techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jul 5, 2012, 06:47 AM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,984 (7.29/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,911 Times in 5,655 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

New OCZ Vertex 4 Firmware Update 1.5 Beta Enhances Performance

Nearly two months after releasing Firmware Update 1.4RC for its Vertex 4 series solid state drives (SSDs), OCZ released yet another firmware update, which pushes sequential speeds further up. The new firmware update version 1.5 beta increases maximum read speed on the 128 GB, 256 GB, and 512 GB variants of Vertex 4 to 560 MB/s (up from 550 MB/s), while maximum write speeds are increased by 6.5% on average. The 256 GB variant sees the highest write performance increase, by around 10%. The update can be applied using OCZ Toolbox.



Source: Expreview
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 5, 2012, 07:57 AM   #2
Bjorn_Of_Iceland
2000 Posts
 
Bjorn_Of_Iceland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Húsið mitt
Posts: 2,608 (1.32/day)
Thanks: 480
Thanked 358 Times in 266 Posts

System Specs

just went better than force gt, very nice for its price point the vertex is.
__________________

SIEG HEIL!!
Bjorn_Of_Iceland is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 5, 2012, 09:23 AM   #3
RejZoR
3500 Posts
 
RejZoR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Europe/Slovenia
Posts: 3,967 (1.26/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 753 Times in 541 Posts

System Specs

We can assume that Crucial will release a firmware for Crucial M4 around the same time OCZ will. It's often like this...
__________________
RejZoR's Little Secrets @ rejzor dot tk
RejZoR is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 5, 2012, 10:25 AM   #4
faramir
200 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 203 (0.28/day)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 27 Times in 20 Posts

Why beta ? On OCZ forums staff stated that "1.5 beta" has bugfixes in addition to speed enhancements compared to previous version. Why call it "beta" then if it's supposedly better than the odler version ? Why treat your customers as lab rats ?
faramir is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 5, 2012, 11:11 AM   #5
RejZoR
3500 Posts
 
RejZoR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Europe/Slovenia
Posts: 3,967 (1.26/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 753 Times in 541 Posts

System Specs

BETA just means it has gone through basic testing but is still not yet ready for mass public release.
Prototypes, Pre-releases and Alphas are stuff that is not tested much and most should stay away from them.
__________________
RejZoR's Little Secrets @ rejzor dot tk
RejZoR is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RejZoR For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 5, 2012, 03:58 PM   #6
imitation
75 Posts
 
imitation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 125 (0.17/day)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 21 Times in 17 Posts

System Specs

Have they fixed the 'feature' where write performance drops below 80MB/s when more than 50% of the SSD's space is used?
imitation is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to imitation For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 5, 2012, 04:51 PM   #7
Jurassic1024
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 163 (0.37/day)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 21 Times in 15 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by faramir View Post
Why beta ? On OCZ forums staff stated that "1.5 beta" has bugfixes in addition to speed enhancements compared to previous version. Why call it "beta" then if it's supposedly better than the odler version ? Why treat your customers as lab rats ?
Because it's not final. And no one said you have to use it, because unlike lab rats, you have a choice.
Jurassic1024 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jurassic1024 For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 5, 2012, 05:05 PM   #8
fullinfusion
1.21 Gigawatts
 
fullinfusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CANADA
Posts: 5,464 (2.79/day)
Thanks: 2,701
Thanked 1,294 Times in 1,092 Posts

System Specs

Thank you OCZ! 1.5 is working nicely and keepem updates coming!
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
fullinfusion is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2012, 12:22 AM   #9
cedrac18
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 92 (0.09/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by imitation View Post
Have they fixed the 'feature' where write performance drops below 80MB/s when more than 50% of the SSD's space is used?
Does that happen on the Vertex 4 or the older ones?
cedrac18 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2012, 12:44 AM   #10
Sinzia
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 705 (0.73/day)
Thanks: 88
Thanked 184 Times in 135 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Sinzia Send a message via MSN to Sinzia Send a message via Yahoo to Sinzia Send a message via Skype™ to Sinzia

System Specs

Beta can also mean that if it fucks the drive, they're not liable. I just don't like how the vertex 4's seem to have a new firmware every 2 months.
__________________
http://tpucdn.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic88947_1.gif
Sinzia is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2012, 04:09 AM   #11
Abbysion
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by imitation
Have they fixed the 'feature' where write performance drops below 80MB/s when more than 50% of the SSD's space is used?
Is this an issue on the 256GB model too? I read somewhere (don't remeber exactly where) that this issue was only present on the lower capacities. The 256GB SKU does not suffer such a severe performance degradation. Am I correct?
Abbysion is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2012, 04:44 AM   #12
cedrac18
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 92 (0.09/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abbysion View Post
Is this an issue on the 256GB model too? I read somewhere (don't remeber exactly where) that this issue was only present on the lower capacities. The 256GB SKU does not suffer such a severe performance degradation. Am I correct?
I don't have that issue on my 90GB Agility 2 and i am using 50GB right now. The benchmarks show that it is not as fast as when i bought it but using it i couldn't tell the difference.
cedrac18 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2012, 05:25 AM   #13
Abbysion
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by cedrac18 View Post
I don't have that issue on my 90GB Agility 2 and i am using 50GB right now. The benchmarks show that it is not as fast as when i bought it but using it i couldn't tell the difference.
The performance drop is present on the Vertex 4 128GB, not sure if other capacities are affected (I read not). The Agility 2 is Sandforce based, this issue is unrelated to those controllers as far as I know.
Abbysion is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2012, 06:08 AM   #14
largon
2000 Posts
 
largon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Tre, Suomi Finland
Posts: 2,696 (0.92/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 437 Times in 335 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by imitation View Post
Have they fixed the 'feature' where write performance drops below 80MB/s when more than 50% of the SSD's space is used?
Too bad HDD manufacturers haven't fixed that on their products, either, and they've been out there for several decades.
__________________
You were not supposed to see this.
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

Suum cuique pulchrum est.
largon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2012, 08:04 AM   #15
imitation
75 Posts
 
imitation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 125 (0.17/day)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 21 Times in 17 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abbysion View Post
The performance drop is present on the Vertex 4 128GB, not sure if other capacities are affected (I read not). The Agility 2 is Sandforce based, this issue is unrelated to those controllers as far as I know.
This is specifically related to the Vertex 4's 1.4 firmware and therefore is not an issue on earlier drives. While the VTX4 was performing at 170MB/s over the whole drive before (f/w <1.4), it now reaches much higher numbers, but only when less than half-full.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abbysion View Post
Is this an issue on the 256GB model too? I read somewhere (don't remeber exactly where) that this issue was only present on the lower capacities. The 256GB SKU does not suffer such a severe performance degradation. Am I correct?
I tried to find reviews testing the 256GB model for this, but couldn't find any. Maybe there is someone on TPU that could test the new firmware with HDtune.

Quote:
Originally Posted by largon View Post
Too bad HDD manufacturers haven't fixed that on their products, either, and they've been out there for several decades.
imitation is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2012, 10:58 AM   #16
RejZoR
3500 Posts
 
RejZoR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Europe/Slovenia
Posts: 3,967 (1.26/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 753 Times in 541 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by imitation View Post
Have they fixed the 'feature' where write performance drops below 80MB/s when more than 50% of the SSD's space is used?
Was this a Marvell Controller issue or just Vertex 4 (since Vertex 4 is using a modified Marvell controller)?
__________________
RejZoR's Little Secrets @ rejzor dot tk
RejZoR is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2012, 11:08 AM   #17
Prima.Vera
1000 Posts
 
Prima.Vera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Antagonia
Posts: 1,367 (2.21/day)
Thanks: 228
Thanked 179 Times in 120 Posts

System Specs

Just one question for SSD guys in here. That means for every firmware update you need to do a full system restore??!??
__________________
The richest man is not he who has the most, but he who needs the least.
Prima.Vera is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2012, 12:15 PM   #18
imitation
75 Posts
 
imitation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 125 (0.17/day)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 21 Times in 17 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by RejZoR View Post
Was this a Marvell Controller issue or just Vertex 4 (since Vertex 4 is using a modified Marvell controller)?
This is very specific to the Vertex's 1.4 firmware and does not affect any other SSDs using Marvel's controllers.
Tom's did a nice re-review on this: OCZ Vertex 4 128 GB: Testing Write Performance With Firmware 1.4

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prima.Vera View Post
Just one question for SSD guys in here. That means for every firmware update you need to do a full system restore??!??
That depends. Most updates will try to preserve your data, but it is always a good idea to have a backup at hand in case something goes wrong.

Last edited by imitation; Jul 6, 2012 at 12:37 PM.
imitation is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OCZ Releases Firmware Enhancement for Vertex 4 SSDs and Intros 64 GB Model Cristian_25H News 12 May 7, 2012 07:38 PM
Crucial Releases "000F" Firmware Update for M4 SSD, Enhances Power-Loss Protection btarunr News 20 Apr 16, 2012 11:18 AM
OCZ Vertex Plus New Firmware 99vw Storage 0 Oct 6, 2011 10:42 AM
SSD Firmware 2.13 for OCZ Vertex 3, Vertex 3 Max IOPS, Agility 3, Solid 3, RevoDrive onethreehill Storage 0 Sep 22, 2011 04:35 AM
Upgrade from OCZ Vertex 2 50gb to OCZ Revodrive 120gb or OCZ Vertex 2 50gb+60 RAID 0? n-ster General Hardware 9 Sep 12, 2010 02:37 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts