techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Feb 7, 2012, 06:57 PM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,982 (7.30/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,898 Times in 5,649 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Heat Key To Faster HDDs...Hundreds of Times Faster

Physicists have discovered a new method of recording data on hard drives that could potentially make mechanical hard drives hundreds of times faster (in terms of performance). Heat holds the key. A hard disk drive is a magnetic storage device, which, unlike magnetic tapes, allows random access. Its recording surfaces consist of hundreds of billions of tiny portions that can be magnetized in a particular polar direction to represent 0s or 1s. To create meaningful arrangements of these portions (bytes), the recording heads apply an external magnetic field to flip their polarities.

A team of researchers led by Thomas Ostler at the University of York, UK concluded that the process of flipping the polarities of these tiny portions can be greatly expedited using short bursts of heat. It has been believed that heat could only assist in remagnetization, when used in conjunction with a magnetic field. Research shows that this can also be achieved using a very, very precise amount of heat generated by beaming a fine laser for less than a trillionth of a second, which momentarily raises its temperature by 800 °C. The results of this study was published here.



Researchers say that the new method of magnetic recording can achieve terabytes per second (1000 GB/s) recording/reading speeds. The process also uses less energy than magnetic recording, meaning the new drives would be more energy efficient.

Source: New Scientist, Image Courtesy Gizmodo
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 7, 2012, 07:06 PM   #2
Steevo
Eligible for custom title
 
Steevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,567 (2.02/day)
Thanks: 238
Thanked 979 Times in 729 Posts

System Specs

At a few watts for a drive I don't really care about energy use, however I would like them to expound upon the terrabytes per second of reading and writing with their technology, as I am understanding this it uses a laser to write at a much higher speed onto magnetic media, but I'm not sure what they have done differently to make reading any faster?


Grant money hunt anyone?
__________________

“it would have been perfect....its got trains and the line"tech your kids not to do what iv done"(or similar) because i had obviously done something to warrent 2 e-thugs to come 4000miles out of their way and kill me.” -Solaris17
“yeah i failed. i noticed the "coming soon" part after i posted.” -Mussels
“people are just stupid.” -W1zzard
Yes I am evil, yes you can have some.
Steevo is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Steevo For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 7, 2012, 07:07 PM   #3
m1dg3t
1000 Posts
 
m1dg3t's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,881 (1.72/day)
Thanks: 623
Thanked 419 Times in 344 Posts

System Specs

Interesting, temperature has long been known to affect magnetization but to see it implemented in this manner is a first! Maybe i should pull the fan's off my HDD's
__________________

Why dazzle 'em with brilliance when you can baffle 'em with bullshit.
Alterius non sit, qui potest esse sui!
Und setzet ihr nicht das leben ein, Nie wird euch das leben gewonnen sein!

If knowledge is power, then ignorance is bliss!
If god didn't want them sheared, he wouldn't have made them sheep!
m1dg3t is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2012, 07:08 PM   #4
tigger
I'm the only one
 
tigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: HU5 1LL
Posts: 7,201 (2.75/day)
Thanks: 470
Thanked 947 Times in 778 Posts
Send a message via MSN to tigger

System Specs

Yaay for British ingenuity.

And very interesting development for hard disc tech.
tigger is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to tigger For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 7, 2012, 07:12 PM   #5
WhiteLotus
3500 Posts
 
WhiteLotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Plymouth, UK
Posts: 4,804 (2.26/day)
Thanks: 529
Thanked 856 Times in 682 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by tigger View Post
Yaay for British ingenuity.

And very interesting development for hard disc tech.
Yup just read this, and instantly came over here to see if anyone had picked up on it.

Hurray for the University of York!
__________________
http://tpucdn.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic41435_1.gif

“Sorry but I cannot respond now, I am running a full virus scan on the internet.” -brandonwh64
WhiteLotus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2012, 07:15 PM   #6
Delta6326
2000 Posts
 
Delta6326's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Iowa, USA
Posts: 3,288 (1.80/day)
Thanks: 557
Thanked 597 Times in 437 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Delta6326

System Specs

... How much will cost to add a laser gun to the HD?

Sounds cool(no pun intended) If this get popular than hopefully it will drive prices of more practical stuff down. As it will take a long time to be able transfer stuff at those speeds.

And for the energy use this would be helpful for large servers with TB's of memory. Take a server with over 120TB's say they all are 2TB thats 60HD's that can create a lot of heat and power.
__________________
Delta6326 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2012, 07:26 PM   #7
theonedub
habe fidem
 
theonedub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 6,603 (4.46/day)
Thanks: 2,269
Thanked 3,188 Times in 1,923 Posts

System Specs

What interface would support transfer speeds that fast?
theonedub is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2012, 07:34 PM   #8
crazyeyesreaper
Chief Broken Rig
 
crazyeyesreaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 04578
Posts: 6,011 (3.96/day)
Thanks: 760
Thanked 2,219 Times in 1,556 Posts

System Specs

PCIe

aka PCIe 3.0 x1 = 2GB/s
crazyeyesreaper is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2012, 07:35 PM   #9
sneekypeet
Unpaid Babysitter
 
sneekypeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 19,003 (7.32/day)
Thanks: 3,035
Thanked 5,487 Times in 3,950 Posts

System Specs

Wonder how long it takes someone to buy one of these and strip it down for that 800*C temperature, pew pew laser. Good idea on the tech, but I think letting the average Joe have access to these lasers has to be bad news somehow
__________________
Hers: ASUS Maximus V Gene / i7 3770K / Swiftech H220 / 4X8GB Corsair Dominators / ASUS GTX660 / Corsair AX-760 / Windows 7 64bit / Fractal Design ARC Midi R2

Test: Gigabyte Z68X-UD4-B3 / i7 2600K / A lot Of Coolers / Ripjaws Currently / HIS HD7950 IceQ Turbo / Silverstone SST-ST85F-G / Windows 7 64bit / InWin D-Frame Limited Edition
sneekypeet is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2012, 07:35 PM   #10
extrasalty
75 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 174 (0.12/day)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 25 Times in 18 Posts

System Specs

Can't wait for the sharks with the frickin laser beams.
extrasalty is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to extrasalty For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 7, 2012, 07:38 PM   #11
m1dg3t
1000 Posts
 
m1dg3t's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,881 (1.72/day)
Thanks: 623
Thanked 419 Times in 344 Posts

System Specs

Pretty sure if you got the cash you can get 1,000mw+ laser's, in a variety of colour's as well! Not sure if they'll hit 800c but they are said to be able to light thing's on fire and cut certain material's

You could have shark's with red/green or blue/purple or any combination lol
__________________

Why dazzle 'em with brilliance when you can baffle 'em with bullshit.
Alterius non sit, qui potest esse sui!
Und setzet ihr nicht das leben ein, Nie wird euch das leben gewonnen sein!

If knowledge is power, then ignorance is bliss!
If god didn't want them sheared, he wouldn't have made them sheep!
m1dg3t is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2012, 07:46 PM   #12
jsfitz54
500 Posts
 
jsfitz54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 771 (0.72/day)
Thanks: 192
Thanked 178 Times in 154 Posts

System Specs

My question would be: Will this get defeated by those who want to develope SSDs as the new platform?

Every indication would leave one to believe that mechanical drives are going the way of the dinosaur.

What about Capacity per GB expense?
jsfitz54 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2012, 07:52 PM   #13
Batou1986
1000 Posts
 
Batou1986's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Baltimore MD
Posts: 1,937 (0.69/day)
Thanks: 123
Thanked 282 Times in 236 Posts

System Specs

brb benchmarking the raptor in the oven............
Batou1986 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Batou1986 For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 7, 2012, 07:53 PM   #14
phanbuey
Eligible for custom title
 
phanbuey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 5,010 (2.48/day)
Thanks: 1,484
Thanked 959 Times in 812 Posts

System Specs

or... you could buy four modern SSD's now and put them into a 4xRaid 0.
phanbuey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2012, 08:14 PM   #15
twicksisted
2000 Posts
 
twicksisted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,234 (1.09/day)
Thanks: 391
Thanked 358 Times in 285 Posts

System Specs

Cool idea, wonder how it would be "safely" implemented in home computing.
Temperatures of 800c inside a component as small as an HDD sounds like a fire risk. Also with that heat im guessing there would be a lot of wear & tear.
__________________
twicksisted is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2012, 08:15 PM   #16
a_ump
2000 Posts
 
a_ump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Fairmont, WV
Posts: 3,081 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 317 Times in 294 Posts
Send a message via AIM to a_ump

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by phanbuey View Post
or... you could buy four modern SSD's now and put them into a 4xRaid 0.
sounds like a lot of work compared to if one of these drives were available.

Here's my question, even if the laser only has to beam for a trillionth of a second, and say i'm transfering a massive amount of data(take the server example above) of 120TB, wouldn't the constant beaming cause instability, bc the drive would eventually heat up too much. I suppose that's the only thing holding this back.
__________________
My Heatware

MRCL:What if Jesus came by and Apocalypse actually would happen? Weer:Then I'd be more afraid that other works of fiction would come true, such as Harry Potter.”
a_ump is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2012, 08:17 PM   #17
Beertintedgoggles
500 Posts
 
Beertintedgoggles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 692 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 63
Thanked 194 Times in 144 Posts

System Specs

Eh, if you look at the numbers it seems all they did was present that the laser only needs less than a trillionth of a second to flip the magnetic polarity so they extrapolated that they could then potentially flip a trillion bits in one second (1 TB, you can see they are using the decimal 1 TB = 1000 GB). While cool that the theory could potentiall lead to faster writes on a mechanical HD, this is still to far off from implementation to get a rise out of me.

Additionally, as was mentioned above, this doesn't appear to help with read times at all.

Edit: Forgot to mention, this isn't going to help seek times either unless they speed up the RPM's.
Beertintedgoggles is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Beertintedgoggles For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 7, 2012, 08:26 PM   #18
Jizzler
2000 Posts
 
Jizzler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Geneva, FL, USA
Posts: 3,010 (1.43/day)
Thanks: 567
Thanked 606 Times in 487 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beertintedgoggles View Post
Additionally, as was mentioned above, this doesn't appear to help with read times at all.

Edit: Forgot to mention, this isn't going to help seek times either unless they speed up the RPM's.
Combine with: http://www.techpowerup.com/97827/Har...r_to_SSDs.html

Better seek times, more speed
Jizzler is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jizzler For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 7, 2012, 08:44 PM   #19
Sasqui
Eligible for custom title
 
Sasqui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,052 (2.22/day)
Thanks: 820
Thanked 906 Times in 740 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beertintedgoggles View Post
Eh, if you look at the numbers it seems all they did was present that the laser only needs less than a trillionth of a second to flip the magnetic polarity so they extrapolated that they could then potentially flip a trillion bits in one second (1 TB, you can see they are using the decimal 1 TB = 1000 GB). While cool that the theory could potentiall lead to faster writes on a mechanical HD, this is still to far off from implementation to get a rise out of me.

Additionally, as was mentioned above, this doesn't appear to help with read times at all.

Edit: Forgot to mention, this isn't going to help seek times either unless they speed up the RPM's.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jizzler View Post
Combine with: http://www.techpowerup.com/97827/Har...r_to_SSDs.html

Better seek times, more speed
You still have to move either the read/write head, or the media. That'll be the bottleneck (not even counting the current interface technology)
__________________
Heatware
Sasqui is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2012, 08:46 PM   #20
Kantastic
3500 Posts
 
Kantastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Big Apple
Posts: 4,976 (3.38/day)
Thanks: 1,252
Thanked 930 Times in 739 Posts

System Specs

This is great and all, but I can't help but feel this is garbage propaganda spewed out by the HDD industry to offset enthusiasm and focus for SSDs. Moving parts will never be as efficient, and when refined, as easily produced as something flash-based.
__________________
Heatware
Kantastic is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Kantastic For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 7, 2012, 09:08 PM   #21
white phantom
75 Posts
 
white phantom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Kilmarnock Scotland
Posts: 197 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 52
Thanked 35 Times in 29 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by m1dg3t View Post
Interesting, temperature has long been known to affect magnetization but to see it implemented in this manner is a first! Maybe i should pull the fan's off my HDD's
exactly what i was thinking lol all this time a cool drives a happy drive, now they are saying a roasting hot drive is a faster drive
white phantom is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2012, 09:17 PM   #22
Steevo
Eligible for custom title
 
Steevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,567 (2.02/day)
Thanks: 238
Thanked 979 Times in 729 Posts

System Specs

Cooling your hard drive is a waste anyway, it has been proven that cooler temps on hard drives results in earlier death.
__________________

“it would have been perfect....its got trains and the line"tech your kids not to do what iv done"(or similar) because i had obviously done something to warrent 2 e-thugs to come 4000miles out of their way and kill me.” -Solaris17
“yeah i failed. i noticed the "coming soon" part after i posted.” -Mussels
“people are just stupid.” -W1zzard
Yes I am evil, yes you can have some.
Steevo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2012, 09:29 PM   #23
Shihabyooo
200 Posts
 
Shihabyooo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hell on Earth -or someplace similar-
Posts: 487 (0.56/day)
Thanks: 160
Thanked 107 Times in 87 Posts

System Specs

Well, that would be one OC you won't mind the increased temperature with >_>
__________________
MAL

-~--Please excuse my poor English.
Shihabyooo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2012, 09:44 PM   #24
Jizzler
2000 Posts
 
Jizzler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Geneva, FL, USA
Posts: 3,010 (1.43/day)
Thanks: 567
Thanked 606 Times in 487 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasqui View Post
You still have to move either the read/write head, or the media. That'll be the bottleneck (not even counting the current interface technology)
Yup, but I'll take it. 64+ heads helps
Jizzler is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2012, 10:12 PM   #25
Kreij
Hardcore Monkey Moderator
 
Kreij's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cheeseland (Wisconsin, USA)
Posts: 12,113 (5.28/day)
Thanks: 591
Thanked 5,492 Times in 2,936 Posts

System Specs

Interesting concept but it leaves a lot of questions.
What's the cool down time for the spot the laser hits and cooks to 800°C?
If adjacent heat transfer occurs between laser points, the platter is going to have to be made out of ceramic (think space shuttle tiles) to perform sequential writes.
__________________

Cloud (noun, singular): A dynamic arrangement of multiple potential single points of failure, with a user at one end and their data at the other.


Get more tech news on a wide variety of topics at NextPowerUp
Kreij is online now  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nvidia claims 570 times faster gpu's in 6 years KainXS NVIDIA 46 Aug 31, 2009 10:31 PM
NVIDIA Prepares GeForce 9500, up to 3 times Faster than 8500 GT btarunr News 18 Jul 7, 2008 03:14 AM
faster heat removal via wind tunnel Nitro-Max Cases, Modding & Electronics 0 Feb 3, 2008 01:09 AM
New Phase-change Memory 1000 Times Faster than Flash malware News 17 Sep 25, 2007 12:11 PM
ATI Avivo encoding five times faster than traditional means Darksaber News 0 Nov 29, 2005 03:36 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts