techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

View Poll Results: Does DirectX 11 support matter for a PCI/PCIe x1 graphics card?
Yes 14 31.11%
No 31 68.89%
Voters: 45. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Sep 27, 2011, 03:50 PM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,983 (7.30/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,899 Times in 5,650 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

ZOTAC Announces GeForce GT 520 in PCI and PCIe x1 Interface Variants

ZOTAC International, a leading innovator and channel manufacturer, today expands the value GeForce GT 520 lineup with new PCI and PCI Express x1 form factors for users with pre-built systems that have limited expansion capabilities. The new ZOTAC GeForce GT 520 PCI and PCI Express x1 graphics cards breathe new life into older systems by delivering a performance punch and new video capabilities.

“Upgrading your graphics card is the easiest way to boost your system performance and gain new capabilities. The new ZOTAC GeForce GT 520 PCI and PCI Express x1 graphics cards shows that you can experience good graphics without upgrading the rest of your system,” said Carsten Berger, marketing director, ZOTAC International.



The ZOTAC GeForce GT 520 PCI and PCI Express x1 graphics cards provide DVI, HDMI and VGA outputs with dual simultaneous independent display support for an instant dual-monitor upgrade. The low-profile form factor enables the ZOTAC GeForce GT 520 PCI and PCI express x1 graphics card to easily fit in compact pre-built systems with height limitations in addition to expansion limitations.



It’s time to play with the ZOTAC GeForce GT 520 PCI and PCI Express x1 graphics card.

btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2011, 04:07 PM   #2
Jizzler
2000 Posts
 
Jizzler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Geneva, FL, USA
Posts: 3,010 (1.42/day)
Thanks: 567
Thanked 606 Times in 487 Posts

System Specs

Nice.

I've used x1/PCI cards in servers without onboard video before, leaving the valuable x16/x8 slots available for RAID controllers, NICs, etc. A niche benefit, but a benefit none the less.

Also nice as a secondary card. Better compatibility with other newer series cards than with the ancient 6000/7000/8000 x1 and PCI cards currently available.
Jizzler is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jizzler For This Useful Post:
Old Sep 27, 2011, 04:08 PM   #3
Frick
Fishfaced Nincompoop
 
Frick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 7,882 (2.98/day)
Thanks: 1,076
Thanked 1,445 Times in 1,151 Posts

System Specs

Would be cool with a review of the PCI card.
__________________
Typemachine: Acer Aspire One D250 | Atom N280 1.6 Ghz | 1GB DDR2 | 160GB SATA | 10.1' 1024 x 600 | Lubuntu 12.10
Oldbox: HP D530 | Pentium 4 2.8 Ghz | 1GB DDR | 40GB | Windows XP
"The 'gentle biker' look is overdone. I'm going for 'psycho hillbilly.' "
Frick is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2011, 04:08 PM   #4
RejZoR
3500 Posts
 
RejZoR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Europe/Slovenia
Posts: 3,963 (1.26/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 752 Times in 540 Posts

System Specs

Nice. The PCI one would be cool for my cousin that has an old HP workstation. Low profile card and PCI. It's all about the price now...
__________________
RejZoR's Little Secrets @ rejzor dot tk
RejZoR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2011, 04:10 PM   #5
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,751 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,115 Times in 3,706 Posts

System Specs

The PCI version will be useful, but the PCI-E x1 version will probably be way overpriced for something I can make myself with a normal card and a dremel.
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2011, 04:11 PM   #6
Shihabyooo
200 Posts
 
Shihabyooo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hell on Earth -or someplace similar-
Posts: 487 (0.56/day)
Thanks: 160
Thanked 107 Times in 87 Posts

System Specs

PCI...
Anyone else feeling nostalgic ?
__________________
MAL

-~--Please excuse my poor English.
Shihabyooo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2011, 04:20 PM   #7
Apollo565
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

They are both great ideas...especially the PCI!
The last Nvidia PCI card was Geforce 6200 if i'm correct. An update is certainly due.
Apollo565 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2011, 04:28 PM   #8
Drone
1000 Posts
 
Drone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Nonlocal location
Posts: 1,897 (1.91/day)
Thanks: 62
Thanked 822 Times in 525 Posts

System Specs

That's nice. This is a good news for people with weak machines.
__________________
...the young Universe was filled with a hot dense soup of interacting protons, electrons and photons at about 2700ºC. When the protons and electrons joined to form hydrogen atoms, the light was set free
Drone is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2011, 04:29 PM   #9
Yukikaze
2000 Posts
 
Yukikaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Jerusalem, Israel
Posts: 2,121 (1.25/day)
Thanks: 213
Thanked 481 Times in 347 Posts

System Specs

On. Nice. I need about three
__________________
Cameron: Core i7 2600K 4.5Ghz, MCR220, 2xMCR120, MCP655, ASRock P67 Extreme4, 4GB DDR3, 2xOCZ Vertex 30GB RAID0, GTX470, 2xHD5670, Modu82+ 625W, TT Xaser VI.
Neuromancer: Core i7 975, DFI DK X58-T3eH6, 12GB DDR3 1333Mhz CL6-6-6-15-1T, 3x9600GSO 384MB, Hiper 880W, TT Xaser VI.
Administrator of a 40 core Hadoop cluster.
Yukikaze is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2011, 04:29 PM   #10
JATownes
1000 Posts
 
JATownes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: West Texas
Posts: 1,666 (1.01/day)
Thanks: 659
Thanked 407 Times in 332 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to JATownes

System Specs

Would this card do physx? If so, that would be a nice little addition to my rig, just for fun.
__________________
Please rate my M1dn1ght Rig
"I will only buy this if it make's me a sandwich and plays with my balls" - alexsubri

Sig compliments of Stefanels
JATownes is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2011, 04:33 PM   #11
_JP_
2000 Posts
 
_JP_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Portugal
Posts: 2,121 (1.87/day)
Thanks: 1,956
Thanked 647 Times in 468 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by JATownes View Post
Would this card do physx? If so, that would be a nice little addition to my rig, just for fun.
It doesn't. See the last picture (table).
_JP_ is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2011, 04:48 PM   #12
qubit
Overclocked quantum bit
 
qubit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Quantumville UK
Posts: 8,648 (4.34/day)
Thanks: 4,178
Thanked 3,303 Times in 1,943 Posts

System Specs

Having a x1 PCI-E interface is interesting and nichily useful. I'm just wondering if the x1 card can possibly have any worse performance than standard x16 one?

Also, why put the passive heatsink on the x16 version, but an active, whiny one on the x1 one? Makes no sense to me, should be the other way round, if anything.
__________________
Siggie in the post.
qubit is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2011, 05:02 PM   #13
Sinzia
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 703 (0.73/day)
Thanks: 88
Thanked 184 Times in 135 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Sinzia Send a message via MSN to Sinzia Send a message via Yahoo to Sinzia Send a message via Skype™ to Sinzia

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by qubit View Post
Having a x1 PCI-E interface is interesting and nichily useful. I'm just wondering if the x1 card can possibly have any worse performance than standard x16 one?

Also, why put the passive heatsink on the x16 version, but an active, whiny one on the x1 one? Makes no sense to me, should be the other way round, if anything.
I ran a 9800GT in an open-ended x1 slot, never had issues for browsing the web and video playback.
__________________
http://tpucdn.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic88947_1.gif
Sinzia is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2011, 05:06 PM   #14
_JP_
2000 Posts
 
_JP_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Portugal
Posts: 2,121 (1.87/day)
Thanks: 1,956
Thanked 647 Times in 468 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by qubit View Post
Also, why put the passive heatsink on the x16 version, but an active, whiny one on the x1 one? Makes no sense to me, should be the other way round, if anything.
I'm wondering the exact same thing, because my x1650PRO had a cooler just like that one and it was noisy. Anyway that card is for PCI slots, not PCI-e x16.
_JP_ is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2011, 05:14 PM   #15
qubit
Overclocked quantum bit
 
qubit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Quantumville UK
Posts: 8,648 (4.34/day)
Thanks: 4,178
Thanked 3,303 Times in 1,943 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by _JP_ View Post
I'm wondering the exact same thing, because my x1650PRO had a cooler just like that one and it was noisy. Anyway that card is for PCI slots, not PCI-e x16.
You're right, it is PCI. I'm so used to seeing PCI-E that I missed it. I'm surprised they're still supporting it.
__________________
Siggie in the post.
qubit is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2011, 05:14 PM   #16
Breathless
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 368 (0.18/day)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts

Best PCI graphics card evvar?
Breathless is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2011, 05:47 PM   #17
[H]@RD5TUFF
Eligible for custom title
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 5,589 (4.34/day)
Thanks: 1,825
Thanked 1,710 Times in 1,431 Posts

System Specs

I own a 520, and it's a pretty stout little card for physx, I am eyeing that passive one for sure perhaps as a Christmas upgrade.
__________________
Stuff 4 Sale!
Heat Ware
ebay



[H]@RD5TUFF is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2011, 06:23 PM   #18
n-ster
Eligible for custom title
 
n-ster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Posts: 8,304 (5.21/day)
Thanks: 1,205
Thanked 1,420 Times in 1,153 Posts
Send a message via MSN to n-ster

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by [H]@RD5TUFF View Post
I own a 520, and it's a pretty stout little card for physx, I am eyeing that passive one for sure perhaps as a Christmas upgrade.
This version of the card doesn't seem to have PhysX
__________________
My Heatware
n-ster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2011, 06:29 PM   #19
Jizzler
2000 Posts
 
Jizzler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Geneva, FL, USA
Posts: 3,010 (1.42/day)
Thanks: 567
Thanked 606 Times in 487 Posts

System Specs

I bet it's just omitted from the spec sheet.

[H]@RD5TUFF is using one, TPU has a GT 520 review stating it's supported, and the only requirements that nVidia give are:

Quote:
The minimum requirement to support GPU-accelerated PhysX is a GeForce 8-series or later GPU with a minimum of 32 cores and a minimum of 256MB dedicated graphics memory. However, each PhysX application has its own GPU and memory recommendations. In general, 512MB of graphics memory is recommended unless you have a GPU that is dedicated to PhysX.
I can't see the manufacturer having control over PhysX (or CUDA) support.
Jizzler is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jizzler For This Useful Post:
Old Sep 27, 2011, 06:40 PM   #20
Shihabyooo
200 Posts
 
Shihabyooo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hell on Earth -or someplace similar-
Posts: 487 (0.56/day)
Thanks: 160
Thanked 107 Times in 87 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jizzler View Post
I bet it's just omitted from the spec sheet.

[H]@RD5TUFF is using one, TPU has a GT 520 review stating it's supported, and the only requirements that nVidia give are:



I can't see the manufacturer having control over PhysX (or CUDA) support.
Maybe they found a way to disable it ? I wouldn't want a Passive cooled card or one that runs on a very limited bandwidth to run Physx calculations. It would be counter productive IMO. Better wait for some benches to see if it does though.
__________________
MAL

-~--Please excuse my poor English.
Shihabyooo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2011, 07:30 PM   #21
Jizzler
2000 Posts
 
Jizzler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Geneva, FL, USA
Posts: 3,010 (1.42/day)
Thanks: 567
Thanked 606 Times in 487 Posts

System Specs

Then they found a way to alienate me as a customer for life

More seriously...

I can't see performance being affected all that much by the bandwidth provided:

http://physxinfo.com/news/880/dedica...i-e-bandwidth/

If you have a truly passive system, then yes, this may be a concern. I don't, as the intake fan blows across all my peripheral cards and I've been meaning to purchase the rear-extractor for my Lian-Li case. Give a bit of overclock room for moar physics! I'd wager most of our systems have some level of airflow.

Most seriously...

I would just go ahead and buy this card, knowing that there is a chance of PhysX being disabled and I don't endorse for it for anyone else. End: Disclaimer.
Jizzler is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2011, 07:44 PM   #22
TRWOV
2000 Posts
 
TRWOV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Mexico
Posts: 2,056 (3.16/day)
Thanks: 793
Thanked 1,068 Times in 553 Posts

System Specs

I also don't think that they would disable Phyxs support and even if they did it shouldn't take more than a bios flash to get it back. I mean, these GT520s must be using the same GPUs as the PCIe 16x variants, wouldn't they?
__________________

My other rigs:
OCTANUX - Conroe865PE - QX6800 - 4GB OCZ Platinum EL - HIS HD4670 AGP - SB Audigy 2 ZS - BFG PPU
phenomenal - AM2NF3-VSTA - 965BE - 8GB OCZ Platinum LV - HIS HD3850 AGP - SB X-Fi - Asus PPU - *WIP*
Green Tea - 939A8X-M - FX60 - 4GB OCZ Platinum EL - 7950GT AGP
Re-build - CT-6VTA2 - PIII 600E - 384MB PC133 - Voodoo 5500 AGP - SB16 ISA
BLUELINE - H61M-GE - PDC G645 - 8GB DDR3-1333 - Powercolor HD7750 - 2xTV Wonder 650
TRWOV is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2011, 08:38 PM   #23
Dj-ElectriC
1000 Posts
 
Dj-ElectriC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Trollithia
Posts: 1,580 (1.56/day)
Thanks: 141
Thanked 645 Times in 301 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
It’s time to play with the ZOTAC GeForce GT 520 PCI and PCI Express x1 graphics card.
Hell yeah, battlefield 3 all the freaking way
Dj-ElectriC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2011, 09:45 PM   #24
arnoo1
500 Posts
 
arnoo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 708 (0.54/day)
Thanks: 98
Thanked 116 Times in 99 Posts

System Specs

i like to see more low end graphics cards with pci-e 1x interface, so if my gpu stops for any reason i can always use the one with pci-e 1x
__________________
intel + nvidia the best
amd
arnoo1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2011, 09:47 PM   #25
_JP_
2000 Posts
 
_JP_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Portugal
Posts: 2,121 (1.87/day)
Thanks: 1,956
Thanked 647 Times in 468 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jizzler View Post
I bet it's just omitted from the spec sheet.

[H]@RD5TUFF is using one, TPU has a GT 520 review stating it's supported, and the only requirements that nVidia give are:

I can't see the manufacturer having control over PhysX (or CUDA) support.
Uhm, you are right. My bad then.
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
The PCI version will be useful, but the PCI-E x1 version will probably be way overpriced for something I can make myself with a normal card and a dremel.
Agreed. I think Asus has one that is passive and cheap enough.
_JP_ is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ZOTAC GeForce GT 520 1024 MB W1zzard Reviews 11 Jun 6, 2011 09:11 AM
Gigabyte Intros TurboCache and Overclocked GeForce GT 520 Graphics Cards btarunr News 8 Apr 18, 2011 07:29 AM
Zotac Announces GeForce GT 220 and 210-based Graphics Cards btarunr News 0 Oct 12, 2009 03:44 PM
Zotac Announces GeForce GTX 275 1792 MB btarunr News 1 Jun 24, 2009 08:24 AM
BFG Tech Announces Factory-overclocked GeForce GTX 260 Variants btarunr News 17 Jul 2, 2008 02:33 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts