MW3 looks dated vs BlackOps O_o

[Live OR Die]

What a let down i wasn't expecting much but they at lest could of updated the engine to look better than Blackops MW3 looks the same as MW2 did which was s**t.

[brandonwh64]

Its COD4 with extra maps. /END THREAD

[BeepBeep2]

Originally Posted by brandonwh64

Its COD4 with extra maps. /END THREAD

/LOL CAPS

[Crusader]

What Brandon said. I certainly hope you didn't buy it personally.

Call of Duty these days is nothing more than a method of wasting $100, you'd be better off getting a hooker - you'd have a better time.

[Captain.Abrecan]

Originally Posted by Crusader

you'd be better off getting a hooker - you'd have a better time.

of course the graphical quality with that is not guaranteed either

[erocker]

Set image quality to native. See if that helps.

[t77snapshot]

Originally Posted by erocker

Set image quality to native. See if that helps.

Are we still talking about the hooker?

[erocker]

Originally Posted by t77snapshot

Are we still talking about the hooker?

I am not. Besides, people who don't check out their whore before purchasing deserve what they get.

[Delta6326]

Originally Posted by erocker

I am not. Besides, people who don't check out their whore before purchasing deserve what they get.

It's hard to check 10 of them out at one time.

[WarhammerTX]

Originally Posted by Crusader

What Brandon said. I certainly hope you didn't buy it personally.

Call of Duty these days is nothing more than a method of wasting $100, you'd be better off getting a hooker - you'd have a better time.

You got pictures of the hooker lol

[PVTCaboose1337]

I am really disappointed looking at MW3. I mean I thought my settings were on low when I played my first match. BF3 really blows MW3 out of the water. I can keep going on and on about how much I like BF3 more than MW3, but really, the gameplay in MW3 has not changed, the graphics have not. BF3 offers amazing graphics, great gameplay, and MW3 has none of that. Needless to say I am disappointed in it a huge amount.

Hopefully this is the end of the franchise, because strictly speaking, the game is pretty terrible when compared to BF3.

[Wrigleyvillain]

Pffft why did DICE even rush to be first then? I guess so the, uh, less-informed and discriminating (console) players would have a better chance of experiencing it which they may not have at all had MW3 dropped first. Though if BF3 is really that much better it doesn't really matter. Though DICE couldn't really have known this.

[Jstn7477]

Originally Posted by Wrigleyvillain

Pffft why did DICE even rush to be first then? I guess so the, uh, less-informed and discriminating (console) players would have a better chance of experiencing it which they may not have at all had MW3 dropped first. Though if BF3 is really that much better it doesn't really matter. Though DICE couldn't really have known this.

Probably the same reason Intel is pumping out even more kickass, overkill processors and platforms even though AMD hasn't done well performance wise since Conroe. Who knows.

[H82LUZ73]

Originally Posted by Captain.Abrecan

of course the graphical quality with that is not guaranteed either

you know he is right... but i spend the $200 and get the full service at ounce,That come`s with her and the magic blue pill 3 hours of more fun and stress relief then MW3 would ever bring......and I don`t have to keep paying for the service after

[Live OR Die]

Originally Posted by Crusader

What Brandon said. I certainly hope you didn't buy it personally.

Call of Duty these days is nothing more than a method of wasting $100, you'd be better off getting a hooker - you'd have a better time.

I brought it for $30 i got a Russian key i wouldn't pay more than that for it, The FOV in the game sucks ballz its very blurry vs blackops don't know why think MW2 was better also the game set texture Quality to low and there's no setting in game you have to change it you have to in the config file.

[Wrigleyvillain]

Wow.

FYI tho (from Guru3D forum):

Native is better than extra for image quality

seta r_imageQuality "0"

0 is native not 5
I repeat
0 is native not 5

i see that most of members in here are making the image quality option to extra.
You should set the image quality to native for the highest settings

image quality means image size
if you set it extra the image resolution will downscale %85 then upscale %100
what is the point of this instead of changing resolution?
the point is a monitor upscales the resolution with linear filter, but the software upscales it with anisotropic filter.
so it is almost same thing with downscale resolution(but a little bit higher quality coz of filter)
if you set it native, the native resolution image size will be used.
that means it wont downscale or something.

[H82LUZ73]

Originally Posted by Live OR Die

I brought it for $30 i got a Russian key i wouldn't pay more than that for it, The FOV in the game sucks ballz its very blurry vs blackops don't know why think MW2 was better also the game set texture Quality to low and there's no setting in game you have to change it you have to in the config file.

The hooker would do that and she will make you see blurry for about 15 mins....Much better then MW3........

[DonInKansas]

Originally Posted by erocker

I am not. Besides, people who don't check out their whore before purchasing deserve what they get.

But the girl in the picture on the card the guy gave me on the Strip was hot!

[Live OR Die]

Originally Posted by Wrigleyvillain

Wow.

FYI tho (from Guru3D forum):

What do u mean it looks really bad on 0 or 1

[radrok]

Yeah the graphic is horrid, especially if you get into the game after playing with BF3...
I'm very happy that I didn't purchase it, a trip to my friend's house to take a look was well worthy and made me skip this mistake (not that I was seriously interested in purchasing)

[Abe504]

Originally Posted by Live OR Die

I brought it for $30 i got a Russian key i wouldn't pay more than that for it, The FOV in the game sucks ballz its very blurry vs blackops don't know why think MW2 was better also the game set texture Quality to low and there's no setting in game you have to change it you have to in the config file.

when i get a cod itch i think ill go with that route, no way im paying 60 bucks for no advancement

[Live OR Die]

Heres what the games looks like running on 1920x1080 max settings in game before you change the r_imageQuality





And here is it after and it still looks like crap.

[NinkobEi]

It worries me that the same company runs CoD and Diablo 3. I have lost expectations for D3 now unfortunately

[erocker]

Originally Posted by Live OR Die

And here is it after and it still looks like crap.

Looks like CoD to me.

[Wrigleyvillain]

Originally Posted by Live OR Die

And here is it after and it still looks like crap.

Hmm yeah...though the second shot does suck less. There is like no AF in the first one and perhaps lower res textures too.