![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banstick Dummy
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Crystal River, FL
Posts: 15,142 (6.86/day)
Thanks: 1,337
Thanked 6,861 Times in 3,752 Posts
|
Backlash Over Google's New Privacy Settings
Analysts from all over the world are questioning Google's new privacy settings being implemented on March 1. Google is going to be tying its services closer together then before by allowing the privacy setting to be shared across services.
By doing this It will also be able to implement a new search for registered users. Google has stated,"If you're signed into Google, we can do things like suggest search queries, or tailor your search results, based on the interests you've expressed in Google+, Gmail and YouTube" the firm said. Critics like the UK's Information Commissioner's Office warned that any changes must be communicated to users. They are quoted as saying, "It is important that technology companies, such as Google, are aware of the privacy concerns that exist when behavioral advertising is used to target particular content at individuals. Failure to inform users about changes may not only lead to a loss of trust in the company, but could also mean that they are failing to comply with the requirements of the Data Protection Act," it warned. Other critics question the move as purely financial being individual searches are a valuable commodity to advertisers. However Google maintains the stance its change in its privacy rules are to improve the customers experience by streamlining its settings across all of its services and improved searches. ![]() Source: BBC Last edited by btarunr; Jan 25, 2012 at 04:03 PM. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to TheMailMan78 For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Portugal
Posts: 2,142 (1.85/day)
Thanks: 1,968
Thanked 650 Times in 471 Posts
|
I think Google only wants to promote Google+ even further. I guess they found out the only way they could do it effectively was to shove it down the user's throats. But that's just me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ireland
Posts: 190 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
i dont mind being seen as a single user on all google services so I see no harm in google sharing information between its services as long as this information stays with in google
__________________
CPU : Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 @ 3 GHz Ram: 4GB @ 820MHz | 2x2GB 5-4-4-16 [img...]www.danasoft.com/sig/BorisX.jpg[/img]
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 5,123 (2.48/day)
Thanks: 456
Thanked 644 Times in 530 Posts
|
This. And im usually never signed into Google anyway.
__________________
Raid Arrays Explained Wanna look up your BSOD code? Heatware under CrAsHnBuRnXp http://crashtown.myminicity.com/ind CrAsHnBuRnXP's For Sale Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Poland,Slask
Posts: 1,119 (0.35/day)
Thanks: 204
Thanked 176 Times in 144 Posts
|
The thing that scares me is that I give them rights to all my email.
Quote:
__________________
"Let me noobilize you"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 3,713 (3.14/day)
Thanks: 192
Thanked 852 Times in 558 Posts
|
first i guess google want to make their products as a unity.
search engine award in their hand and our world cant be separated from google so its a good base if google wanna match it with their other services. like the other as long as they keep their user privacy and not filtering and tracking the traffic i still feel its fine
__________________
:: New Cases, Tips And All About Your Cases Visit CaseGear :: ![]() Don't Ever Ask About Love And Honesty That You Don't Ever Have |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 2,098 (1.19/day)
Thanks: 739
Thanked 1,032 Times in 598 Posts
|
Maybe I'm the only one who feels this way, but I think Internet privacy issues sometimes get blown out of proportion these days. Take some responsibility and don't send things over the Internet that you want to keep private. That falls under common sense IMO. If you're not prepared for shady privacy policies, accidental information leaks, and information theft from servers, you probably shouldn't be using the Internet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Portugal
Posts: 2,142 (1.85/day)
Thanks: 1,968
Thanked 650 Times in 471 Posts
|
No, you're not alone. The reason I don't join certain social networks is purely because I don't want to share certain personal information, nor do I see any need for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,030 (7.23/day)
Thanks: 790
Thanked 13,028 Times in 5,719 Posts
|
Remember, if it's free, you're not the customer, you're the commodity being sold.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| facebook privacy settings | regan1985 | General Software | 7 | Sep 7, 2009 08:44 PM |
| Microsoft Sued Over WGA Privacy Issues | zekrahminator | News | 20 | Sep 18, 2007 04:51 AM |
| google's street view | Easy Rhino | General Software | 2 | Jun 1, 2007 11:04 AM |
| FTC investigating Google's acquisition of Doubleclick | zekrahminator | News | 0 | Apr 21, 2007 05:43 PM |
| Microsoft changes WGA software in response to consumer backlash | zekrahminator | News | 22 | Feb 25, 2007 11:27 AM |