techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > Graphics Cards > AMD / ATI

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jun 12, 2012, 10:42 AM   #1
Yo_Wattup
500 Posts
 
Yo_Wattup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 704 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 176
Thanked 199 Times in 125 Posts

System Specs

Crossfire video memory...

I thought the amount of video memory, when crossfiring, equals the amount of memory on the card with the lower amount of memory, e.g. if you have a 1GB HD6950 and crossfire it with a 2GB HD 6970, there will only be 1GB available video memory.

Likewise, if you have 2x 2GB 6950's (which is what I have), there will only be 2GB available.


Well check out this picture.. this is a picture of gpu-z just after I closed a 64 player game of Battlefield 3, a game known to eat video memory.



You can see that while I am playing, the video memory usage (dedicated) is at around 3GB, suggesting maximum video memory is 4GB (I hovered my mouse over the part of the bar graph that was highest, this screenshot doesnt show my cursor though).

This information correlates to when I was running one card, because before I crossfired, I was unable to play Battlefield 3 on maximum settings, only 2xMSAA and 0xAF, and memory usage was sitting at 1800MB, now I have MSAA at 8x and AF at 16x, so the fact that theyre using 3000MB kind of makes sense

Is this correct? Or am I missing something? The memory usage (dynamic) never rose above 300mb, so that cant be right.
__________________
Less is not more. More is more.

Yo_Wattup is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 12, 2012, 11:43 AM   #2
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,545 (10.98/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,686 Times in 6,387 Posts

System Specs

GPU-Z shows the video memory, doubled. its a driver/GU-Z bug.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mussels For This Useful Post:
Old Jun 12, 2012, 12:27 PM   #3
HossHuge
1000 Posts
 
HossHuge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 1,809 (1.01/day)
Thanks: 513
Thanked 448 Times in 301 Posts

System Specs

I had the same thing happen to me with my 6850's.

I have another sorta related question. If my vram memory is is being fully utilized will it start to use my system memory?
__________________
But they are useless. They can only give you answers. ~Pablo Picasso, about computers
HossHuge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 12, 2012, 12:32 PM   #4
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,545 (10.98/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,686 Times in 6,387 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by HossHuge View Post
I had the same thing happen to me with my 6850's.

I have another sorta related question. If my vram memory is is being fully utilized will it start to use my system memory?
yes. and thats why you get those sudden tanking FPS drops at 8x aa, yet 2x or 4x runs just fine...
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 12, 2012, 03:04 PM   #5
GotNoRice
75 Posts
 
GotNoRice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Pleasant Hill, CA
Posts: 126 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 57 Times in 41 Posts

System Specs

My 2x 4870x2 monitored via MSI Afterburner also shows 4GB as the memory. When I see it using say 2800/4000 memory, that is actually using 700/1000 per GPU.
GotNoRice is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 12, 2012, 07:13 PM   #6
Yo_Wattup
500 Posts
 
Yo_Wattup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 704 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 176
Thanked 199 Times in 125 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussels View Post
GPU-Z shows the video memory, doubled. its a driver/GU-Z bug.
Okay, thanks. Does w1zz know about this bug?
__________________
Less is not more. More is more.

Yo_Wattup is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 12, 2012, 07:19 PM   #7
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 31,884 (12.77/day)
Thanks: 2,779
Thanked 12,254 Times in 7,807 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yo_Wattup View Post
Okay, thanks. Does w1zz know about this bug?
I don't think it's a bug, it's just reading off of each individual card. Perhaps a memory used bard could be implemented for multi cards, maybe not though.

You are also using a version of GPU-Z that I believe came out before the 79xx series was released. Update that.
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 12, 2012, 07:28 PM   #8
Yo_Wattup
500 Posts
 
Yo_Wattup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 704 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 176
Thanked 199 Times in 125 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by erocker View Post
I don't think it's a bug, it's just reading off of each individual card. Perhaps a memory used bard could be implemented for multi cards, maybe not though.

You are also using a version of GPU-Z that I believe came out before the 79xx series was released. Update that.
Well I would call that a bug. Strange, it only shows memory usage on one of the cards (when I click AMD radeon 6900 series down the bottom)
__________________
Less is not more. More is more.

Yo_Wattup is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 12, 2012, 07:39 PM   #9
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 31,884 (12.77/day)
Thanks: 2,779
Thanked 12,254 Times in 7,807 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yo_Wattup View Post
Well I would call that a bug. Strange, it only shows memory usage on one of the cards (when I click AMD radeon 6900 series down the bottom)
So if you click on "AMD radeon 6900" at the bottom and it shows usage on one card wouldn't that be the correct reading for both cards? Again, try it with the latest GPU-Z.
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 12, 2012, 07:40 PM   #10
Wrigleyvillain
3500 Posts
 
Wrigleyvillain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,498 (2.20/day)
Thanks: 1,524
Thanked 1,573 Times in 1,116 Posts

System Specs

I don't know all the details either but yeah the video memory usage monitoring on AMD cards is more recent functionality and doesn't seem to work quite right, at least yet.
__________________
“i dont care what consoles have they dont have mouse and keyboard” -crazyeyesreaper
Wrigleyvillain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ERROR 6950 crossfire Run out of memory remdiablo AMD / ATI 10 Jan 23, 2012 12:32 AM
Future video card choice: To Crossfire? Or Not? JrRacinFan Graphics Cards 10 Jan 16, 2008 03:43 PM
Does Video Card Memory affect OS memory? suraswami Graphics Cards 13 Sep 28, 2007 10:11 PM
can I use usb 2.0 flash memory(drive)to add to my video card memory ptrick Graphics Cards 7 May 31, 2007 10:10 AM
Crucial Technology Announces CrossFire Certified Memory malware News 11 Dec 19, 2006 04:48 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts