu. This is a not much of a feat really. But yes i guess the 2.0ghz does count

350e 18w + a50m 4.7w

d2700 10w + nm10 2.1w

de.das.dude · Sep 27, 2011, 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr0n Inspector

350e 18w + a50m 4.7w

d2700 10w + nm10 2.1w

but can we play

low settings. But still something right?

Ferrum Master · Sep 27, 2011, 02:35 PM

These are pointless releases to me...

ARM still the best in terms of performance per watt... Intel woke up too late...

Steevo · Sep 27, 2011, 02:47 PM

ATI used to do this, but then they sold that division.

ARM is the most efficient in power, but hardly in performance. It takes a dual core 1.2Ghz ARM with samsungs own GPU to make my phone awesome. But the graphics still look like my K6 550 and 7500.

_Zod_ · Sep 27, 2011, 04:35 PM

Yes, ARM is weak sauce relegated to to small locked down proprietary devices.

This Intel release could be a major problem for AMD if the price is right and it performs as well as Zacate. The netbook market is pretty much dead so that leaves x86 tablets, mini ITX servers and HTPC's that AMD and Intel will be fighting over and Intel wins that fight due to unfair leverage over OEMS and brand recognition.

brandonwh64 · Sep 27, 2011, 05:23 PM

need quad core atoms with 4mb cache and 2.6ghz clock speeds.

Jizzler · Sep 27, 2011, 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brandonwh64

need quad core atoms with 4mb cache and 2.6ghz clock speeds.

And they should have additional interface links, so you can go 2, 3, 4-way SMP with them.

[H]@RD5TUFF · Sep 27, 2011, 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Completely Bonkers

It would have been very smart if Intel had included their thunderbolt technology in this new processor lineup. It would have set it apart from Zacate. As is, it remains an equal contender.

Yeah I gotta agree I would pay 10 dollars more for thunderbolt.

mastrdrver · Sep 28, 2011, 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RejZoR

Finally netbook CPU's that went past 2GHz... I was getting tired of crappy repacked 1,6GHz cores...

In related news these are still Atom processors. They feature the ability to play 1080p content in slide picture mode instead of video mode.

For the record, I'd still take a 1Ghz C-50 dual core Bobcat over any (and I mean any) Atom.

RejZoR · Sep 28, 2011, 06:59 AM

Well i'm still on the first Atom that arrived to the world (the N270). It's not bad but compared to any AMD Fusion offfering, any Atom GPU part is just pathetic. Yesterday i watched a video of someone playing Dirt 2 on netbook. I could run it if it doesn't strictly demand SM3.0 or TnL (which 99% of games these days do, even indie ones), but would probably run in slideshow mode as well.
The reason why i'd change is the GPU at most. Because it's a proper full fledged DX11 chip. Compared to Intels half broken stuff that's being repacked for ages. The GPU that's with my N270 is exactly the same as the one that comes with N570 for example. They just stuffed it inside CPU and called it GMA3150. While in reality its still just a repacked GMA950...

Sep 27, 2011, 07:49 AM	#1
btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Hyderabad, India Posts: 14,982 (7.30/day) Thanks: 788 Thanked 12,899 Times in 5,650 Posts System Specs	Intel Releases First Atom ''Cedar Trail'' Processors Intel released its latest generation of Atom processors, codenamed "Cedar Trail". Unlike earlier expected, the portable (netbook) variants of the new Atom processor aren't launched this day, just the low-power desktop (nettop) variants of Atom D2500 and Atom D2700. Cedar Trail is built on the 32 nm fabrication process, it features faster graphics, more graphics connectivity options (such as DisplayPort), hardware HD video acceleration, and a faster integrated memory controller. Both the D2500 and D2700 are dual-core processors, with two x86-64 cores, and four logical CPUs for the OS to deal with, using HyperThreading technology. The D2500 is clocked at 1.86 GHz, while the D2700 runs at 2.13 GHz. Both chips feature 1 MB of shared L2 cache, the TDP of both are rated at 10W. New features included with the two are Intel Wireless Display Technology, Fast Boot, and PC Sync. The improved embedded graphics core is capable of 1080p video playback, supports hardware acceleration of popular HD video formats, and supports Blu-ray 2.0 format. Available to OEMs, the Atom D2500 and D2700 are BGA chips, priced at $42 and $52 in 1K quantities, respectively. The portable (netbook) variants of this generation, the N2600 and N2800, are expected to arrive a little later. Source: CPU World

System Name:	Blackbox
Processor:	Intel Core i7-950
Motherboard:	Intel Extreme Series DX58OG
Cooling:	Xigmatek Aegir SD128264 with IC Diamond 24 Thermal Compound
Memory:	12GB ADATA Premier (3x 4GB) DDR3-1333 MHz
Video Card:	Palit GeForce GTX 680 JetStream 2GB outfitted with IC Diamond 24 TIM
Hard Disk:	Samsung 840 Series 250GB, Random 8 TB storage
Optical Drive:	HT-LG DVD-RW
CRT/LCD Model:	ViewSonic VX2450wm-LED
Case:	Cooler Master CM690 Window
Sound Card:	Creative SB Recon3D
PSU:	Corsair HX850W
Software:	Windows 8 Pro 64-bit

Sep 27, 2011, 08:00 AM	#2
RejZoR Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Europe/Slovenia Posts: 3,963 (1.26/day) Thanks: 39 Thanked 752 Times in 540 Posts System Specs	Finally netbook CPU's that went past 2GHz... I was getting tired of crappy repacked 1,6GHz cores... __________________ RejZoR's Little Secrets @ rejzor dot tk

System Name:	The BlackBox 3
Processor:	Intel Core i7 920 4,2 GHz
Motherboard:	ASUS Rampage II Gene + 2x Noiseblocker XM2 on chipset/VRM
Cooling:	ANTEC H2O 920 + 2x Noiseblocker M12-S3HS
Memory:	6GB Corsair Dominator 1600MHz
Video Card:	GIGABYTE RADEON HD7950 3GB WindForce 3X (1100/6000)
Hard Disk:	WD Caviar Black 2TB 64MB
Optical Drive:	SAMSUNG SH-S223F
CRT/LCD Model:	SAMSUNG SyncMaster 931c
Case:	Lian Li PC-V354 Black
Sound Card:	Creative Sound Blaster Z + Altec Lansing MX5021
PSU:	Corsair HX750 + Noiseblocker BlackSilent XR2
Software:	Windows 8 Professional x64
Benchmarks:	It can run 3DMark and all...

Processor:	Dual Xeon 5506
Motherboard:	Asus Z8NA-D6
Cooling:	2x Thermalright HR-01 X/passive
Memory:	6GB Corsair something
Video Card:	EVGA GTX 260 Core 216
Hard Disk:	None
Optical Drive:	None
CRT/LCD Model:	24" Asus
Case:	Thermaltake Swing
Sound Card:	Onboard
PSU:	620W CM
Software:	Win2k8

Processor:	AMD Phenom II 555BE unlocked X4 @3.8GHz
Motherboard:	GA-78LMT-S2P
Cooling:	Thermaltake Blue Orb + open case in cold room = low temps lol
Memory:	8Gb DDR3 1600
Video Card:	GTX580
Hard Disk:	64GB SSD Super Talent
CRT/LCD Model:	22" Chimei, 17" Philips
Case:	POS!
PSU:	Cooler Master Silent Pro Gold 800W

Sep 27, 2011, 08:39 AM	#5
HalfAHertz Join Date: May 2009 Location: Singapore Posts: 1,740 (1.18/day) Thanks: 364 Thanked 347 Times in 251 Posts System Specs	any more info on the graphics? Is it intel powered or imagination tech powered? __________________ smile or the devil will get in your head and sing karaoke forever...

System Name:	Mini Kraken
Processor:	i5-3330
Motherboard:	AsRock B75M-DGS
Cooling:	stock
Memory:	2x4GB Kingston 1600MHz
Video Card:	Saphire Radeon 7850 2GB
Hard Disk:	Plextor M5S 120GB+1TB Seagate
Optical Drive:	-
CRT/LCD Model:	23' Dell
Case:	Nonamebrand ATX case with lots of fans
Sound Card:	stock
PSU:	CM Extreme Power 475W
Software:	W7

Sep 27, 2011, 08:42 AM	#6
Completely Bonkers Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 2,415 (1.05/day) Thanks: 582 Thanked 533 Times in 374 Posts System Specs	It would have been very smart if Intel had included their thunderbolt technology in this new processor lineup. It would have set it apart from Zacate. As is, it remains an equal contender. __________________ ... some things in life just drive you bonkers. Especially the rubbish you see in forum posts

Processor:	Mysterious Engineering Prototype
Motherboard:	Intel 865
Cooling:	Custom block made in workshop
Memory:	Corsair XMS 2GB
Video Card:	FireGL X3-256
CRT/LCD Model:	1600x1200 SyncMaster x 2 = 3200x1200
Software:	Windows 2003

System Name:	Lailalo / Edelweiss
Processor:	FX 8320 @ 4.5Ghz / i7 3610QM @2.3-3.2Ghz
Motherboard:	ASrock 990FX Extreme 4 / Lenovo Y580
Cooling:	Cooler Master Hyper 212 Plus / Big hunk of copper
Memory:	16GB Samsung 30nm DDR3 1600+ / 8GB Hyundai DDR3 1600
Video Card:	(2x) Gigabyte GTX460 1GB (816,1000,1632) / GTX 660M 2GB
Hard Disk:	Seagate 1TB/250GB/80GB + 500GB WD Passport + OCZ Synapse 64GB SSD Cache / Seagate Momentus 500GB
Optical Drive:	16x DVD Internal + Samsung External BD Combo / BD-Combo drive
CRT/LCD Model:	Viewsonic 20.1 @ 1680x1050 / Lenovo 15.6 @ 1920x1080
Case:	Coolermaster Storm Sniper / Lenovo Y580
Sound Card:	Asus Xonar DG / Whatever Lenovo used
PSU:	Antec Truepower Blue 750W / Big Power Brick
Software:	Windows 7 Pro / Windows 7 Home Premium
Benchmarks:	Cinebench 11.5: CPU @ 7.72 GL @ 56.52

Sep 27, 2011, 09:49 AM	#9
RejZoR Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Europe/Slovenia Posts: 3,963 (1.26/day) Thanks: 39 Thanked 752 Times in 540 Posts System Specs	Not really, most Atom's use a derivate of GMA950 (just again repackaged). Only exception were some CPU's that were using GMA500 which was not an Intel branded GPU. It was just as crappy though from what i heard, but it could accelerate HD videos though... __________________ RejZoR's Little Secrets @ rejzor dot tk

Sep 27, 2011, 10:15 AM	#10
de.das.dude Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Wild Wild East Posts: 4,555 (4.24/day) Thanks: 2,323 Thanked 1,333 Times in 913 Posts System Specs	i guess it will fail to be effecient as the c-60's? and i am sure the c60's have better graphics capabilities. __________________ my wallet isnt hashwell compatiple sad face

System Name:	SuperDuperUberComputer
Processor:	AMD Phenom II 945 X4 3.0Ghz
Motherboard:	ASRock 990FX Extreme 4
Cooling:	CM Hyper 212 EVO push:pull+ 1 panaflow 113CFM + 2 x 120mm NZXTs
Memory:	2x4GB DDR3 Corsair Vengeance 1600MHz CL9
Video Card:	GIGABYTE GTS450 OC2
Hard Disk:	SATA II 80GB Hitachi 7200RPM,W.D 500GB Green \|\| 4GB int + random SD cards
Optical Drive:	ASUS DVD drive
CRT/LCD Model:	Samsung Sync Master 793s CRT\|
Case:	NZXT Guardian 921RB
Sound Card:	Realtek ALC892 with THX True Studio
PSU:	Corsair GS600
Software:	Windows 7 64bit
Benchmarks:	real men dont need to bench :p

Sep 27, 2011, 10:17 AM	#11
faramir Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 203 (0.28/day) Thanks: 5 Thanked 27 Times in 20 Posts	Performance vs. C2 ? I'm eagerly awaiting the benchmarks. These are the same clockspeeds the 65W TDP Core2 Duo E6300/E6400 ran at (but without hyperthreading) so I'd love to see how them perform head to head.

Sep 27, 2011, 11:11 AM	#14
micropage7 Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Jakarta, Indonesia Posts: 3,674 (3.19/day) Thanks: 190 Thanked 835 Times in 549 Posts System Specs	tdp 10w? wow imagine what we gonna have in the future could be below 1w with multi cores, multi thread and (i hope) its still cheap __________________ :: New Cases, Tips And All About Your Cases Visit CaseGear :: Don't Ever Ask About Love And Honesty That You Don't Ever Have

System Name:	micropage7
Processor:	phenom x4 955 Black Edition @ Stock
Motherboard:	Asrock 990FX
Cooling:	Xigmatek HDT-SD964
Memory:	8Gb Team Xtreem DDR3
Video Card:	Radeon 5570 CrossFire
Hard Disk:	Seagate 160Gb, 250Gb & 500Gb SATA
Optical Drive:	LG DVDRW, Samsung Combo
CRT/LCD Model:	LG 19 inch LCD Wide Screen
Case:	Lian Li PC-7FNW
Sound Card:	Creative Audigy Value
PSU:	VenomRX Red Diamond 650 Watt
Software:	Windows 7 64-bit
Benchmarks:	Classified

System Name:	sans nom
Processor:	AMD 1090T, EK Supreme hf
Motherboard:	MSI 890GXM-G65
Cooling:	Feser X-480, MCR220-QP, MCP655, Ek D5 TOP
Memory:	2 x G.Skill F3-12800CL9D-4GBRL
Video Card:	EVGA GTX 570, Ek GTX 580 FC block
Hard Disk:	X25M 80GB 34nm, WDC WD20EARS, WD15EADS, WD6401AALS
Optical Drive:	Pioneer DVR-216D
CRT/LCD Model:	Acer P191w, Philips 240PW9EB, ColorMunki Photo
Case:	SST-TJ07B-W
Sound Card:	Asus Essence ST
PSU:	Corsair TX750

Sep 27, 2011, 02:35 PM	#18
Ferrum Master Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Riga, Latvia Posts: 288 (0.31/day) Thanks: 26 Thanked 48 Times in 36 Posts System Specs	These are pointless releases to me... ARM still the best in terms of performance per watt... Intel woke up too late... __________________

Processor:	Intel Xeon X5660 Westmere
Motherboard:	ASUS Sabertooth X58
Cooling:	Prolimatech Megahalems
Memory:	3*2GB Corsair XMS3 CM3X2G1600C8
Video Card:	HD 7970
Hard Disk:	2 x Crucial M4 64GB RAID0 + 2TB Samsung F4
CRT/LCD Model:	HP LP2275w
Case:	Fractal Design Define R4
Sound Card:	Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
PSU:	Enermax Galaxy DXX EGX1000EWL
Software:	Windows 8 x64

Sep 27, 2011, 02:47 PM	#19
Steevo Eligible for custom title Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 5,567 (2.02/day) Thanks: 238 Thanked 979 Times in 729 Posts System Specs	ATI used to do this, but then they sold that division. ARM is the most efficient in power, but hardly in performance. It takes a dual core 1.2Ghz ARM with samsungs own GPU to make my phone awesome. But the graphics still look like my K6 550 and 7500. __________________ “it would have been perfect....its got trains and the line"tech your kids not to do what iv done"(or similar) because i had obviously done something to warrent 2 e-thugs to come 4000miles out of their way and kill me.” -Solaris17 “yeah i failed. i noticed the "coming soon" part after i posted.” -Mussels “people are just stupid.” -W1zzard Yes I am evil, yes you can have some.

System Name:	MoFo
Processor:	AMD PhenomII 1100T @ 3.7Ghz/4.1Ghz Turbo
Motherboard:	Asus M3A32-MVP Deluxe 2202 BIOS
Cooling:	Swiftec 655 pump, Apogee GT, MCW60-R GPU, MCR360mm Rad, 1/2 loop.
Memory:	G-Skill 1200Mhz 5.5.5.15 2T
Video Card:	HD5870 1Gb HIS custom BIOS watercooled & VRM-R4
Hard Disk:	2 Agility 3 SSD RAID 0 on highpoint 640, 2 3TB RAID 0, 1 2TB and one failing 750Gb
Optical Drive:	Lite-On DL DVD
CRT/LCD Model:	Asus 1920X1200 60Hz 25.5" LCD, 46" 1080P Toshiba LCD
Case:	Rosewill R6A34-BK modded (thanks to MKmods)
Sound Card:	On Board
PSU:	750W PC Power & Cooling modded (thanks to MKmods)
Software:	Vista X64 Ultimate/Win 7 Ultimate
Benchmarks:	780 MBps read on HDD's 1052 core on 5870.

Sep 27, 2011, 04:35 PM	#20
_Zod_ Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 159 (0.12/day) Thanks: 16 Thanked 33 Times in 25 Posts System Specs	Yes, ARM is weak sauce relegated to to small locked down proprietary devices. This Intel release could be a major problem for AMD if the price is right and it performs as well as Zacate. The netbook market is pretty much dead so that leaves x86 tablets, mini ITX servers and HTPC's that AMD and Intel will be fighting over and Intel wins that fight due to unfair leverage over OEMS and brand recognition. __________________ Recommended software: Windows 7 Classic Shell Open Hardware Monitor Truecrypt

System Name:	Zim
Processor:	AMD Phenom II X4 925
Motherboard:	GA-970A-UD3 (rev. 2.0)
Cooling:	AMD Stock with heat pipes
Memory:	Corsair CMV8GX3M2A1333C9 2x 8GB Kit DDR3 1333
Video Card:	EVGA GeForce GTX 550 Ti FPB
Hard Disk:	Western Digital WD RE4 1TB - Main
Optical Drive:	Sony Optiarc AD-7260S-0B
CRT/LCD Model:	HP LP2465 1920x1200
Case:	COOLMAX CS-480
Sound Card:	Intergrated VIA VT2021
PSU:	hec X-Power Pro 600
Software:	Windows 7 Ultimate

Sep 27, 2011, 05:23 PM	#21
brandonwh64 Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!! Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Chatsworth, GA Posts: 13,562 (10.02/day) Thanks: 2,146 Thanked 5,341 Times in 3,696 Posts System Specs	need quad core atoms with 4mb cache and 2.6ghz clock speeds. __________________ Cruncher's: All GPU's GPU's: 7970 3GB Unlocked = 8 Threads 5770 1GB OCed = 2 Threads

System Name:	The StarCrunch Defender!
Processor:	I7 2600K @ 4.5ghz 1.32V
Motherboard:	Gigabyte Z68X-UD3H-B3
Cooling:	Corsair A70 Push/Pull
Memory:	G-Skill Ripjaws 2x4GB DDR3 1866mhz
Video Card:	Gigabyte 7970 3GB Reference Card at boost clocks
Hard Disk:	2x 500GB WD Blue Raid 0 / 1TB WD Black
Optical Drive:	Samsung DVD/R/RW SATA
CRT/LCD Model:	ViewSonic VG2227wm 1080P
Case:	NZXT Tempest 410 Elite
Sound Card:	Onboard Realtek (Azalia)
PSU:	Corsair 750TX
Software:	Windows 7 Home X64

Processor:	AMD FX-8120
Motherboard:	ASRock Fatal1ty 990FX Professional
Cooling:	Scythe Ninja 3
Memory:	G.Skill DDR3-1866 8GB x 2
Video Card:	Gigabyte GTX 660 2GB
Hard Disk:	Crucial M4 128GB, WD 640GB x 4, 2TB Seagate
Optical Drive:	Asus SATA DVD-RW
CRT/LCD Model:	Asus 24" HD+ (1920x1200)
Case:	Lian Li PC-A17B
Sound Card:	Onboard
PSU:	OCZ GameXtreme 700w
Software:	Windows 7 Ultimate

System Name:	White Boy
Processor:	Core i7 3770k @4.6 Ghz
Motherboard:	ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
Cooling:	CORSAIR H100
Memory:	CORSAIR Vengeance 16GB @ 2177
Video Card:	EVGA GTX 680 CLASSIEFIED @ 1250 Core
Hard Disk:	2 Samsung 830 256 GB (Raid 0) 1 Hitachi 4 TB
Optical Drive:	none
CRT/LCD Model:	1 Dell 30U11 30"
Case:	BIT FENIX Prodigy
Sound Card:	none
PSU:	SeaSonic X750 Gold 750W Modular
Software:	Windows Pro 7 64 bit \|\| Ubuntu 64 Bit
Benchmarks:	2017 Unigine Heaven :: P37239 3D Mark Vantage

System Name:	Money Hole
Processor:	Core i7 970
Motherboard:	Asus P6T6 WS Revolution
Cooling:	Noctua UH-D14
Memory:	12GB (6x2GB) Corsair Domminators
Video Card:	XFX 5870 Crossfire
Hard Disk:	WD 900GB VR (Raid 0) (3x drives)
Optical Drive:	LG BD/HD-DVD Burner
CRT/LCD Model:	3x Hanns-g HE225
Case:	CM HAF 932
Sound Card:	ADI (onboard)
PSU:	Enermax Revolution 85+ 1050w
Software:	Windows 7 Professional x64

Sep 28, 2011, 06:59 AM	#25
RejZoR Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Europe/Slovenia Posts: 3,963 (1.26/day) Thanks: 39 Thanked 752 Times in 540 Posts System Specs	Well i'm still on the first Atom that arrived to the world (the N270). It's not bad but compared to any AMD Fusion offfering, any Atom GPU part is just pathetic. Yesterday i watched a video of someone playing Dirt 2 on netbook. I could run it if it doesn't strictly demand SM3.0 or TnL (which 99% of games these days do, even indie ones), but would probably run in slideshow mode as well. The reason why i'd change is the GPU at most. Because it's a proper full fledged DX11 chip. Compared to Intels half broken stuff that's being repacked for ages. The GPU that's with my N270 is exactly the same as the one that comes with N570 for example. They just stuffed it inside CPU and called it GMA3150. While in reality its still just a repacked GMA950... __________________ RejZoR's Little Secrets @ rejzor dot tk

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
ASUS Displays Cedar Trail-based IPC Motherboard	btarunr	News	2	Jun 6, 2011 01:30 PM
Intel Readies 32 nm Cedar View Atom Processors for Late 2011	btarunr	News	16	May 4, 2011 01:04 AM
Intel to Stop Supplying Atom Z500 ''Silverthrone'' Processors	btarunr	News	4	Aug 2, 2009 03:40 AM
Intel Celebrates One Year from Atom Launch, Brings New Atom Processors to the Public	malware	News	9	Apr 9, 2009 03:19 AM
Intel Introduces Five Atom Processors	malware	News	9	Apr 3, 2008 05:10 AM