techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Mar 7, 2012, 03:32 AM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,035 (7.22/day)
Thanks: 792
Thanked 13,033 Times in 5,720 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

GK104 (GTX 680) Has 17% Higher Compute Power Than Tahiti (HD7970): Report

A report by 3DCenter.org, which takes into account the specifications of NVIDIA's GK104 GPU, based on clock-speed and specs. leak estimated its shader compute power to be 17% higher than that of AMD's Tahiti in its Radeon HD 7970 avatar (4.46 TFLOPs single-precision floating point). Based on the said specifications, the report also hypothesized things such as memory bandwidth, ROP performance, and texture performance; and compared it to those of the Radeon HD 7970 and Radeon HD 7950.



Source: 3DCenter.org
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2012, 03:40 AM   #2
jmcslob
2000 Posts
 
jmcslob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Internet Heaven
Posts: 2,735 (1.75/day)
Thanks: 794
Thanked 424 Times in 328 Posts

System Specs

So what does that mean when the two are compared all around?
jmcslob is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2012, 03:51 AM   #3
Inceptor
200 Posts
 
Inceptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: North of 49
Posts: 491 (0.77/day)
Thanks: 139
Thanked 124 Times in 90 Posts

System Specs

Do the math.
__________________
"Stupidity is infinite" -- Umberto Eco
Inceptor is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2012, 03:53 AM   #4
radrok
1000 Posts
 
radrok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,980 (3.28/day)
Thanks: 156
Thanked 487 Times in 388 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to radrok

System Specs

If this is true then the GK100/110 will be a compute monster, paired with a wider memory bus, well... it makes a lot of sense because Nvidia has always made big dies in favour of compute power, a refined Fermi (aka Kepler) will make for a nice CUDA monster that's what I'm looking for.
radrok is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to radrok For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 7, 2012, 04:32 AM   #5
Jstn7477
2000 Posts
 
Jstn7477's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sarasota, Florida, USA
Posts: 3,249 (2.34/day)
Thanks: 397
Thanked 1,250 Times in 841 Posts

System Specs

Can't wait to see what one of these bad boys can do in Folding@Home (once released and supported of course).
__________________
Intel Crunchers (34 threads): 4770K 4.3G (7t), 2x 3770K 4.3G (14t), 2600K 4G (7t), X3210 (3t), P-M 735A, P4 HT 3G
AMD Crunchers (12 cores):1100T 3.6G (3t), 1045T 3.4G (2t), X4 640 3.2G, X2 4200+, T64 ML-37
AMD Folders (6272 GCN cores): 2x 7950 1125/1475, 7970 1150/1650, 7770 1100/1200
NV Folders (2336 GF10x + 1344 GK104 cores):GTX 470 & 465 720/1715, 4x 460 768MB 825/2000, GTS 450, 660Ti 1228/6000

HEATWARE
Jstn7477 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2012, 04:34 AM   #6
jbunch07
3500 Posts
 
jbunch07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chattanooga,TN
Posts: 3,738 (1.92/day)
Thanks: 499
Thanked 621 Times in 474 Posts
Send a message via AIM to jbunch07

System Specs

Patiently waiting for reviews/benchmarks
jbunch07 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2012, 04:45 AM   #7
AsRock
TPU addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: US\ Uk Born
Posts: 8,912 (4.07/day)
Thanks: 1,730
Thanked 1,384 Times in 1,200 Posts

System Specs

LoL is that all they can come up with, 17% faster or not i still see only ATI cards and no nvidia cards so it aint nothing till it's released..
AsRock is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2012, 04:46 AM   #8
jbunch07
3500 Posts
 
jbunch07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chattanooga,TN
Posts: 3,738 (1.92/day)
Thanks: 499
Thanked 621 Times in 474 Posts
Send a message via AIM to jbunch07

System Specs

When is 7990 coming? Sorry its OT
jbunch07 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2012, 04:47 AM   #9
radrok
1000 Posts
 
radrok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,980 (3.28/day)
Thanks: 156
Thanked 487 Times in 388 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to radrok

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbunch07 View Post
When is 7990 coming? Sorry its OT
Last time I heard talking about it was Q2 2012
radrok is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to radrok For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 7, 2012, 04:48 AM   #10
legends84
200 Posts
 
legends84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Jitra, Malaysia
Posts: 239 (0.15/day)
Thanks: 105
Thanked 18 Times in 13 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to legends84 Send a message via Skype™ to legends84

System Specs

why only the green bar beyond 100% and the others is around 70%. imba?
legends84 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2012, 04:50 AM   #11
jbunch07
3500 Posts
 
jbunch07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chattanooga,TN
Posts: 3,738 (1.92/day)
Thanks: 499
Thanked 621 Times in 474 Posts
Send a message via AIM to jbunch07

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by radrok View Post
Last time I heard talking about it was Q2 2012
I hope they (nvidia) have an answer for that. Something better than 17% :/
jbunch07 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2012, 04:52 AM   #12
trickson
OH, I have such a headache
 
trickson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 6,154 (1.97/day)
Thanks: 1,947
Thanked 922 Times in 757 Posts

System Specs

Only time will tell. This is just hype to me.
trickson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2012, 04:52 AM   #13
radrok
1000 Posts
 
radrok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,980 (3.28/day)
Thanks: 156
Thanked 487 Times in 388 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to radrok

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by legends84 View Post
why only the green bar beyond 100% and the others is around 70%. imba?
The lower mem bandwidth makes sense, GK104 has a narrower memory bus than Tahiti
radrok is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2012, 05:04 AM   #14
jbunch07
3500 Posts
 
jbunch07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chattanooga,TN
Posts: 3,738 (1.92/day)
Thanks: 499
Thanked 621 Times in 474 Posts
Send a message via AIM to jbunch07

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbunch07 View Post
I hope they (nvidia) have an answer for that. Something better than 17% :/
Although I guess a direct competition would be gtx 690
jbunch07 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2012, 05:19 AM   #15
hellrazor
1000 Posts
 
hellrazor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,361 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 1,416
Thanked 276 Times in 194 Posts

System Specs

Colors are

Red: Bandwidth
Yellow: ROP-Performance
Blue: Texture Performance
Green: Computational efficiency

All according to google translate.
__________________
"Doom means two things: demons and shotguns." -John Carmack
hellrazor is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2012, 05:20 AM   #16
Inceptor
200 Posts
 
Inceptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: North of 49
Posts: 491 (0.77/day)
Thanks: 139
Thanked 124 Times in 90 Posts

System Specs

I guess you'd better hope for a multi-sku 680; GTO, GS, GT, Ultra, etc.
I'd be interested to see how things roll out, I haven't ruled out an NV gpu.
__________________
"Stupidity is infinite" -- Umberto Eco
Inceptor is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2012, 05:36 AM   #17
dir_d
500 Posts
 
dir_d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Manteca, Ca
Posts: 780 (0.56/day)
Thanks: 69
Thanked 109 Times in 85 Posts

System Specs

So kelper is supposed to be really efficient?
dir_d is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2012, 05:49 AM   #18
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,035 (7.22/day)
Thanks: 792
Thanked 13,033 Times in 5,720 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by dir_d View Post
So kelper is supposed to be really efficient?
Really fast. For efficiency, we have to take power specifications into account. One does not simply walk into estimate power draw.
__________________

Gadgets, Gaming, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 7, 2012, 05:58 AM   #19
neko77025
25 Posts
 
neko77025's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 65 (0.09/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts

System Specs

Going too make a guess here.

1) it will not overclock much more then stock.

2) retailers will only get like 10x for sale at time. ( hard 2 find & wont force the price of the 7970s down)

3) by the time it is out, all the "juiced" 7970 (Lightnings / Toxics ) will be out.
__________________

Congrats on you New GPU.
1 second, 2 , 3 ... Sorry its outdated.
neko77025 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2012, 06:10 AM   #20
Live OR Die
2000 Posts
 
Live OR Die's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Perth-Westen Australia
Posts: 3,386 (1.52/day)
Thanks: 436
Thanked 315 Times in 256 Posts

System Specs

I dont care about power but i do want a 680 now lol.
Live OR Die is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2012, 06:30 AM   #21
Crap Daddy
2000 Posts
 
Crap Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,314 (2.40/day)
Thanks: 966
Thanked 974 Times in 678 Posts

System Specs

Kyle at HardOCp continues posting about the GTX680. Yes, it seems it's gonna be called 680.

This is what he says:

"GK104 will be 680.

Seeing some benchmarks show 7970 in the lead, mostly in tessellated situations there, other "normal" synthetic 3D benchmarks and gaming benchmarks show 680 faster. Driver advancements still happening as well for 680."
Crap Daddy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2012, 06:34 AM   #22
imitation
75 Posts
 
imitation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 125 (0.17/day)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 21 Times in 17 Posts

System Specs

Memory bandwith, ROP perf and texture perf are about 25% worse than the 7970. That puts its actual gaming performance between the 7850 and the 7870.
imitation is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2012, 06:51 AM   #23
Inceptor
200 Posts
 
Inceptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: North of 49
Posts: 491 (0.77/day)
Thanks: 139
Thanked 124 Times in 90 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by imitation View Post
Memory bandwith, ROP perf and texture perf are about 25% worse than the 7970. That puts its actual gaming performance between the 7850 and the 7870.
Probably more like 7870 to 7950 gaming performance.
Approx. 7950 performance with a good factory overclock.
But better compute.
Slots right into the performance segment where the 560Ti was, in relation to the 6950 and 6970.
If it's going to be called the 680, then they can't be using the same numbering/naming scheme as the last two generations. Looks to me like a multiple model 680 line is coming, or not, depending on what AMD does.

That would be my surmise.
__________________
"Stupidity is infinite" -- Umberto Eco
Inceptor is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2012, 06:56 AM   #24
Yo_Wattup
500 Posts
 
Yo_Wattup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 704 (1.38/day)
Thanks: 176
Thanked 199 Times in 125 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
A report by 3DCenter.org, which takes into account the specifications of NVIDIA's GK104 GPU, based on clock-speed and specs. leak estimated its shader compute power to be 17% higher than that of AMD's Tahiti in its Radeon HD 7970 avatar (4.46 TFLOPs single-precision floating point). Based on the said specifications, the report also hypothesized things such as memory bandwidth, ROP performance, and texture performance; and compared it to those of the Radeon HD 7970 and Radeon HD 7950.

http://www.techpowerup.com/img/12-03-06/87a_thm.png

Source: 3DCenter.org
Quote:
Originally Posted by legends84 View Post
why only the green bar beyond 100% and the others is around 70%. imba?
Quote:
Originally Posted by imitation View Post
Memory bandwith, ROP perf and texture perf are about 25% worse than the 7970. That puts its actual gaming performance between the 7850 and the 7870.
Yes, can someone clear this up instead of ignoring these bars on the graph? Looks like it will significantly slower than 7970.

Btranr whats with the title? YOu should've said: 'GTX680 looks crap compared with 7970.'
Yo_Wattup is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2012, 06:56 AM   #25
Crap Daddy
2000 Posts
 
Crap Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,314 (2.40/day)
Thanks: 966
Thanked 974 Times in 678 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inceptor View Post
Probably more like 7870 to 7950 gaming performance.
Approx. 7950 performance with a good factory overclock.
But better compute.
Slots right into the performance segment where the 560Ti was, in relation to the 6950 and 6970.
If it's going to be called the 680, then they can't be using the same numbering/naming scheme as the last two generations. Looks to me like a multiple model 680 line is coming, or not, depending on what AMD does.

That would be my surmise.
Have you read my above post citing Kyle?
Crap Daddy is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Crap Daddy For This Useful Post:
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NVIDIA GK104 PCB Drawings, Unusual Power Connector Designs Surface btarunr News 45 Mar 3, 2012 02:44 PM
GK104 Board Draws Power From 6+8 Pin Connectors, 3+2 VDD Phase Power Supply btarunr News 36 Feb 27, 2012 06:40 PM
AMD 5830 to have higher max board power than 5850? devguy AMD / ATI 28 Feb 24, 2010 07:52 AM
Higher quality HD than Youtube wolf2009 General Software 21 Jun 21, 2009 06:49 AM
VID Higher than Core? SK-1 Overclocking & Cooling 5 Dec 17, 2008 07:43 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts