techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 3, 2012, 09:00 PM   #101
HammerON
The Watchful Moderator
 
HammerON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Cold North
Posts: 4,346 (2.82/day)
Thanks: 3,975
Thanked 2,872 Times in 1,541 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by symmetrical View Post
Yes it's valued as two GTX 680s, and is probably more worth it than two 680s. It still doesn't remove the shock factor.
Agree
HammerON is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 09:02 PM   #102
EarthDog
2000 Posts
 
EarthDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,051 (1.66/day)
Thanks: 246
Thanked 349 Times in 303 Posts

System Specs

Its valued as that, yup. However, in previous generations of cards, like 590, 6990, etc, the pricing didnt represent performance. Those cards were usually slightly slower than its SLI/Crossfire counterparts but cost maybe 1.5x the card (IIRC), while this one is the same or a hair faster.

You didnt see GTX 295's, 590's, 6990's at twice the price though.
EarthDog is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 09:07 PM   #103
douglatins
2000 Posts
 
douglatins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brasil
Posts: 2,607 (1.42/day)
Thanks: 295
Thanked 268 Times in 204 Posts
Send a message via MSN to douglatins Send a message via Skype™ to douglatins

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by EarthDog View Post
Its valued as that, yup. However, in previous generations of cards, like 590, 6990, etc, the pricing didnt represent performance. Those cards were usually slightly slower than its SLI/Crossfire counterparts but cost maybe 1.5x the card (IIRC), while this one is the same or a hair faster.

You didnt see GTX 295's, 590's, 5970's, 6990's at twice the price though.
Fixed

+1. And 999 is like other people said too shocking to accept.
Make it 1.5x the price of a 680 and 90% the performance of a SLI setup, like always.

Would be funny if Asus decided to make a ARES 3. true TRUE 680 SLI. 1800USD.

And a 690 hidro copper, yours for only 1300USD.

Also my opinion is that 1000usd on a single card is not the best investment, dual gpu super top cards lose their value faster and are harder to sell.
__________________

douglatins is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 09:11 PM   #104
15th Warlock
1000 Posts
 
15th Warlock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California, U.S.A.
Posts: 1,984 (0.62/day)
Thanks: 549
Thanked 510 Times in 215 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Melvis View Post
4870X2

This card is Epic unlike the 590 which was (in W1zzards own words) Epic Fail.
Thanks for refreshing my memory, I forgot about the 4870X2, it truly was an equal to two high end cards

Yes, Nvidia can afford to fix some of the mistakes they made with the 590 thanks to the versatility of GK104, we have to remember that this GPU was really meant to be the GTX670, but due to its high performance, it was marketed as a high end part, now Nvidia is laughing all the way to the bank

Can you imagine the profit margins on a 690? it's two 294mm2 dies after all, about the same size as a 9800GT (a card that was found at $300 back in the day), and they can market this card as a premium product, using materials as aluminum, poly carbonate and magnesium for the shroud alone, in my opinion, they took a page from Apple's book.

It'll take AMD to price the 7990 way low to maybe bring the price of the 690 down, and maybe not even that will be enough, as I mentioned, this is a halo product, and a major PR win for Nvidia anyway you slice it, already review sites are comparing this card to an exotic sports car, rare and unattainable by the vast majority of the population, but highly desirable, and Nvidia is pricing it as such.
__________________
Main Rig: See System Specs
HTPC Game room: Ci7 SB 2600K@4.5Ghz - Asus ROG Maximus IV Gene-Z - EVGA 2xGTX680s SLI - 4x4GBs GSkill Ripjaws - 2x120GBs Vertex 3MIOPS - OCZ 1.25 kW PSU
HTPC Bedroom: C2Q Q9550@3.4Ghz - Asus ROG Striker II - EVGA 2xGTX680s SLI - 2x4GBs Kingston HyperX - 2x120GBs Agility 3 - SB Recon3D - Silverstone 1 kW PSU
Lappy: Samsung Series 7 NP700G7C - Ci7 IVB 3610QM@2.3~3.3Ghz - 17.3" 1920x1080 120 Hz - GeForce GTX675M - 16GBs 1600Mhz RAM - 512GBs Crucial M4 - 6X BluRay
15th Warlock is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to 15th Warlock For This Useful Post:
Old May 3, 2012, 09:12 PM   #105
HammerON
The Watchful Moderator
 
HammerON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Cold North
Posts: 4,346 (2.82/day)
Thanks: 3,975
Thanked 2,872 Times in 1,541 Posts

System Specs

It may be shocking, but if I want a true dual GTX 680 card and not a dual GTX 670 then the price is worth it in my opinion. I spent over a thousand dollars when I purchased my GTX 580's. There are some people that are going to buy these at the stated price, not many however. But that is okay as I am sure there will be a limited supply anyways.
HammerON is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 09:14 PM   #106
qubit
Overclocked quantum bit
 
qubit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Quantumville UK
Posts: 8,646 (4.34/day)
Thanks: 4,176
Thanked 3,302 Times in 1,942 Posts

System Specs

I can't wait for the bottom end GTX 620. The performance difference will be staggering.

Oh hang on, that space is taken up with modern IGPs. Oh well.
__________________
Siggie in the post.
qubit is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 09:17 PM   #107
douglatins
2000 Posts
 
douglatins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brasil
Posts: 2,607 (1.42/day)
Thanks: 295
Thanked 268 Times in 204 Posts
Send a message via MSN to douglatins Send a message via Skype™ to douglatins

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by 15th Warlock View Post
Thanks for refreshing my memory, I forgot about the 4870X2, it truly was an equal to two high end cards

Yes, Nvidia can afford to fix some of the mistakes they made with the 590 thanks to the versatility of GK104, we have to remember that this GPU was really meant to be the GTX670, but due to its high performance, it was marketed as a high end part, now Nvidia is laughing all the way to the bank

Can you imagine the profit margins on a 690? it's two 294mm2 dies after all, about the same size as a 9800GT (a card that was found at $300 back in the day), and they can market this card as a premium product, using materials as aluminum, poly carbonate and magnesium for the shroud alone, in my opinion, they took a page from Apple's book.

It'll take AMD to price the 7990 way low to maybe bring the price of the 690 down, and maybe not even that will be enough, as I mentioned, this is a halo product, and a major PR win for Nvidia anyway you slice it, already review sites are comparing this card to an exotic sports car, rare and unattainable by the vast majority of the population, but highly desirable, and Nvidia is pricing it as such.
Great information here, nvidia could price the 680 all the way to 350, since it was designed for that price range, a mid range card, but performance exceeded the high end solution from AMD, so they bumped the price on it.
__________________

douglatins is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 09:22 PM   #108
GC_PaNzerFIN
200 Posts
 
GC_PaNzerFIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 378 (0.29/day)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 203 Times in 82 Posts

System Specs

Probably the most amazing thing is that this dual-GPU card stole the perf/w crown at 2560x1600 resolution.
__________________
WE REQUIRE MORE HARDWARE
GC_PaNzerFIN is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 09:34 PM   #109
piotrekhc
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 18 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

omg world wide crysis and they just release 1k card bravo bravo lets separate riches from poorer even more clap our hands !
piotrekhc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 09:47 PM   #110
Benetanegia
2000 Posts
 
Benetanegia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Reaching your left retina.
Posts: 2,683 (1.99/day)
Thanks: 125
Thanked 701 Times in 494 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by GC_PaNzerFIN View Post
Probably the most amazing thing is that this dual-GPU card stole the perf/w crown at 2560x1600 resolution.
Yeah that's what really surprised me the most.

That and achieving same performance as SLI 680 with 100 Mhz lower clocks.

About that, I wonder if the GTX670 is taking so long because of a similar thing happening. I can somehow imagine Nvidia disabling a cluster and lowering clocks by 100 Mhz as they always do with the GTX x70, just to find out that performance is too close to the GTX680 for them to be comfortable. You know GPU Boost bitting them in the back. I figure it would take them some extra time to find the proper GPU Boost settings, so that it is as fast as they want in most situations but that it does not come too close to the GTX680 in others.
Benetanegia is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 10:05 PM   #111
Casecutter
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 740 (0.97/day)
Thanks: 51
Thanked 51 Times in 44 Posts

As to price there’s two fully capable GK104, fully sorted and vetted "top shelve" parts there's work binning those. Then, a especially this time, there's a bunch of engineering and tooling cost spread over a significantly minuscule production numbers to recoup. That magnesium shroud is not like making a plastic part, for once can see a notable differance in the construction of pieces they used.

They look a perf/price... We got this $$$ for 6990/590, customer basically took all we made and those weren't near as nice as this. They think let’s press to see where the market will bend, we can always lower it and still make profit.

I don't know volume sold on other Dual Offering of the past, but if they know they sold all they could deliver on those (in an austere economy) they figure maybe we can sell "X"-more volume, with "X"-more profit now. The same thing folks decry AMD for when the 7970 release for $550, but these things have a way of working out.

And agian there's a line forming, while other hope to justify/scrounging $1000 to throw at those marketing folks when they get to market. Those selling don’t see it as high... if there's buyers, just those whining they can't.
Casecutter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 10:12 PM   #112
N3M3515
200 Posts
 
N3M3515's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cartagena
Posts: 374 (0.39/day)
Thanks: 173
Thanked 37 Times in 33 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kreij View Post
Yeah, but if it's $200-$300 less expensive ...
Then it definetly would be the better card lol
N3M3515 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2012, 10:24 PM   #113
N3M3515
200 Posts
 
N3M3515's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cartagena
Posts: 374 (0.39/day)
Thanks: 173
Thanked 37 Times in 33 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by EarthDog View Post
Thats the problem... when you put 2 GPU's on a single PCB, PCIe spec is max of 300W so it needs to fit in that envelope. Obviously overclocking wouldnt help make it fit under that number soooo.........
Think about something for a moment: amd released 7970 almost 3 months before gtx 680, and amd also has better yields of the chip, as they said they have no trouble with supply.
So, why didn't amd released 7990 before nvidia released gtx 690?
Maybe, just maybe they are up to something, maybe they managed to lower the power consumption of the gpu without lowering the clocks, maybe they will release it at 1000 or 1050 core clock. We just don't know for sure, but the fact is that amd could have released this card months ago, they just didn't, and for a good reason.

That's a lot of maybes, but hey . . . . . . . . . . .maybe
N3M3515 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to N3M3515 For This Useful Post:
Old May 3, 2012, 10:33 PM   #114
EarthDog
2000 Posts
 
EarthDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,051 (1.66/day)
Thanks: 246
Thanked 349 Times in 303 Posts

System Specs

Maybe... But it already had a 20-25W hurdle to overcome. That said, Nvidia manged to shave off 90W to hit the 300W spec, so who is to say that AMD cant shave off 140W.
EarthDog is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to EarthDog For This Useful Post:
Old May 3, 2012, 11:11 PM   #115
OneCool
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Look behind you!!
Posts: 797 (0.29/day)
Thanks: 71
Thanked 58 Times in 39 Posts

I wish I could afford one myself.

With a grand I could build a nice IB gaming rig
OneCool is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2012, 02:18 AM   #116
mrthanhnguyen
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 151 (0.24/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

System Specs

hi

Why did they release a gtx 690 when gtx 680 is always not in stock? $1200 for gtx 690 gives u equal performance to gtx 680 sli-$1000, less power consumption, and less slot occupied. this gtx690 cost similar as my rig. what the hell is this?
mrthanhnguyen is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2012, 02:54 AM   #117
dude12564
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 457 (0.88/day)
Thanks: 640
Thanked 216 Times in 127 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrthanhnguyen View Post
Why did they release a gtx 690 when gtx 680 is always not in stock? $1200 for gtx 690 gives u equal performance to gtx 680 sli-$1000, less power consumption, and less slot occupied. this gtx690 cost similar as my rig. what the hell is this?
Moneymaking?
dude12564 is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2012, 03:01 AM   #118
manofthem
2000 Posts
 
manofthem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 3,328 (3.85/day)
Thanks: 2,077
Thanked 2,510 Times in 1,274 Posts

System Specs

Another great review W1zz. Love the BF3 bench to show the overclock gains, very practical!

And an awesome card too! That would be an awesome $1k to blow.
manofthem is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2012, 03:02 AM   #119
Delta6326
2000 Posts
 
Delta6326's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Iowa, USA
Posts: 3,287 (1.80/day)
Thanks: 557
Thanked 597 Times in 437 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Delta6326

System Specs

Awesome REVIEW as always

Awesome card with a understandable price. As a company $1000 makes sense, I know most people are hating on the price but it does make sense. the 680 is $500, but you never really find it at that price its around $520-550 here so $999 is good and I think people are for getting that this is made out of magnesium alloy which makes it lighter than other dual GPU cards and its quieter than 2x 680 while saving space and cables. which in my book adds value to a card.

I also do agree that in general GPU's are getting to $$$ for their performance, I personally think that the 680 should cost $400 and the 690 $750-800
__________________
Delta6326 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2012, 04:00 AM   #120
D007
2000 Posts
 
D007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pompano beach, Florida
Posts: 2,463 (1.09/day)
Thanks: 454
Thanked 331 Times in 264 Posts
Send a message via MSN to D007

System Specs

lol people talking about 999.00 and 500.00 what gpu's are you looking at? The prices are horrendous out there.. try more like 1200 and 600..

300-600 is what I feel they should stay at. Sony and Xbox make an entire system for that with a blu ray player.. The blu ray alone at that time was around 600 dollars. They are not being fair with pricing. They are gouging, no mystery to it.. It's upsetting really. People get in trouble for doing things like this. Like how the Ebook scenario got them sued, for fixing prices.. Nvidia and Ati keep this up, they'll be on that wagon soon enough..
__________________
There is nothing more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity. "Martin Luther King"
D007 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2012, 04:09 AM   #121
HTC
1000 Posts
 
HTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Portugal
Posts: 1,920 (1.02/day)
Thanks: 461
Thanked 282 Times in 230 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by D007 View Post
lol people talking about 999.00 and 500.00 what gpu's are you looking at? The prices are horrendous out there.. try more like 1200 and 600..

300-600 is what I feel they should stay at. Sony and Xbox make an entire system for that with a blu ray player.. The blu ray alone at that time was around 600 dollars. They are not being fair with pricing. They are gouging, no mystery to it.. It's upsetting really. People get in trouble for doing things like this. Like how the Ebook scenario got them sued, for fixing prices.. Nvidia and Ati keep this up, they'll be on that wagon soon enough..
Judging by the fact that the 680 is $640 over here, you're a tad bit off.
__________________
HTC - Hugo Teve Cá

I'm PORTUGUESE: apologies for any spelling mistakes!
HTC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2012, 05:01 AM   #122
Darkrealms
500 Posts
 
Darkrealms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 843 (0.37/day)
Thanks: 52
Thanked 23 Times in 20 Posts

Thanks for the awsome review (as always) W1zz!

Nvidia did it right this time. Performance, power, even noise. The price is steep but for what this card can do and the build quality of it, I can see the price tag. If you think about the build quality there isn't a 680 out there, that I've seen, that matches it. Granted out of my reach (willing to pay) but it will make some people very happy.
__________________
ISP
F@H TPU RANK
Darkrealms is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2012, 05:23 AM   #123
MicroUnC
200 Posts
 
MicroUnC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Israel
Posts: 234 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 63
Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by HTC View Post
Judging by the fact that the 680 is $640 over here, you're a tad bit off.
$710 here!
__________________
MicroUnC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2012, 05:35 AM   #124
powow
5 Posts
 
powow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Temanggung
Posts: 5 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via Yahoo to powow

System Specs

honest, it's an almost perfect card.. in 3 digits level, it scores 999.. in dollars too..

it's jussst.. mmm.. if i have that amount of money, i'll spend about 599 bucks to upgrading my present rig.. it can be a much better speaker and soundcard, or more hardisk space,or another video card for SLI, or much much better PSU, etc.. and i'll have much more fun in my gaming room..
the rest 400? buying presents for my girlfriend, hanging around the real world, having so many much fun out there too.. well, fresh air is always good for you..
powow is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to powow For This Useful Post:
Old May 4, 2012, 07:38 AM   #125
MicroUnC
200 Posts
 
MicroUnC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Israel
Posts: 234 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 63
Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by powow View Post
honest, it's an almost perfect card.. in 3 digits level, it scores 999.. in dollars too..

it's jussst.. mmm.. if i have that amount of money, i'll spend about 599 bucks to upgrading my present rig.. it can be a much better speaker and soundcard, or more hardisk space,or another video card for SLI, or much much better PSU, etc.. and i'll have much more fun in my gaming room..
the rest 400? buying presents for my girlfriend, hanging around the real world, having so many much fun out there too.. well, fresh air is always good for you..
Well that is fare enough
__________________
MicroUnC is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MicroUnC For This Useful Post:
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 Launched btarunr News 111 May 1, 2012 01:36 PM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 Slated for April 28, Launches at GeForce LAN, in Shanghai btarunr News 41 Apr 29, 2012 04:36 AM
NVIDIA to Launch GeForce GTX 690 Before May 5 btarunr News 72 Apr 26, 2012 05:19 PM
ASUS MARS Dual GeForce GTX 285 4096 MB W1zzard Reviews 42 Oct 21, 2009 02:52 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts