![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,030 (7.22/day)
Thanks: 790
Thanked 13,028 Times in 5,719 Posts
|
Top NVIDIA GK104 Part Gets GeForce GTX 670 Ti Branding
NVIDIA has reportedly named the top desktop graphics card based on its upcoming 28 nm GK104 GPU GeForce GTX 670 Ti. The GK104 is a spiritual-successor to GF114 (which in-turn, to GF104), and NVIDIA is eager to get this part out fast, so it could consolidate on the performance thru high-end segment, before it's certain that it won't face issues with its foundry partners, so it could go ahead and launch parts based on the GK110. Interestingly, NVIDIA chose to name the highest-performing GK104-based SKU GTX 670 Ti and not GTX 660 Ti, probably indicating that this part will perform competitively with high-end parts out in the market today, including AMD's recently-launched Radeon HD 7000 series.
Speaking of performance, sources told SweClockers that they expect the GeForce GTX 670 Ti to outperform GeForce GTX 580 and Radeon HD 7950. Its specifications doing rounds on the web suggest it has a radically different number-crunching machinery. Industry analyst DigiTimes recently pinned launches of GeForce Kepler family to begin in April, though we're hearing there will be substantial activity surrounding these GPUs in March. Sources: SweClockers, VR-Zone Chinese, English |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 303 (0.19/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 35 Times in 23 Posts
|
The should seriously slap the people that make up the names.
What is up with that "Ti" bullshit? Stop trying to make stuff more complex than it has to be. |
|
|
|
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ZoneDymo For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Trollithia
Posts: 1,611 (1.55/day)
Thanks: 141
Thanked 666 Times in 309 Posts
|
I Agree, i was hoping the GTX560 Ti was a one time thing. this is so pointless, like they lack of branding solutions
what is wrong with something like: GT620 GT640 GTS650 GTX660 GTX670 GTX680 ? Need another GPU between the GTX660 and the GTX670? call it GTX665 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 1 Post
|
Sigh...
Were you born the last decade or something? The Ti suffix has been around since the Geforce 3 days. It's not Nvidia's fault if you are overwhelm by something so simple.
|
|
|
|
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Kookie For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 621 (0.31/day)
Thanks: 2,266
Thanked 47 Times in 38 Posts
|
LMAO...well said!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Fabry Perot cavity,AlGaAs-GaAs Heterojunction
Posts: 287 (0.33/day)
Thanks: 97
Thanked 131 Times in 62 Posts
|
What do they call the GK110 cards ? GTX 680 Ti and GTX680 ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Perth-Westen Australia
Posts: 3,385 (1.52/day)
Thanks: 436
Thanked 315 Times in 256 Posts
|
>_< give me GTX 680 to cream HD 7970 why release a slower card poo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,030 (7.22/day)
Thanks: 790
Thanked 13,028 Times in 5,719 Posts
|
Because the crown chip of this series is not ready.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Marlow, ENGLAND
Posts: 1,454 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 149
Thanked 279 Times in 226 Posts
|
It actually first appeared with the GeForce2 Ti a year earlier.
__________________
Alienware M11x R1 Netbook: 1.3GHz Core2 Duo U7300 (OC'd to 1.7GHz) | 8GB Corsair DDR3 1333MHz | nVIDIA GeForce GT 335M 1GB/Intel GMA 4500MHD Hyrbid Graphics System | Western Digital Scorpio Black 500GB | Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit ![]() Microsoft Certified Desktop Support Technician | CompTIA A+ Certified Heatware |
|
|
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Red_Machine For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The armpit of California
Posts: 1,068 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 156
Thanked 238 Times in 142 Posts
|
So they are shifting the 104 number to the 70 series now. Probably a good move. Maybe, each GPU is going to be suitable for 2 performance levels. But I sure as heck hope NV allows more than dual SLI on their midrange.
Hey, if you think NV's lineup is confusing, just wait till AMD gets done with all their GPUs + Trinity. Already got a glimpse of that with Llano. Zomg, too many numbers. Crossfire didn't help because APU + GPU added a letter on the end too. Now try to make heads of tails of performance levels from mobile and desktop lines. I miss the days when both companies just had 3-4 basic models. Low end, mid range, high end. Then came XT, Ultra...gah. Really, we don't need that much! I would concede to allowing 6 variations, but more than that is just...wasting silicon. Just end up in bargain clearance racks in the end anyways.
__________________
"We tried to help Intel, but they don’t listen much. We’ve been telling them for years that their graphics suck…" -Steve Jobs |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Perth-Westen Australia
Posts: 3,385 (1.52/day)
Thanks: 436
Thanked 315 Times in 256 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cobourg,Ontario
Posts: 1,369 (0.72/day)
Thanks: 1,139
Thanked 253 Times in 210 Posts
|
How can they say it outperforms the 580 and 7970 on just the specs floating around the net....If true just watch AMD come out with the 7980(the mystery Sapphire card on the release sheet) and the 7990(dual core)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Redditch, Worcestershire, England
Posts: 2,681 (2.32/day)
Thanks: 336
Thanked 865 Times in 612 Posts
|
Same shit different day.
__________________
![]() Bioshock Infinite, FC3, Crysis 3, Shogun 2, Dirt Showdown AMD bundle keys for sale:
http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=182837 |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() |
damn it!!! I HATE odd numbers.......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,030 (7.22/day)
Thanks: 790
Thanked 13,028 Times in 5,719 Posts
|
Good for you, 670 is even.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | ||
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Perth-Westen Australia
Posts: 3,385 (1.52/day)
Thanks: 436
Thanked 315 Times in 256 Posts
|
Quote:
fanboyQuote:
|
||
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Live OR Die For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#17 |
![]() |
Naming choice kinda telling, yeah?
Mid-range part clocked to be in the higher bracket. I still think core ipc is slightly over half-way between 7870 and 7950. As-in, it will probably have 20% on Pitcairn, and 7950 will have 5-<10% on it, but 1.1875 greater clockspeed than 7950 will place it between the 7900 series skus. 5-<10% because of ipc, 6-8% because of memory bandwidth disparity puts 670ti ahead at those clocks. I refuse to go by these arbitrary sku clocks when 28nm clocks so ridiculously high, none of the AMD skus seem to be held back substantially by powertune, the ppc on 7970 is so ridiculously small over 7950, and 7950/7870 should be boatloads more efficient while 7970 should be similar-ish to 670ti. I'm waiting on power consumption at stock and when overclocked (TPU's specialty, thanks W1z!), and nvidia's clock potential vs AMD on the core and memory controller. Should be interesting vs. 7950 and 7870. I'm especially curious where each will stand when consuming approx. 225w...What I imagine will be the powertune limits for the amd skus and probably much closer to the stock tdp for 670ti. nVIDIA are magicians and I just hope people don't want to be...fooled. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 303 (0.19/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 35 Times in 23 Posts
|
Quote:
Oh thats right, nowhere. Pro tip: think before you post because your comment really is just dumb. I am not overwhelm(ed) by anything here, its just a stupid and unnecessary name scheme. What they for example did with the 200 series is almost how it should be. GTX280, Nvidia makes revision on that card and instead of calling it something stupid like GTX280Ti (which makes it look to most as if its some factory overclocked card like Evga's FTW name scheme) they called it the GTX285, simple and understandable for EVERYONE. (seriously there are more people on this planet then you, you might want to think about those). Now of course the GTX260 was a complete mess with its 2 revisions and worthless not really rename scheme. Again think things through before you comment. Your comment is so dumb honestly that it looks like its coming from some blind fanboy who can't handle people criticizing that which he worships. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 781 (1.41/day)
Thanks: 287
Thanked 184 Times in 119 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() |
If this is true, more important than the 670Ti and nonTi name is the fact that this card will not surpass the 7970 otherwise they would have called it GTX680. On the other hand I expect it to be more than 10% above the 580/7950 at stock clocks based on the specs leaked some time ago and which seem to be more or less right. If they will stick with the rumored price of $300-$350 then AMD has to do some serious adjustments in the price department for the 7900 and 7800 series.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,977 (3.28/day)
Thanks: 155
Thanked 486 Times in 387 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() Join Date: May 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,996 (1.78/day)
Thanks: 676
Thanked 451 Times in 373 Posts
|
__________________
Why dazzle 'em with brilliance when you can baffle 'em with bullshit. Alterius non sit, qui potest esse sui! Und setzet ihr nicht das leben ein, Nie wird euch das leben gewonnen sein! If knowledge is power, then ignorance is bliss! If god didn't want them sheared, he wouldn't have made them sheep! |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Look behind you!!
Posts: 819 (0.30/day)
Thanks: 73
Thanked 61 Times in 41 Posts
|
670ti doesnt sound like a "mid-range part" to me.Even the 570 was considered a higher end part.
I would say nVidia is releasing this first because its FAST and their yields are decent on it. It wont be a good day if Nv releases this and its faster than AMDs best offering ![]() With that said Nv seems adamant about how fast it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,084 (1.62/day)
Thanks: 336
Thanked 880 Times in 511 Posts
|
I'm not being argumetative but... where has Nvidia said what the performance for this card will be? All we've had is rumours and hearsay. Nothing official has been released by Nvidia commenting on the specific performance of the GK10'whatever'.
I challenge Nvidia to make a statement and stop being cowardly dicks.
__________________
My Heatware: http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=75854 |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 110 (0.07/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 28 Times in 16 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
Last edited by punani; Feb 21, 2012 at 07:40 PM. Reason: link |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GeForce GTX 670 Ti in March? | ViperXTR | NVIDIA | 23 | Mar 20, 2012 12:28 PM |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti 2gb vs. Nvidia GeForce GTX 570 1280mb | puma99dk| | NVIDIA | 9 | Jan 31, 2012 06:17 PM |
| NVIDIA Announces the GeForce GTX 480 and GeForce GTX 470 Graphics Cards | btarunr | News | 41 | Mar 29, 2010 11:39 AM |
| NVIDIA GeForce 181.20 WHQL Released - Adds Support for GeForce GTX 295 and GTX 285 | malware | News | 21 | Jan 11, 2009 09:40 AM |
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 and GeForce 280 GTX Price Cuts Now Official | malware | News | 37 | Jul 17, 2008 03:26 AM |