techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Apr 30, 2012, 09:07 PM   #1
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,766 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,215 Times in 3,159 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 4096 MB

To read this review go to: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/N...Force_GTX_690/

Last edited by W1zzard; Oct 21, 2012 at 05:07 PM.
W1zzard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 01:05 PM   #2
mtosev
1000 Posts
 
mtosev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maribor, Slovenia
Posts: 1,145 (0.38/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 147 Times in 107 Posts

System Specs

Awesome card. I didn't expect such a good card from nVidia
AMD's answer to this card will be interesting
__________________
My notebook:

Dell Inspiron 1520 (6464) Intel Core 2 Duo (Merom) T7500, 2gb Hyundai 667MHz DDR2 CL5, 8600M GT 256Mb DDR2, 160Gb Seagate NCQ SATA, TSST DVD-RAM/+/-RW, PM/GM965 chipset

[img disabled]http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/534/326cd7.gif[/IMG]

CNN - "The Most Trusted Name in News"
mtosev is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mtosev For This Useful Post:
Old May 3, 2012, 01:11 PM   #3
LAN_deRf_HA
3500 Posts
 
LAN_deRf_HA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,022 (2.15/day)
Thanks: 290
Thanked 831 Times in 588 Posts

System Specs

How did they achieve the same performance as 680 sli with lower clock speeds? More than just sli/xfire on a stick for once?
LAN_deRf_HA is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 01:12 PM   #4
AthlonX2
Better Than You
 
AthlonX2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toledo,Ohio
Posts: 5,449 (2.24/day)
Thanks: 729
Thanked 1,572 Times in 994 Posts

System Specs

great review
AthlonX2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 01:12 PM   #5
entropy13
2000 Posts
 
entropy13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Philippines
Posts: 3,423 (2.22/day)
Thanks: 42
Thanked 1,132 Times in 713 Posts

System Specs

It really is GTX 680 SLI in just one card, thus saving on space and power. Looks like the slightly lower default core clock doesn't really hurt it too.
__________________
MSI P67A-GD65 (B3), Intel Core i5 2500K, Corsair H60, 2x MSI GTX 570 Twin Frozr II/OC, G.Skill RipjawsX (2x4GB) DDR3-1600 RAM, OCZ Agility 3 120GB + 2TB, Corsair AX1200, Corsair Carbide 400R

MSI Z68MA-ED55, i5 2500K, Noctua NH-U9B SE2, Inno3D GTX 570, Corsair Vengeance LP 8GB, OCZ Agility 3 120GB + 1TB, Seasonic X660, Lian Li PC-V600FB

The Big Useful List of Free Useful Programs To Use Usually For Free
entropy13 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 01:13 PM   #6
zsolt_93
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Romania
Posts: 128 (0.12/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 23 Times in 19 Posts

System Specs

This is awesome. It is what a dual gpu card was meant to be. Good power consumption and good thermals while being as fast as two separate gpus, only drawback is the ocability, but that is a calculated risk when using a dual gpu. It will be hard for the 7990 to beat it not in performace, but in power consumption and efficiency things that don't really excel with the current 7970s compared to the 680. Performance of 7990 i think is expected to be a little higher than the 690 as crossfire worked better for amd this generation than nvidias sli.
zsolt_93 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 01:20 PM   #7
imitation
75 Posts
 
imitation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 125 (0.17/day)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 21 Times in 17 Posts

System Specs

Wow, that is one great card! They managed to put two 680s on one board without sacrificing performance, but still reduced power consumption over two individual cards.
It will be interesting what AMD comes up with to compete with this beast. I seriously doubt a 7990 will beat this.

Thanks for the review!

Last edited by imitation; May 3, 2012 at 01:27 PM.
imitation is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 01:23 PM   #8
DarkOCean
1000 Posts
 
DarkOCean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: on top of that big mountain on mars(e Eu)
Posts: 1,418 (0.90/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 272 Times in 234 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by LAN_deRf_HA View Post
How did they achieve the same performance as 680 sli with lower clock speeds? More than just sli/xfire on a stick for once?
The gpus are on the same board wich results in lower latency and much higher boost.
DarkOCean is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 01:26 PM   #9
Benetanegia
2000 Posts
 
Benetanegia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Reaching your left retina.
Posts: 2,683 (1.99/day)
Thanks: 125
Thanked 701 Times in 494 Posts

Excellent review. I love the fact that you included GTX680 SLI results and they are very interesting.

As to the card I think this has to be the best dual-GPU card ever made. Too bad it costs so much, though I guess it makes more sense than GTX680 SLI which would cost the same and produce more noise and heat..
Benetanegia is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 01:30 PM   #10
Chaitanya
200 Posts
 
Chaitanya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Pune
Posts: 287 (0.36/day)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 29 Times in 20 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to Chaitanya

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtosev View Post
AMD's answer to this card will be interesting
wait for Computex...
Chaitanya is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Chaitanya For This Useful Post:
Old May 3, 2012, 01:30 PM   #11
imitation
75 Posts
 
imitation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 125 (0.17/day)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 21 Times in 17 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkOCean View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAN_deRf_HA View Post
How did they achieve the same performance as 680 sli with lower clock speeds? More than just sli/xfire on a stick for once?
The gpus are on the same board wich results in lower latency and much higher boost.
Dynamic O/C pushes the 690 to clocks similar to two 680s (page 32).
imitation is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to imitation For This Useful Post:
Old May 3, 2012, 01:37 PM   #12
ViperXTR
1000 Posts
 
ViperXTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pasig City, Philippines
Posts: 1,028 (1.22/day)
Thanks: 108
Thanked 339 Times in 190 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to ViperXTR

System Specs

$999 ugh
ViperXTR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 01:39 PM   #13
AthlonX2
Better Than You
 
AthlonX2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toledo,Ohio
Posts: 5,449 (2.24/day)
Thanks: 729
Thanked 1,572 Times in 994 Posts

System Specs

This isnt a mainstream card,and we all expected the high price tag. so im not sure what the fuss is about? It is the fastest GPU available,and even when AMD releases there 7990 it wont touch this 690
AthlonX2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to AthlonX2 For This Useful Post:
Old May 3, 2012, 01:40 PM   #14
okidna
200 Posts
 
okidna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 362 (0.72/day)
Thanks: 496
Thanked 271 Times in 151 Posts

System Specs

Top review, w1zz.

Those power consumption.... Wow.. Dual GPU, nearly twice the performance of single GTX 580 and only consume a couple watts more from GTX 580. Amazing.
okidna is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 01:44 PM   #15
DarkOCean
1000 Posts
 
DarkOCean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: on top of that big mountain on mars(e Eu)
Posts: 1,418 (0.90/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 272 Times in 234 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by imitation View Post
Dynamic O/C pushes the 690 to clocks similar to two 680s (page 32).
Still the dynamic oc push 680's even higher to 1111mhz.
DarkOCean is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 01:44 PM   #16
mstenholm
1000 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,772 (1.37/day)
Thanks: 1,009
Thanked 1,048 Times in 644 Posts

System Specs

Thx w1zzard. Good review. You might want to look at this phrase again - lowers maximum boost clocks by 13 MHz each 10°C, so there would be an extra 13 MHz if the card ran 1.5°C cooler.
mstenholm is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 01:45 PM   #17
EarthDog
2000 Posts
 
EarthDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,052 (1.66/day)
Thanks: 246
Thanked 349 Times in 303 Posts

System Specs

$1k for this thing? LOL!

Great review Wiz!
EarthDog is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 01:47 PM   #18
Dj-ElectriC
1000 Posts
 
Dj-ElectriC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Trollithia
Posts: 1,579 (1.56/day)
Thanks: 141
Thanked 643 Times in 300 Posts

System Specs

I'm gonna say meh.
There, i said it
__________________


Battletag: HolyDiver#1664
Dj-ElectriC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 01:48 PM   #19
Crap Daddy
2000 Posts
 
Crap Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,284 (2.44/day)
Thanks: 943
Thanked 963 Times in 671 Posts

System Specs

Well, that's it. Fastest dual card "in the universe". Goodbye GK110 for the GTX600 series. Average improvement over 7970 crossfire 21% (That's in another review from the web).
They knew why they launch before AMD. A dual AMD card based on Tahiti can't beat this.
Now all we need is some... money.
Crap Daddy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 01:55 PM   #20
D007
2000 Posts
 
D007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pompano beach, Florida
Posts: 2,464 (1.09/day)
Thanks: 455
Thanked 331 Times in 264 Posts
Send a message via MSN to D007

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by LAN_deRf_HA View Post
How did they achieve the same performance as 680 sli with lower clock speeds? More than just sli/xfire on a stick for once?
Well, you start by charging everyone about $200.00 more dollars, than any other dual gpu on the market.. Then I guess, that allows you, the head room, to screw them.. Said it before, I find the prices insulting..
__________________
There is nothing more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity. "Martin Luther King"
D007 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 01:57 PM   #21
Steevo
Eligible for custom title
 
Steevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,567 (2.02/day)
Thanks: 238
Thanked 979 Times in 729 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benetanegia View Post
Excellent review. I love the fact that you included GTX680 SLI results and they are very interesting.

As to the card I think this has to be the best dual-GPU card ever made. Too bad it costs so much, though I guess it makes more sense than GTX680 SLI which would cost the same and produce more noise and heat..
It is an amazing card. This might turn me from the red side......


So, full coverage waterblocks........when do we get them?
__________________

“it would have been perfect....its got trains and the line"tech your kids not to do what iv done"(or similar) because i had obviously done something to warrent 2 e-thugs to come 4000miles out of their way and kill me.” -Solaris17
“yeah i failed. i noticed the "coming soon" part after i posted.” -Mussels
“people are just stupid.” -W1zzard
Yes I am evil, yes you can have some.
Steevo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 01:57 PM   #22
Fluffmeister
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 287 (0.56/day)
Thanks: 126
Thanked 81 Times in 33 Posts

What an amazing card, ass tons of performance whilst running cool, quiet and consuming less power.

Fluffmeister is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 02:00 PM   #23
Woodhull
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 7 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

dbA

All that extra expense and hype for the stock cooler and it's still 42 dbA @ load. They need to learn from Arctic, their 6990 air cooler took the 6990 from the loudest card @ 53 dbA to around 33.4 dbA (Furmark, per KitGuru). It is triple slot, but it also has to dissipate more wattage.
Woodhull is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 02:02 PM   #24
mastrdrver
2000 Posts
 
mastrdrver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,341 (1.51/day)
Thanks: 497
Thanked 491 Times in 395 Posts

System Specs

Thanks for doing the multi monitor resolution. Is this something your going to do with certain cards from now on or for all cards?

Also shouldn't that be the resolution in the performance summaries instead of 2560x1600?
__________________
AV-Test reports (updated Quarterly)
Fan sounds, airflow, and voltage/rpm recordings: Martinm210, Cooling Technique, atreviewnet
mastrdrver is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 02:08 PM   #25
raptori
500 Posts
 
raptori's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Baghdad,Iraq
Posts: 506 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 58
Thanked 62 Times in 46 Posts

System Specs

Power consume is very good ... good job Nvidia really good job
raptori is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 Launched btarunr News 111 May 1, 2012 01:36 PM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 Slated for April 28, Launches at GeForce LAN, in Shanghai btarunr News 41 Apr 29, 2012 04:36 AM
NVIDIA to Launch GeForce GTX 690 Before May 5 btarunr News 72 Apr 26, 2012 05:19 PM
ASUS MARS Dual GeForce GTX 285 4096 MB W1zzard Reviews 42 Oct 21, 2009 02:52 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts