![]() |
|
|
#26 | |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 252 (0.51/day)
Thanks: 64
Thanked 30 Times in 28 Posts
|
Quote:
however september october that is 2month before amd releases the 8000 series, if an 8970 makes good use of gcn(not to mention tweaks to the architecture) and gets that 20% performance its supposed to have, and equip it with more cores (2304) then there you have something like 30% faster than tahiti xt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Banned
|
I highly doubt the 8000 series will be out this Fall.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Knowledgeable Posting Whore
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 6,038 (5.90/day)
Thanks: 1,340
Thanked 1,202 Times in 909 Posts
|
25% better in gaming is pretty good. I have a feeling since this is the GK110 that itll be about 40% better in Direct Compute
__________________
Motocross is not just a sport, it's a lifestyle. ![]() File Server: Intel Pentium G630, 8GB PNY 1600, AsRock H77M Micro, Corsair CX430M, Vertex 2 90GB (OS), 2x WD Red 2TB in RAID1 “We will never know our full potential, unless we push ourselves to find it. -Travis Rice”
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 252 (0.51/day)
Thanks: 64
Thanked 30 Times in 28 Posts
|
oh amds graphics division has been perfect with release dates/execution, their whole methodology works around that rather than just completion of intended project(like nvidia)
amd is adapting that methodology in cpus as well now and they have been doing pretty well in terms of meeting deadlines |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
![]() |
Lets wait and see but i highly doubt this info, i guess they will skip straight to 7xx series
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
![]() Join Date: May 2012
Location: Northern NJ, USA
Posts: 263 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 52
Thanked 32 Times in 24 Posts
|
So I can reasonably pay $250-325 for a midrange 670 base/Ti in Q3 of 2012. Until then I can pay at least a hundred dollars when its released next week. Wonderful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
![]() Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 50 (0.12/day)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
|
the gtx680 is already $500, is this going to be over $600 or something?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 252 (0.51/day)
Thanks: 64
Thanked 30 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HTX
Posts: 10,099 (4.63/day)
Thanks: 1,364
Thanked 1,164 Times in 1,040 Posts
|
lets see, G80-G92 all over again, then GF 9 series had nothing to bring to the table
__________________
Athlon XP USERS with COD 4 FIX http://www.techsupportforum.com/foru...ls-202011.html http://www.howorks.com/2011/02/24/ho...-memory-limit/ “Sometimes my level of fail is unprecedented.” -TheMailMan78
“This is what the force of a thousand suns looks like.” -3870x2
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Burlington, VT
Posts: 1,709 (2.09/day)
Thanks: 228
Thanked 405 Times in 298 Posts
|
Like I said, it's more than likely that if Nvidia were going to launch GK110, they would do it as the 7xx series, and rebadge GK104 chips to make up the lower segment GPU's (750, 760, etc.) So more than likely if when Nvidia does get around to launching a 685 or 780, it will be at $500-600, and current high-end GPU's will be lower cost by then.
__________________
“If BF3 doesn't turn out to be the biggest selling PC shooter of all time, then I will eat my graphics card.” -MatTheCat
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kent, Washington
Posts: 1,018 (0.44/day)
Thanks: 129
Thanked 73 Times in 58 Posts
|
Well seeing how the GK110 is the GTX690 I'm wondering what the GK112 is?
I was thinking about picking up a GTX690 but I'm really curious what the GK112 is going to be. I'm sure the GTX690 will be more powerful but the GK112 could be a good middle ground between the GTX680 and GTX690
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Marlow, ENGLAND
Posts: 1,454 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 149
Thanked 279 Times in 226 Posts
|
No, the GK110 is NOT the GTX 690. That's 2xGK104 GPUs.
Currently, the only card planned with a GK110 is a Tesla GPGPU.
__________________
Alienware M11x R1 Netbook: 1.3GHz Core2 Duo U7300 (OC'd to 1.7GHz) | 8GB Corsair DDR3 1333MHz | nVIDIA GeForce GT 335M 1GB/Intel GMA 4500MHD Hyrbid Graphics System | Western Digital Scorpio Black 500GB | Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit ![]() Microsoft Certified Desktop Support Technician | CompTIA A+ Certified Heatware |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Red_Machine For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#38 | |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: East Coast, USA
Posts: 1,169 (1.44/day)
Thanks: 110
Thanked 667 Times in 389 Posts
|
Quote:
What I see is: 1) Yields from the manufacturer are miserable, so few cards are leaving AMD and Nvidea both. 2) AMD has yet to release the 7990. 3) Kepler has yet to make a dent in the market, because of extremely limited availability. 4) AMD is now working on performance enhancements of the 7xxx series, to more accurately compete with Kepler. 5) There were recently price drops from AMD, but not enough to cover every market segment. All five of these things suggest that the 7xxx series still has a lot of life left in it. Why, other than holiday buying, would AMD release a new line? They shoot down the possibility of buyers going for the current cards, and with current yields couldn't produce enough cards for a proper launch if they started in the next month. I'd prefer to see AMD go balls-to-the-wall, and get a variant of the 7xxx series to compete with Kepler (680, as GK110 is likely to be nearly untouchable performance high). Nvidea keeps releasing news of continuously improving cards (without actual market availability). It would be nice to have an AMD product that competes with Kepler, and is actually available to purchase. Barring this, Nvidea is winning the PR war. Better benches, more products being released, and a substantial enough shortage to drive consumers to pay way too much for a GPU. AMD may win the race though, as it's impossible to buy a card that isn't on store shelves. Here's to 2013; the next generation is likely to be released, and with the yields higher they might actually be available from both companies.
__________________
You haven't seen anything until you've seen this. *pokes computer* Wow! I didn't know the blue screen of death could get a blue screen of death. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HTX
Posts: 10,099 (4.63/day)
Thanks: 1,364
Thanked 1,164 Times in 1,040 Posts
|
Dude have you been Sleeping under a Rock? Most Games tested here 7970 takes lead by 5-10% In multiple Resolutions, Only things faster are the 6990, 590, 690.
If Im not mistaken the 680 is clocked higher from factory over the 7970. http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/sh...=1#post2636770 Quote:
__________________
Athlon XP USERS with COD 4 FIX http://www.techsupportforum.com/foru...ls-202011.html http://www.howorks.com/2011/02/24/ho...-memory-limit/ “Sometimes my level of fail is unprecedented.” -TheMailMan78
“This is what the force of a thousand suns looks like.” -3870x2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southeastern Virginia
Posts: 3,792 (1.95/day)
Thanks: 381
Thanked 1,106 Times in 814 Posts
|
this is what will be replacing my 5870 crossfireX set-up
__________________
“Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.”
“Amd....definitely a blond female.....not much on the cpu side, but always strutting about showing off her gpus......wow that was bad. I apologize.” -ensabrenoir
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HTX
Posts: 10,099 (4.63/day)
Thanks: 1,364
Thanked 1,164 Times in 1,040 Posts
|
whats amazing is most are keeping 4870s, 5870s, etc now adays
__________________
Athlon XP USERS with COD 4 FIX http://www.techsupportforum.com/foru...ls-202011.html http://www.howorks.com/2011/02/24/ho...-memory-limit/ “Sometimes my level of fail is unprecedented.” -TheMailMan78
“This is what the force of a thousand suns looks like.” -3870x2
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | ||
![]() Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Hunting for Prey
Posts: 308 (0.71/day)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 127 Times in 77 Posts
|
Well im looking forward to Gefroce variant, hopefully Q1-Q3 2013
Im mostly or only interested in these 2 features that are missing in GK104. my quote form nvidia.forums lol Quote:
And someone made a make believe benchmark, here http://www.ocaholic.ch/xoops/html/mo...php?itemid=747 And to tell the truth i had a feeling its gonna be something like that, but still Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to TheHunter For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#43 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southeastern Virginia
Posts: 3,792 (1.95/day)
Thanks: 381
Thanked 1,106 Times in 814 Posts
|
well my 5870's in crossfire are about the same as a GTX680/6990/7970. One 5870 give like 98% of the performance a 6950 gives, so really the only advantage a 6950 crossfire or 6990 card has over my setup is better scaling.
__________________
“Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.”
“Amd....definitely a blond female.....not much on the cpu side, but always strutting about showing off her gpus......wow that was bad. I apologize.” -ensabrenoir
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 637 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 108 Times in 82 Posts
|
I dont see anyone asking one of the obvious questions. Well to me atleast.
When was the last time Nvidia up-scaled a die size after releasing a flagship card ? I'll give you a cookie if you can get it right ![]() ^for all you cynical people single board dual GPUs dont count ![]() Thats what it would have to do to keep GK110 as is or as its predicted by the original poster. He mentions 28nm variant but is using GK110 scalability performance to match that of GK104 in his graphs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: ATL, GA
Posts: 1,222 (0.71/day)
Thanks: 129
Thanked 167 Times in 115 Posts
|
Why would they release this so soon. I could see this coming out next January maybe, but they still haven't put out a 660 ti 660 650 cards.
__________________
NOCT-Gaming.org "Half Bouncey Castle/Half Business meeting" Focused on Guild Missions and Structured PvP/World PvP |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Hunting for Prey
Posts: 308 (0.71/day)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 127 Times in 77 Posts
|
So soon? Imo is still far away (Q4 2012) and only Tesla at first. I have no doubt Geforce variant will follow, but yea sometime next year 2013..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 | ||
![]() Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: republic of mancunia UK
Posts: 2,321 (1.94/day)
Thanks: 857
Thanked 392 Times in 330 Posts
|
Quote:
you need further proof,,![]() Quote:
![]() come on Big Kep ya bastid releaseth thyself, im starting to think nvidia are deffinately bringing this (gK110)out ,pre christmass too ,as it seems to me they are trying to fully outshine the competition by as big a margin as possible , id prefer they actually made a few to sell though too ![]() imho this would be great as it gives AMD a higher cliff face to climb for the 8xxx's
__________________
Last edited by theoneandonlymrk; May 23, 2012 at 04:58 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: Brunswick, GA
Posts: 3,039 (2.05/day)
Thanks: 2,779
Thanked 685 Times in 461 Posts
|
Just one more thing to piss off the GTX 680 early adopters
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 637 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 108 Times in 82 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GTX 680 Generally Faster Than HD 7970: New Benchmarks | btarunr | News | 273 | Mar 20, 2012 04:29 PM |
| GeForce GTX 680 Up To 40% Faster Than Radeon HD 7970: NVIDIA | btarunr | News | 192 | Mar 16, 2012 11:02 PM |
| GTX 680 , GK110, Gpu-z screenshot, fake or real | crazy | GPU-Z | 10 | Jan 29, 2012 01:28 AM |
| GeForce GTX 580 Expected to be 20% Faster than GeForce GTX 480 | btarunr | News | 98 | Oct 27, 2010 01:56 PM |
| R700 up to 80 % Faster than GeForce GTX 280 | btarunr | News | 149 | Jul 13, 2008 08:16 AM |