techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > General Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Feb 22, 2012, 01:33 PM   #1
insane 360
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 121 (0.08/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 34 Times in 20 Posts

System Specs

amd piledriver looking better..4+ghz

http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/22/a...nt-clock-mesh/

don't know how many saw this, but man, its making me want to see a review on TPU for these next gen APU's...really want to replace my current system with these
insane 360 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to insane 360 For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 22, 2012, 01:36 PM   #2
dude12564
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 457 (0.88/day)
Thanks: 640
Thanked 216 Times in 127 Posts

System Specs

AMD's been pushing (for a while) for more cores and higher core clocks instead of IPC.
dude12564 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2012, 02:07 PM   #3
insane 360
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 121 (0.08/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 34 Times in 20 Posts

System Specs

i mainly still like amd thanks to there graphics tech. was a huge ATI fan, and their APU's have the graphic muscle i want with low power...still want to see benches, i know at least the cpu won't stand up too well against intel but the whole package should do everything i want it to
insane 360 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 22, 2012, 02:21 PM   #4
AphexDreamer
Eligible for custom title
 
AphexDreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: C:\Program Files (x86)\Aphexdreamer\
Posts: 5,614 (2.59/day)
Thanks: 812
Thanked 888 Times in 674 Posts

System Specs

my Bulldozer is already over 4Ghz :/
__________________
Sent from my PC using chrome.
AphexDreamer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 23, 2012, 01:27 AM   #5
n3rdf1ght3r
200 Posts
 
n3rdf1ght3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 213 (0.46/day)
Thanks: 134
Thanked 157 Times in 63 Posts

System Specs

AMDs look fast on paper but they don't use resources very well so they actually perform really slow in real life situations.
n3rdf1ght3r is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 23, 2012, 07:29 AM   #6
pantherx12
Eligible for custom title
 
pantherx12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
Posts: 8,443 (5.28/day)
Thanks: 1,188
Thanked 1,705 Times in 1,375 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by AphexDreamer View Post
my Bulldozer is already over 4Ghz :/
Read the article man, stock speeds of over 4ghz.
pantherx12 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 23, 2012, 07:31 AM   #7
de.das.dude
3500 Posts
 
de.das.dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Wild Wild East
Posts: 4,538 (4.23/day)
Thanks: 2,313
Thanked 1,327 Times in 908 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to de.das.dude

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by n3rdf1ght3r View Post
AMDs look fast on paper but they don't use resources very well so they actually perform really slow in real life situations.
actually they perform pretty well considering the IMC on AMDs are complete poop compared to intel IMCs which offers sky high memory bandwidth.
__________________
my wallet isnt hashwell compatiple *sad face*
de.das.dude is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 23, 2012, 01:38 PM   #8
AphexDreamer
Eligible for custom title
 
AphexDreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: C:\Program Files (x86)\Aphexdreamer\
Posts: 5,614 (2.59/day)
Thanks: 812
Thanked 888 Times in 674 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by pantherx12 View Post
Read the article man, stock speeds of over 4ghz.
Well couldn't they have released my chip at 4ghz? I would have just gotten less of an overclock lol.
__________________
Sent from my PC using chrome.
AphexDreamer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 23, 2012, 01:41 PM   #9
insane 360
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 121 (0.08/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 34 Times in 20 Posts

System Specs

well cpu wise, i'm fine with amd, sure it would be nice to be faster but it does what i need it to. i like the gpu's and this is an all-in-one package that could replace my current htpc and give me a much lower power usage but similar or better performance...i'm all over that!
insane 360 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 23, 2012, 02:22 PM   #10
arnoo1
500 Posts
 
arnoo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 708 (0.54/day)
Thanks: 98
Thanked 116 Times in 99 Posts

System Specs

amd piledriver looking better 4+ghz??

why would it in eath be better because of idiot high stock speed?
probally it crappy like faildozer, intel once prove with P4's that high stock clock isn't good,TDP and temp wise
amd musst go back to handcraft cpu's and get better performance per clock instead off high stock clocks and ditch the Module stuff
no hating, i don't want a flame war and don't look @ my sig.:P
__________________
intel + nvidia the best
amd
arnoo1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 23, 2012, 03:50 PM   #11
devguy
1000 Posts
 
devguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,198 (0.52/day)
Thanks: 49
Thanked 171 Times in 133 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by AphexDreamer View Post
Well couldn't they have released my chip at 4ghz? I would have just gotten less of an overclock lol.
They could've, but not at the TDP rating they gave your processor at stock. I expect significantly higher stock clocks with Piledriver, while managing to maintain the same power envelope.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
devguy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 23, 2012, 04:43 PM   #12
lilhasselhoffer
1000 Posts
 
lilhasselhoffer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: East Coast, USA
Posts: 1,154 (1.48/day)
Thanks: 107
Thanked 656 Times in 382 Posts

System Specs

The inclusion of meshing technology to decrease power loss is...interesting. This will allow higher operational frequencies, but it also makes that sky-high frequency far less impressive than they should be. Higher frequencies are nice, but they only obscure the fact that the IPC of the processors isn't in the same class as similar Intel offerings.

It's good to see two completely different research lines emerge in the x86 market. Given that ARM is starting to actually be worth competing against in the desktop class market. I'd love to see AMD pull a win out of their collective back ends with Piledriver.

This said, the announcement means nothing. Numbers are what will drive Intel to decrease pricing, and AMD is unlikely to pull out an amazing win. I would love to be proven wrong, but given what AMD is saying that is....unlikely....
__________________
You haven't seen anything until you've seen this.
*pokes computer*
Wow! I didn't know the blue screen of death could get a blue screen of death.
lilhasselhoffer is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to lilhasselhoffer For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 28, 2012, 02:58 PM   #13
Super XP
2000 Posts
 
Super XP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ancient Greece, Acropolis
Posts: 2,209 (0.74/day)
Thanks: 1,204
Thanked 534 Times in 362 Posts

System Specs

We are talking about higher stock clock speeds at lower volts and lower TDP. Combine this with AMD's bulldozer refinements and we have Piledriver
Quote:
AMD Piledriver Cores "WILL" Clock Over 4.0GHz.
Piledriver will feature "Resonant Clock Mesh" Technology
What is Resonant Clock Mesh?


Quote:
Resonant Clock Mesh recycles clock power instead of letting it dissipate and thereby enables higher clock speeds in "next generation SoCs that also require ultra-low power consumption." We also know that the technology is financially backed by ARM and Siemens and has seen precious little implementation prior to AMD -- which is fine, so long as all that resonance doesn't make our rig hum even louder.
__________________
Super XP is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2012, 03:04 PM   #14
mr_jean
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

new frecuencies?



http://foro.noticias3d.com/vbulletin...=1#post4429008
mr_jean is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2012, 03:45 PM   #15
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,982 (7.30/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,897 Times in 5,649 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Those are Piledriver models. http://www.techpowerup.com/160274/AM...10-Series.html
__________________

Gadgets, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2012, 06:11 PM   #16
Horrux
500 Posts
 
Horrux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 641 (0.89/day)
Thanks: 335
Thanked 132 Times in 101 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by AphexDreamer View Post
Well couldn't they have released my chip at 4ghz? I would have just gotten less of an overclock lol.
Engineers actually calculate how quickly a chip is going to fail at a given speed. That's how they do their binning. That you are willing to trade in its longevity for extra speed is up to you of course.
__________________
The head honcho at the Serious Gamers' Association

Criticism
“However, the Intel CPU dispatcher does not only check which instruction set is supported by the CPU, it also checks the vendor ID string. If the vendor string is "GenuineIntel" then it uses the optimal code path. If the CPU is not from Intel then, in most cases, it will run the slowest possible version of the code, even if the CPU is fully compatible with a better version. ”
Horrux is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 29, 2012, 12:30 AM   #17
xenocide
1000 Posts
 
xenocide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Burlington, VT
Posts: 1,706 (2.16/day)
Thanks: 228
Thanked 404 Times in 297 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Horrux View Post
Engineers actually calculate how quickly a chip is going to fail at a given speed. That's how they do their binning. That you are willing to trade in its longevity for extra speed is up to you of course.
There was a news post here on TPU about new models of BD chips, one of which was the FX-4170 and was like 4.1GHz stock. So BD can handle it already.
__________________
If BF3 doesn't turn out to be the biggest selling PC shooter of all time, then I will eat my graphics card. -MatTheCat
xenocide is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 29, 2012, 01:04 AM   #18
trickson
OH, I have such a headache
 
trickson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 6,086 (1.97/day)
Thanks: 1,832
Thanked 878 Times in 737 Posts

System Specs

Oh goody another hyped up paper launch! Now we all wait in total anticipation for the big day and when it comes we all start to
__________________
I KILLED IT. MY COMPUTER IS DEAD.
trickson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 29, 2012, 01:33 AM   #19
nt300
500 Posts
 
nt300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Toronto, ON. Canada
Posts: 731 (0.60/day)
Thanks: 628
Thanked 160 Times in 99 Posts

System Specs

What's a frecuencies
Or do you mean frequencies
Hopefully Piledriver will Intel's offerings
__________________
nt300 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 29, 2012, 01:40 AM   #20
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 31,902 (12.77/day)
Thanks: 2,782
Thanked 12,274 Times in 7,814 Posts

System Specs

Well.. the earlier they get piledriver out, the better. Till then it's all just fluff talk.
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to erocker For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 29, 2012, 01:40 AM   #21
enaher
200 Posts
 
enaher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 380 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 125
Thanked 85 Times in 73 Posts

System Specs

I think it's nice for the average Joe, problem is TPU members tend to be powerusers/gamer/profesionals/benchmarkmonkeys... etc, I have a friend who uses an unlocked sempron oc'ed @3.4ghz with 3Gigs of DDr3 Ram and a 4650 DDr3 and finds his computer is more than enough for his needs, his doesn't care it takes twice the time to encode video or anything of that sort that said brining a 2 module/ 4 core procesor a 4.6 at 100-120$ would be quite tempting to him even as an average joe.
enaher is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 29, 2012, 01:46 AM   #22
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 31,902 (12.77/day)
Thanks: 2,782
Thanked 12,274 Times in 7,814 Posts

System Specs

Bulldozers power consumption is not good. Bad for OEM's, bad for the normal joe.
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 29, 2012, 01:48 AM   #23
trickson
OH, I have such a headache
 
trickson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 6,086 (1.97/day)
Thanks: 1,832
Thanked 878 Times in 737 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by erocker View Post
Bulldozers power consumption is not good. Bad for OEM's, bad for the normal joe.
Lets not forget the bad press. That thing was pumped up so high that when it fell flat on it's face I felt the ground shake!
__________________
I KILLED IT. MY COMPUTER IS DEAD.
trickson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 29, 2012, 01:52 AM   #24
enaher
200 Posts
 
enaher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 380 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 125
Thanked 85 Times in 73 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by erocker View Post
Bulldozers power consumption is not good. Bad for OEM's, bad for the normal joe.
P4 sucked power in their time and most people only cared it was great to have a 1.5 Ghz cpu people rarely worry about how power hungry their cpu is, that said I actually care so it stands average joe will fall for high clock speeds and more coresa and see it as a bargain.

Hell I remeber being sad about having a Athlon XP instead of a P4 LOL
enaher is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to enaher For This Useful Post:
Old Feb 29, 2012, 01:58 AM   #25
trickson
OH, I have such a headache
 
trickson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 6,086 (1.97/day)
Thanks: 1,832
Thanked 878 Times in 737 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by enaher View Post
P4 sucked power in their time and most people only cared it was great to have a 1.5 Ghz cpu people rarely worry about how power hungry their cpu is, that said I actually care so it stands average joe will fall for high clock speeds and more coresa and see it as a bargain.

Hell I remeber being sad about having a Athlon XP instead of a P4 LOL
I disagree, The average Joe care more about how much some thing costs. The P4 was more widely used by HP, Compaq, Dell and rarely offered AMD in the store as an alternative, One main reason for AMD sewing Intel.
Oh and Not me I loved my Athlon XP it smoked the Intel P4!
__________________
I KILLED IT. MY COMPUTER IS DEAD.
trickson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD Radeon HD 7970 Overclocked to 1.70 GHz Core, 8.00 GHz Memory, Benchmarked btarunr News 40 Aug 5, 2012 06:24 PM
AMD A8-3870K Overclocked to 5.87 GHz CPU, 1.32 GHz GPU in Suicide-Run btarunr News 43 Dec 31, 2011 07:11 AM
AMD Piledriver to Boost Performance by 10%, Feature New Instruction Set btarunr News 64 Nov 3, 2011 04:55 PM
Leaked AMD roadmap shows a 10-core 'Piledriver' chip will tip up in 2012 {INQUIRER} twilyth General Hardware 1 Jul 25, 2011 07:19 PM
Intel e6550 2.33 GHZ or AMD 4800+ 2.5 GHZ? Which is faster? drew24 General Hardware 8 Oct 14, 2008 07:00 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts