EVGA GTX 680 Classified 4GB Smashes 2 GHz GPU Clock Barrier

btarunr · Jun 21, 2012, 05:14 AM

EVGA's GeForce GTX 680 4GB, in the skilled hands of Vince “k|ngp|n” Lucido, smashed the 2 GHz barrier for GPU clock, setting a new clock speed world record for the GTX 680. The card achieved a GPU clock speed of 2,002 MHz, with a core voltage of 1.212V; and memory clock speed of 7.406 GHz. The card went on to score P16472 in 3DMark 11 (performance preset). The rest of the test-bench included Intel Core i7-3960X six-core processor clocked at 5.53 GHz, EVGA X79 Classified motherboard, 16 GB of quad-channel DDR3-2400 MHz G.Skill RipjawsZ memory, and EVGA NEX 1500W PSU. The GPU was cooled by k|ngp|n Tek-9 FAT 6.0 LN2 evaporator, while the CPU was cooled by k|ngp|n Dragon F1 Dark LN2 evaporator. Find the ORB page here.

Assimilator · Jun 21, 2012, 05:48 AM

That is extremely impressive. Has the 7970 breached the 2GHz barrier yet?

1c3d0g · Jun 21, 2012, 06:19 AM

LOVE this classified version's huge single fan.

Quake · Jun 21, 2012, 06:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by btarunr

EVGA's GeForce GTX 680 4GB, in the skilled hands of Vince “k|ngp|n” Lucido, smashed the 2 GHz barrier for GPU clock, setting a new clock speed world record for the GTX 680. The card achieved a GPU clock speed of 2,002 MHz, with a core voltage of 1.212V; and memory clock speed of 7.406 GHz. The card went on to score P16472 in 3DMark 11 (performance preset). The rest of the test-bench included Intel Core i7-3960X six-core processor clocked at 5.53 GHz, EVGA X79 Classified motherboard, 16 GB of quad-channel DDR3-2400 MHz G.Skill RipjawsZ memory, and EVGA NEX 1500W PSU. The GPU was cooled by k|ngp|n Tek-9 FAT 6.0 LN2 evaporator, while the CPU was cooled by k|ngp|n Dragon F1 Dark LN2 evaporator

Anyone who ever OCed any HW knows that 2GHz would be impossible with that voltage..

amdftw · Jun 21, 2012, 06:33 AM

This is fake...
Kingpin replaced the evga precession image or after 3D load he set the 2003Mhz clock.
Facts:
The power graph is not show that there was any 3dmark load.
I or everybody can set higher clocks in 2D which freeze in 3D.

So the simply way that kingpin is chose: He ran the 3dmark with lower clock, it would was 1800-1900Mhz, and after in 2D he set 2003Mhz.
This way he can tell he was the first who broke 2ghz but actually not...

damric · Jun 21, 2012, 06:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amdftw

This is fake...
Kingpin replaced the evga precession image or after 3D load he set the 2003Mhz clock.
Facts:
The power graph is not show that there was any 3dmark load.
I or everybody can set higher clocks in 2D which freeze in 3D.

So the simply way that kingpin is chose: He ran the 3dmark with lower clock, it would was 1800-1900Mhz, and after in 2D he set 2003Mhz.
This way he can tell he was the first who broke 2ghz but actually not...

This is the conclusion that I came since there is not a GPU-Z validation of 2GHZ.

hardcore_gamer · Jun 21, 2012, 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Assimilator

That is extremely impressive.

I'll breach the 3Ghz barrier. Gimme some time to install Photoshop.

Andrew Moore · Jun 21, 2012, 07:51 AM

Did Galaxy not hit this already at Computex with their white PCB card?

Hayder_Master · Jun 21, 2012, 09:42 AM

GPU-Z shows it's on 1.845ghz, i think the test on this clocks and the 2ghz just a screen shot from freezing windows.

ShockG · Jun 21, 2012, 10:16 AM

I'd normally not reply to this but the ignorance about extreme overclocking by the posts above is staggering. None of you have run 3DM11 at anything close to those clock speeds or in any extreme environment and for you to call KNGPIN a cheat is evidence of this. Tee sub scores are in line with the clock speeds and indeed that score is perfectly acceptable and legitimate.

If you didn't know we change clock speeds during different tests on the fly during the benchmark. This applied to 3DMark Vantage GT2 as well where you had to clock lower than in GT1. You can use keyboard short cuts for this. GPU-Z validation isn't the end all be all, it's useful but it isn't always reliable and in the desktop it indeed may be 1846 that does not mean it was that during the benchmark. He's done 1950MHz before btw

sanadanosa · Jun 21, 2012, 10:17 AM

check this out.
http://hwbot.org/submission/2293742_...80_16472_marks

20mmrain · Jun 21, 2012, 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Assimilator

That is extremely impressive. Has the 7970 breached the 2GHz barrier yet?

No it hasn't although 2nd place is held by a HD 7970..... only 200 points lower then this card. Guess what it was done @ 1700mhz. It shows... that the 7970's Stream Processors are more powerful then the GTX 680's CUDA core. It wouldn't take much to overcome those 200 points.
So while the 2ghz clock is impressive.... I don't believe this score will take too much... to be beaten by the HD 7970.

Quake · Jun 21, 2012, 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 20mmrain

No it hasn't although 2nd place is held by a HD 7970..... only 200 points lower then this card. Guess what it was done @ 1700mhz. It shows... that the 7970's Stream Processors are more powerful then the GTX 680's CUDA core. It wouldn't take much to overcome those 200 points.
So while the 2ghz clock is impressive.... I don't believe this score will take too much... to be beaten by the HD 7970.

No, it doesn't show that 7970 is more powerful.. The difference is that 680 runs with default level of tessellation and its score is valid on ORB while 7970 runs with disabled/tweaked tessellation which you can adjust in ccc and its score isn't valid on ORB

ShockG · Jun 21, 2012, 10:29 AM

No you're mistaken.
HD7970 results are done with Tessellation turned off, that's why the scores are so high. With Tessellation turned on, the scores on the HD7970s are significantly lower.
We all know this who take part in Extreme OC

okidna · Jun 21, 2012, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShockG

No you're mistaken.
HD7970 results are done with Tessellation turned off, that's why the scores are so high. With Tessellation turned on, the scores on the HD7970s are significantly lower.
We all know this who take part in Extreme OC

So, that's "Non-standard AMD Tessellation Setting 1" means tessellation OFF?

Thank you. You answered my curiosity.

creepingdeath · Jun 21, 2012, 10:37 AM

Who the fuck cares what kingpin does...Kingpin uses hardware mods out the wazzoo, cherry picked cards, in a special testing environment...anyone who is stupid enough to believe this has any relevance to REAL WORLD overclocking has issues.

I bet EVGA sells cards from this nonsense, I feel sorry for the sucker that falls for it.

ShockG · Jun 21, 2012, 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by creepingdeath

Who the fuck cares what kingpin does...Kingpin uses hardware mods out the wazzoo, cherry picked cards, in a special testing environment...anyone who is stupid enough to believe this has any relevance to REAL WORLD overclocking has issues.

I bet EVGA sells cards from this nonsense, I feel sorry for the sucker that falls for it.

We care. The rest of us who mod our cards using the "untouchables" VRM mod, the rest of us who buy Lightning cards, and freeze them specifically for this purpose of achieving high scores. This isn't meant to impress you of "real world overclocking". If you can't appreciate it then it's not for you, but please don't knock it. To some of us, go cold or go home is the motto, this "real world" air cooling overclocking you're talking about doesn't appeal to us at all.

The amount of effort required to do and achieve this is lost to you and that's ok but don't speak ill of an overclocking milestone. Big ups to EVGA and Vince for this achievement

beck24 · Jun 21, 2012, 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 20mmrain

No it hasn't although 2nd place is held by a HD 7970..... only 200 points lower then this card. Guess what it was done @ 1700mhz. It shows... that the 7970's Stream Processors are more powerful then the GTX 680's CUDA core. It wouldn't take much to overcome those 200 points.
So while the 2ghz clock is impressive.... I don't believe this score will take too much... to be beaten by the HD 7970.

100% WRONG! Turn on tess and watch 7970 collapse.

TheGuruStud · Jun 22, 2012, 02:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beck24

100% WRONG! Turn on tess and watch 7970 collapse.

You mean like this? http://techreport.com/articles.x/21404/1

Nvidia and their tricks. They're a sad competitor.

MxPhenom 216 · Jun 22, 2012, 02:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amdftw

This is fake...
Kingpin replaced the evga precession image or after 3D load he set the 2003Mhz clock.
Facts:
The power graph is not show that there was any 3dmark load.
I or everybody can set higher clocks in 2D which freeze in 3D.

So the simply way that kingpin is chose: He ran the 3dmark with lower clock, it would was 1800-1900Mhz, and after in 2D he set 2003Mhz.
This way he can tell he was the first who broke 2ghz but actually not...

Everything that has to do with Nvidia and Intel is just fake too you huh?

Quote:

Originally Posted by beck24

100% WRONG! Turn on tess and watch 7970 collapse.

No. 7970 and the 680 are pretty equal when it comes to Geometry/Tesselation horse power now. AMD went to there new architecture that really boosted their power in Tesselation, while Nvidia went a different route and made the cores a bit weaker and less complex but added a shit ton of them compared to the prior gens.

nleksan · Jun 22, 2012, 05:24 AM

I am just pleased to see it done with a 4GB card... Anyone else?

cadaveca · Jun 22, 2012, 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nleksan

I am just pleased to see it done with a 4GB card... Anyone else?

I'm still confused about the whole GPU-Z not showing 2.002 GHz. Apparantly K1ngP1n stil ahs a score or two in his back pocket as well, so this is al lrather unexciting, really. Let's see the back-up scores!

"Saving" scores waiting for someone to beat your own, so you cna then one-up them...man...This truly isn't the record...The real record is the score he's got saved and will submit later!

LAN_deRf_HA · Jun 25, 2012, 05:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cadaveca

I'm still confused about the whole GPU-Z not showing 2.002 GHz. Apparantly K1ngP1n stil ahs a score or two in his back pocket as well, so this is al lrather unexciting, really. Let's see the back-up scores!

These cards always boost higher than what GPUz shows on the main window.

cadaveca · Jun 25, 2012, 05:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LAN_deRf_HA

These cards always boost higher than what GPUz shows on the main window.

BUt then what you are saying is that it's a boost clock...and might not have been running for the full test, or what, or...

It's not this result that is confusing, it's nVidia's boost that is..well..confusing!

evulmunk33 · Jul 5, 2012, 01:33 AM

so was it 2g throughout the whole run?
or did it only turbo to 2g occasionally throughout the bench?

others have hit 1950 as well, so then this "2g" run wouldnt really be anything special...

Jun 21, 2012, 05:14 AM	#1
btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Hyderabad, India Posts: 14,984 (7.29/day) Thanks: 788 Thanked 12,911 Times in 5,655 Posts System Specs	EVGA GTX 680 Classified 4GB Smashes 2 GHz GPU Clock Barrier EVGA's GeForce GTX 680 4GB, in the skilled hands of Vince “k\|ngp\|n” Lucido, smashed the 2 GHz barrier for GPU clock, setting a new clock speed world record for the GTX 680. The card achieved a GPU clock speed of 2,002 MHz, with a core voltage of 1.212V; and memory clock speed of 7.406 GHz. The card went on to score P16472 in 3DMark 11 (performance preset). The rest of the test-bench included Intel Core i7-3960X six-core processor clocked at 5.53 GHz, EVGA X79 Classified motherboard, 16 GB of quad-channel DDR3-2400 MHz G.Skill RipjawsZ memory, and EVGA NEX 1500W PSU. The GPU was cooled by k\|ngp\|n Tek-9 FAT 6.0 LN2 evaporator, while the CPU was cooled by k\|ngp\|n Dragon F1 Dark LN2 evaporator. Find the ORB page here.

System Name:	Blackbox
Processor:	Intel Core i7-950
Motherboard:	Intel Extreme Series DX58OG
Cooling:	Xigmatek Aegir SD128264 with IC Diamond 24 Thermal Compound
Memory:	12GB ADATA Premier (3x 4GB) DDR3-1333 MHz
Video Card:	Palit GeForce GTX 680 JetStream 2GB outfitted with IC Diamond 24 TIM
Hard Disk:	Samsung 840 Series 250GB, Random 8 TB storage
Optical Drive:	HT-LG DVD-RW
CRT/LCD Model:	ViewSonic VX2450wm-LED
Case:	Cooler Master CM690 Window
Sound Card:	Creative SB Recon3D
PSU:	Corsair HX850W
Software:	Windows 8 Pro 64-bit

Jun 21, 2012, 05:48 AM	#2
Assimilator Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: South Africa Posts: 425 (0.14/day) Thanks: 113 Thanked 56 Times in 41 Posts System Specs	That is extremely impressive. Has the 7970 breached the 2GHz barrier yet? __________________ <html> <code> <style> The QuadFather: 4x4x4x4 4 cores (QX9650) / 4 GPUs (2x 9800 GX2) / 4x 2GB DDR2-800 / 4 hard disks (quad 320GB Seagates, RAID-5)

System Name:	Firelance
Processor:	i5 2500K @ 4.6GHz
Motherboard:	Asrock Z77 Extreme6
Cooling:	Corsair H100 w/4x Gentle Typhoon 1800s
Memory:	4x 2GB G.Skill RipjawsX 6-8-6-24
Video Card:	KFA² GeForce GTX 660 Ti OC 3GB
Hard Disk:	OCZ Agility 4 256GB
CRT/LCD Model:	Acer P243W + LG 1970HR
Case:	HAF 932 + DemciFlex dust filters
PSU:	TruePower Quattro 850W
Software:	Windows 7 Professional x64 Service Pack 1

System Name:	pron finder
Processor:	Core 42% Overclocked NB 50% Overclocked
Motherboard:	20% Overclocked
Cooling:	78% Nitrogen, 21% Oxygen, 1% Argon
Memory:	80% Overclocked
Video Card:	Core 29% Overclocked VRAM 20% Overclocked

Jun 21, 2012, 06:19 AM	#3
1c3d0g Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 615 (0.31/day) Thanks: 2,255 Thanked 47 Times in 38 Posts	LOVE this classified version's huge single fan.

Jun 21, 2012, 06:33 AM	#5
amdftw Join Date: Mar 2012 Posts: 25 (0.06/day) Thanks: 0 Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts	This is fake... Kingpin replaced the evga precession image or after 3D load he set the 2003Mhz clock. Facts: The power graph is not show that there was any 3dmark load. I or everybody can set higher clocks in 2D which freeze in 3D. So the simply way that kingpin is chose: He ran the 3dmark with lower clock, it would was 1800-1900Mhz, and after in 2D he set 2003Mhz. This way he can tell he was the first who broke 2ghz but actually not...

System Name:	This is how I spent my Q2, 2012 bonus
Processor:	Core i7 3770K at 4.2 Ghz
Motherboard:	ASRock Fatal1ty Z77
Cooling:	Noctua NH-D14
Memory:	G.Skill TridentX 8 GB DDR3 2400
Video Card:	2 x Asus NVIDIA GTX 670 DC2T in SLI
Hard Disk:	Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 240GB (System Drive)
Case:	bitfenix colossus (windowed version)
PSU:	Corsair CMPSU-850TXV2UK

Jun 21, 2012, 07:51 AM	#8
Andrew Moore Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 14 (0.03/day) Thanks: 0 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post	Did Galaxy not hit this already at Computex with their white PCB card?

Jun 21, 2012, 09:42 AM	#9
Hayder_Master Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: IRAQ-Baghdad Posts: 4,861 (2.61/day) Thanks: 388 Thanked 639 Times in 444 Posts System Specs	GPU-Z shows it's on 1.845ghz, i think the test on this clocks and the 2ghz just a screen shot from freezing windows. __________________ Easiest way to overclock the graphic card guide Easiest way to overclock your graphic card , my other overclocking threads , Core i7-1156 Overclocking and Feedback Thread , C2Q overclocking and feedback thread , C2QX overclocking and feedback thread ,C2D overclocking and feedback thread ,AMDX2 overclocking and feedback thread

System Name:	MASTER
Processor:	Core i7 3930k run at 4.4ghz
Motherboard:	Asus Rampage IV extreme
Cooling:	Corsair H100i
Memory:	4x4G kingston hyperx beast 2400mhz
Video Card:	2X EVGA GTX680
Hard Disk:	2X Crusial M4 256g raid0, 1TbWD g, 2x500 WD B
Optical Drive:	2x LG dvd/R 22x
CRT/LCD Model:	Samsung 27' 1080P LED 3D monitior 2ms
Case:	CoolerMaster Chosmos II
Sound Card:	Creative sound blaster X-FI Titanum champion,Creative speakers 7.1 T7900
PSU:	Corsair 1200i, Logitch G500 Mouse, headset Corsair vengeance 1500
Software:	Win7 64bit Ultimate
Benchmarks:	3d mark 2011: testing

Jun 21, 2012, 10:16 AM	#10
ShockG Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Jozi Posts: 19 (0.01/day) Thanks: 1 Thanked 18 Times in 6 Posts	I'd normally not reply to this but the ignorance about extreme overclocking by the posts above is staggering. None of you have run 3DM11 at anything close to those clock speeds or in any extreme environment and for you to call KNGPIN a cheat is evidence of this. Tee sub scores are in line with the clock speeds and indeed that score is perfectly acceptable and legitimate. If you didn't know we change clock speeds during different tests on the fly during the benchmark. This applied to 3DMark Vantage GT2 as well where you had to clock lower than in GT1. You can use keyboard short cuts for this. GPU-Z validation isn't the end all be all, it's useful but it isn't always reliable and in the desktop it indeed may be 1846 that does not mean it was that during the benchmark. He's done 1950MHz before btw

Jun 21, 2012, 10:17 AM	#11
sanadanosa Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Semarang, Indonesia Posts: 101 (0.14/day) Thanks: 67 Thanked 13 Times in 8 Posts System Specs	check this out. http://hwbot.org/submission/2293742_...80_16472_marks __________________

Processor:	Intel Core i5 3570K
Motherboard:	Asrock Z68 Extreme3 Gen 3
Memory:	2x4GB Corsair Vengeance 1600MHz
Video Card:	MSI GTX 660 TF OC
Hard Disk:	1TB WD Blue
CRT/LCD Model:	Samsung BX1931N
Case:	Corsair Carbide 300R Windowed
Sound Card:	Realtek HD
PSU:	Corsair CX600 80+ Bronze
Software:	Win 7 64-bit

System Name:	My Gaming System
Processor:	Intel i7 3930K @ 4.5Ghz
Motherboard:	Asus X79Pro
Cooling:	Custom Full System Water cooling Loop
Memory:	G.Skill 1866 Mhz Sniper 16 Gb
Video Card:	EVGA GTX Titan
Hard Disk:	2x Intel X25 SSD 80GB 2x Western Digital 500GB Black Caviar 1x Seagate 500Gb 2.5 Storage drive
Optical Drive:	Samsung External CDD DVD Burner USB 3.0
CRT/LCD Model:	ASUS W246H - 24" - widescreen TFT active matrix LCD
Case:	Fractal Arc Midi R2
PSU:	XFX Pro Modular 1050 Watt PSU
Software:	Windows 8 Home Primeum

Jun 21, 2012, 10:29 AM	#14
ShockG Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Jozi Posts: 19 (0.01/day) Thanks: 1 Thanked 18 Times in 6 Posts	No you're mistaken. HD7970 results are done with Tessellation turned off, that's why the scores are so high. With Tessellation turned on, the scores on the HD7970s are significantly lower. We all know this who take part in Extreme OC

System Name:	Downgrading......
Processor:	AMD FX-4100 @ 4.6 Ghz
Motherboard:	ASRock 970 Extreme3
Cooling:	Xigmatek DK Nighthawk
Memory:	F3-12800CL9D-4GBRL
Video Card:	HIS HD7850 @ 1000/1400
Hard Disk:	80GB WDC + 500 GB WDC GREEN
PSU:	Seasonic SS-650AT 650W
Software:	Windows 7 SP1 x64
Benchmarks:	http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/aqppg/ \| http://valid.canardpc.com/2702426

Jun 21, 2012, 10:37 AM	#16
creepingdeath Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 14 (0.03/day) Thanks: 1 Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts	Who the fuck cares what kingpin does...Kingpin uses hardware mods out the wazzoo, cherry picked cards, in a special testing environment...anyone who is stupid enough to believe this has any relevance to REAL WORLD overclocking has issues. I bet EVGA sells cards from this nonsense, I feel sorry for the sucker that falls for it.

Processor:	OCed 8350
Motherboard:	Sabertooth R2.0
Cooling:	Mugen 2 rev B push/pull
Memory:	16GB Gskill
Video Card:	1200 MHz 7950
Hard Disk:	Kingston 3K 120s raid 0, Sammy, WDs
Optical Drive:	flashed pioneer
CRT/LCD Model:	Auria 27" 2560x1440
Case:	cooler master HAF 932
Sound Card:	X-fi Titanium HD - Onkyo HT-RC360 Receiver - BIC America custom 5.1 set up (and extra Klipsch sub)
PSU:	Corsair 850W V2
Software:	I wish I could kill myself instead of using windows (OSX can suck it too).

System Name:	My System
Processor:	Intel Core i5 2500k @ 4.5GHZ 1.36v
Motherboard:	AsRock Extreme4 Gen3 P67
Cooling:	EK Supremacy w/ Black Ice X-Flow 240
Memory:	Corsair Dominator Platinums 8GB 4GBx2 2133mhz 1.5v
Video Card:	EVGA Geforce GTX780 3GB
Hard Disk:	Samsung 830 128GB SSD, Corsair Neutron 240GB, Samsung F3 500GB
Optical Drive:	Asus 24x SATA DVD
CRT/LCD Model:	Dell U2412M IPS 24" 1920 x 1200
Case:	Corsair Carbide Series 500r w/ 2x Corsair AF120 fans
Sound Card:	HT Omega Striker 7.1
PSU:	Corsair HX850 Gen1 Silver
Software:	Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit SP1

Jun 22, 2012, 05:24 AM	#21
nleksan Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Ohio Posts: 228 (0.54/day) Thanks: 67 Thanked 29 Times in 29 Posts System Specs	I am just pleased to see it done with a 4GB card... Anyone else?

System Name:	Cogito Ergo Switch
Processor:	i7 3930K @ 4.8Ghz
Motherboard:	Asus Rampage IV Extreme
Cooling:	Custom Water (CPU/MB/GPU Blocks, 420+240rads PP)
Memory:	16GB G.Skill Ripjaws Z 2133 9-11-10-27 @ 2380 9-10-10-28
Video Card:	EVGA GTX670 FTW 2GB SLI @ 1344core/7648mem + EVGA 650Ti PhysX
Hard Disk:	Samsung 830 256GB SSD (Boot) + 1TB WD10EZEX (Games/Apps) + 1TB WD10EALX (Prog) + 2x 320GB WD/HGST
Optical Drive:	LG-Hitachi Slim DVD-R/W Drive
CRT/LCD Model:	Dell U2412HM + U2312HM + 2x P2212Hbe + Viewsonic 21.5" 1680x1050
Case:	NZXT Switch 810 White - MODDED
Sound Card:	Creative X-Fi Titanium HD PCI-Express
PSU:	NZXT HALE90 850W - Custom Sleeved Cables (White, No Heatshrink)
Software:	Windows7 Pro x64

System Name:	Eyefinity Gamer
Processor:	Intel i5 3570K @ 4.6 GHz
Motherboard:	ASUS Maximmus V Formula
Cooling:	Corsair H100
Memory:	16 GB G.Skill F3-2666C11Q-16GTXD
Video Card:	AMD Radeon HD7950 3GB x2 w/AMD Catalyst 12.10
Hard Disk:	OCZ Nocti 60GB mSATA, Crucial M4 120GB x2
Optical Drive:	LG BluRay/HD-DVD
CRT/LCD Model:	3x Dell U2412M
Case:	LianLi T60
Sound Card:	N/A
PSU:	Silverstone Strider 750W GOLD
Software:	Windows 8 Pro
Benchmarks:	Benchmarking is for suckers. ;)

System Name:	Obelisc
Processor:	i7 2600k @ 4.5 GHz
Motherboard:	Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling:	H110
Memory:	16GB(4x8) @ 2133 MHz 9-11-10-28 2T
Video Card:	Galaxy GTX 660 Ti GC 3GB SLI
Hard Disk:	M4 256GB, 2x 3TB Seagate XT
Optical Drive:	Samsung 12x Bluray
CRT/LCD Model:	Crossover 27Q
Case:	Corsair 550D
Sound Card:	X-Fi Titanium HD with HD598
PSU:	Kingwin LZP-550
Software:	Win7 64bit SP1

Jul 5, 2012, 01:33 AM	#25
evulmunk33 CM Storm Rep Join Date: Apr 2012 Posts: 63 (0.16/day) Thanks: 22 Thanked 18 Times in 9 Posts	so was it 2g throughout the whole run? or did it only turbo to 2g occasionally throughout the bench? others have hit 1950 as well, so then this "2g" run wouldnt really be anything special...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Zotac 680 4GB or EVGA 680 2GB SC+?	mog22wai	NVIDIA	5	Jun 15, 2012 03:00 AM
EVGA GTX 680 SC+ OR Zotac 680 4G Stock?	mog22wai	NVIDIA	0	Jun 14, 2012 05:10 AM
ZOTAC Working On GeForce GTX 680 with 2 GHz Core Clock Speed	btarunr	News	51	Mar 27, 2012 11:38 PM
EVGA GTX 580 Classified + watercooling Doubles Core Clock Speed!	qubit	News	51	Sep 26, 2011 04:27 PM
EVGA Announces the EVGA GeForce GTX 580 Classified!	onethreehill	NVIDIA	2	Sep 24, 2011 04:48 PM