techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

View Poll Results: Do you think HD 7990, once released, can beat GTX 690 ?
Yes 79 49.69%
No 80 50.31%
Voters: 159. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jul 25, 2012, 11:35 AM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,030 (7.22/day)
Thanks: 790
Thanked 13,028 Times in 5,719 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Radeon HD 7990 Further Delayed

Troubles don't seem to end for AMD's Radeon HD 7990 dual-GPU graphics card, with sources indicating that AMD has no new product launches till late-August. Sections of the press reported that the HD 7990 could be released some time this month. A couple of factors could be behind the delay. For starters, there have been reports of shortage of PEX8747 PCIe bridge chips by PLX, which is at the heart of dual-GPU graphics cards, including the GeForce GTX 690. Another factor could relate to how AMD plans to achieve competitive price-performance and performance-Watt ratios for the HD 7990. Meanwhile, launches of NVIDIA's mid-range GeForce GTX 660 Ti and GTS 650 are reportedly closing in.



Source: VR-Zone Chinese

Last edited by W1zzard; Jul 25, 2012 at 11:52 AM.
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2012, 11:44 AM   #2
DanTheMan
75 Posts
 
DanTheMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 199 (0.17/day)
Thanks: 30
Thanked 47 Times in 34 Posts
Send a message via MSN to DanTheMan

System Specs

Here lately for AMD when it rains it pours: slow forcast, exec leaving, product delays
Come on AMD pull those rabbits out of the hat and kick some butt
DanTheMan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2012, 11:56 AM   #3
mtosev
1000 Posts
 
mtosev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maribor, Slovenia
Posts: 1,145 (0.38/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 147 Times in 107 Posts

System Specs

hmm AMD has a lot of problems competing with nvidia lately. when they launch the hd 7990 i'm betting that the card will be slower than nvidia's gtx690
__________________
My notebook:

Dell Inspiron 1520 (6464) Intel Core 2 Duo (Merom) T7500, 2gb Hyundai 667MHz DDR2 CL5, 8600M GT 256Mb DDR2, 160Gb Seagate NCQ SATA, TSST DVD-RAM/+/-RW, PM/GM965 chipset

[img disabled]http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/534/326cd7.gif[/IMG]

CNN - "The Most Trusted Name in News"
mtosev is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2012, 12:01 PM   #4
dinmaster
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 22 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

maybe thats why those people are leaving. instead of a john carter movie coming out and people leaving the big company that made it, they know it sucks before it comes out and heads are getting chopped.
dinmaster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2012, 12:04 PM   #5
afw
500 Posts
 
afw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 629 (0.40/day)
Thanks: 93
Thanked 129 Times in 97 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to afw

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtosev View Post
hmm AMD has a lot of problems competing with nvidia lately. when they launch the hd 7990 i'm betting that the card will be slower than nvidia's gtx690
The main reason for the delay is to ensure its faster than gtx690 i think ...

But whether its released now or next month really doesnt matter much ... cos it'll probably cost an arm and leg ... and only a few will buy it ... Its all abt reclaiming the performance crown from nVidia ...
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Main Rig : Asus Sabertooth z77 , Intel i7 2700k, Corsair Vengeance 8GB , Corsair FORCE GT 120GB, Seasonic x650 GOLD , Acer G235H , SilverStone Raven RV02
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

afw is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to afw For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 25, 2012, 12:04 PM   #6
FYFI13
25 Posts
 
FYFI13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 52 (0.13/day)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 17 Times in 9 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtosev View Post
hmm AMD has a lot of problems competing with nvidia lately. when they launch the hd 7990 i'm betting that the card will be slower than nvidia's gtx690
My guess:

Performance: GTX690 > HD7990
Power consumption: HD7990 > GTX690
Price: HD7990 = GTX690
What people actually buy: GTX660Ti - GTX670
FYFI13 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to FYFI13 For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 25, 2012, 12:12 PM   #7
naoan
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 292 (0.20/day)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 63 Times in 50 Posts

System Specs

Most people don't actually care about this card and most enthusiasts care enough are probably already having blast with their GTX690 for months. So yeah.
naoan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2012, 12:19 PM   #8
LAN_deRf_HA
3500 Posts
 
LAN_deRf_HA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,069 (2.14/day)
Thanks: 295
Thanked 853 Times in 595 Posts

System Specs

Nvidia pulled a rabbit out of their hat with the 690. As fast as 680's in sli while maintaining very reasonable power consumption all in a high quality package.

This leaves AMD in an uncomfortable position. They know they need more clockspeed, more power consumption to match a single 680, but this doesn't work well in a dual gpu card. Whatever the power difference is between the 680 and 7970 GHz it would be even greater, and that's just to match their performance. More power, more heat, more noise. And that's just the spec side. I doubt they were prepared to match the 690s quality cooler either. One way or another it will be a second class product with second class pricing.... and second class looks pretty shitty on a flagship product.
LAN_deRf_HA is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to LAN_deRf_HA For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 25, 2012, 01:14 PM   #9
THE_EGG
500 Posts
 
THE_EGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 781 (1.41/day)
Thanks: 287
Thanked 184 Times in 119 Posts

System Specs

Hmm interesting. Heres hoping that AMD can still compete with Nvidia to keep prices in control.

Also, why does the picture showcase a FirePro card (unless this particular one is related to the 7990)?
__________________
<3 Citroen DS3
THE_EGG is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2012, 01:25 PM   #10
phanbuey
Eligible for custom title
 
phanbuey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 5,011 (2.45/day)
Thanks: 1,484
Thanked 960 Times in 813 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by naoan View Post
Most people don't actually care about this card and most enthusiasts care enough are probably already having blast with their GTX690 for months. So yeah.
It is not so much that as it is the technical display. No dual GPU from AMD means either drivers or power envelope/ GPU design are not efficient enough to come out with a better dual GPU product than the competition.
phanbuey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2012, 01:43 PM   #11
marsey99
500 Posts
 
marsey99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 961 (0.44/day)
Thanks: 150
Thanked 134 Times in 109 Posts

System Specs

i fear for amd, and us as a knock on, as they are finding it hard in the cpu sector and the gpu arm was keeping them afloat but this gen has seen them lose their edge and if nv do to them what intel are doing to the cpu side its all over for use as consumers hoping for price wars and bargain buys
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
marsey99 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2012, 01:55 PM   #12
Samskip
5 Posts
 
Samskip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by FYFI13 View Post
My guess:

Performance: GTX690 > HD7990
Power consumption: HD7990 > GTX690
Price: HD7990 = GTX690
What people actually buy: GTX660Ti - GTX670
Hahahaha.... exactly
Samskip is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2012, 02:19 PM   #13
radrok
1000 Posts
 
radrok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,977 (3.28/day)
Thanks: 155
Thanked 486 Times in 387 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to radrok

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by LAN_deRf_HA View Post
Nvidia pulled a rabbit out of their hat with the 690. As fast as 680's in sli while maintaining very reasonable power consumption all in a high quality package.

This leaves AMD in an uncomfortable position. They know they need more clockspeed, more power consumption to match a single 680, but this doesn't work well in a dual gpu card. Whatever the power difference is between the 680 and 7970 GHz it would be even greater, and that's just to match their performance. More power, more heat, more noise. And that's just the spec side. I doubt they were prepared to match the 690s quality cooler either. One way or another it will be a second class product with second class pricing.... and second class looks pretty shitty on a flagship product.
I agree with you on many points but the GTX 690 has one fatal weakness that hinders it, VRAM, if it had atleast 4GB per GPU I'd already have bought one, clearly some will say that 2GB is fine at 1080p and I agree but you don't buy a dual Kepler GPU to play at 1080p.
It would have been the perfect dual GPU, spot on amount of VRAM, performance, noise and power consumption.

Quote:
Originally Posted by marsey99 View Post
i fear for amd, and us as a knock on, as they are finding it hard in the cpu sector and the gpu arm was keeping them afloat but this gen has seen them lose their edge and if nv do to them what intel are doing to the cpu side its all over for use as consumers hoping for price wars and bargain buys
I disagree on the GPU part, AMD is very competitive right now, especially on the midrange where Nvidia is yet to be seen.
radrok is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2012, 02:36 PM   #14
Prima.Vera
1000 Posts
 
Prima.Vera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Antagonia
Posts: 1,426 (2.22/day)
Thanks: 246
Thanked 184 Times in 123 Posts

System Specs

This 7xxx was a disaster series for AMD, even worst than 2xxx or 3xxx. Time to bring the 8xxx series with at least 60% more performance than the current crap generation.
__________________
The richest man is not he who has the most, but he who needs the least.
Prima.Vera is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2012, 02:39 PM   #15
sanadanosa
75 Posts
 
sanadanosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Semarang, Indonesia
Posts: 108 (0.15/day)
Thanks: 75
Thanked 14 Times in 9 Posts

System Specs

so that means HD8000 will be delayed too?
__________________
sanadanosa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2012, 03:49 PM   #16
Casecutter
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 774 (0.98/day)
Thanks: 53
Thanked 54 Times in 47 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prima.Vera View Post
This 7xxx was a disaster series for AMD, even worst than 2xxx or 3xxx. Time to bring the 8xxx series with at least 60% more performance than the current crap generation.
You mean AMD has products from $100-500 and Nvidia has two at $400 and $500 respectively. Oh yea and the GT640 $110 that basically not as good as 6670 that showed back 18 months ago with DDR5 and was less than $100.

Me I'd rather be late with a Halo (bragging rights product that will be on par in performance and $200 less... and hardly add to the bottom line) than have the competition own the $130-350 range uncontested, for what's like 7-8 months! AMD will have new 8XXX parts ready 3 months after GK106 starts to make strides.

It's not any disaster for AMD.
Casecutter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2012, 03:50 PM   #17
TheMailMan78
Banstick Dummy
 
TheMailMan78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Crystal River, FL
Posts: 15,142 (6.86/day)
Thanks: 1,337
Thanked 6,861 Times in 3,752 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by dinmaster View Post
maybe thats why those people are leaving. instead of a john carter movie coming out and people leaving the big company that made it, they know it sucks before it comes out and heads are getting chopped.
Dunno why everyone hates John Carter. I liked that movie. The chick was SUPER hot.
TheMailMan78 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TheMailMan78 For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 25, 2012, 04:10 PM   #18
MxPhenom 216
Knowledgeable Posting Whore
 
MxPhenom 216's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 6,034 (5.90/day)
Thanks: 1,340
Thanked 1,197 Times in 907 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by FYFI13 View Post
My guess:

Performance: GTX690 > HD7990
Power consumption: HD7990 > GTX690
Price: HD7990 = GTX690
What people actually buy: GTX660Ti - GTX670
I do not understand your logic here. If GTX680/670 are more efficient then 7970/7950s by close to 50w and the GTX690 is 2 680s on one PCB which is what the 7990 will most likely be is 2 7970s, then I do not see how the HD7990 will be better in terms of power consumption.
__________________
Motocross is not just a sport, it's a lifestyle.

File Server: Intel Pentium G630, 8GB PNY 1600, AsRock H77M Micro, Corsair CX430M, Vertex 2 90GB (OS), 2x WD Red 2TB in RAID1
“We will never know our full potential, unless we push ourselves to find it. -Travis Rice”
MxPhenom 216 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2012, 04:15 PM   #19
radrok
1000 Posts
 
radrok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,977 (3.28/day)
Thanks: 155
Thanked 486 Times in 387 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to radrok

System Specs

I think he used > to indicate more power consumption, not to indicate better aka less power consumption.
radrok is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2012, 04:40 PM   #20
okidna
200 Posts
 
okidna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 364 (0.68/day)
Thanks: 496
Thanked 271 Times in 151 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Casecutter View Post
You mean AMD has products from $100-500 and Nvidia has two at $400 and $500 respectively. Oh yea and the GT640 $110 that basically not as good as 6670 that showed back 18 months ago with DDR5 and was less than $100.

Me I'd rather be late with a Halo (bragging rights product that will be on par in performance and $200 less... and hardly add to the bottom line) than have the competition own the $130-350 range uncontested, for what's like 7-8 months! AMD will have new 8XXX parts ready 3 months after GK106 starts to make strides.

It's not any disaster for AMD.
Yeah, not a disaster at all.

Actually, today is a big day for AMD. They managed to achieve lowest stock price in 1 year calendar :



A delayed flagship product, a couple of crucial staff gone (John Bruno to Apple, Bob Feldstein to NVIDIA, Ben Williams to Calxeda Inc.), lowest stock price in 1 year? Not a disaster at all. They'll bounce back stronger!

Go AMD!
okidna is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2012, 04:47 PM   #21
Widjaja
3500 Posts
 
Widjaja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wangas, New Zealand
Posts: 4,058 (1.85/day)
Thanks: 244
Thanked 632 Times in 547 Posts

System Specs

I predict it will be a little bit slower in benchmarks and be a bit stuttery in games.
Widjaja is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2012, 05:02 PM   #22
m1dg3t
1000 Posts
 
m1dg3t's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,996 (1.78/day)
Thanks: 676
Thanked 451 Times in 373 Posts

System Specs

Theres definately changes goin down @ AMD, uncertainty causes low stocks, even if business is good. You would know that by looking at current global market trends

I think ATi is sandbagging with the 7990. Which doesnt bother me because they have again provided me with excellent performance/$$$.
__________________

Why dazzle 'em with brilliance when you can baffle 'em with bullshit.
Alterius non sit, qui potest esse sui!
Und setzet ihr nicht das leben ein, Nie wird euch das leben gewonnen sein!

If knowledge is power, then ignorance is bliss!
If god didn't want them sheared, he wouldn't have made them sheep!
m1dg3t is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2012, 05:20 PM   #23
Casecutter
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 774 (0.98/day)
Thanks: 53
Thanked 54 Times in 47 Posts

How about this… Such a delay or the speculation (that's what it is) could be nothing more than a smoke screen to have it ready and "available on shelves" when Nvidia hits with GK106 parts as a way of muscling in on some review time. AMD not about to let Nvidia waltz in late and have reviews abound.

In the real world this speculation of some exorbitant flagship which in real terms has nothing to do with profit streams is stupid. At least unless you think today is a good day to unload your stock… “stupid is as stupid does”.
Casecutter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2012, 05:38 PM   #24
MxPhenom 216
Knowledgeable Posting Whore
 
MxPhenom 216's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 6,034 (5.90/day)
Thanks: 1,340
Thanked 1,197 Times in 907 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by m1dg3t View Post
Theres definately changes goin down @ AMD, uncertainty causes low stocks, even if business is good. You would know that by looking at current global market trends

I think ATi is sandbagging with the 7990. Which doesnt bother me because they have again provided me with excellent performance/$$$.
This has been AMDs worst generation in terms of price to performance Ratios.
__________________
Motocross is not just a sport, it's a lifestyle.

File Server: Intel Pentium G630, 8GB PNY 1600, AsRock H77M Micro, Corsair CX430M, Vertex 2 90GB (OS), 2x WD Red 2TB in RAID1
“We will never know our full potential, unless we push ourselves to find it. -Travis Rice”
MxPhenom 216 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2012, 05:54 PM   #25
okidna
200 Posts
 
okidna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 364 (0.68/day)
Thanks: 496
Thanked 271 Times in 151 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Casecutter View Post
How about this… Such a delay or the speculation (that's what it is) could be nothing more than a smoke screen to have it ready and "available on shelves" when Nvidia hits with GK106 parts as a way of muscling in on some review time. AMD not about to let Nvidia waltz in late and have reviews abound.
IMO, they need to make sure that 7970 Ghz Edition are "available on shelves" first before thinking about 7990 as a "smoke screen".
okidna is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to okidna For This Useful Post:
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD Radeon HD 7990 Debuts as a Very Limited Edition ? Elmo AMD / ATI 0 Jul 9, 2012 03:30 PM
AMD Chooses Computex 2012 as Radeon HD 7990 Launchpad btarunr News 20 Apr 25, 2012 09:13 AM
AMD Radeon HD 7990 Clock Speeds, Chip-Configuration Surface btarunr News 43 Mar 21, 2012 05:35 PM
Specs for AMD Radeon HD 7990 disclosed alexsubri AMD / ATI 34 Mar 26, 2011 12:16 PM
NVIDIA Fermi-based GeForce GPU Further Delayed? btarunr News 136 Jan 3, 2010 10:54 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts