techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > Graphics Cards > NVIDIA

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Apr 30, 2012, 05:12 PM   #26
sergionography
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 252 (0.51/day)
Thanks: 64
Thanked 30 Times in 28 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by thunderising View Post
It's not much of a crush, because most of the revenue comes from under 300$, heck, under 250$ cards. And AMD has that covered since a loong time really. So it's more like the fastest card tag being a matter of prestige in us geek's eyes

Also, according to me, the HD7800 series DIE is the actual winner in this entire series. It's amazing, perfect, I believe if AMD had worked a month or two more on fine tuning it further, heck if they released the HD7870 as this:

- 1200MHz Core
- 1700MHz Memory (use 7GT/s chips already!)

The card would actually have left HD7970 in the dust, while being a HELL lot cheaper, to consumers and AMD as well.
that is very true, the 7970 is the least efficient in the family, 7800 series makes the best use of the GCN cores, if amd fine tuned the 7970 better they wouldve had 20% better performance(as much as people say kepler is the most effiecient i think GCN is even more efficient, they just happen to look at tahiti and not GCN as a whole)
however september october that is 2month before amd releases the 8000 series, if an 8970 makes good use of gcn(not to mention tweaks to the architecture) and gets that 20% performance its supposed to have, and equip it with more cores (2304) then there you have something like 30% faster than tahiti xt.
sergionography is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 30, 2012, 05:21 PM   #27
Phusius
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,262 (2.79/day)
Thanks: 621
Thanked 380 Times in 208 Posts

System Specs

I highly doubt the 8000 series will be out this Fall.
Phusius is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 30, 2012, 05:31 PM   #28
MxPhenom 216
Knowledgeable Posting Whore
 
MxPhenom 216's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 6,038 (5.90/day)
Thanks: 1,340
Thanked 1,202 Times in 909 Posts

System Specs

25% better in gaming is pretty good. I have a feeling since this is the GK110 that itll be about 40% better in Direct Compute
__________________
Motocross is not just a sport, it's a lifestyle.

File Server: Intel Pentium G630, 8GB PNY 1600, AsRock H77M Micro, Corsair CX430M, Vertex 2 90GB (OS), 2x WD Red 2TB in RAID1
“We will never know our full potential, unless we push ourselves to find it. -Travis Rice”
MxPhenom 216 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 1, 2012, 06:18 AM   #29
sergionography
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 252 (0.51/day)
Thanks: 64
Thanked 30 Times in 28 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phusius View Post
I highly doubt the 8000 series will be out this Fall.
oh amds graphics division has been perfect with release dates/execution, their whole methodology works around that rather than just completion of intended project(like nvidia)
amd is adapting that methodology in cpus as well now and they have been doing pretty well in terms of meeting deadlines
sergionography is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old May 1, 2012, 08:55 AM   #30
Protagonist
500 Posts
 
Protagonist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 685 (0.67/day)
Thanks: 18
Thanked 116 Times in 89 Posts

System Specs

Lets wait and see but i highly doubt this info, i guess they will skip straight to 7xx series
Protagonist is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 1, 2012, 09:41 PM   #31
Hilux SSRG
200 Posts
 
Hilux SSRG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Northern NJ, USA
Posts: 263 (0.63/day)
Thanks: 52
Thanked 32 Times in 24 Posts

System Specs

So I can reasonably pay $250-325 for a midrange 670 base/Ti in Q3 of 2012. Until then I can pay at least a hundred dollars when its released next week. Wonderful.
Hilux SSRG is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 2, 2012, 04:10 AM   #32
washd123
25 Posts
 
washd123's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 50 (0.12/day)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts

the gtx680 is already $500, is this going to be over $600 or something?
washd123 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 2, 2012, 08:31 AM   #33
sergionography
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 252 (0.51/day)
Thanks: 64
Thanked 30 Times in 28 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by washd123 View Post
the gtx680 is already $500, is this going to be over $600 or something?
1000
sergionography is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old May 2, 2012, 08:53 AM   #34
eidairaman1
Eligible for custom title
 
eidairaman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HTX
Posts: 10,099 (4.63/day)
Thanks: 1,364
Thanked 1,164 Times in 1,040 Posts
Send a message via MSN to eidairaman1

System Specs

lets see, G80-G92 all over again, then GF 9 series had nothing to bring to the table
__________________
Athlon XP USERS with COD 4 FIX
http://www.techsupportforum.com/foru...ls-202011.html
http://www.howorks.com/2011/02/24/ho...-memory-limit/
“Sometimes my level of fail is unprecedented.” -TheMailMan78
“This is what the force of a thousand suns looks like.” -3870x2
eidairaman1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 2, 2012, 09:02 AM   #35
xenocide
1000 Posts
 
xenocide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Burlington, VT
Posts: 1,709 (2.09/day)
Thanks: 228
Thanked 405 Times in 298 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by washd123 View Post
the gtx680 is already $500, is this going to be over $600 or something?
Like I said, it's more than likely that if Nvidia were going to launch GK110, they would do it as the 7xx series, and rebadge GK104 chips to make up the lower segment GPU's (750, 760, etc.) So more than likely if when Nvidia does get around to launching a 685 or 780, it will be at $500-600, and current high-end GPU's will be lower cost by then.
__________________
If BF3 doesn't turn out to be the biggest selling PC shooter of all time, then I will eat my graphics card. -MatTheCat
xenocide is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2012, 10:48 AM   #36
Conti027
1000 Posts
 
Conti027's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kent, Washington
Posts: 1,018 (0.44/day)
Thanks: 129
Thanked 73 Times in 58 Posts

System Specs

Well seeing how the GK110 is the GTX690 I'm wondering what the GK112 is?
I was thinking about picking up a GTX690 but I'm really curious what the GK112 is going to be.
I'm sure the GTX690 will be more powerful but the GK112 could be a good middle ground between the GTX680 and GTX690
__________________
Conti027 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2012, 10:52 AM   #37
Red_Machine
1000 Posts
 
Red_Machine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Marlow, ENGLAND
Posts: 1,454 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 149
Thanked 279 Times in 226 Posts

System Specs

No, the GK110 is NOT the GTX 690. That's 2xGK104 GPUs.

Currently, the only card planned with a GK110 is a Tesla GPGPU.
__________________
Alienware M11x R1 Netbook:
1.3GHz Core2 Duo U7300 (OC'd to 1.7GHz) | 8GB Corsair DDR3 1333MHz | nVIDIA GeForce GT 335M 1GB/Intel GMA 4500MHD Hyrbid Graphics System | Western Digital Scorpio Black 500GB | Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit


Microsoft Certified Desktop Support Technician | CompTIA A+ Certified
Heatware
Red_Machine is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Red_Machine For This Useful Post:
Old May 23, 2012, 12:07 PM   #38
lilhasselhoffer
1000 Posts
 
lilhasselhoffer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: East Coast, USA
Posts: 1,169 (1.44/day)
Thanks: 110
Thanked 667 Times in 389 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by sergionography View Post
...however september october that is 2month before amd releases the 8000 series, if an 8970 makes good use of gcn(not to mention tweaks to the architecture) and gets that 20% performance its supposed to have, and equip it with more cores (2304) then there you have something like 30% faster than tahiti xt.
Help me to understand this statement.

What I see is:
1) Yields from the manufacturer are miserable, so few cards are leaving AMD and Nvidea both.
2) AMD has yet to release the 7990.
3) Kepler has yet to make a dent in the market, because of extremely limited availability.
4) AMD is now working on performance enhancements of the 7xxx series, to more accurately compete with Kepler.
5) There were recently price drops from AMD, but not enough to cover every market segment.


All five of these things suggest that the 7xxx series still has a lot of life left in it. Why, other than holiday buying, would AMD release a new line? They shoot down the possibility of buyers going for the current cards, and with current yields couldn't produce enough cards for a proper launch if they started in the next month.

I'd prefer to see AMD go balls-to-the-wall, and get a variant of the 7xxx series to compete with Kepler (680, as GK110 is likely to be nearly untouchable performance high). Nvidea keeps releasing news of continuously improving cards (without actual market availability). It would be nice to have an AMD product that competes with Kepler, and is actually available to purchase.

Barring this, Nvidea is winning the PR war. Better benches, more products being released, and a substantial enough shortage to drive consumers to pay way too much for a GPU. AMD may win the race though, as it's impossible to buy a card that isn't on store shelves. Here's to 2013; the next generation is likely to be released, and with the yields higher they might actually be available from both companies.
__________________
You haven't seen anything until you've seen this.
*pokes computer*
Wow! I didn't know the blue screen of death could get a blue screen of death.
lilhasselhoffer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2012, 12:28 PM   #39
eidairaman1
Eligible for custom title
 
eidairaman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HTX
Posts: 10,099 (4.63/day)
Thanks: 1,364
Thanked 1,164 Times in 1,040 Posts
Send a message via MSN to eidairaman1

System Specs

Dude have you been Sleeping under a Rock? Most Games tested here 7970 takes lead by 5-10% In multiple Resolutions, Only things faster are the 6990, 590, 690.

If Im not mistaken the 680 is clocked higher from factory over the 7970.

http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/sh...=1#post2636770

Quote:
Originally Posted by lilhasselhoffer View Post
Help me to understand this statement.

What I see is:
1) Yields from the manufacturer are miserable, so few cards are leaving AMD and Nvidea both.
2) AMD has yet to release the 7990.
3) Kepler has yet to make a dent in the market, because of extremely limited availability.
4) AMD is now working on performance enhancements of the 7xxx series, to more accurately compete with Kepler.
5) There were recently price drops from AMD, but not enough to cover every market segment.


All five of these things suggest that the 7xxx series still has a lot of life left in it. Why, other than holiday buying, would AMD release a new line? They shoot down the possibility of buyers going for the current cards, and with current yields couldn't produce enough cards for a proper launch if they started in the next month.

I'd prefer to see AMD go balls-to-the-wall, and get a variant of the 7xxx series to compete with Kepler (680, as GK110 is likely to be nearly untouchable performance high). Nvidea keeps releasing news of continuously improving cards (without actual market availability). It would be nice to have an AMD product that competes with Kepler, and is actually available to purchase.

Barring this, Nvidea is winning the PR war. Better benches, more products being released, and a substantial enough shortage to drive consumers to pay way too much for a GPU. AMD may win the race though, as it's impossible to buy a card that isn't on store shelves. Here's to 2013; the next generation is likely to be released, and with the yields higher they might actually be available from both companies.
__________________
Athlon XP USERS with COD 4 FIX
http://www.techsupportforum.com/foru...ls-202011.html
http://www.howorks.com/2011/02/24/ho...-memory-limit/
“Sometimes my level of fail is unprecedented.” -TheMailMan78
“This is what the force of a thousand suns looks like.” -3870x2
eidairaman1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2012, 12:36 PM   #40
BarbaricSoul
3500 Posts
 
BarbaricSoul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southeastern Virginia
Posts: 3,792 (1.95/day)
Thanks: 381
Thanked 1,106 Times in 814 Posts
Send a message via MSN to BarbaricSoul

System Specs

this is what will be replacing my 5870 crossfireX set-up
__________________
“Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.”

“Amd....definitely a blond female.....not much on the cpu side, but always strutting about showing off her gpus......wow that was bad. I apologize.” -ensabrenoir
BarbaricSoul is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2012, 01:26 PM   #41
eidairaman1
Eligible for custom title
 
eidairaman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HTX
Posts: 10,099 (4.63/day)
Thanks: 1,364
Thanked 1,164 Times in 1,040 Posts
Send a message via MSN to eidairaman1

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by BarbaricSoul View Post
this is what will be replacing my 5870 crossfireX set-up
whats amazing is most are keeping 4870s, 5870s, etc now adays
__________________
Athlon XP USERS with COD 4 FIX
http://www.techsupportforum.com/foru...ls-202011.html
http://www.howorks.com/2011/02/24/ho...-memory-limit/
“Sometimes my level of fail is unprecedented.” -TheMailMan78
“This is what the force of a thousand suns looks like.” -3870x2
eidairaman1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2012, 01:32 PM   #42
TheHunter
200 Posts
 
TheHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Hunting for Prey
Posts: 308 (0.71/day)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 127 Times in 77 Posts

System Specs

Well im looking forward to Gefroce variant, hopefully Q1-Q3 2013

Im mostly or only interested in these 2 features that are missing in GK104.

my quote form nvidia.forums lol
Quote:
hehe nvidia please give us GK110 in geforce and dont skip HyperQ, dynamic parallelism..

Both options are very welcome, especially HyperQ. Dynamic parallelism is very cool too, no need for uber fast cpu. I could still use my OC'ed Q9450 with it




http://www.nvidia.com/object/nvidia-kepler.html


And someone made a make believe benchmark, here
http://www.ocaholic.ch/xoops/html/mo...php?itemid=747


And to tell the truth i had a feeling its gonna be something like that, but still
Quote:
We remind you that those aren't the real results of the GK110 performance nor random numbers, it is a prediction based on a valable hypothesis!
no sheit?!
TheHunter is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TheHunter For This Useful Post:
Old May 23, 2012, 02:31 PM   #43
BarbaricSoul
3500 Posts
 
BarbaricSoul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southeastern Virginia
Posts: 3,792 (1.95/day)
Thanks: 381
Thanked 1,106 Times in 814 Posts
Send a message via MSN to BarbaricSoul

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by eidairaman1 View Post
whats amazing is most are keeping 4870s, 5870s, etc now adays
well my 5870's in crossfire are about the same as a GTX680/6990/7970. One 5870 give like 98% of the performance a 6950 gives, so really the only advantage a 6950 crossfire or 6990 card has over my setup is better scaling.
__________________
“Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.”

“Amd....definitely a blond female.....not much on the cpu side, but always strutting about showing off her gpus......wow that was bad. I apologize.” -ensabrenoir
BarbaricSoul is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2012, 03:56 PM   #44
Xzibit
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 637 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 108 Times in 82 Posts

I dont see anyone asking one of the obvious questions. Well to me atleast.

When was the last time Nvidia up-scaled a die size after releasing a flagship card ? I'll give you a cookie if you can get it right
^for all you cynical people single board dual GPUs dont count

Thats what it would have to do to keep GK110 as is or as its predicted by the original poster. He mentions 28nm variant but is using GK110 scalability performance to match that of GK104 in his graphs.
Xzibit is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2012, 04:00 PM   #45
bpgt64
1000 Posts
 
bpgt64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: ATL, GA
Posts: 1,222 (0.71/day)
Thanks: 129
Thanked 167 Times in 115 Posts

System Specs

Why would they release this so soon. I could see this coming out next January maybe, but they still haven't put out a 660 ti 660 650 cards.
__________________
NOCT-Gaming.org
"Half Bouncey Castle/Half Business meeting"
Focused on Guild Missions and Structured PvP/World PvP
bpgt64 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2012, 04:10 PM   #46
alexsubri
1000 Posts
 
alexsubri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,250 (1.02/day)
Thanks: 123
Thanked 200 Times in 130 Posts

System Specs

ATI has something up their sleeve...i can feel it

__________________
Heatware
alexsubri is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2012, 04:47 PM   #47
TheHunter
200 Posts
 
TheHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Hunting for Prey
Posts: 308 (0.71/day)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 127 Times in 77 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by bpgt64 View Post
Why would they release this so soon. I could see this coming out next January maybe, but they still haven't put out a 660 ti 660 650 cards.
So soon? Imo is still far away (Q4 2012) and only Tesla at first. I have no doubt Geforce variant will follow, but yea sometime next year 2013..
TheHunter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2012, 04:52 PM   #48
theoneandonlymrk
2000 Posts
 
theoneandonlymrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: republic of mancunia UK
Posts: 2,321 (1.94/day)
Thanks: 857
Thanked 392 Times in 330 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to theoneandonlymrk

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by slyfox2151 View Post
if this does indeed come out... does that finally prove the 680 was/is a mid range card with a high price tag?



only time will tell if this is in fact true.... and not something made up.
you need further proof,,

Quote:
Originally Posted by eidairaman1 View Post
whats amazing is most are keeping 4870s, 5870s, etc now adays
at 1000 core a 5870xfire setups still very good 1080p style,

come on Big Kep ya bastid releaseth thyself, im starting to think nvidia are deffinately bringing this (gK110)out ,pre christmass too ,as it seems to me they are trying to fully outshine the competition by as big a margin as possible , id prefer they actually made a few to sell though too

imho this would be great as it gives AMD a higher cliff face to climb for the 8xxx's
__________________

Last edited by theoneandonlymrk; May 23, 2012 at 04:58 PM.
theoneandonlymrk is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2012, 05:03 PM   #49
Soylent Joe
2000 Posts
 
Soylent Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Brunswick, GA
Posts: 3,039 (2.05/day)
Thanks: 2,779
Thanked 685 Times in 461 Posts

System Specs

Just one more thing to piss off the GTX 680 early adopters
__________________
Soylent Joe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2012, 05:08 PM   #50
Xzibit
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 637 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 108 Times in 82 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soylent Joe View Post
Just one more thing to piss off the GTX 680 early adopters
Someones got to pay for R & D
Xzibit is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GTX 680 Generally Faster Than HD 7970: New Benchmarks btarunr News 273 Mar 20, 2012 04:29 PM
GeForce GTX 680 Up To 40% Faster Than Radeon HD 7970: NVIDIA btarunr News 192 Mar 16, 2012 11:02 PM
GTX 680 , GK110, Gpu-z screenshot, fake or real crazy GPU-Z 10 Jan 29, 2012 01:28 AM
GeForce GTX 580 Expected to be 20% Faster than GeForce GTX 480 btarunr News 98 Oct 27, 2010 01:56 PM
R700 up to 80 % Faster than GeForce GTX 280 btarunr News 149 Jul 13, 2008 08:16 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts