techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > General Hardware

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old Oct 21, 2011, 12:12 AM   #201
D4S4
500 Posts
 
D4S4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Posts: 614 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 158
Thanked 78 Times in 62 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by qubit View Post
Unfortunately, it looks like they are. Take a look at these two articles I posted about some way back in this thread.

http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/sh...34#post2430034

AMD royally screwed up with this launch and their future as an x86 CPU manufacturer doesn't look too rosy right now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benetanegia View Post
Didn't you already said it all in 2 words? Itanium (1) fiasco (2).

What else is there to say? Previous and future failures do not mitigate the failure that Bulldozer is right now plain and simple.
my bad, i should've written then "what do you make of..."

i better start reading though i doubt anyone would make a design with so much useless transistors.
__________________
Send your kids to music lessons. This commercial music bs needs to die.

I'm on Soundcloud
D4S4 is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2011, 12:30 AM   #202
Super XP
2000 Posts
 
Super XP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ancient Greece, Acropolis
Posts: 2,209 (0.74/day)
Thanks: 1,204
Thanked 534 Times in 362 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dent1 View Post
I see very few people defending Bulldozer. Me myself is defending the Phenom II X6 1100T which appears to be holding its own against Bulldozer and SB at times. Fvck Bulldozer.
It may hold on it's own and don't get me wrong, the PII x6 is a fantastic CPU, but Bulldozer is still the faster CPU and the better buy IMO. Just check out the review sites. The PII x6 1100T only win a few of them. Here is an example of one site:
The FX 8150 (13 WIN) beat out the x6 1100T (6 WIN) in 13 out of 19 Benchmarks
The FX 8120 (11 WIN) beat out the x6 1100T (8 WIN) in 11 out of 19 Benchmarks

http://www.guru3d.com/article/amd-fx...mance-review/3

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benetanegia View Post
Of course it is an issue. A big one. There's no way they can ever dream of really competing in price. It also means that they just cannot add more logic in order to fix things unless they really do fix things. No "trying" allowed, only success is allowed.

And new design or not, the design was suposed to reduce the transistors required per-core or per-performance unit, but it has made it skyrocket instead. Such a huge difference from what it was claimed to be (+25% aka 750 million) to what it really is, just cannot come from bad execution alone. The concept is flawed from the beginning.
AMD Working on Bulldozer B3 Stepping (It's coming, and I assume it will be Piledriver in Q1 2011)
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4997/a...er-b3-stepping
__________________
Super XP is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Super XP For This Useful Post:
Old Oct 21, 2011, 12:37 AM   #203
D4S4
500 Posts
 
D4S4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Posts: 614 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 158
Thanked 78 Times in 62 Posts

System Specs

damn did they f up! i had no idea that their architecture is so full of holes, so to speak. thanks for the links qubit!
__________________
Send your kids to music lessons. This commercial music bs needs to die.

I'm on Soundcloud
D4S4 is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2011, 01:02 AM   #204
Super XP
2000 Posts
 
Super XP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ancient Greece, Acropolis
Posts: 2,209 (0.74/day)
Thanks: 1,204
Thanked 534 Times in 362 Posts

System Specs

The same thing was said about the Phenom I, where AMD scewed up. Hopefully this B3 stepping will do the trick. Also I made an error, Piledriver is not coming until Q3 2012, though I believe the B3 revision should be within our grasp in Q1 2012.
__________________
Super XP is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Super XP For This Useful Post:
Old Oct 21, 2011, 04:18 AM   #205
seronx
500 Posts
 
seronx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA, Arizona, Maricopa
Posts: 938 (0.90/day)
Thanks: 36
Thanked 234 Times in 168 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Super XP View Post
The same thing was said about the Phenom I, where AMD scewed up. Hopefully this B3 stepping will do the trick. Also I made an error, Piledriver is not coming until Q3 2012, though I believe the B3 revision should be within our grasp in Q1 2012.
We will see Piledriver earlier than Q3 2012



Vishera Piledriver... is unknown but more likely Q3 2012

If the Trinity Quad-core beats or loses to the Llano/Zambezi Quad-core we will know the answer if Piledriver fixes anything
seronx is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to seronx For This Useful Post:
Old Oct 21, 2011, 01:27 PM   #206
nt300
500 Posts
 
nt300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Toronto, ON. Canada
Posts: 731 (0.60/day)
Thanks: 628
Thanked 160 Times in 99 Posts

System Specs

I though Piledriver was on schedule for Q1 2012?
I think we should let Bulldozer slide, give AMD a break, but no break for Piledrive that CPU line better perform much better.
I don't care about trying to beat Intel's top $1000 beasts, as long as AMD keeps strong pressure on the mid range while still staying strong and competitive with the high end.
Am I going to buy a Bulldozer, maybe because I don't use my PC for gaming only, I think the FX 8150 and FX 8120 do good enough in gaming.
What I am dissatisfied with is the new quad and 6 core Bulldozers. Dam AMD, screw servers/workstations, concentrate Bulldozer's update to run much better for desktop and it's apps.
nt300 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to nt300 For This Useful Post:
Old Oct 21, 2011, 03:06 PM   #207
Horrux
500 Posts
 
Horrux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 641 (0.89/day)
Thanks: 335
Thanked 132 Times in 101 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by nt300 View Post
I though Piledriver was on schedule for Q1 2012?
I think we should let Bulldozer slide, give AMD a break, but no break for Piledrive that CPU line better perform much better.
I don't care about trying to beat Intel's top $1000 beasts, as long as AMD keeps strong pressure on the mid range while still staying strong and competitive with the high end.
Am I going to buy a Bulldozer, maybe because I don't use my PC for gaming only, I think the FX 8150 and FX 8120 do good enough in gaming.
What I am dissatisfied with is the new quad and 6 core Bulldozers. Dam AMD, screw servers/workstations, concentrate Bulldozer's update to run much better for desktop and it's apps.
I remain pretty sure PileDriver is scheduled for Q1 2012. It was, and I haven't seen anything that indicates otherwise, except rumors.
__________________
The head honcho at the Serious Gamers' Association

Criticism
“However, the Intel CPU dispatcher does not only check which instruction set is supported by the CPU, it also checks the vendor ID string. If the vendor string is "GenuineIntel" then it uses the optimal code path. If the CPU is not from Intel then, in most cases, it will run the slowest possible version of the code, even if the CPU is fully compatible with a better version. ”
Horrux is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Horrux For This Useful Post:
Old Oct 21, 2011, 04:25 PM   #208
Super XP
2000 Posts
 
Super XP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ancient Greece, Acropolis
Posts: 2,209 (0.74/day)
Thanks: 1,204
Thanked 534 Times in 362 Posts

System Specs

Well I hope so, I wonder if the FX 8170 will be the Piledriver or the Bulldozer based CPU. It can very well be called something like FX2 8170 or something. But if AMD calls the new CPU's FX Next, then somebody really needs a bitch slap upside there head
__________________
Super XP is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2011, 05:08 PM   #209
bucketface
75 Posts
 
bucketface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 132 (0.12/day)
Thanks: 38
Thanked 19 Times in 17 Posts

System Specs

piledriver is supposed to be released in q1 2012 with the trinity APU, there are only rumours stating the release of the piledriver fx series and they state late q2 or q3.
bucketface is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2011, 05:10 PM   #210
seronx
500 Posts
 
seronx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA, Arizona, Maricopa
Posts: 938 (0.90/day)
Thanks: 36
Thanked 234 Times in 168 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Super XP View Post
Well I hope so, I wonder if the FX 8170 will be the Piledriver or the Bulldozer based CPU. It can very well be called something like FX2 8170 or something. But if AMD calls the new CPU's FX Next, then somebody really needs a bitch slap upside there head
I think it is going to follow the Intel model numbers this time

FX-8210/8250/8270
seronx is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to seronx For This Useful Post:
Old Oct 21, 2011, 05:24 PM   #211
Super XP
2000 Posts
 
Super XP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ancient Greece, Acropolis
Posts: 2,209 (0.74/day)
Thanks: 1,204
Thanked 534 Times in 362 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by seronx View Post
I think it is going to follow the Intel model numbers this time

FX-8210/8250/8270
Yes that makes a lot more sense. Once agian thank you for your informative posts.
__________________
Super XP is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2011, 05:26 PM   #212
Damn_Smooth
1000 Posts
 
Damn_Smooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: A frozen turdberg.
Posts: 1,361 (1.85/day)
Thanks: 1,434
Thanked 502 Times in 329 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Super XP View Post
Well I hope so, I wonder if the FX 8170 will be the Piledriver or the Bulldozer based CPU. It can very well be called something like FX2 8170 or something. But if AMD calls the new CPU's FX Next, then somebody really needs a bitch slap upside there head
Somebody already needs a bitch slap upside their head for releasing the beta.
Damn_Smooth is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Damn_Smooth For This Useful Post:
Old Oct 21, 2011, 05:36 PM   #213
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 31,896 (12.77/day)
Thanks: 2,782
Thanked 12,268 Times in 7,811 Posts

System Specs

Since this thread is turning into the same discussion as any other "Bulldozer" thread it is closed due to redundancy.

Last edited by erocker; Oct 21, 2011 at 05:41 PM.
erocker is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to erocker For This Useful Post:
Old Oct 21, 2011, 07:23 PM   #214
Tatty_One
Senior Moderator
 
Tatty_One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 12,734 (4.75/day)
Thanks: 1,093
Thanked 1,931 Times in 1,435 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Tatty_One

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by erocker View Post
Since this thread is turning into the same discussion as any other "Bulldozer" thread it is closed due to redundancy.
Seconded!
__________________
Tatty_One is online now  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Seagate Techie Speaks Out, Explains Firmware Debacle btarunr News 10 Jan 24, 2009 11:10 PM
Ex-Intel Employee Charged with Stealing Sensitive Information En Route AMD btarunr News 33 Sep 15, 2008 04:54 PM
Pirate Bay Administrator Speaks Out on Television Spot zekrahminator News 56 Apr 5, 2008 06:31 AM
Help me to understand why my build failed validuz General Hardware 14 Feb 3, 2008 02:23 AM
Former Employee of AMD Sues; Claims Unsafe Working Conditions Causes Birth Defects zekrahminator News 44 Nov 11, 2007 08:41 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts