![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() |
amd piledriver looking better..4+ghz
http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/22/a...nt-clock-mesh/
don't know how many saw this, but man, its making me want to see a review on TPU for these next gen APU's...really want to replace my current system with these |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 457 (0.88/day)
Thanks: 640
Thanked 216 Times in 127 Posts
|
AMD's been pushing (for a while) for more cores and higher core clocks instead of IPC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() |
i mainly still like amd thanks to there graphics tech. was a huge ATI fan, and their APU's have the graphic muscle i want with low power...still want to see benches, i know at least the cpu won't stand up too well against intel but the whole package should do everything i want it to
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: C:\Program Files (x86)\Aphexdreamer\
Posts: 5,614 (2.59/day)
Thanks: 812
Thanked 888 Times in 674 Posts
|
my Bulldozer is already over 4Ghz :/
__________________
Sent from my PC using chrome. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 213 (0.46/day)
Thanks: 134
Thanked 157 Times in 63 Posts
|
AMDs look fast on paper but they don't use resources very well so they actually perform really slow in real life situations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
Posts: 8,443 (5.28/day)
Thanks: 1,188
Thanked 1,705 Times in 1,375 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Wild Wild East
Posts: 4,538 (4.23/day)
Thanks: 2,313
Thanked 1,327 Times in 908 Posts
|
actually they perform pretty well considering the IMC on AMDs are complete poop compared to intel IMCs which offers sky high memory bandwidth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: C:\Program Files (x86)\Aphexdreamer\
Posts: 5,614 (2.59/day)
Thanks: 812
Thanked 888 Times in 674 Posts
|
Well couldn't they have released my chip at 4ghz? I would have just gotten less of an overclock lol.
__________________
Sent from my PC using chrome. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() |
well cpu wise, i'm fine with amd, sure it would be nice to be faster but it does what i need it to. i like the gpu's and this is an all-in-one package that could replace my current htpc and give me a much lower power usage but similar or better performance...i'm all over that!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 708 (0.54/day)
Thanks: 98
Thanked 116 Times in 99 Posts
|
amd piledriver looking better 4+ghz??
why would it in eath be better because of idiot high stock speed?
probally it crappy like faildozer, intel once prove with P4's that high stock clock isn't good,TDP and temp wise amd musst go back to handcraft cpu's and get better performance per clock instead off high stock clocks and ditch the Module stuff no hating, i don't want a flame war and don't look @ my sig.:P
__________________
intel + nvidia the best amd
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,198 (0.52/day)
Thanks: 49
Thanked 171 Times in 133 Posts
|
They could've, but not at the TDP rating they gave your processor at stock. I expect significantly higher stock clocks with Piledriver, while managing to maintain the same power envelope.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: East Coast, USA
Posts: 1,154 (1.48/day)
Thanks: 107
Thanked 656 Times in 382 Posts
|
The inclusion of meshing technology to decrease power loss is...interesting. This will allow higher operational frequencies, but it also makes that sky-high frequency far less impressive than they should be. Higher frequencies are nice, but they only obscure the fact that the IPC of the processors isn't in the same class as similar Intel offerings.
It's good to see two completely different research lines emerge in the x86 market. Given that ARM is starting to actually be worth competing against in the desktop class market. I'd love to see AMD pull a win out of their collective back ends with Piledriver. This said, the announcement means nothing. Numbers are what will drive Intel to decrease pricing, and AMD is unlikely to pull out an amazing win. I would love to be proven wrong, but given what AMD is saying that is....unlikely....
__________________
You haven't seen anything until you've seen this. *pokes computer* Wow! I didn't know the blue screen of death could get a blue screen of death. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to lilhasselhoffer For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#13 | ||
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ancient Greece, Acropolis
Posts: 2,209 (0.74/day)
Thanks: 1,204
Thanked 534 Times in 362 Posts
|
We are talking about higher stock clock speeds at lower volts and lower TDP. Combine this with AMD's bulldozer refinements and we have Piledriver
![]() Quote:
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,982 (7.30/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,897 Times in 5,649 Posts
|
Those are Piledriver models. http://www.techpowerup.com/160274/AM...10-Series.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() |
Engineers actually calculate how quickly a chip is going to fail at a given speed. That's how they do their binning. That you are willing to trade in its longevity for extra speed is up to you of course.
__________________
The head honcho at the Serious Gamers' Association Criticism “However, the Intel CPU dispatcher does not only check which instruction set is supported by the CPU, it also checks the vendor ID string. If the vendor string is "GenuineIntel" then it uses the optimal code path. If the CPU is not from Intel then, in most cases, it will run the slowest possible version of the code, even if the CPU is fully compatible with a better version. ” |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Burlington, VT
Posts: 1,706 (2.16/day)
Thanks: 228
Thanked 404 Times in 297 Posts
|
There was a news post here on TPU about new models of BD chips, one of which was the FX-4170 and was like 4.1GHz stock. So BD can handle it already.
__________________
“If BF3 doesn't turn out to be the biggest selling PC shooter of all time, then I will eat my graphics card.” -MatTheCat
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
OH, I have such a headache
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 6,086 (1.97/day)
Thanks: 1,832
Thanked 878 Times in 737 Posts
|
Oh goody another hyped up paper launch! Now we all wait in total anticipation for the big day and when it comes we all start to
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
I KILLED IT. MY COMPUTER IS DEAD. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Toronto, ON. Canada
Posts: 731 (0.60/day)
Thanks: 628
Thanked 160 Times in 99 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() Or do you mean frequencies ![]() Hopefully Piledriver will Intel's offerings
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 31,902 (12.77/day)
Thanks: 2,782
Thanked 12,274 Times in 7,814 Posts
|
Well.. the earlier they get piledriver out, the better. Till then it's all just fluff talk.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to erocker For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#21 |
![]() |
I think it's nice for the average Joe, problem is TPU members tend to be powerusers/gamer/profesionals/benchmarkmonkeys... etc, I have a friend who uses an unlocked sempron oc'ed @3.4ghz with 3Gigs of DDr3 Ram and a 4650 DDr3 and finds his computer is more than enough for his needs, his doesn't care it takes twice the time to encode video or anything of that sort that said brining a 2 module/ 4 core procesor a 4.6 at 100-120$ would be quite tempting to him even as an average joe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 31,902 (12.77/day)
Thanks: 2,782
Thanked 12,274 Times in 7,814 Posts
|
Bulldozers power consumption is not good. Bad for OEM's, bad for the normal joe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
OH, I have such a headache
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 6,086 (1.97/day)
Thanks: 1,832
Thanked 878 Times in 737 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
I KILLED IT. MY COMPUTER IS DEAD. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
![]() |
Quote:
people rarely worry about how power hungry their cpu is, that said I actually care so it stands average joe will fall for high clock speeds and more coresa and see it as a bargain.Hell I remeber being sad about having a Athlon XP instead of a P4 LOL |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to enaher For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#25 | |
|
OH, I have such a headache
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 6,086 (1.97/day)
Thanks: 1,832
Thanked 878 Times in 737 Posts
|
Quote:
Oh and Not me I loved my Athlon XP it smoked the Intel P4!
__________________
I KILLED IT. MY COMPUTER IS DEAD. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AMD Radeon HD 7970 Overclocked to 1.70 GHz Core, 8.00 GHz Memory, Benchmarked | btarunr | News | 40 | Aug 5, 2012 06:24 PM |
| AMD A8-3870K Overclocked to 5.87 GHz CPU, 1.32 GHz GPU in Suicide-Run | btarunr | News | 43 | Dec 31, 2011 07:11 AM |
| AMD Piledriver to Boost Performance by 10%, Feature New Instruction Set | btarunr | News | 64 | Nov 3, 2011 04:55 PM |
| Leaked AMD roadmap shows a 10-core 'Piledriver' chip will tip up in 2012 {INQUIRER} | twilyth | General Hardware | 1 | Jul 25, 2011 07:19 PM |
| Intel e6550 2.33 GHZ or AMD 4800+ 2.5 GHZ? Which is faster? | drew24 | General Hardware | 8 | Oct 14, 2008 07:00 PM |