![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,035 (7.22/day)
Thanks: 792
Thanked 13,033 Times in 5,720 Posts
|
GK104 (GTX 680) Has 17% Higher Compute Power Than Tahiti (HD7970): Report
A report by 3DCenter.org, which takes into account the specifications of NVIDIA's GK104 GPU, based on clock-speed and specs. leak estimated its shader compute power to be 17% higher than that of AMD's Tahiti in its Radeon HD 7970 avatar (4.46 TFLOPs single-precision floating point). Based on the said specifications, the report also hypothesized things such as memory bandwidth, ROP performance, and texture performance; and compared it to those of the Radeon HD 7970 and Radeon HD 7950.
![]() Source: 3DCenter.org |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Internet Heaven
Posts: 2,735 (1.75/day)
Thanks: 794
Thanked 424 Times in 328 Posts
|
So what does that mean when the two are compared all around?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: North of 49
Posts: 491 (0.77/day)
Thanks: 139
Thanked 124 Times in 90 Posts
|
Do the math.
__________________
"Stupidity is infinite" -- Umberto Eco |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,980 (3.28/day)
Thanks: 156
Thanked 487 Times in 388 Posts
|
If this is true then the GK100/110 will be a compute monster, paired with a wider memory bus, well... it makes a lot of sense because Nvidia has always made big dies in favour of compute power, a refined Fermi (aka Kepler) will make for a nice CUDA monster
that's what I'm looking for.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to radrok For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sarasota, Florida, USA
Posts: 3,249 (2.34/day)
Thanks: 397
Thanked 1,250 Times in 841 Posts
|
Can't wait to see what one of these bad boys can do in Folding@Home (once released and supported of course).
__________________
Intel Crunchers (34 threads): 4770K 4.3G (7t), 2x 3770K 4.3G (14t), 2600K 4G (7t), X3210 (3t), P-M 735A, P4 HT 3G AMD Crunchers (12 cores):1100T 3.6G (3t), 1045T 3.4G (2t), X4 640 3.2G, X2 4200+, T64 ML-37 AMD Folders (6272 GCN cores): 2x 7950 1125/1475, 7970 1150/1650, 7770 1100/1200 NV Folders (2336 GF10x + 1344 GK104 cores):GTX 470 & 465 720/1715, 4x 460 768MB 825/2000, GTS 450, 660Ti 1228/6000 HEATWARE |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chattanooga,TN
Posts: 3,738 (1.92/day)
Thanks: 499
Thanked 621 Times in 474 Posts
|
Patiently waiting for reviews/benchmarks
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
TPU addict
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: US\ Uk Born
Posts: 8,912 (4.07/day)
Thanks: 1,730
Thanked 1,384 Times in 1,200 Posts
|
LoL is that all they can come up with, 17% faster or not i still see only ATI cards and no nvidia cards so it aint nothing till it's released..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chattanooga,TN
Posts: 3,738 (1.92/day)
Thanks: 499
Thanked 621 Times in 474 Posts
|
When is 7990 coming? Sorry its OT
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,980 (3.28/day)
Thanks: 156
Thanked 487 Times in 388 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to radrok For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Jitra, Malaysia
Posts: 239 (0.15/day)
Thanks: 105
Thanked 18 Times in 13 Posts
|
why only the green bar beyond 100% and the others is around 70%. imba?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chattanooga,TN
Posts: 3,738 (1.92/day)
Thanks: 499
Thanked 621 Times in 474 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
OH, I have such a headache
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 6,154 (1.97/day)
Thanks: 1,947
Thanked 922 Times in 757 Posts
|
Only time will tell. This is just hype to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,980 (3.28/day)
Thanks: 156
Thanked 487 Times in 388 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chattanooga,TN
Posts: 3,738 (1.92/day)
Thanks: 499
Thanked 621 Times in 474 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,361 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 1,416
Thanked 276 Times in 194 Posts
|
Colors are
Red: Bandwidth Yellow: ROP-Performance Blue: Texture Performance Green: Computational efficiency All according to google translate.
__________________
"Doom means two things: demons and shotguns." -John Carmack |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: North of 49
Posts: 491 (0.77/day)
Thanks: 139
Thanked 124 Times in 90 Posts
|
I guess you'd better hope for a multi-sku 680; GTO, GS, GT, Ultra, etc.
I'd be interested to see how things roll out, I haven't ruled out an NV gpu.
__________________
"Stupidity is infinite" -- Umberto Eco |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Manteca, Ca
Posts: 780 (0.56/day)
Thanks: 69
Thanked 109 Times in 85 Posts
|
So kelper is supposed to be really efficient?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,035 (7.22/day)
Thanks: 792
Thanked 13,033 Times in 5,720 Posts
|
Really fast. For efficiency, we have to take power specifications into account. One does not simply walk into estimate power draw.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#19 |
![]() |
Going too make a guess here.
1) it will not overclock much more then stock. 2) retailers will only get like 10x for sale at time. ( hard 2 find & wont force the price of the 7970s down) 3) by the time it is out, all the "juiced" 7970 (Lightnings / Toxics ) will be out.
__________________
![]() Congrats on you New GPU. 1 second, 2 , 3 ... Sorry its outdated. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Perth-Westen Australia
Posts: 3,386 (1.52/day)
Thanks: 436
Thanked 315 Times in 256 Posts
|
I dont care about power but i do want a 680 now lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
![]() |
Kyle at HardOCp continues posting about the GTX680. Yes, it seems it's gonna be called 680.
This is what he says: "GK104 will be 680. Seeing some benchmarks show 7970 in the lead, mostly in tessellated situations there, other "normal" synthetic 3D benchmarks and gaming benchmarks show 680 faster. Driver advancements still happening as well for 680." |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() |
Memory bandwith, ROP perf and texture perf are about 25% worse than the 7970. That puts its actual gaming performance between the 7850 and the 7870.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: North of 49
Posts: 491 (0.77/day)
Thanks: 139
Thanked 124 Times in 90 Posts
|
Quote:
Approx. 7950 performance with a good factory overclock. But better compute. Slots right into the performance segment where the 560Ti was, in relation to the 6950 and 6970. If it's going to be called the 680, then they can't be using the same numbering/naming scheme as the last two generations. Looks to me like a multiple model 680 line is coming, or not, depending on what AMD does. That would be my surmise.
__________________
"Stupidity is infinite" -- Umberto Eco |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |||
![]() Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 704 (1.38/day)
Thanks: 176
Thanked 199 Times in 125 Posts
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Looks like it will significantly slower than 7970. Btranr whats with the title? YOu should've said: 'GTX680 looks crap compared with 7970.'
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Crap Daddy For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NVIDIA GK104 PCB Drawings, Unusual Power Connector Designs Surface | btarunr | News | 45 | Mar 3, 2012 02:44 PM |
| GK104 Board Draws Power From 6+8 Pin Connectors, 3+2 VDD Phase Power Supply | btarunr | News | 36 | Feb 27, 2012 06:40 PM |
| AMD 5830 to have higher max board power than 5850? | devguy | AMD / ATI | 28 | Feb 24, 2010 07:52 AM |
| Higher quality HD than Youtube | wolf2009 | General Software | 21 | Jun 21, 2009 06:49 AM |
| VID Higher than Core? | SK-1 | Overclocking & Cooling | 5 | Dec 17, 2008 07:43 AM |