techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Dec 5, 2011, 07:00 AM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,981 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,895 Times in 5,647 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

AMD Working On Radeon HD 6930 Graphics Card

AMD is reportedly working on a new Radeon HD 6900 series single-GPU graphics card based on the "Cayman" silicon, the Radeon HD 6930. This SKU will be designed to make things very competitive for the non-Ti GeForce GTX 560 from NVIDIA. In its most recent salvo, NVIDIA launched a limited edition GeForce GTX 560 Ti with 448 CUDA cores, targeting select markets in the winter shopping season. Tests showed it to be very competitive with HD 6950 and HD 6970, and is priced accordingly, at $289. AMD's new SKU will be designed to heat things up in the sub-$200 market where GTX 560 non-Ti and HD 6870 are trading blows.

Carved out of the 40 nm "Cayman" silicon, the GPU in its HD 6930 configuration will carry the codename "Cayman-CE". It will feature 1280 advanced VLIW4 stream processors, 80 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and a 256-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface that will hold 1 GB of memory. The core will be clocked at 750 MHz, and the memory at 1200 MHz (4.80 GHz effective). Most AIBs will reuse their cost-effective HD 6950 1 GB board designs with the new SKUs. The new Radeon HD 6930 is expected to be priced around $180.



Source: MyDrivers
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2011, 07:02 AM   #2
BrooksyX
3500 Posts
 
BrooksyX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 3,572 (1.82/day)
Thanks: 511
Thanked 570 Times in 527 Posts

System Specs

Why? Will it really be that much better than the 6870? Maybe they have a bunch of 69xx chips that arnt very good clockers that they are trying to dump?
BrooksyX is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2011, 07:20 AM   #3
RejZoR
3500 Posts
 
RejZoR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Europe/Slovenia
Posts: 3,963 (1.26/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 752 Times in 540 Posts

System Specs

Probably. If it's priced well, why not? You'd get EQAA along with improved Tessellation which ain't a bad thing.
__________________
RejZoR's Little Secrets @ rejzor dot tk
RejZoR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2011, 07:34 AM   #4
Tatsumaru
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 26 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

well now, this must be the first 6000 radeon card that simply has no purpouse,
its only a bit faster than 6870 , and will not be able tu pull ahead of 560ti original version,
the way i see it, this is amd s exact version of 560ti, so im sure 6930 will match its speed easily, but will not jump it, unless its a phenomenal overcklocker,cause 560ti has a great overcklocking potential..
Tatsumaru is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2011, 07:41 AM   #5
faramir
200 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 203 (0.28/day)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 27 Times in 20 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tatsumaru View Post
well now, this must be the first 6000 radeon card that simply has no purpouse,
Actually that was 6770, aka 5770 with BIOS update.
faramir is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2011, 07:46 AM   #6
BrooksyX
3500 Posts
 
BrooksyX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 3,572 (1.82/day)
Thanks: 511
Thanked 570 Times in 527 Posts

System Specs

Well if its anything like past amd chips with disabled components it should be a great overclocker. I used to have dual 4830 (a 4870 chip with disable spus) which came with a stock core clock of 575. I had no problem reaching 950mhz core speeds on both cards with some slight voltage mods.. I would consider that a great overclock.
BrooksyX is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2011, 08:15 AM   #7
Relayer
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 85 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

Maybe it'll be a dual bios design?
Relayer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2011, 09:00 AM   #8
_LEGendARY_
5 Posts
 
_LEGendARY_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 10 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

System Specs

Omg

It's anus aching what they're doing in the graphics cards market
Ridiculously so many models and so many re-brands.


6450/6570/6670/6750/6770/6790/6850/6870/6930/6950i_1GB/6950_2GB/6970/6990
_LEGendARY_ is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2011, 09:05 AM   #9
radrok
1000 Posts
 
radrok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,852 (3.25/day)
Thanks: 137
Thanked 447 Times in 351 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to radrok

System Specs

Maybe it will unlock like the 6950, who knows... might be a win
radrok is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2011, 09:14 AM   #10
Hayder_Master
3500 Posts
 
Hayder_Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: IRAQ-Baghdad
Posts: 4,859 (2.62/day)
Thanks: 388
Thanked 639 Times in 444 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Hayder_Master Send a message via Yahoo to Hayder_Master

System Specs

Tell me it will be unlock
Hayder_Master is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2011, 09:35 AM   #11
1Kurgan1
The Knife in your Back
 
1Kurgan1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Duluth, Minnesota
Posts: 6,711 (4.14/day)
Thanks: 3,093
Thanked 2,312 Times in 1,556 Posts

System Specs

Interesting they are putting this out there with the 7k cards are slow close, seems a bit pointless.

Quote:
Originally Posted by _LEGendARY_ View Post
It's anus aching what they're doing in the graphics cards market
Ridiculously so many models and so many re-brands.

6450/6570/6670/6750/6770/6790/6850/6870/6930/6950i_1GB/6950_2GB/6970/6990
The only rebrands are in the lower end cards, and that happens many of the times, who really cares about the cheap cards.
__________________
1Kurgan1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2011, 10:18 AM   #12
Hustler
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 100 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 40 Times in 15 Posts

Anyone remember what an absolute stinker the 5830 was, hot running, power hog..

History repeating itself..?
Hustler is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hustler For This Useful Post:
Old Dec 5, 2011, 10:23 AM   #13
HossHuge
1000 Posts
 
HossHuge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 1,809 (1.01/day)
Thanks: 513
Thanked 448 Times in 301 Posts

System Specs

I guess it fits at the $180 mark, but who's going to pay $40 for about 6-8% more performance?

Cheapest 6870 139.99 with rebate
Cheapest 6950 209.99 with rebate

__________________
But they are useless. They can only give you answers. ~Pablo Picasso, about computers
HossHuge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2011, 10:24 AM   #14
Completely Bonkers
2000 Posts
 
Completely Bonkers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,415 (1.05/day)
Thanks: 582
Thanked 533 Times in 374 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Kurgan1 View Post
Interesting they are putting this out there with the 7k cards are slow close, seems a bit pointless.
It tells you something about the7k cards. Either they hope to price them somewhere in outer orbit... or they are lackluster and so AMD might as well swamp the retail channel shelves with ANOTHER same-ish product already.
__________________
... some things in life just drive you bonkers. Especially the rubbish you see in forum posts
Completely Bonkers is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2011, 10:24 AM   #15
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,981 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,895 Times in 5,647 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hustler View Post
Anyone remember what an absolute stinker the 5830 was, hot running, power hog..

History repeating itself..?
That was because AMD messed with ROPs. In this new SKU, only the SP (with it TMU) counts and core clock speed are lowered. Rest is the same. There's a real chance that these can unlock to HD 6950 1GB since they'll most likely reuse boards.
__________________

Gadgets, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2011, 10:24 AM   #16
Zubasa
3500 Posts
 
Zubasa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hong Kong, China
Posts: 3,700 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 585
Thanked 451 Times in 387 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hustler View Post
Anyone remember what an absolute stinker the 5830 was, hot running, power hog..

History repeating itself..?
The 5830 sucked because it is bottle necked by its 16ROPs, this thing will have its full 32ROP and should be fine.

Edit: LOL btarunr beat me to it.
__________________
ʃ( ◕ ‿‿ ◕ )ʅ
“but oh ze noes! i can't convert my porn to iphone so i can watch in the bus .. it doesnt support cuda / badaboom.” -W1zzard
Zubasa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2011, 10:27 AM   #17
Completely Bonkers
2000 Posts
 
Completely Bonkers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,415 (1.05/day)
Thanks: 582
Thanked 533 Times in 374 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by HossHuge View Post
I guess it fits at the $180 mark, but who's going to pay $40 for about 6-8% more performance?
This product and pricing strategy is NOT about offering objective performance to the informed. It is about clogging the retail channel and limited shelf space with another "new" card, with a "9" in it, priced at the same point as a competitor card, and with a different "product bundle" so that the retail consumer will take it to the cash desk.

This card isnt about the TPU community, but about Best Buy, Media Markt, Currys, High Street Shopping etc.
__________________
... some things in life just drive you bonkers. Especially the rubbish you see in forum posts
Completely Bonkers is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2011, 10:27 AM   #18
20mmrain
2000 Posts
 
20mmrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 2,397 (1.82/day)
Thanks: 475
Thanked 722 Times in 449 Posts

System Specs

Why also with this when the HD7000 series is right around the corner?.... I mean seriously this news releases on a day that AMD was rumored to release details on their HD7000 series. This is really anti constructive.
The only thing I can think of is.... the HD 6970/6950 are still selling very well and instead of lowering the price on those.... make a 6930 to help get rid of more chips with higher profit.
20mmrain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2011, 10:35 AM   #19
HossHuge
1000 Posts
 
HossHuge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 1,809 (1.01/day)
Thanks: 513
Thanked 448 Times in 301 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Completely Bonkers View Post
This product and pricing strategy is NOT about offering objective performance to the informed. It is about clogging the retail channel and limited shelf space with another "new" card, with a "9" in it, priced at the same point as a competitor card, and with a different "product bundle" so that the retail consumer will take it to the cash desk.

This card isnt about the TPU community, but about Best Buy, Media Markt, Currys, High Street Shopping etc.
I hear what you're saying. Sometimes I forget that there are people out there that will drop a bunch of money on something and not research it first....
__________________
But they are useless. They can only give you answers. ~Pablo Picasso, about computers
HossHuge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2011, 10:48 AM   #20
Hustler
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 100 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 40 Times in 15 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
That was because AMD messed with ROPs. In this new SKU, only the SP (with it TMU) counts and core clock speed are lowered. Rest is the same. There's a real chance that these can unlock to HD 6950 1GB since they'll most likely reuse boards.
Yeah maybe they have learnt from their mistake this time, anyway, i would have thought the sensible thing to do from a marketing point of view would be to discontinue the 6850 and 6870, and release this as a budget 7830.

$150 7830
$200 7850
$250 7870

This line up Would make alot more sense.
Hustler is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2011, 11:20 AM   #21
Completely Bonkers
2000 Posts
 
Completely Bonkers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,415 (1.05/day)
Thanks: 582
Thanked 533 Times in 374 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by HossHuge View Post
I hear what you're saying. Sometimes I forget that there are people out there that will drop a bunch of money on something and not research it first....
Yes, Graphics Cards are getting like mobile phone industry. There are so many nearly-the-same products plus a merry basket of subscription package options... remember they are DESIGNED to confuse the retail shopper. Hate that.

If A>B>C then it is easy to choose A. But if there is a multi-dimensional matrix of models and options then it can be designed such that THERE IS NO SOLUTION. Mathematically, there is "no formula", you actually CANNOT OPTIMISE. So you have to play "lucky dip bingo" somewhere around the price and feature set you want. But remember that IS RELATIVE to what you see in the store on the shelf that day. Retail channel confusion. Hate that.
__________________
... some things in life just drive you bonkers. Especially the rubbish you see in forum posts
Completely Bonkers is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2011, 11:38 AM   #22
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
 
cdawall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,021 (6.43/day)
Thanks: 457
Thanked 2,752 Times in 2,222 Posts
Send a message via AIM to cdawall Send a message via Yahoo to cdawall Send a message via Skype™ to cdawall

System Specs

I bet they had a bunch of damaged cores and wanted to make some money.
__________________
cdawall is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cdawall For This Useful Post:
Old Dec 5, 2011, 01:49 PM   #23
TRWOV
2000 Posts
 
TRWOV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Mexico
Posts: 2,042 (3.16/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 1,047 Times in 545 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by 20mmrain View Post
Why also with this when the HD7000 series is right around the corner?.... I mean seriously this news releases on a day that AMD was rumored to release details on their HD7000 series. This is really anti constructive.
The only thing I can think of is.... the HD 6970/6950 are still selling very well and instead of lowering the price on those.... make a 6930 to help get rid of more chips with higher profit.
The first HD7000 cards will be the mobile and low end cards so this one isn't overlapping with any.
__________________

My other rigs:
OCTANUX - Conroe865PE - QX6800 - 4GB OCZ Platinum EL - HIS HD4670 AGP - SB Audigy 2 ZS - BFG PPU
phenomenal - AM2NF3-VSTA - 965BE - 8GB OCZ Platinum LV - HIS HD3850 AGP - SB X-Fi - Asus PPU - *WIP*
Green Tea - 939A8X-M - FX60 - 4GB OCZ Platinum EL - 7950GT AGP
Re-build - CT-6VTA2 - PIII 600E - 384MB PC133 - Voodoo 5500 AGP - SB16 ISA
BLUELINE - H61M-GE - PDC G645 - 8GB DDR3-1333 - Powercolor HD7750 - 2xTV Wonder 650
TRWOV is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2011, 01:53 PM   #24
bear jesus
1000 Posts
 
bear jesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Britland
Posts: 1,529 (1.51/day)
Thanks: 321
Thanked 200 Times in 162 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdawall View Post
I bet they had a bunch of damaged cores and wanted to make some money.
that's was what i was thinking while reading through the article and entire thread.

Think how many wafers are made and how many chips that almost work are on each wafer, the 570 and 6950 are chips that almost work as they should but don't quite meet the 6970 or 580 grade so with a little poking around they give them another name and disable the faulty parts, these are just chips that could not quite make the grade of 6950 and instead of just throwing them away or recycling them they are being sold relatively cheap.

To me it looks like a win win situation as long as the chips are not too chopped up, people get relatively cheap and powerful cards and AMD makes money of more chips per wafer.
__________________
The pastafarian jesus
bear jesus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 5, 2011, 02:04 PM   #25
1Kurgan1
The Knife in your Back
 
1Kurgan1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Duluth, Minnesota
Posts: 6,711 (4.14/day)
Thanks: 3,093
Thanked 2,312 Times in 1,556 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Completely Bonkers View Post
It tells you something about the7k cards. Either they hope to price them somewhere in outer orbit... or they are lackluster and so AMD might as well swamp the retail channel shelves with ANOTHER same-ish product already.
Estimated pricing for the 7950 is $349, for the 7970 is $449, I haven't looked lower than that. But those cards specs are far greater than whats out there for AMD right now, so I doubt the performance being lackluster. The 7870 has slightly greater specs then a 6950, my guess is those will land around $220 - $250, And I would bet the 7850 would fill the exact price segment this card aims to, except the 7850 would use about half as much watts.
__________________
1Kurgan1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD Unveils Radeon HD 6450 Entry-Level Graphics Card btarunr News 50 Apr 10, 2011 06:48 PM
AMD Announces ATI Radeon HD 5830 Graphics Card btarunr News 11 Feb 26, 2010 09:19 AM
AMD Announces ATI Radeon HD 5670 Graphics Card btarunr News 6 Jan 17, 2010 06:04 AM
AMD Radeon RV840 Graphics Card Caught on Camera btarunr News 46 Jun 7, 2009 08:37 AM
AMD Launches ATI Radeon HD 4830 Graphics Card btarunr News 3 Oct 23, 2008 09:54 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts