![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Europe
Posts: 108 (0.13/day)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 31 Times in 20 Posts
|
use SB Audigy or onboard Relatek ALC892 ?
Hi folks,
I have a rather oldish Soundblaster Audigy lying around. I used the card in the days when onboard audio was not so widespread as it is today. My current computer of course now has onboard audio, a Realtek ALC892 codec (is that the hardware chip or a layer on top?). I plan to attach my computer to my home audio system (stereo amplifier Marantz PM7003 with analog cinch inputs). Which audio source should I use? The Audigy card or the onboard Realtek thing? Which produces a more crisp, a lesser distored signal for 16bit/44.1kHz lossless files? The Audigy is quite old so maybe the technics have evolved with the Realtek. However it is onboard so crosstalking from CPU and other motherboard circuits might be possible? Specs: Audigy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_B...rst_generation Realtek: http://www.realtek.com/products/prod...n=4&ProdID=284 Last edited by scooper22; Feb 9, 2012 at 02:27 PM. Reason: bits and pieces |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
I'm the only one
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: HU5 1LL
Posts: 7,189 (2.75/day)
Thanks: 469
Thanked 940 Times in 773 Posts
|
If you are connecting via analogue, i would say the card, if you are using digital out from your board, then use the onboard.
__________________
http://img.techpowerup.org/110324/v6351cpuzvalj197.jpg ]Monster E6300 oc http://www.techpowerup.com/gallery/2163.html |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to tigger For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Europe
Posts: 108 (0.13/day)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 31 Times in 20 Posts
|
Both Audigy and onboard have optical out but the amp only has analog in as it's a stereo amplifier (not home cinema). If it would have I would have attached it by optical...
![]() tigger: what is your reasoning? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
I'm the only one
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: HU5 1LL
Posts: 7,189 (2.75/day)
Thanks: 469
Thanked 940 Times in 773 Posts
|
The analogue section on the card will be better than it is on the onboard, the s/n ratio on the card will be lots better than on your onboard. Onboard is usually around 80-90DB s/n, the card will be easily 100+ s/n. If you was using digital, it makes no difference really quality wise.
__________________
http://img.techpowerup.org/110324/v6351cpuzvalj197.jpg ]Monster E6300 oc http://www.techpowerup.com/gallery/2163.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Europe
Posts: 108 (0.13/day)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 31 Times in 20 Posts
|
Audigy claims to have 100 dB, Realtek claims to have 95 dB.
Any insights on the specs I posted above? |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
![]() Join Date: May 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 328 (0.45/day)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 110 Times in 97 Posts
|
Quote:
I guess you may need to use the Realtek ALC892, since the official Audigy (emu10k2) series drivers by Creative Labs do not support more than 4 GB system memory (if I remember it correctly); with more than 4 GB ram you will get random crashes and mic issues. The only driver that support more than 4 GB ram are the last beta and newest alpha project KX drivers. Although, you can always try the other unofficial driver pack for the Audigy series that's made by Daniel_K; the latest Daniel_K Audigy driver pack is just released in January this year. |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to TC-man For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Europe
Posts: 108 (0.13/day)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 31 Times in 20 Posts
|
I used the kX drivers back then on XP x86 and was happy with them. Seems like they are also compatible with x64, so I'd rather use them than broken and halfpatched CL drivers.
Back to sound quality... which one?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Baltimore MD
Posts: 1,936 (0.69/day)
Thanks: 123
Thanked 282 Times in 236 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Batou1986 For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Europe
Posts: 108 (0.13/day)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 31 Times in 20 Posts
|
Plugged my Audigy in and, man!, this is such a great card. I'm using the kX drivers as they offer the most flexibiliy and tuning options and are compatible with 7x64.
Using the DSP routing I was able to route stereo sound to both the front and the back speakers as a surround copy and now have two output jacks playing the sound, one for my headphones and one for my amp. This card is so freaking great ![]() e.g. kX DSP (one of the many modules): ![]() ![]() ![]() there's more than 50 or so effects that can be connected at heart's desire, all fully configurable and reusable multiple times... surround mixer, 10-band-eq and band pass, reverb, delays, compression... all at the hardware/driver level. Amazing!
Last edited by scooper22; Feb 19, 2012 at 09:50 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() |
if you'd ask me audigy does not perform well if you use it under windows 7 platform. if you are using XP go for it if not realtek is much better in windows 7. Driver architecture of realtek HD audio is much more superior to the old Audigy in windows 7. Using Windows XP iv even used Realtek 1200 but still went for xtreme music 0460, not just that SB audigy and above handle sound better if you have plugged in sound systems then any other on board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Europe
Posts: 108 (0.13/day)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 31 Times in 20 Posts
|
Hm,
- what exactly does not perform well under Windows 7? - which driver architecture does the realtek have and which does the Audigy have and which of the first makes it better than the last? Also the DSP of the Audigy does everything "by itself" and without the CPU, unlike e.g. soft modems do. Example of a line-in-through-DSP-to-Speakers-setup without any computer input or output signal, running only on the card's DSP: ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Hi! I'm from the Internet
Posts: 3,739 (6.97/day)
Thanks: 2,530
Thanked 2,443 Times in 1,468 Posts
|
I am also using an Sb audigy in one of my systems and love it. Mine has the live drive.
![]()
__________________
Crunchers : Phenom II x6 1090t / 2x Phenom II x6 1055t / Phenom II x4 970BE / “I always succed in my mission tho. Beer just delays it!” -ChaoticAtmosphere
“TPU is very mild, and I love to tell people I love them when they are being retarded, it makes me feel special in my special places. What was the point of this thread again? Oh well, I love all of you.” -Steevo
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Served 5k and counting ...
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Youngstown, OH
Posts: 16,121 (7.15/day)
Thanks: 4,149
Thanked 4,552 Times in 4,027 Posts
|
My vote: Audigy. Just the driver level controls in itself are pretty good. Also you still have people experimenting with 3rd party development on them to make it even better.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Comparing Sound: Onboard - Audigy - Standard PCI | Wingo101 | General Hardware | 6 | Jan 27, 2009 06:26 PM |
| Use onboard HD 3200 or 9600GSO? | xazraelx | Graphics Cards | 7 | Oct 10, 2008 04:58 PM |
| Creative Audigy 2 ZS or RealTek AC97' onboard sound? | Widjaja | General Hardware | 6 | Apr 23, 2008 01:45 AM |
| Asus P5K premium onboard sound or Creative audigy 2 ZS? | tostator | General Hardware | 1 | Dec 4, 2007 10:35 PM |
| Onboard Audio (Audigy SE) Does Not Work | Jenesis | General Hardware | 27 | May 31, 2007 10:38 AM |