techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > System Builder's Advice

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Feb 4, 2012, 09:34 PM   #1
Cratzky
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 288 (0.23/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 49 Times in 43 Posts

System Specs

Upgrade tips: AMD or Intel?

Hey everyone!

Im in the thought about getting an upgrade in the upcoming month and i got a very limited budget. My budget cannot exceed 370euro.

I want to be able to play SWTOR without dropping to the sub 30s fps in warzones as i do with my current setup. Im 80% sure that im getting bottlenecked by my CPU + RAM, since my GPU usage never goes above 25% in warzones, while my RAM is at between 25-40mb "free" and cpu usage is around 50-80%.

I do not think i need to upgrade my gtx470, thoughts?

Since i got a pretty low budget, i wonder which one of these i should upgrade to.

My current system specs can be seen to the left.


Here is an AMD upgrade i put toghether:

AMD Memoria AMD Dimm 8 Gb (2x4 Gb) ddr3 1600 Mhz CL 8 Performance Edition
€ 51,89
(This memory is manufactured by Patriot)

AMD Processore FX-8120 Black Edition 8 Core 3,1 Ghz Socket AM3+ Sbloccato
€ 199,99

ASROCK Motherboard 970 Extreme3 socket AM3+ chipset AMD 970 ATX
€ 82,69

Total price: € 334,57


Here is the Intel upgrade i put toghether:

INTEL Processore Core i5-2500K (Sandy Bridge) Quad-Core 3,30 Ghz con moltiplicatore sbloccato GPU integrata HD 3000 socket LGA 1155 Boxato
€ 219,99

CORSAIR Memoria Dimm Vengeance 8Gb (2x4Gb) ddr3 1600 MHz Unbuffered CL 9-9-9-24
€ 49,99

MSI Motherboard P67A-C43B3 (Rev. B3) socket LGA 1155 chipset Intel P67 Micro-ATX
€ 97,69

Total price: € 367,67

Regards
Cratzky
Cratzky is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 4, 2012, 09:39 PM   #2
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 31,932 (12.77/day)
Thanks: 2,789
Thanked 12,304 Times in 7,823 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cratzky View Post
Hey everyone!
I do not think i need to upgrade my gtx470, thoughts?
I agree, shold be a fine card for the job.

Quote:
Since i got a pretty low budget, i wonder which one of these i should upgrade to.

My current system specs can be seen to the left.


Here is an AMD upgrade i put toghether:

AMD Memoria AMD Dimm 8 Gb (2x4 Gb) ddr3 1600 Mhz CL 8 Performance Edition
€ 51,89
(This memory is manufactured by Patriot)

AMD Processore FX-8120 Black Edition 8 Core 3,1 Ghz Socket AM3+ Sbloccato
€ 199,99

ASROCK Motherboard 970 Extreme3 socket AM3+ chipset AMD 970 ATX
€ 82,69

Total price: € 334,57


Here is the Intel upgrade i put toghether:

INTEL Processore Core i5-2500K (Sandy Bridge) Quad-Core 3,30 Ghz con moltiplicatore sbloccato GPU integrata HD 3000 socket LGA 1155 Boxato
€ 219,99

CORSAIR Memoria Dimm Vengeance 8Gb (2x4Gb) ddr3 1600 MHz Unbuffered CL 9-9-9-24
€ 49,99

MSI Motherboard P67A-C43B3 (Rev. B3) socket LGA 1155 chipset Intel P67 Micro-ATX
€ 97,69

Total price: € 367,67

Regards
Cratzky
As for the rest.. It's for gaming and having faster cores is more relevant to having more cores. Get the Intel system.
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to erocker For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 4, 2012, 09:43 PM   #3
qubit
Overclocked quantum bit
 
qubit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Quantumville UK
Posts: 8,648 (4.34/day)
Thanks: 4,178
Thanked 3,303 Times in 1,943 Posts

System Specs

+1 to erocker. Just check out the Bulldozer reviews; Intel is the way to go.

I would recommend Bulldozer if you're into hardcore overclocking and want to set records using LN2 (or just want to have one for the sake of owning it). This is a pretty niche activity though, so for general gaming it's definitely Intel.

Graphics card is fine.
__________________
Siggie in the post.
qubit is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 4, 2012, 09:44 PM   #4
Cratzky
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 288 (0.23/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 49 Times in 43 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by erocker View Post
I agree, shold be a fine card for the job.

Yeah, especially when i overclocked it a little bit its not that bad imo

As for the rest.. It's for gaming and having faster cores is more relevant to having more cores. Get the Intel system.
Yeah i agree, but i had to be sure, since i will be doin overclocking and i like saveing money, but maybe even with overclocking, the 2500k may be even more ahead with decent 4ghz+ overclock that i would put it to. More data to the graphics card = better fps in my brain, and fast cores achieves that better then more cores to a certain degree, especially when most games are optimized for dualcores or quadcores at the best. We will havent seen any 6core games yet , have we?
Im completely and utterly in love with swtor so i have no idea whats goin on in the world Havent been outside the door since it was released in december....
Cratzky is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 4, 2012, 09:46 PM   #5
Suhidu
75 Posts
 
Suhidu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 158 (0.19/day)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 75 Times in 48 Posts

If you're on this budget, gaming is your primary concern, and you price out an AMD system to compare to a 2500k, it'd probably be a better idea to go with the budget angle and look at one of their quads (or possibly a six core). The FX-8120 is high-end at certain tasks, but for most games it provides little (or in many cases no) improvement over a Phenom II or FX quad/six core. In fact, in many gaming benchmarks, even the Athlon IIs closely trail the Phenom IIs and FXs (on a core-for-core basis).

As erocker said, of those two builds (and for gaming), get the Intel.

Last edited by Suhidu; Feb 4, 2012 at 10:08 PM.
Suhidu is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 4, 2012, 09:51 PM   #6
TRWOV
2000 Posts
 
TRWOV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Mexico
Posts: 2,058 (3.16/day)
Thanks: 794
Thanked 1,069 Times in 554 Posts

System Specs

The Intel system will last more than the AMD system you've put together. Also, as Suhidu indicated, the FX-8120/8150 has little to offer in terms of gaming compared to the FX-6100.
__________________

My other rigs:
OCTANUX - Conroe865PE - QX6800 - 4GB OCZ Platinum EL - HIS HD4670 AGP - SB Audigy 2 ZS - BFG PPU
phenomenal - AM2NF3-VSTA - 965BE - 8GB OCZ Platinum LV - HIS HD3850 AGP - SB X-Fi - Asus PPU - *WIP*
Green Tea - 939A8X-M - FX60 - 4GB OCZ Platinum EL - 7950GT AGP
Re-build - CT-6VTA2 - PIII 600E - 384MB PC133 - Voodoo 5500 AGP - SB16 ISA
BLUELINE - H61M-GE - PDC G645 - 8GB DDR3-1333 - Powercolor HD7750 - 2xTV Wonder 650
TRWOV is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 4, 2012, 09:55 PM   #7
xenocide
1000 Posts
 
xenocide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Burlington, VT
Posts: 1,706 (2.16/day)
Thanks: 228
Thanked 404 Times in 297 Posts

System Specs

That Intel System is better. I would try and get like an ASrock Z68 or P67 motherboard, should be cheaper. That GTX470 is fine. Keep in mind, SWTOR has problems with some people where, even though their system is fine, it runs at really low frames. There were some people on the SWTOR forums with like GTX580's and i7's that were dropping to 10-15 dps in Warzones for some unknown reason.
__________________
If BF3 doesn't turn out to be the biggest selling PC shooter of all time, then I will eat my graphics card. -MatTheCat
xenocide is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 4, 2012, 10:59 PM   #8
qubit
Overclocked quantum bit
 
qubit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Quantumville UK
Posts: 8,648 (4.34/day)
Thanks: 4,178
Thanked 3,303 Times in 1,943 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by xenocide View Post
There were some people on the SWTOR forums with like GTX580's and i7's that were dropping to 10-15 dps in Warzones for some unknown reason.
Sounds like a buggy game engine to me. Duke Nukem Forever had a tendency to do this until the patch came out. In this case, no matter how powerful your system, it will run poorly when it hits that bug.
__________________
Siggie in the post.
qubit is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 4, 2012, 11:17 PM   #9
xBruce88x
2000 Posts
 
xBruce88x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Winder, GA, USA
Posts: 2,218 (1.70/day)
Thanks: 652
Thanked 506 Times in 401 Posts

System Specs

+1 for the intel setup
__________________
xBruce88x is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 4, 2012, 11:33 PM   #10
Outback Bronze
200 Posts
 
Outback Bronze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Perth, West Australia
Posts: 373 (0.57/day)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 68 Times in 59 Posts

System Specs

Yep. Intel mate. Keep the card 2.
Outback Bronze is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 5, 2012, 12:12 AM   #11
Yo_Wattup
500 Posts
 
Yo_Wattup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 704 (1.46/day)
Thanks: 176
Thanked 199 Times in 125 Posts

System Specs

You'd be silly not to go with intel.
Yo_Wattup is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 5, 2012, 12:19 AM   #12
Darkleoco
1000 Posts
 
Darkleoco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Cullowhee, North Carolina
Posts: 1,333 (2.17/day)
Thanks: 660
Thanked 238 Times in 213 Posts

System Specs

Intel all the way.
__________________
Darkleoco is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 5, 2012, 12:58 AM   #13
LifeOnMars
2000 Posts
 
LifeOnMars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kettering,Northants. UK
Posts: 2,242 (1.25/day)
Thanks: 1,718
Thanked 401 Times in 337 Posts

System Specs

In CPU limited games Sandy Bridge has shown real benefits for me coming from a 4.2Ghz Phenom II quad and a 4GHz 1090T.

GTA IV, Oblivion/Morrowind.Skyrim etc all play smoothly now at 1080p with much higher frames whereas previously smooth frames where hard to come by.

Your card is more than adequate and I definitely recommend the intel setup, not just for the game in question but for improvements in a plethora of other titles.

Let us know how you get on mate
LifeOnMars is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 5, 2012, 02:24 AM   #14
Cratzky
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 288 (0.23/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 49 Times in 43 Posts

System Specs

Thanks everyone!

I was just finishing a thing in swtor for the rest of the night and checked back on the forum and i see that literally Everyone has recommended me the intel system . I love this forum , should check back more often

but im busy doin to people in warzones on my scoundrel

Will check back in a month or 2 again and update with the final upgrade list, money first, then toys

But i wonder, how is that MSI board for overclocking? Havent bought an MSI board since the old K8 series... If i get the 2500k, i will be overclocking it to 4.2-4.5 somewhere along those numbers i suppose any p67 board would do ? since this crap board i got now with my q9400 that i bought for like 60euro actually manages to take my q9400 from 2.66 to 3.50 before no-post :P and its been running like that since 2009, and i play games atleast 8hours per day, and its still goin strong

Last edited by Cratzky; Feb 5, 2012 at 02:31 AM.
Cratzky is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 5, 2012, 04:58 PM   #15
cadaveca
My name is Dave
 
cadaveca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 10,771 (4.14/day)
Thanks: 4,487
Thanked 5,219 Times in 3,207 Posts

System Specs

MSI is doing very well in BIOS design right now. And yeah, bnascially any obard will do, but as time goes on, it's becoming clear that some boards do do a fair bit better than some others. You'll have to pick individual boards for an accurate compare of what they are able to do, as I've only played with one Z68 MSI board, and the last before that was the MSI P45 Neo2 FIR, which is still kicking it with an e8400.
cadaveca is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 6, 2012, 04:19 AM   #16
Admiral Breaker
5 Posts
 
Admiral Breaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: New England
Posts: 22 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

System Specs

I understand that this is about the AMD. I am just pointing out the problems of going into Hex and Octo cpus. Software cannot utilize more then 4-cores. So an Octo-core system is shooting you in the foot, because the software would only use 1 core or up 4 of those cores. If the game has an option for multi-core processing you should enable that to allow the program to use more the cpu.
Admiral Breaker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 6, 2012, 09:00 AM   #17
Chevalr1c
2000 Posts
 
Chevalr1c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Tilburg, Netherlands
Posts: 2,058 (2.07/day)
Thanks: 4,960
Thanked 785 Times in 531 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Admiral Breaker View Post
If the game has an option for multi-core processing you should enable that to allow the program to use more the cpu.
Funny actually that Divinity II has it the other way around. Therein one must state that the game must behave single-threaded. Other games I ever played don't ask it, in neither way.
Chevalr1c is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 6, 2012, 10:17 AM   #18
nt300
500 Posts
 
nt300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Toronto, ON. Canada
Posts: 731 (0.60/day)
Thanks: 628
Thanked 160 Times in 99 Posts

System Specs

Both setups is great. The Intel setup will gain you a slight performance advantage in none gaming apps. In Gaming they are both good.
__________________
nt300 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 6, 2012, 12:48 PM   #19
Ryleh
25 Posts
 
Ryleh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41 (0.09/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by cadaveca View Post
MSI is doing very well in BIOS design right now. And yeah, bnascially any obard will do, but as time goes on, it's becoming clear that some boards do do a fair bit better than some others. You'll have to pick individual boards for an accurate compare of what they are able to do, as I've only played with one Z68 MSI board, and the last before that was the MSI P45 Neo2 FIR, which is still kicking it with an e8400.
Something OP should take note of is their notoriously bad VRMs on certain models. Could be a potential hiccup if he were to need a higher overclock later down the road.

I have 890fxa-GD70 and love it though. Especially the bios. :P
Ryleh is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 6, 2012, 01:14 PM   #20
Riotpump
25 Posts
 
Riotpump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 61 (0.09/day)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts

System Specs

Intel+MSI combo all day. I have both that CPU and a MSI board and trust me even with a your current cpu you will notice a increase in all things gaming. This is coming from a AMD user...loved my old dusty dual core Athlon64 X2 5200. Oh though don't expect break necking performance in that game. As previously stated SWTOR is poorly optimized and people with high end rigs are having issues. Hopefully over time Bioware will improve performance.

Ironically from what I've read the latest version of the Hero Engine has DX11 and performs well. I guess they licensed it long ago and did their own tweaks/changes to it. To compare this is coming from someone who gets over 100 FPS(solo) normally, and then it falls off a cliff in warzones. You can also go to the Fleet when crowded and notice the same massive dip when around other players.
Riotpump is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 23, 2012, 01:05 PM   #21
Cratzky
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 288 (0.23/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 49 Times in 43 Posts

System Specs

Thanks everyone for ur answers

I went with this setup:

Intel i5 2500k
MSI Z68A-GD65 (G3)
Kingston Hyperx 1600mhz CL9

total cost for upgrade: 377euro

Waiting for the things to arrive, its like being a baby waiting for christmas presents, lol
Cratzky is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cratzky For This Useful Post:
Old Apr 23, 2012, 01:57 PM   #22
brandonwh64
Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!
 
brandonwh64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Chatsworth, GA
Posts: 13,564 (10.01/day)
Thanks: 2,147
Thanked 5,341 Times in 3,696 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to brandonwh64 Send a message via AIM to brandonwh64 Send a message via MSN to brandonwh64 Send a message via Yahoo to brandonwh64

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cratzky View Post
Thanks everyone for ur answers

I went with this setup:

Intel i5 2500k
MSI Z68A-GD65 (G3)
Kingston Hyperx 1600mhz CL9

total cost for upgrade: 377euro

Waiting for the things to arrive, its like being a baby waiting for christmas presents, lol
Great Choice!
__________________
Cruncher's:
All GPU's
GPU's:
7970 3GB *Unlocked* = 8 Threads
5770 1GB OCed = 2 Threads
brandonwh64 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
looking to upgrade/build(AMD vs Intel warning) p_o_s_pc System Builder's Advice 15 Sep 17, 2009 08:31 PM
New Upgrade. Intel or AMD? Wingo101 General Hardware 63 Nov 13, 2008 02:15 PM
Upgrade to Intel or Amd titan_zero General Hardware 20 May 22, 2008 04:04 PM
Is Intel doing an easy-upgrade dual-core (Like AMD) yet? AMDCam General Hardware 16 Apr 22, 2006 04:30 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts