TechPowerUp GPU-Z 0.5.8 Released

[The Von Matrices]

Lol, I have two of the worst cards of the bunch. It could explain my really high power consumption.

GTX 470 #1: 50.6%
GTX 470 #2: 58.0%

I guess NVidia really needed to sell the worst chips when they created the 470.

[TissueBox]

GTX 470 with an ASIC quality of 36.6% (currently the lowest in this thread I believe), clocks to 810/1900 at 1.075V.

GPU-Z 0.5.8 seems to be reading my pixel fill rate wrong - 5.5 reads it fine.

0.5.8

Spoiler

0.5.5

Spoiler

[Maban]

Originally Posted by TissueBox

GTX 470 with an ASIC quality of 36.6% (currently the lowest in this thread I believe), clocks to 810/1900 at 1.075V.

GPU-Z 0.5.8 seems to be reading my pixel fill rate wrong - 5.5 reads it fine.

0.5.8

Spoiler

http://img.techpowerup.org/120121/GTX 470.png

0.5.5

Spoiler

http://img.techpowerup.org/120121/0.5.5.png

When did you buy your 470? I bought my 36.9% in June 2010.

I've gone over my quota of explaining the fill rate thing, so I will let someone else do that.

[LAN_deRf_HA]

The lower score was introduced in a prior version and is supposedly a more accurate reading, but I've heard that fermi's fill rate is actually variable once you enable AA.

[The Von Matrices]

I bought my 470's in April of 2010, just after they were released. The 58.0% one is a MSI rebranded one built by NVidia while the 50.6% one is built by MSI.

[TissueBox]

Originally Posted by Maban

When did you buy your 470? I bought my 36.9% in June 2010.

I've gone over my quota of explaining the fill rate thing, so I will let someone else do that.

I bought mine around October 2010, getting 85-90C with MSI Kombustor at 60% fan speed with an ambient of 23C.

[chodaboy19]

Pretty crappy lol

[Derek12]

Originally Posted by Delta6326

If I understand this all correctly, Higher the % just means more likely to have a higher OC, It's doesn't mean your card is going to die.

Thanks I was thinking it was sort of a "wear level" measure

[Shihabyooo]

ASIC Quality 63.7%. For a premium GTX580, I believe that is somewhat low, no ?

[burwij]

Just ran the test on my 560 Ti Twin Frozr II/OC: 100.6%!



I'm flattered, but I feel like the calculations might need some tweaking.

As a side note, I haven't pushed the limits of the card (or felt the need to), but the stock VID is 0.987 V.

[v12dock]

Support for the 6XXX would be awesome. I would interesting to see how the 6950 vs 6970 compare and why you can unlock some 6950s

[Dj-ElectriC]

75.7% for Gigabyte's GTX570 SuperDuperOverclock (SOC)
732@845@955 core

[Bo$$]

Originally Posted by Dj-ElectriC

75.7% for Gigabyte's GTX570 SuperDuperOverclock (SOC)
732@845@955 core

what volts do you need for that??

[tongey54]

My Asus GTX 580 Direct CU II is 68.6%, and it will not OC past 885MHz core (not 24 hours stable anyway).

I don't think Asus cherry picks the GPUs for this card, it's just good at cooling.

Bit disappointing to have the confirmation like...

[BetA]

@ W1zzard

I cant find any good Info about what ASIC actually is..and how i need to refeer to it. Also less% means higher leakage and mroe % means less? is that right?

Heres a screen of my mighty GTX460




I really would appreciate more Info about this ASIC thing..

Thank u very much Wizz....looking forward to it

Greetz, AK_ViruS aka (BetA@Guru3D and RigMods.com)

[kaktus1907]

lower leakege chips use higher voltages to reach nominal clocks that what higher leakege chip needs..

lower leakage = higher voltage
higher leakage = lower voltage

if you are a overclocker you want higher leakege (=lower voltages) chips..

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.p...postcount=2525

[blacksnoopy]

Originally Posted by Tatty_One

Lol my ASIC quality is 117.4%

I now vote we should have a ASIC quality performance table!

Asus 560 Ti - 113%

[Shihabyooo]

Originally Posted by tongey54

My Asus GTX 580 Direct CU II is 68.6%, and it will not OC past 885MHz core (not 24 hours stable anyway).

I don't think Asus cherry picks the GPUs for this card, it's just good at cooling.

Bit disappointing to have the confirmation like...

hmm, I could do 900MHz core @ 1075mV. Currently running @ 850MHz while undervolted. The chip won't run past the 900 no matter how much Volts I add though

It's funny though that this same card had an impressive OC of 1.5GHz!!

[KainXS]

so is this the chips binned across the entire gpu series because i tried a 4 cards

GTX460 768 40%
GTX460 41.1%
GTX470 59.5%
GTX580 98.2%

[Tatty_One]

Originally Posted by Shihabyooo

hmm, I could do 900MHz core @ 1075mV. Currently running @ 850MHz while undervolted. The chip won't run past the 900 no matter how much Volts I add though

It's funny though that this same card had an impressive OC of 1.5GHz!!

You could be restricted by the shaders..... I assume you have tried unlinking them from the GPU speed? Assuming of course you still can with the 580.

[W1zzard]

Originally Posted by Tatty_One

Assuming of course you still can with the 580

fermi has linked shader & core; not possible to unlink it

[Dj-ElectriC]

Originally Posted by bo$$

what volts do you need for that??

1.1v, Cant argue with GPU gauntlet

[tongey54]

Originally Posted by Shihabyooo

hmm, I could do 900MHz core @ 1075mV. Currently running @ 850MHz while undervolted. The chip won't run past the 900 no matter how much Volts I add though

It's funny though that this same card had an impressive OC of 1.5GHz!!

Ha yeah with LN2, and still probably a lucky one. Should have got a Twin Frozr

[MaKCuMyC]

Why new version use crappy MS Sans again instead of Tahoma in 0.5.7?

[W1zzard]

Originally Posted by MaKCuMyC

Why new version use crappy MS Sans again instead of Tahoma in 0.5.7?

hmm unchanged for me