techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > General Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Feb 13, 2012, 07:54 PM   #1
happy
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 615 (0.88/day)
Thanks: 192
Thanked 25 Times in 23 Posts

System Specs

ASRock P67 EXTREME4 GEN3 P67 Vs. GIGABYTE GA-Z68MA-D2H-B3

Wouldn't the Gigabyte mobo be better than the AsRock? I am planning to overclock my i5 2500k, and also crossfire x2 6950. The Gigabyte is x16 and x8 when Crossfire x2, and the AsRock is dual x8 when crossfire. I understand that the AsRock is PCI-E 3.0 but I don't plan to change my CPU anytime soon so which would be the best bet. I already got the AsRock for $120. Should I return for the Gigabyte which is $101?


Thanks.
happy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2012, 07:59 PM   #2
brandonwh64
Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!
 
brandonwh64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Chatsworth, GA
Posts: 13,564 (10.01/day)
Thanks: 2,147
Thanked 5,341 Times in 3,696 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to brandonwh64 Send a message via AIM to brandonwh64 Send a message via MSN to brandonwh64 Send a message via Yahoo to brandonwh64

System Specs

The ASrock Extreme would be better IMO.
__________________
Cruncher's:
All GPU's
GPU's:
7970 3GB *Unlocked* = 8 Threads
5770 1GB OCed = 2 Threads
brandonwh64 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2012, 08:01 PM   #3
happy
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 615 (0.88/day)
Thanks: 192
Thanked 25 Times in 23 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandonwh64 View Post
The ASrock Extreme would be better IMO.
But wouldn't x16 and x8 be faster than x8 and x8?
happy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2012, 08:15 PM   #4
brandonwh64
Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!
 
brandonwh64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Chatsworth, GA
Posts: 13,564 (10.01/day)
Thanks: 2,147
Thanked 5,341 Times in 3,696 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to brandonwh64 Send a message via AIM to brandonwh64 Send a message via MSN to brandonwh64 Send a message via Yahoo to brandonwh64

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by happy View Post
But wouldn't x16 and x8 be faster than x8 and x8?
Honestly you wouldn't see much of a difference.
__________________
Cruncher's:
All GPU's
GPU's:
7970 3GB *Unlocked* = 8 Threads
5770 1GB OCed = 2 Threads
brandonwh64 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to brandonwh64 For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 13, 2012, 08:18 PM   #5
Maban
1000 Posts
 
Maban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,925 (1.01/day)
Thanks: 803
Thanked 554 Times in 362 Posts

System Specs

They are both x8/x8 with two cards. But yeah, either way it wouldn't make much of a difference.
Maban is online now  
More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Maban For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 13, 2012, 08:19 PM   #6
Crap Daddy
2000 Posts
 
Crap Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,289 (2.44/day)
Thanks: 945
Thanked 963 Times in 671 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by happy View Post
But wouldn't x16 and x8 be faster than x8 and x8?
It's the same there's no such thing as x16 and x8. When you populate the x8 lane, the x16 lane will run at the same x8 so you'll have 2x 8x. And don't return the ASRock, it's a beter board.
Crap Daddy is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Crap Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 13, 2012, 08:20 PM   #7
happy
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 615 (0.88/day)
Thanks: 192
Thanked 25 Times in 23 Posts

System Specs

Well thanks guys, I guess Imma opt for the cheaper one if they are the same. The only difference I see from the two is that the AsRock has PCI 3.0 and the extra 3.0 front panel and 2 more sata.

Thanks
happy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2012, 08:24 PM   #8
brandonwh64
Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!
 
brandonwh64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Chatsworth, GA
Posts: 13,564 (10.01/day)
Thanks: 2,147
Thanked 5,341 Times in 3,696 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to brandonwh64 Send a message via AIM to brandonwh64 Send a message via MSN to brandonwh64 Send a message via Yahoo to brandonwh64

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by happy View Post
Well thanks guys, I guess Imma opt for the cheaper one if they are the same. The only difference I see from the two is that the AsRock has PCI 3.0 and the extra 3.0 front panel and 2 more sata.

Thanks
You would get better performance out of the ASRock P67 EXTREME4 GEN3 though
__________________
Cruncher's:
All GPU's
GPU's:
7970 3GB *Unlocked* = 8 Threads
5770 1GB OCed = 2 Threads
brandonwh64 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2012, 08:25 PM   #9
happy
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 615 (0.88/day)
Thanks: 192
Thanked 25 Times in 23 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandonwh64 View Post
You would get better performance out of the ASRock P67 EXTREME4 GEN3 though
Can you specify better performance? I thought every mobo was the same. Just different features.
happy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2012, 08:28 PM   #10
brandonwh64
Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!
 
brandonwh64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Chatsworth, GA
Posts: 13,564 (10.01/day)
Thanks: 2,147
Thanked 5,341 Times in 3,696 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to brandonwh64 Send a message via AIM to brandonwh64 Send a message via MSN to brandonwh64 Send a message via Yahoo to brandonwh64

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by happy View Post
Can you specify better performance? I thought every mobo was the same. Just different features.
Better OCing performance
__________________
Cruncher's:
All GPU's
GPU's:
7970 3GB *Unlocked* = 8 Threads
5770 1GB OCed = 2 Threads
brandonwh64 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2012, 08:30 PM   #11
happy
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 615 (0.88/day)
Thanks: 192
Thanked 25 Times in 23 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandonwh64 View Post
Better OCing performance
I see. But I have read reviews that the Gigabyte could overclock the i5 2500k to 4.8ghz in some reviews. I understand the AsRock is good but will it be drastically different in performance than the Gigabyte?
happy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2012, 08:34 PM   #12
brandonwh64
Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!
 
brandonwh64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Chatsworth, GA
Posts: 13,564 (10.01/day)
Thanks: 2,147
Thanked 5,341 Times in 3,696 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to brandonwh64 Send a message via AIM to brandonwh64 Send a message via MSN to brandonwh64 Send a message via Yahoo to brandonwh64

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by happy View Post
I see. But I have read reviews that the Gigabyte could overclock the i5 2500k to 4.8ghz in some reviews. I understand the AsRock is good but will it be drastically different in performance than the Gigabyte?
Well compaired to the mATX board you are looking at the ASrock has the Digi Power, Advanced V8 + 2 Power Phase Design. Would be alot better for OCing the 2500K. I also did the same as you and relied on reviews until I got my board. it has the cheap 4+1 Phase and does not do as well as the cheaper full ATX boards with higher phases.
__________________
Cruncher's:
All GPU's
GPU's:
7970 3GB *Unlocked* = 8 Threads
5770 1GB OCed = 2 Threads
brandonwh64 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to brandonwh64 For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 13, 2012, 08:36 PM   #13
mrw1986
1000 Posts
 
mrw1986's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wallingford, CT
Posts: 1,997 (0.90/day)
Thanks: 122
Thanked 338 Times in 260 Posts

System Specs

I have that exact ASRock and it gets my 2500k to 4.8ghz @ 1.38v and 5ghz @ 1.41v. I would take the ASRock over that Gigabyte any day. I run a GB mobo in my other PC and its flawless, but you can not beat the value of the ASRock.
__________________
Visit TechFuzion.net

My Heatware
mrw1986 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mrw1986 For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 13, 2012, 08:37 PM   #14
OnePostWonder
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 486 (0.30/day)
Thanks: 61
Thanked 90 Times in 71 Posts

System Specs

There are a lot of differences between those two boards. What I do is go on to Newegg, have one board in one tab and the other board/s in another, then line them up on the specs page and flip between the two tabs. It's the easiest way of seeing the differences.

If one board lacks what you need, then you know you should look for another board. If both boards have what you need, then the next place to look is to reviews and see what performance they are getting on the average, while keeping their respective prices in mind. Naturally if they both scale linearly with their price, then what you come down to is how much you want to spend.

That P67 board is one of the best P67 boards you can get as far as stability goes (per reviews).
OnePostWonder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2012, 08:37 PM   #15
happy
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 615 (0.88/day)
Thanks: 192
Thanked 25 Times in 23 Posts

System Specs

Thanks for the insight.
happy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2012, 08:40 PM   #16
happy
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 615 (0.88/day)
Thanks: 192
Thanked 25 Times in 23 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by OnePostWonder View Post
There are a lot of differences between those two boards. What I do is go on to Newegg, have one board in one tab and the other board/s in another, then line them up on the specs page and flip between the two tabs. It's the easiest way of seeing the differences.

If one board lacks what you need, then you know you should look for another board. If both boards have what you need, then the next place to look is to reviews and see what performance they are getting on the average, while keeping their respective prices in mind. Naturally if they both scale linearly with their price, then what you come down to is how much you want to spend.

That P67 board is one of the best P67 boards you can get as far as stability goes (per reviews).
I did exactly what you said prior to buying the mobo. But the price of the Gigabyte drastically decreased; hence, I had to see if I should return the AsRock for a twenty dollar difference.

Thanks for that bit of info though.
happy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2012, 08:40 PM   #17
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 31,930 (12.77/day)
Thanks: 2,789
Thanked 12,304 Times in 7,823 Posts

System Specs

The Gigabyte board uses old open chokes and not enough of them. It's cheaply made. The AsRock board has much better components than the Gigabyte.
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2012, 08:41 PM   #18
happy
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 615 (0.88/day)
Thanks: 192
Thanked 25 Times in 23 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by erocker View Post
The Gigabyte board uses old open chokes and not enough of them. It's cheaply made. The AsRock board has much better components than the Gigabyte.
I don't know what you mean but I guess from all your input, the AsRock would be the best option to choose from.
happy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2012, 09:16 PM   #19
JrRacinFan
Served 5k and counting ...
 
JrRacinFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Youngstown, OH
Posts: 16,121 (7.14/day)
Thanks: 4,149
Thanked 4,552 Times in 4,027 Posts
Send a message via AIM to JrRacinFan Send a message via Yahoo to JrRacinFan

System Specs

From what I heard dont use a heavy cooler on the asrock as its a thinner PCB and may warp a little easier.
JrRacinFan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2012, 09:37 PM   #20
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 31,930 (12.77/day)
Thanks: 2,789
Thanked 12,304 Times in 7,823 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by JrRacinFan View Post
From what I heard dont use a heavy cooler on the asrock as its a thinner PCB and may warp a little easier.
I have the z68 version (same PCB) and there's no issue in that regard. I've used a Coolermaster V8 and I've got my current waterblock clamped down pretty tight. Minimal flexing and I've seen much worse on more expensive boards.
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to erocker For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 13, 2012, 10:18 PM   #21
Paulieg
The Mad Moderator
 
Paulieg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wherever I can find the iron.
Posts: 11,448 (5.01/day)
Thanks: 2,519
Thanked 3,054 Times in 2,098 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Paulieg

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by erocker View Post
I have the z68 version (same PCB) and there's no issue in that regard. I've used a Coolermaster V8 and I've got my current waterblock clamped down pretty tight. Minimal flexing and I've seen much worse on more expensive boards.
I can back this up. The PCB is not any thinner than any other quality board, nor have I seen any flexing with a Venomous-X, and a Swifty Apogee HD block installed. The board itself is very high quality, and I'm surprised that it isn't more expensive.
__________________
"I have found the Iron to be my greatest friend. It never freaks out on me, never runs. Friends may come and go. But two hundred pounds is always two hundred pounds."
-Henry Rollins


My heatware
Save lives by joining the TPU WCG team!
Paulieg is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Paulieg For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 13, 2012, 11:10 PM   #22
brandonwh64
Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!
 
brandonwh64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Chatsworth, GA
Posts: 13,564 (10.01/day)
Thanks: 2,147
Thanked 5,341 Times in 3,696 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to brandonwh64 Send a message via AIM to brandonwh64 Send a message via MSN to brandonwh64 Send a message via Yahoo to brandonwh64

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by JrRacinFan View Post
From what I heard dont use a heavy cooler on the asrock as its a thinner PCB and may warp a little easier.
ASrock has nice PCB's the only motherboard manufacturer I have seen to have a thin PCB is EVGA
__________________
Cruncher's:
All GPU's
GPU's:
7970 3GB *Unlocked* = 8 Threads
5770 1GB OCed = 2 Threads
brandonwh64 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to brandonwh64 For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 14, 2012, 01:26 AM   #23
JrRacinFan
Served 5k and counting ...
 
JrRacinFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Youngstown, OH
Posts: 16,121 (7.14/day)
Thanks: 4,149
Thanked 4,552 Times in 4,027 Posts
Send a message via AIM to JrRacinFan Send a message via Yahoo to JrRacinFan

System Specs

Thanks guys. Just was hear say.
JrRacinFan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Asrock p67 pro3 / i5 2500k overclock problem cmc7 Overclocking & Cooling 50 Apr 26, 2012 04:28 PM
PMW function not working with ASRock P67 EXTREME4 dirtyferret Overclocking & Cooling 0 Dec 27, 2011 10:51 PM
Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3: PCI-E x16 slots not performing according to specs Starla Motherboards & Memory 4 Dec 16, 2011 06:58 PM
Asrock P67 clubhouse erixx Motherboards & Memory 21 Jul 31, 2011 03:57 PM
2600k cant OC well on Asrock p67 fatal1ty warup89 Overclocking & Cooling 9 Apr 30, 2011 05:31 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts