techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Nov 8, 2011, 06:35 AM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,030 (7.23/day)
Thanks: 790
Thanked 13,028 Times in 5,719 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

AMD 1090FX and 1070 Chipsets Disclosed, No PCI Express 3.0

AMD is fine-tuning its product development cycle to deliver a new processor architecture towards the end of each year, and a new chipset towards the beginning of one, maintaining platform compatibility and longevity. The company launched its socket AM3+ compliant 9-series chipset months ahead of its first-generation Bulldozer FX processor family, though it looks like in the year 2012 it will launch a new line of desktop chipset, in all likelihood it will precede the launch of second-generation Bulldozer (codenamed "Piledriver") processors.

In 2012, AMD chipset family will be led by the 10-series chipset. At the very top is AMD 1090FX northbridge, followed by 1070. 1090FX will be designed to give out two PCI-Express x16 links, which can then drive up to four graphics cards. The 1070, on the other hand, gives out just one x16 link, which can drive up to two graphics cards. AMD will scrap its present model of 990X and 970, in which the northbridge is essentially the same piece of silicon, with the 990X having lane switches and supporting CrossFireX. A big revelation here is that the 10-series chipset will not feature PCI Express Gen 3.0. We'd normally expect AMD to be at the forefront of supporting new technologies. If we remember, AMD 790FX was the first AMD platform chipset in the industry to feature PCI-Express 2.0. Also, it is highly likely that AMD's Radeon HD 7000 series graphics, which are slated for later this year, will support PCI-Express 3.0 interface.



On the upside, though, 10-series chipset will be backed by the new SB1050 southbridge, which outpaces Intel's 7-series chipset in terms of connectivity. To begin with, SB1050 will pack a massive 8-port SATA 6 Gb/s RAID controller. All ports will run support 6 Gb/s data-rate. The SB1050 will also integrate native USB 3.0 SuperSpeed controllers. They will also streamline inventory management for manufacturers, as the chipset will be compatible with existing processor platforms. Some industry sources we spoke to commented that PCI-Express 3.0 chipset support is unlikely till Piledriver processors start selling.

Source: DonanimHaber

Last edited by btarunr; Nov 8, 2011 at 11:27 AM.
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post:
Old Nov 8, 2011, 06:38 AM   #2
Damn_Smooth
1000 Posts
 
Damn_Smooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: A frozen turdberg.
Posts: 1,362 (1.78/day)
Thanks: 1,434
Thanked 502 Times in 329 Posts

System Specs

Sounds nice but I learned my lesson about buying an AMD board before the chip is released for it.
Damn_Smooth is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Damn_Smooth For This Useful Post:
Old Nov 8, 2011, 06:51 AM   #3
The Von Matrices
200 Posts
 
The Von Matrices's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: State College, PA, USA
Posts: 450 (0.49/day)
Thanks: 121
Thanked 110 Times in 81 Posts

System Specs

Sounds like it's the same northbridge as the 790/890/990 with a slightly tweaked southbridge. This rebranding of one chip is getting close to being as bad as nVidia and the one MCP that powered 19 different chipsets over 4 generations.

Last edited by The Von Matrices; Nov 8, 2011 at 07:09 AM.
The Von Matrices is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2011, 07:16 AM   #4
DrunkenMafia
1000 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cairns QLD, Aussie
Posts: 1,869 (0.80/day)
Thanks: 230
Thanked 239 Times in 215 Posts

System Specs

not sure about the naming scheme, I mean cpus with the same model name as the chipsets would be confusing!!

And +1 for lesson learned with AMD - Never buy a chipset before CPU launch. Lol
__________________
DrunkenMafia is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2011, 07:18 AM   #5
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,030 (7.23/day)
Thanks: 790
Thanked 13,028 Times in 5,719 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

I think the new northbridge is built on 40 nm process. So it will run cooler with lower power draw. But yes, this is essentially the same silicon as 890FX/990FX. Can't say the same about 790FX, because with 890FX the ALink chipset bus got updated to 4 GB/s.
__________________

Gadgets, Gaming, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2011, 07:22 AM   #6
eidairaman1
Eligible for custom title
 
eidairaman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HTX
Posts: 10,099 (4.64/day)
Thanks: 1,364
Thanked 1,164 Times in 1,040 Posts
Send a message via MSN to eidairaman1

System Specs

now we just need a Stepped AMD FX Lineup or even Piledriver
__________________
Athlon XP USERS with COD 4 FIX
http://www.techsupportforum.com/foru...ls-202011.html
http://www.howorks.com/2011/02/24/ho...-memory-limit/
“Sometimes my level of fail is unprecedented.” -TheMailMan78
“This is what the force of a thousand suns looks like.” -3870x2
eidairaman1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to eidairaman1 For This Useful Post:
Old Nov 8, 2011, 08:21 AM   #7
MrMilli
200 Posts
 
MrMilli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Antwerp, Belgium
Posts: 216 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 35 Times in 27 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
I think the new northbridge is built on 40 nm process. So it will run cooler with lower power draw. But yes, this is essentially the same silicon as 890FX/990FX. Can't say the same about 790FX, because with 890FX the ALink chipset bus got updated to 4 GB/s.
Well the upgrade to the ALink bus didn't happen thanks to the northbridge but thanks to the SB. The 790 NB already supported PCIE 2.0 but it's accompanying SB didn't. Since ALink is nothing more than a PCIE connection, you see where i'm getting at. So 790 & 890 where the same silicon and AMD has only upgraded the southbridge since then.
I think the reason why AMD is so reluctant to upgrade the NB is bc the next step for them would be to integrate a fully new NB into the CPU. So I guess all the (limited) resources are going into that.
MrMilli is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2011, 08:58 AM   #8
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
 
cdawall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,170 (6.41/day)
Thanks: 460
Thanked 2,807 Times in 2,254 Posts
Send a message via AIM to cdawall Send a message via Yahoo to cdawall Send a message via Skype™ to cdawall

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
I think the new northbridge is built on 40 nm process. So it will run cooler with lower power draw. But yes, this is essentially the same silicon as 890FX/990FX. Can't say the same about 790FX, because with 890FX the ALink chipset bus got updated to 4 GB/s.
40nm won't make it run at a lower temp. Lower volts will but the package size makes zero difference in a heat equation.
__________________
cdawall is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2011, 10:22 AM   #9
Dr. Nick
5 Posts
 
Dr. Nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 22 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

System Specs

If there's anything to look forward to, it's the new southbridge.

The plans for my current system involve 2 SSDs in RAID 0 and 4 HDDS in RAID 10, so I've maxed out my onboard SATA3 controller.
Dr. Nick is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2011, 10:45 AM   #10
Recus
200 Posts
 
Recus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 359 (0.51/day)
Thanks: 165
Thanked 145 Times in 75 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
If we remember, AMD 790FX was the first chipset in the industry to feature PCI-Express 2.0, ahead of even Intel and NVIDIA.
According to Wikipedia:
Intel X38 has been launched in 2007.09,
Nvidia 780a - 2008.05,
AMD 790X - 2007.11.


Last edited by Recus; Nov 9, 2011 at 11:01 AM. Reason: what btarunr said
Recus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2011, 11:09 AM   #11
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,030 (7.23/day)
Thanks: 790
Thanked 13,028 Times in 5,719 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdawall View Post
40nm won't make it run at a lower temp. Lower volts will but the package size makes zero difference in a heat equation.
Yes it will. When you optically shrink a chip without affecting its transistor count, and downscale its voltage, it will result in lower temperatures.
__________________

Gadgets, Gaming, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2011, 11:14 AM   #12
heky
500 Posts
 
heky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Slovenia, Europe
Posts: 873 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 891
Thanked 144 Times in 122 Posts
Send a message via MSN to heky

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
If we remember, AMD 790FX was the first chipset in the industry to feature PCI-Express 2.0, ahead of even Intel and NVIDIA
Nope, x38 was the first chipset released with PCI-Express 2.0.
heky is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2011, 11:26 AM   #13
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,030 (7.23/day)
Thanks: 790
Thanked 13,028 Times in 5,719 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Recus View Post
According to Wikipedia:
Intel X38 has been launched in 2007.09,
Nvidia 780a - 2007.05,
AMD 790X - 2007.11.

http://i56.tinypic.com/2e1sp3m.gif
Intel X38 was launched in October 2007 (sources: Anandtech (pin pointed to the revised launch date, October 11 2007), and Intel ARK mentions it as Q4 2007 (September isn't part of Q4)).

NVIDIA 780a was launched in May 2008. Google it.

AMD 790FX was launched around the same time as X38. I concede Intel was ahead with X38. Let me fix that part.
__________________

Gadgets, Gaming, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2011, 11:27 AM   #14
NC37
1000 Posts
 
NC37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The armpit of California
Posts: 1,067 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 156
Thanked 238 Times in 142 Posts

System Specs

Wasn't the 990 also a reworked 890?

Not impressed. Course I'll reserve final judgement till it actually ships.
NC37 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2011, 11:51 AM   #15
nt300
500 Posts
 
nt300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Toronto, ON. Canada
Posts: 731 (0.59/day)
Thanks: 628
Thanked 160 Times in 99 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by NC37 View Post
Wasn't the 990 also a reworked 890?

Not impressed. Course I'll reserve final judgement till it actually ships.
The 890 was a reworked 790, but the 990 stands on it's own.
__________________
nt300 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2011, 12:07 PM   #16
de.das.dude
3500 Posts
 
de.das.dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Wild Wild East
Posts: 4,833 (4.39/day)
Thanks: 2,429
Thanked 1,401 Times in 969 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to de.das.dude

System Specs

i was confused. i thought it was the 1090 phenom :6.


anyhoo when do we expect this to kick into the market? with piledriver or with the revised bulldozer chips?
__________________
de.das.dude is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2011, 12:56 PM   #17
beautyless
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: No sign of life, I'm look like the machine.
Posts: 43 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to beautyless

System Specs

990FX: Same As 890FX, But Guaranteed Compatibility

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...-am3,2953.html
__________________
beautyless is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2011, 02:58 PM   #18
lastcalaveras
25 Posts
 
lastcalaveras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 57 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts

System Specs

they should of just released a new revision of the southbridge and named it SB955 or call the new chipset 995FX
lastcalaveras is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2011, 03:15 PM   #19
Steven B
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 575 (0.20/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 50 Times in 33 Posts

that is kind of odd no? no PCI-E 3.0?

Thanks for bringing this to our attention btarunr
Steven B is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2011, 03:19 PM   #20
devguy
1000 Posts
 
devguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,198 (0.52/day)
Thanks: 49
Thanked 171 Times in 133 Posts

System Specs

At least this shows a prolonging of the lifespan of AM3+. Many (myself included) thought that AMD was gonna try and move everything to FM2, until the recent leaked slides showing an AM3+ Piledriver.

But the lack of PCIe 3.0 seems disappointing. AMD can try and say we have dual 16x slots with the 1090FX to Intel's dual 8x slots, but the Ivy Bridge chipsets will have PCIe 3.0, so dual 8x 3.0 ~ dual 16x 2.0.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
devguy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2011, 03:26 PM   #21
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,030 (7.23/day)
Thanks: 790
Thanked 13,028 Times in 5,719 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by devguy View Post
At least this shows a prolonging of the lifespan of AM3+. Many (myself included) thought that AMD was gonna try and move everything to FM2, until the recent leaked slides showing an AM3+ Piledriver.

But the lack of PCIe 3.0 seems disappointing. AMD can try and say we have dual 16x slots with the 1090FX to Intel's dual 8x slots, but the Ivy Bridge chipsets will have PCIe 3.0, so dual 8x 3.0 ~ dual 16x 2.0.
There's always a catch. "Trinity" as it's known, packs just two Piledriver modules (four "cores"). So imagine the CPU performance about 10~15% higher than FX-4000 series chips.
__________________

Gadgets, Gaming, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2011, 05:02 PM   #22
yogurt_21
3500 Posts
 
yogurt_21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,058 (1.52/day)
Thanks: 2,249
Thanked 542 Times in 443 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
Yes it will. When you optically shrink a chip without affecting its transistor count, and downscale its voltage, it will result in lower temperatures.
since when have they not increased trasistors on each gen?

the best example of what cdwall was saying is 775 compared to 1366, lower nm, higher wattage and higher heat.

a die shrink doesn't equate to heat output most of the time these days.
yogurt_21 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2011, 05:08 PM   #23
phanbuey
Eligible for custom title
 
phanbuey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 5,011 (2.45/day)
Thanks: 1,484
Thanked 960 Times in 813 Posts

System Specs

What i want to know is when the next iteration of B.Dozie is coming out.

Something makes me feel like if they could tweak it a bit, then they would be able to do what they did with the Phenom to Phenom II rehash.
phanbuey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2011, 05:36 PM   #24
PopcornMachine
1000 Posts
 
PopcornMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Los Angeles/Orange County CA
Posts: 1,144 (0.82/day)
Thanks: 2,027
Thanked 383 Times in 308 Posts

System Specs

Very curious about the lack of PCIE 3.0. Don't think it really matters personally, but if they going to make GPUs that use it why not make motherboard chipsets that support it?

Not sure what is going on at AMD any more.
PopcornMachine is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to PopcornMachine For This Useful Post:
Old Nov 8, 2011, 05:52 PM   #25
Damn_Smooth
1000 Posts
 
Damn_Smooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: A frozen turdberg.
Posts: 1,362 (1.78/day)
Thanks: 1,434
Thanked 502 Times in 329 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by PopcornMachine View Post
Very curious about the lack of PCIE 3.0. Don't think it really matters personally, but if they going to make GPUs that use it why not make motherboard chipsets that support it?

Not sure what is going on at AMD any more.
I really don't think AMD knows what is going on at AMD anymore.
Damn_Smooth is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Damn_Smooth For This Useful Post:
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
what the different between the PCI Express 2.0 VS PCI Express 2.1 and PCI Express 16? F430 AMD / ATI 2 Apr 1, 2010 07:34 PM
PCI express 2.0 graphics card on a PCI express mobo TylerZambori General Hardware 11 Feb 22, 2009 03:49 PM
PCI Express and PCI Ecpressx16 jcreel63 Graphics Cards 0 May 1, 2007 10:04 AM
Will PCI Express x16 work in PCI Express x1? Azn Tr14dZ Graphics Cards 11 Aug 3, 2006 09:45 PM
Intel introduces new PCI Express Chipsets and CPUs Bastieeeh News 0 Jun 21, 2004 07:07 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts