techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jan 10, 2012, 10:35 AM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,981 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,895 Times in 5,647 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

ASUS ROG Phoebus Sound Card Pictured, Driven by New CMI Oxygen Express Chip

ASUS displayed its latest sound card, the Republic of Gamers (ROG) Phoebus. This card is designed for multichannel gaming audio. While it might not pack any fancy DSP that doesn't already exist, its AMP circuitry is so designed to give the best positional audio that could come handy with competitive online gaming. With this card, ASUS also brought to the fore C-Media's latest audio chipset, the CMI 8788DH Oxygen Express, which packs native PCI Express support. All PCI Express sound cards launched by ASUS so far feature OxygenHD and ASUS-rebadged AV-100 chipsets, that use legacy PCI, and hence depend on PCIe-to-PCI bridge chips by PLX to function on PCI Express.

The primary DAC for headphone/front-out channel of the ROG Phoebus is TI-BB PCM1792A, with stellar signal-noise ratio (SNR) of 127 dBA. Other main channels are handled by Cirrus Logic, probably the CS5381, with SNR of 120 dBA. There's also a tertiary Realtek ALC889 (110 dBA) CODEC that probably handles an independent set of audio channels, or handles the digital outputs, since it's licensed with a few Dolby technologies. On the AMP side, we spy bleeding-edge OPAMPs, a Texas Instruments 6120A2(?) AMP chip (for the headphones channel), etc.



Many parts of the card are electrically isolated from the PCI Express slot, to prevent interference from the ground layer of the motherboard. So these parts rely on power drawn from a 6-pin PCIe power connector, conditioned by a tiny VRM. Only the power-conditioning parts of the card use solid-state capacitors, the AMP and audio parts use audiophile-grade electrolytic capacitors since by design they are better for analogue circuits. The whole card is topped off with a groovy-looking EMI shield. Expect this card to be costly.

Source: VR-Zone
btarunr is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 10, 2012, 10:42 AM   #2
Scatler
25 Posts
 
Scatler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 64 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 10 Posts

System Specs

I already fear the day when audio cards will require dual 8 pin power. *shiver*
Scatler is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2012, 10:45 AM   #3
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,981 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,895 Times in 5,647 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scatler View Post
I already fear the day when audio cards will require dual 8 pin power. *shiver*
This card should barely draw 10W. If you read the article, the idea behind that power connector was electrical isolation from the slot.

Why no Molex? Because it's an old, ugly connector in its dusk.
__________________

Gadgets, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2012, 10:52 AM   #4
Live OR Die
2000 Posts
 
Live OR Die's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Perth-Westen Australia
Posts: 3,383 (1.54/day)
Thanks: 436
Thanked 315 Times in 256 Posts

System Specs

I've been waiting for this card
Live OR Die is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2012, 11:10 AM   #5
RejZoR
3500 Posts
 
RejZoR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Europe/Slovenia
Posts: 3,963 (1.26/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 752 Times in 540 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
This card should barely draw 10W. If you read the article, the idea behind that power connector was electrical isolation from the slot.

Why no Molex? Because it's an old, ugly connector in its dusk.
ASUS Xonar Essence STX was using 4 pin molex for power supply in addition to PCIe. Also power draw was apparently pretty high because i had power stability issues when it was plugged in on a 550W PSU with higher end components. It was aooarently on the edge already and the soundcard tipped it over...
__________________
RejZoR's Little Secrets @ rejzor dot tk
RejZoR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2012, 11:12 AM   #6
FreedomEclipse
Crazy Dogmatic Bullsh!t!
 
FreedomEclipse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: (British Born Chinese) London, United Kingdom
Posts: 7,518 (3.38/day)
Thanks: 824
Thanked 1,603 Times in 1,283 Posts

System Specs

I wonder if this is worth getting over the Xonar STX....

though, I really do wish Asus would spend more time on their Audio drivers. They only really release a new driver once or twice a year and it doesnt matter if their new drivers are bugged or not they just make you wait until the next release

luckily, modded drivers are available and they are leagues ahead of Asus's the change log is like a 50 page essay on Astro Physics compared to Asus's own changes/updates.
__________________

“I used to be a serial upgrader like you, then i took a downgrade to the knee” -FreedomEclipse
FreedomEclipse is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2012, 11:31 AM   #7
robal
200 Posts
 
robal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 476 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 24
Thanked 108 Times in 87 Posts

System Specs

Electrolytic caps ?!
I know it's not a power-circuit, but still...
robal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2012, 12:18 PM   #8
arterius2
200 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 234 (0.32/day)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 36 Times in 28 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by robal View Post
Electrolytic caps ?!
I know it's not a power-circuit, but still...
wrong, those are high quality audio-grade electrolyte caps, the ones used on this card I believe are called 'muse-gold'

you obviously do not know a whole lot about analogue circuits, many professional and top end audio equipments use electrolyte caps because they tend to sound more 'musical' (warm or tube-like) to the solid state caps.
arterius2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2012, 12:24 PM   #9
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,981 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,895 Times in 5,647 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by robal View Post
Electrolytic caps ?!
I know it's not a power-circuit, but still...
Solid state caps suck with analogue circuits (audio quality is bad, sounds too shrill/synthetic). The electrolytic caps on this card cost 5~10x the solid caps found on motherboards. They needn't be as durable, since they're not handling large currents.

Besides VRM areas, a PC motherboard doesn't really need solid caps in other parts. The vendors put them anyway, for PR reasons.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RejZoR View Post
ASUS Xonar Essence STX was using 4 pin molex for power supply in addition to PCIe. Also power draw was apparently pretty high because i had power stability issues when it was plugged in on a 550W PSU with higher end components. It was aooarently on the edge already and the soundcard tipped it over...
Maybe because the rest of the rig is already pushing the PSU far, and the sound card is just putting it at its breaking point. There's no way a sound card draws over a dozen Watts. There's nothing on it that needs that much power.
__________________

Gadgets, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 10, 2012, 12:26 PM   #10
Cold Storm
Battosai
 
Cold Storm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In a library somewhere on this earth
Posts: 10,566 (5.15/day)
Thanks: 4,238
Thanked 3,047 Times in 2,493 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Cold Storm

System Specs

It looks cool.. It sounds like something good.. But, if I can't go and swap my opamps easily... It's not for me...
__________________
The only way success is before work, is in the dictionary

Support for the mind. Support for your hardware
Cold Storm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2012, 12:27 PM   #11
Sihastru
200 Posts
 
Sihastru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: You are here.
Posts: 318 (0.21/day)
Thanks: 80
Thanked 62 Times in 44 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by robal View Post
Electrolytic caps ?!
I know it's not a power-circuit, but still...
There are some solid caps that can be considered "audio grade" but they don't look any different from the usual solid caps. There are more electrolytic caps that made the "audiophile" grade then there are solid ones (and there's a war going on there).

Also gold painted electrolytic caps are easylier to explain for the marketing department. There are some green/blue/magenta ones that are much better.

Even if it makes no difference whatsoever.
__________________
There are more things in heaven and earth then are dreamt of in your philosophy.
Sihastru is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2012, 12:37 PM   #12
FreedomEclipse
Crazy Dogmatic Bullsh!t!
 
FreedomEclipse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: (British Born Chinese) London, United Kingdom
Posts: 7,518 (3.38/day)
Thanks: 824
Thanked 1,603 Times in 1,283 Posts

System Specs

people believe too much that anything made of gold (or looks like gold) is pure win.
__________________

“I used to be a serial upgrader like you, then i took a downgrade to the knee” -FreedomEclipse
FreedomEclipse is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2012, 12:59 PM   #13
RejZoR
3500 Posts
 
RejZoR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Europe/Slovenia
Posts: 3,963 (1.26/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 752 Times in 540 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
Solid state caps suck with analogue circuits (audio quality is bad, sounds too shrill/synthetic). The electrolytic caps on this card cost 5~10x the solid caps found on motherboards. They needn't be as durable, since they're not handling large currents.

Besides VRM areas, a PC motherboard doesn't really need solid caps in other parts. The vendors put them anyway, for PR reasons.



Maybe because the rest of the rig is already pushing the PSU far, and the sound card is just putting it at its breaking point. There's no way a sound card draws over a dozen Watts. There's nothing on it that needs that much power.
I doubt that it was in the ~5W difference zone. It had to be more.
__________________
RejZoR's Little Secrets @ rejzor dot tk
RejZoR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2012, 01:10 PM   #14
claylomax
1000 Posts
 
claylomax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 1,385 (1.22/day)
Thanks: 119
Thanked 251 Times in 217 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by FreedomEclipse View Post
I wonder if this is worth getting over the Xonar STX....

though, I really do wish Asus would spend more time on their Audio drivers. They only really release a new driver once or twice a year and it doesnt matter if their new drivers are bugged or not they just make you wait until the next release

luckily, modded drivers are available and they are leagues ahead of Asus's the change log is like a 50 page essay on Astro Physics compared to Asus's own changes/updates.
To get Asus modded drivers, check FreedomEclipse signature.
__________________
At the going down of the sun and in the morning, We will remember them
claylomax is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to claylomax For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 10, 2012, 01:18 PM   #15
tigger
I'm the only one
 
tigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: HU5 1LL
Posts: 7,189 (2.75/day)
Thanks: 469
Thanked 940 Times in 773 Posts
Send a message via MSN to tigger

System Specs

Very nice, really good SNR on the front outputs, but were is the FP connection gone
tigger is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2012, 01:21 PM   #16
Ferrum Master
200 Posts
 
Ferrum Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Riga, Latvia
Posts: 288 (0.32/day)
Thanks: 26
Thanked 48 Times in 36 Posts

System Specs

That shield looks ugly...
__________________
Ferrum Master is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2012, 03:45 PM   #17
treehouse
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 199 (0.26/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts

System Specs

Realtek ftw
__________________
treehouse is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2012, 04:24 PM   #18
jsfitz54
500 Posts
 
jsfitz54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 771 (0.72/day)
Thanks: 192
Thanked 178 Times in 154 Posts

System Specs

How About A TPU Review!?
jsfitz54 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2012, 04:43 PM   #19
repman244
500 Posts
 
repman244's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 964 (1.25/day)
Thanks: 225
Thanked 411 Times in 236 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by RejZoR View Post
ASUS Xonar Essence STX was using 4 pin molex for power supply in addition to PCIe. Also power draw was apparently pretty high because i had power stability issues when it was plugged in on a 550W PSU with higher end components. It was aooarently on the edge already and the soundcard tipped it over...
The whole point of the extra molex connector was to avoid the dirty power from the motherboard, PCI-e is there only for data.
__________________
Storage server:
HP Proliant ML350 G4|2 x Xeon "Nocona" 3GHz|4GB DDR1 ECC|Storage (SCSI): 3x10k 72GB + 10k 300GB + 15k 300GB + Ultrium460 tape drive|Storage (SATA): Adaptec 2810SA + WD Caviar 250GB + Seagate 250GB|
Other:
HP Proliant DL380 G5|Xeon 5150|4GB FB DDR2 ECC|HP Smart Array P400-256MB cache|3x10k 146GB SAS in RAID 0 + 10k 146GB SAS|2x800W|ATi FireGL V7700|
HP Proliant DL320 G5|Xeon 3150|1GB FB DDR2 ECC|2x80GB RAID 0
repman244 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2012, 04:51 PM   #20
LAN_deRf_HA
3500 Posts
 
LAN_deRf_HA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,013 (2.14/day)
Thanks: 290
Thanked 830 Times in 587 Posts

System Specs

Did Asus ever fix that headphone/eardrum damaging super screech? I know it's rare but the possibility of ear damage is significant enough to warrant never recommending their soundcards.
LAN_deRf_HA is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2012, 04:55 PM   #21
Horrux
500 Posts
 
Horrux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 641 (0.89/day)
Thanks: 335
Thanked 132 Times in 101 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cold Storm View Post
It looks cool.. It sounds like something good.. But, if I can't go and swap my opamps easily... It's not for me...
My Auzentech Preludes have that feature I believe. I haven't upgraded anything on any of them though. Should I?
__________________
The head honcho at the Serious Gamers' Association

Criticism
“However, the Intel CPU dispatcher does not only check which instruction set is supported by the CPU, it also checks the vendor ID string. If the vendor string is "GenuineIntel" then it uses the optimal code path. If the CPU is not from Intel then, in most cases, it will run the slowest possible version of the code, even if the CPU is fully compatible with a better version. ”
Horrux is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2012, 06:23 PM   #22
TheLostSwede
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: A little green island far far away
Posts: 842 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 152 Times in 113 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by tigger View Post
Very nice, really good SNR on the front outputs, but were is the FP connection gone
That's what the special headphone/mic extension is for which also add noise cancelling microphones...
TheLostSwede is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2012, 07:19 PM   #23
Static~Charge
200 Posts
 
Static~Charge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North Carolina, USA
Posts: 419 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 65
Thanked 76 Times in 59 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
Why no Molex? Because it's an old, ugly connector in its dusk.
Assuming that you have a 6-pin PCIe power connector to spare, after your video cards are installed. Unused Molex connectors are a lot easier to come by.
Static~Charge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2012, 07:43 PM   #24
jalex3
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 183 (0.21/day)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts

How is Asus software? I'm still feeling burned by my old Creative problems.
jalex3 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2012, 09:32 PM   #25
Horrux
500 Posts
 
Horrux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 641 (0.89/day)
Thanks: 335
Thanked 132 Times in 101 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Static~Charge View Post
Assuming that you have a 6-pin PCIe power connector to spare, after your video cards are installed. Unused Molex connectors are a lot easier to come by.
What are we to do?

LOGISYS AD201 12v Molex to 12V 6Pin Adapter

__________________
The head honcho at the Serious Gamers' Association

Criticism
“However, the Intel CPU dispatcher does not only check which instruction set is supported by the CPU, it also checks the vendor ID string. If the vendor string is "GenuineIntel" then it uses the optimal code path. If the CPU is not from Intel then, in most cases, it will run the slowest possible version of the code, even if the CPU is fully compatible with a better version. ”
Horrux is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ASUS ROG CG8565 Gaming Desktop Pictured btarunr News 19 Sep 18, 2011 01:52 PM
ASUS ROG MATRIX GTX 580 Graphics Card Pictured btarunr News 19 May 27, 2011 12:32 AM
Asus ROG Immensity concept-board pictured with heatsinks Yellow&Nerdy? General Hardware 5 Jun 11, 2010 03:36 AM
ASUS ROG Crosshair IV Formula and Extreme Motherboards Pictured btarunr News 38 Mar 23, 2010 06:17 PM
ASUS ROG Ares PCB Pictured btarunr News 20 Mar 1, 2010 07:46 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts