![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Winter Park
Posts: 1,562 (0.66/day)
Thanks: 247
Thanked 134 Times in 125 Posts
|
Is Pentium 4 Processors still good?
Is the IntelŪ PentiumŪ 4 Processor 540J With Hyper-Threading Tech. Still good for games today?I imagine it being the same as the AMD Athlon 64 + Processors, Reason I ask is because I have a old Sony Vaio(from last spring) and its still a kick ass setupI added a lot to it(RAM)All I really know is that It can run Counter-Strike:Source greatly not with the HDR effects though,lol. Back to the topic does anyone know if its still a kickass processor?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 6,387 (2.71/day)
Thanks: 190
Thanked 739 Times in 599 Posts
|
It can lay down some power, but you wont get top notch performance out of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Graphical Hacker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 7,478 (2.81/day)
Thanks: 798
Thanked 1,174 Times in 834 Posts
|
They still have some power, but not enough for modern day high end gaming. I still use a p4 in my laptop, a 3.2gHz, but my a64 out performs it. By alot.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Winter Park
Posts: 1,562 (0.66/day)
Thanks: 247
Thanked 134 Times in 125 Posts
|
Still good though right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Graphical Hacker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 7,478 (2.81/day)
Thanks: 798
Thanked 1,174 Times in 834 Posts
|
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Winter Park
Posts: 1,562 (0.66/day)
Thanks: 247
Thanked 134 Times in 125 Posts
|
Ah well, ill just use it for CSS then not a big deal I use to run FEAR on it
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,394 (1.03/day)
Thanks: 80
Thanked 320 Times in 242 Posts
|
It's kinda good in an ok sort of way....kinda. You won't be maxing out your games but it'll run the medium settings well with a good graphics card teamed up with it. My P4 550ht pulled off a 9500 in 3dmark05 with a single x1950 pro.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Winter Park
Posts: 1,562 (0.66/day)
Thanks: 247
Thanked 134 Times in 125 Posts
|
I dont care about like putting it to max settings I just want to play,lol, kinda why I just play css easy to run and isnt much of a bitch unlike fear/prey/etc.buuuuuuut the g.card could use a change.......gonna laugh at this.....ATI X300
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia, Sydney
Posts: 5,023 (2.07/day)
Thanks: 412
Thanked 361 Times in 266 Posts
|
It WILL bottleneck with the newer crossfire setups, especially the 2x X1950PRO/X1950GT setups. As Lazzer408 experienced, it sucks these days...
Core 2 Duo e4300 will be the best choice these days. Whats so funny about an X300? Do you think we are dickheads or something? No. We are here to help.
__________________
AMD Radeon X1950~HD4000 Support Clubhouse “Mac: "Woah, what are you doing?" Mac says as he levitates in the air.
PC: "Playing Half-Life 2, this is my gravity gun."
Mac: "Well I can sort of do that."
PC: "Technically Mac, you have to become me first."” -From_Nowhere
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Winter Park
Posts: 1,562 (0.66/day)
Thanks: 247
Thanked 134 Times in 125 Posts
|
nah just cause its kinda old thats why,but other then that Im not really thinking about upgrading it just wanted to see what you guys think and your opinions.like i said all ill really play is fear,css,WoW maybe....,Unreal tournament 2k4,WC3 both, Starcraft,and maybe other crap the one im using now is my main PC this one will be some what of a Loner PC
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Hometown CALI, Current WI.
Posts: 1,170 (0.51/day)
Thanks: 38
Thanked 47 Times in 46 Posts
|
i wouldn't say its very reliable anymore because mines fried and i ended up getting a celeron which is even worse so i didn't decide to build it at all
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
![]() |
Quote:
EASY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() |
My friends and I all own p4's except they have the 500 series
Mine has been great for css,fear,prey,farcry, oblivion, etc First person games. Upped from x700pro to my current 1900gt Gaming-wise i compare to my friend's 540 with 1900gt rev 2 the same. But in just processing theres a big difference between the 6xx and 5xx. simple stuff like winamp, ie, aim, and load times on games i see alot of choppiness. maybe its the cache or something but its really noticeable. Anyways, will stick with this for a few more years unless I get a financial miracle or something. If ur board supports it, go for pentium d's to be better than p4's but behind c2ds. the prices are great these days. But i would say for all the 04-06 games, p4's will be fine |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() |
the P4's still run ok i guess
its not like theyr celerons *shudder* |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 6,387 (2.71/day)
Thanks: 190
Thanked 739 Times in 599 Posts
|
Quote:
I don't like Celerons myself, but that chip blew my mind. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() |
wow thats awesome
its just that when i think of celerons i tend to think of my computing experiences back when i was using the Pentium 1 ![]() EDIT - So very very sh-t |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 6,387 (2.71/day)
Thanks: 190
Thanked 739 Times in 599 Posts
|
Heh I totally couldn't agree with you more... Those first ones were completely useless... These ones seem a lot better as long as you put them in a decent mobo.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|