![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Toronto, ON. Canada
Posts: 731 (0.59/day)
Thanks: 628
Thanked 160 Times in 99 Posts
|
Building your own supercomputer using Ubuntu and Kerrighed:
Building your own supercomputer using Ubuntu and Kerrighed:
http://www.stevekelly.eu/cluster.shtml Like to thank Steve Kelly for this wonderful written step by step guide in building your own Super PC.
__________________
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to nt300 For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Hi! I'm from the Internet
Posts: 3,810 (6.70/day)
Thanks: 2,641
Thanked 2,518 Times in 1,507 Posts
|
Thats an interesting read.
__________________
Crunchers : Phenom II x6 1090t / 2x Phenom II x6 1055t / Phenom II x4 970BE / “I always succed in my mission tho. Beer just delays it!” -ChaoticAtmosphere
“TPU is very mild, and I love to tell people I love them when they are being retarded, it makes me feel special in my special places. What was the point of this thread again? Oh well, I love all of you.” -Steevo
“Feels like I am being punished by a team of dumbasses for being slighty more intelligent than a waffle!” -Arjai
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() |
The thing I don't get...how is gigabit lan sufficient?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,058 (1.51/day)
Thanks: 2,249
Thanked 542 Times in 443 Posts
|
that's a cluster, not a supercomputer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: May 2011
Location: US of A
Posts: 1,346 (1.75/day)
Thanks: 352
Thanked 250 Times in 220 Posts
|
Most "super computers" are just clusters of computers. There is no single super computer due to hardware constraints.
__________________
if you build it, they will hate |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Geneva, FL, USA
Posts: 3,010 (1.41/day)
Thanks: 567
Thanked 606 Times in 487 Posts
|
What property or properties do you use to determine the category/term to use?
While yes, I can see some things being implied by either, at the core these terms are synonymous, no? At least, that's how I've been using them for as long as I remember. Goes all the way back to when Cray was still making supercomputers and was performance king. Last edited by Jizzler; Jan 6, 2012 at 03:54 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned
|
this is not anyware near the power of a true SOC/cluster setup its just a bunch of networked machines working together interesting none the less
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Better Than You
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toledo,Ohio
Posts: 5,450 (2.22/day)
Thanks: 730
Thanked 1,572 Times in 994 Posts
|
Interesting he chose QX chips instead of the much cheaper Q6600
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Banned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Better Than You
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toledo,Ohio
Posts: 5,450 (2.22/day)
Thanks: 730
Thanked 1,572 Times in 994 Posts
|
you obviously dont have a clue what your talking about.QX chips do not have more cores there just unlocked
![]() and second if it was a server board he would be using Xeons. lol The board he was using http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/Int...ket_775/P5B_V/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Banned
|
Motherboards: SuperMicro X7DVL-E (X6)
Hard Disk: Western Digital Caviar (X3 1Tb in raid 1 on head node. No disks in compute nodes) mounted on "/" RAM: 72Gb (6 x 12Gb. Each node has 6 Kingston 2Gb DDR2 modules) CPU: intel quad core Xeon E5420 (X12, 48 Cores of low temperature CPU power!) http://www.supermicro.com/products/m...0V/X7DVL-E.cfm more accuately the q6600 doesnt support dual sockets ... and no the parts he listed in build 1 I would't waste time on |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Better Than You
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toledo,Ohio
Posts: 5,450 (2.22/day)
Thanks: 730
Thanked 1,572 Times in 994 Posts
|
Thats the cluster he built in 2008, not the one he used for tutorial
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
If you where going todo this your best bet would be a few 2600k's and dual port gigabit networking if he really did buy a socket 775chip for this ... hes a idiot ..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Geneva, FL, USA
Posts: 3,010 (1.41/day)
Thanks: 567
Thanked 606 Times in 487 Posts
|
Ideally, high-latency optimized workloads for the nodes.
Like with 3D animation. Send individual frame data to each of the nodes, after minutes/hours/longer, the node returns the rendered frame. Also, like when I write web apps. Can execute dozens of calls locally in same time I can make a single call to a remote database. I tailor the app to it's intended underlying hardware. With the remote db scenario, I'll be making the db do as much work as possible per call, to make as few calls as possible. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Jizzler For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#15 | |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,058 (1.51/day)
Thanks: 2,249
Thanked 542 Times in 443 Posts
|
Quote:
that's a cluster, not a supercomputer. Lan or even fiber is plenty capable for many things, but it's far too limited when it comes to the demanding needs to weather forcasting, quantum physics, or molecular modeling. a cluster is budget oriented. a supercomputer is not. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Join Date: May 2011
Location: US of A
Posts: 1,346 (1.75/day)
Thanks: 352
Thanked 250 Times in 220 Posts
|
LOL, you are so flat out wrong it made me chuckle out loud.
^ this right here shows just how wrong you are. How in the world did you come up with that? Clusters are budget oriented? The word cluster just means several things bundled together. "Super Computers" are just high end clusters of servers. "Blades" is a generic term used to describe a single server unit that is part of a cluster. They are called blades because they are usually vertical, thin, rackmounted units that fit into a larger rackmounted chassis. That is all. (this comes from over 13 years of experience in the web hosting industry, not a wikipedia article. )
__________________
if you build it, they will hate Last edited by LordJummy; Jan 9, 2012 at 06:57 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| School paper: need sources, topic? Pros of building your own pc | n-ster | General Hardware | 9 | Mar 10, 2010 02:41 PM |
| U.S. Air Force building supercomputer | segalaw19800 | General Hardware | 12 | Feb 2, 2010 08:18 PM |
| Building your own vs. Buying from manufacturer | GameRig23 | System Builder's Advice | 13 | Sep 27, 2008 12:45 AM |
| Building my own PC and need help! | Azza17 | Graphics Cards | 10 | Jan 8, 2008 11:54 AM |
| IBM Blue Gene Supercomputer breaks own record. | live2game2003 | News | 5 | Oct 30, 2005 07:41 AM |