![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Overclocked quantum bit
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Quantumville UK
Posts: 8,648 (4.34/day)
Thanks: 4,178
Thanked 3,303 Times in 1,943 Posts
|
Sandy Bridge block diagram
I'm trying to find a block diagram for Sandy Bridge, but I can't find one. In particular, I want one that shows how they've implemented the various bits in each core. I'm curious if it has a full FPU per core and if it supports Hyper Threading. I'd also be on the lookout for anything else interesting in this diagram.
I don't need this for any special reason other than geeky curiousity (which I'm sure all my friends on here will totally relate to ) since I have a Sandy 2700K.And before anyone tells me to jfgi, I've already done some frantic googling, including limiting it to intel.com but come up with nothing useful.
__________________
Siggie in the post. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
WCG Team Assistant
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Northeast, USA
Posts: 5,153 (9.95/day)
Thanks: 5,391
Thanked 10,093 Times in 3,179 Posts
|
__________________
Why sit on the Bench when you can get in the game and Crunch!!!- World Community Grid (FTW) CPU crunchers- FX-8350(4.4)/FX-8150(4.0)/FX-6200(4.0)/ PII 1045T/PII 1045T/i7-920/Xeon (6c/12t)....(44 cores/54 threads) GPU crunchers- no WCG GPU work available Folding@Home- 2x GTX 580's WCG-TPU Mothers Day Challenge (5/10 thru 5/19- crunch for our Team, for Mom, for games and prizes ) |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Norton For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dover, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 4,243 (8.85/day)
Thanks: 1,265
Thanked 1,322 Times in 981 Posts
|
Intel's execution pipeline hasn't changed a whole lot from the C2D, since the memory controller has moved to the CPU on Nehelem, it's safe to assume anything used on skt1366, 1156, 1155, and 2011 is going to be about the same. Intel isn't going to release anything too specific about their cores and what they do to make them go fast, but you may be looking for something like this.
This is a bit out of the pipeline for nehelem, it really hasn't change too much but maybe you can find something on SB, but it shouldn't be too far off. Edit: Aha, I think you want this: http://www.intel.com/content/dam/doc...ion-manual.pdf I think this might be what you wanted: I've actually never taken the time to look at this. Makes a lot of sense why Intel can run single threads really quickly. There isn't much for shared components, each instruction must execute pretty quickly.
__________________
MyHeat Last edited by Aquinus; Jul 16, 2012 at 01:27 AM. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Aquinus For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Moar Input - Sandy Bridge & Sandy Bridge-E Overclocking Progression Tool | johnnyfiive | Programming & Webmastering | 19 | Apr 9, 2012 10:54 PM |
| GK104 Block Diagram Explained | btarunr | News | 23 | Mar 18, 2012 02:39 AM |
| Ivy Bridge Official Benchmarks – Markedly Better Performance Than Sandy Bridge | qubit | News | 66 | Dec 2, 2011 05:05 AM |
| Ivy Bridge Early Sneak Performance Peek: Any Faster Than Sandy Bridge? | qubit | News | 34 | Nov 28, 2011 05:42 PM |
| Sandy Bridge-E 2011 Launch Put on Slide, Ivy Bridge in March-April 2012 | btarunr | News | 20 | Aug 9, 2011 05:12 PM |