techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Mar 28, 2012, 04:02 PM   #1
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,758 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,207 Times in 3,156 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

ASUS HD 7870 Direct CU II 2048M

To read this review go to: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/A..._Direct_Cu_II/

Last edited by W1zzard; Mar 31, 2012 at 03:46 PM.
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to W1zzard For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 30, 2012, 08:16 PM   #2
temp02
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 490 (0.32/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 171 Times in 158 Posts

Quote:
Actual 3D performance gained from overclocking is 2.1%.
should be (if math doesn't fail me)
Quote:
Actual 3D performance gained from overclocking is 14.1%.
still great review, as always.
temp02 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2012, 08:26 PM   #3
N3M3515
200 Posts
 
N3M3515's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cartagena
Posts: 374 (0.39/day)
Thanks: 173
Thanked 37 Times in 33 Posts

System Specs

Excellent overcloking, way to go ASUS!
W1z, just a sugestion, why not put o/c results among the others? (all the benchmarks and de summaries)
That would be awesome!

PD: wake me up when this card costs $240 =)
N3M3515 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2012, 08:30 PM   #4
Sasqui
Eligible for custom title
 
Sasqui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,042 (2.22/day)
Thanks: 814
Thanked 899 Times in 733 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by N3M3515 View Post
W1z, just a sugestion, why not put o/c results among the others? (all the benchmarks and de summaries)
Good suggestion, but I suspect because overclocking is like gas mileage - it may vary from one car(d) to another.
__________________
Heatware
Sasqui is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2012, 09:43 PM   #5
eidairaman1
Eligible for custom title
 
eidairaman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HTX
Posts: 10,078 (4.69/day)
Thanks: 1,359
Thanked 1,159 Times in 1,035 Posts
Send a message via MSN to eidairaman1

System Specs

It was finally smart of asus not to bump price up on such a miniscuile overclock.

Id only pay higher if the cooler is far better as of keeping stock temps down while keeping noise tolerable. Also if the pcb is ref price shouldnt change drastically
__________________
Athlon XP USERS with COD 4 FIX
http://www.techsupportforum.com/foru...ls-202011.html
http://www.howorks.com/2011/02/24/ho...-memory-limit/
“Sometimes my level of fail is unprecedented.” -TheMailMan78
“This is what the force of a thousand suns looks like.” -3870x2
eidairaman1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2012, 10:04 PM   #6
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,758 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,207 Times in 3,156 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by N3M3515 View Post
W1z, just a sugestion, why not put o/c results among the others?
makes graphs more complicated to read: "more colored bars", and adds a ton of testing time, running all the benchmarks again with oc
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2012, 10:11 PM   #7
DarkOCean
1000 Posts
 
DarkOCean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: on top of that big mountain on mars(e Eu)
Posts: 1,418 (0.90/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 272 Times in 234 Posts

System Specs

Wtf is wrong with the power consumption on this card? it only has 10% oc and no overvolting.

Last edited by DarkOCean; Mar 30, 2012 at 11:29 PM.
DarkOCean is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2012, 10:30 PM   #8
N3M3515
200 Posts
 
N3M3515's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cartagena
Posts: 374 (0.39/day)
Thanks: 173
Thanked 37 Times in 33 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
makes graphs more complicated to read: "more colored bars", and adds a ton of testing time, running all the benchmarks again with oc
But W1z, that way we can compare o/c 7870 with the other cards on all the games!, please!!
N3M3515 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2012, 11:02 PM   #9
Inceptor
200 Posts
 
Inceptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: North of 49
Posts: 488 (0.81/day)
Thanks: 139
Thanked 124 Times in 90 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by N3M3515 View Post
But W1z, that way we can compare o/c 7870 with the other cards on all the games!, please!!
The sample overclock resulted in +14.1% performance.
Get a calculator, turn it on, multiply results of benchmarks by 1.141.
Why should he waste his time rerunning benchmarks? He'd have to redo ALL benchmarks for ALL cards...
__________________
"Stupidity is infinite" -- Umberto Eco
Inceptor is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2012, 11:09 PM   #10
eidairaman1
Eligible for custom title
 
eidairaman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HTX
Posts: 10,078 (4.69/day)
Thanks: 1,359
Thanked 1,159 Times in 1,035 Posts
Send a message via MSN to eidairaman1

System Specs

thats what the similar reviews button is for, review the product yourself
__________________
Athlon XP USERS with COD 4 FIX
http://www.techsupportforum.com/foru...ls-202011.html
http://www.howorks.com/2011/02/24/ho...-memory-limit/
“Sometimes my level of fail is unprecedented.” -TheMailMan78
“This is what the force of a thousand suns looks like.” -3870x2
eidairaman1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2012, 02:32 AM   #11
N3M3515
200 Posts
 
N3M3515's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cartagena
Posts: 374 (0.39/day)
Thanks: 173
Thanked 37 Times in 33 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inceptor View Post
The sample overclock resulted in +14.1% performance.
Get a calculator, turn it on, multiply results of benchmarks by 1.141.
Why should he waste his time rerunning benchmarks? He'd have to redo ALL benchmarks for ALL cards...
Lazy man!

14.1 x everygame? it AVG, not the same increase for every game ...¬¬
N3M3515 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2012, 04:29 AM   #12
thunderising
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 682 (0.72/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 62 Times in 50 Posts

System Specs

amazing card must say
thunderising is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2012, 04:44 AM   #13
Jstn7477
2000 Posts
 
Jstn7477's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sarasota, Florida, USA
Posts: 3,114 (2.29/day)
Thanks: 384
Thanked 1,177 Times in 799 Posts

System Specs

Looks like a nice card, but I probably wouldn't get rid of my 6950 unlocked for it due to the seemingly small performance difference. Probably decent if you don't have a 6950 and can't afford the awesome GTX 680 that beats nearly everything but costs $150 more.
__________________
Intel Crunchers (30 threads): 2x 3770K 4.3GHz, 2600K 4GHz, X3210, P-M 735A, P4 3GHz,
AMD Crunchers (20 cores):FX-8150 (4t), 1100T 3.6GHz, 1045T 3.4GHz, X3 8550 2.5GHz, T64 ML-37
AMD Folders (6272 GCN cores): 2x 7950 1125/1475, 7970 1150/1650, 7770
NV Folders (2336 GF10x + 1344 GK104 cores):GTX 470 & 465 720/1715, 4x 460 768MB 825/2000, GTS 450, 660Ti 1228/6000

HEATWARE
Jstn7477 is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2012, 05:57 AM   #14
Inceptor
200 Posts
 
Inceptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: North of 49
Posts: 488 (0.81/day)
Thanks: 139
Thanked 124 Times in 90 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by N3M3515 View Post
Lazy man!

14.1 x everygame? it AVG, not the same increase for every game ...¬¬
It's a percentage. If the overclock gives that percentage in one benchmark, it will give it in all other benchmarks. If you want to look at it another way, think of it as a 'modifier', apply the the 1.141 modifier to the Asus Direct CUII at stock and you get the performance in any particular benchmark based on the percentage modifier. It has absolutely nothing to do with any manufacturer/designer specific features of the gpu, or any specific code in a game benchmark, it's an increase in overall hardware performance. It applies to all benchmarks...

Why do I even bother?
__________________
"Stupidity is infinite" -- Umberto Eco
Inceptor is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2012, 08:00 AM   #15
N3M3515
200 Posts
 
N3M3515's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cartagena
Posts: 374 (0.39/day)
Thanks: 173
Thanked 37 Times in 33 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inceptor View Post
It's a percentage. If the overclock gives that percentage in one benchmark, it will give it in all other benchmarks. If you want to look at it another way, think of it as a 'modifier', apply the the 1.141 modifier to the Asus Direct CUII at stock and you get the performance in any particular benchmark based on the percentage modifier. It has absolutely nothing to do with any manufacturer/designer specific features of the gpu, or any specific code in a game benchmark, it's an increase in overall hardware performance. It applies to all benchmarks...

Why do I even bother?
There are games that don't go up the same way others do, some get huge increases some don't, is that so hard to understand?
Anyway, thanks for your OPINION, i don't have to agree with you
N3M3515 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2012, 08:22 AM   #16
Inceptor
200 Posts
 
Inceptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: North of 49
Posts: 488 (0.81/day)
Thanks: 139
Thanked 124 Times in 90 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by N3M3515 View Post
There are games that don't go up the same way others do, some get huge increases some don't, is that so hard to understand?
Anyway, thanks for your OPINION, i don't have to agree with you
"games that don't go up the same way others do..."

It doesn't apply well to cpu limited games, like Starcraft 2, but it applies to every other game out there. It doesn't matter what game it is, who coded it, what the gpu is; if you increase the performance of the gpu, it increases the performance in all games and benchmarks by the same percentage, except, as mentioned, in cpu limited games.

I can tell that your English is not precise enough for you to articulate yourself properly, and that you probably have not understood everything. So I'll leave it there.

Here's to hoping you don't make another intemperate comment based on misunderstanding.
__________________
"Stupidity is infinite" -- Umberto Eco
Inceptor is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2012, 02:41 PM   #17
OneCool
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Look behind you!!
Posts: 795 (0.29/day)
Thanks: 71
Thanked 58 Times in 39 Posts

Quote:
You will receive:

Graphics card
Driver CD + Documentation
Analog VGA Adapter
SLI Bridge
PCI-E power cable
Good, SLI scales better
OneCool is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2012, 03:02 PM   #18
Alvy Ibn Feroz
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh
Posts: 24 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

System Specs

I am sure something is wrong with the 7950/7970 because even with about 40% higher sp and 60% more transistors at 1920*1200 HD 7950 is only about 6% and HD 7970 is 18% faster than 7870. 7900 also has a 384 bit wide memory.
Alvy Ibn Feroz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2012, 03:12 PM   #19
dir_d
500 Posts
 
dir_d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Manteca, Ca
Posts: 775 (0.57/day)
Thanks: 69
Thanked 109 Times in 85 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alvy Ibn Feroz View Post
I am sure something is wrong with the 7950/7970 because even with about 40% higher sp and 60% more transistors at 1920*1200 HD 7950 is only about 6% and HD 7970 is 18% faster than 7870. 7900 also has a 384 bit wide memory.
I agree something is off or they are just clocked too low stock
dir_d is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2012, 04:04 PM   #20
Alvy Ibn Feroz
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh
Posts: 24 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by dir_d View Post
I agree something is off or they are just clocked too low stock
7870 and 7970 both @ 1ghz there will be only 15-20% difference but 7970 has 40% higher sp and 60% more transistor and also 384 bit wide memory. sometimes 7950 gets beaten by the 7870.

Last edited by Alvy Ibn Feroz; Apr 1, 2012 at 02:43 AM.
Alvy Ibn Feroz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2012, 04:22 PM   #21
Delta6326
2000 Posts
 
Delta6326's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Iowa, USA
Posts: 3,285 (1.80/day)
Thanks: 557
Thanked 597 Times in 437 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Delta6326

System Specs

Might as well save some $ and just get this over the 7950.
__________________
Delta6326 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2012, 06:31 PM   #22
N3M3515
200 Posts
 
N3M3515's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cartagena
Posts: 374 (0.39/day)
Thanks: 173
Thanked 37 Times in 33 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alvy Ibn Feroz View Post
7870 and 7970 both @ 1ghz there will be only 15-20% difference but 7970 has 40% higher sp and 60% more transistor and also 984 bit wide memory. sometimes 7950 gets beaten by the 7870.
WOW, 984bit that's monstruous!!

Maybe the 7970 & 7950 are bottlenecked?
N3M3515 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2012, 08:08 PM   #23
xenocide
1000 Posts
 
xenocide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Burlington, VT
Posts: 1,706 (2.17/day)
Thanks: 228
Thanked 404 Times in 297 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by N3M3515 View Post
WOW, 984bit that's monstruous!!

Maybe the 7970 & 7950 are bottlenecked?
It's the same thing in all reviews. The only potential bottleneck is ROP's, but I find that unlikely. There has to be something at work in the 79xx cards that makes them so much less efficient than Pitcairn...
__________________
If BF3 doesn't turn out to be the biggest selling PC shooter of all time, then I will eat my graphics card. -MatTheCat
xenocide is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 1, 2012, 02:44 AM   #24
Alvy Ibn Feroz
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh
Posts: 24 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by N3M3515 View Post
WOW, 984bit that's monstruous!!

Maybe the 7970 & 7950 are bottlenecked?
Sorry its 384 bit not 984 bit. You should understand that its only a typing mistake.
Alvy Ibn Feroz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 1, 2012, 02:48 AM   #25
Alvy Ibn Feroz
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh
Posts: 24 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by xenocide View Post
It's the same thing in all reviews. The only potential bottleneck is ROP's, but I find that unlikely. There has to be something at work in the 79xx cards that makes them so much less efficient than Pitcairn...
7970 isn't bottleneck-ed by Rops because there is no game out there which can use 70% rops of the 7970
Alvy Ibn Feroz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Asus HD6950 Direct CU II - Unlocking! TheBluePanther AMD / ATI 117 May 7, 2012 02:20 PM
MSI HD 7870 Twin Frozr III 2048M W1zzard Reviews 19 Apr 4, 2012 04:17 PM
Asus Direct Cu II gtx560 Ti new Corduroy_Jr NVIDIA 2 Jul 2, 2011 11:34 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts