techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > Graphics Cards > NVIDIA

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jul 31, 2012, 01:01 PM   #1
afw
500 Posts
 
afw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 628 (0.41/day)
Thanks: 93
Thanked 129 Times in 97 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to afw

System Specs

GTX 660 Ti 2GB -3DMark11 results

TT have posted 3DMark11 results on their FB page ... looks very promising ...

__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Main Rig : Asus Sabertooth z77 , Intel i7 2700k, Corsair Vengeance 8GB , Corsair FORCE GT 120GB, Seasonic x650 GOLD , Acer G235H , SilverStone Raven RV02
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Last edited by afw; Jul 31, 2012 at 04:38 PM.
afw is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to afw For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 31, 2012, 01:23 PM   #2
NHKS
500 Posts
 
NHKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 572 (0.95/day)
Thanks: 1,853
Thanked 375 Times in 199 Posts

hope that TT hasn't mis-typed any scores!.. and also that 660Ti is priced not more than 300$.. then we have a winner
NHKS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2012, 02:15 PM   #3
Capitan Harlock
200 Posts
 
Capitan Harlock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: near Milan
Posts: 328 (0.67/day)
Thanks: 352
Thanked 41 Times in 36 Posts

System Specs

i wanna see the result in gaming and vs the hd7950 ghz edition if comes out
Capitan Harlock is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2012, 02:30 PM   #4
Crap Daddy
2000 Posts
 
Crap Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,282 (2.45/day)
Thanks: 941
Thanked 961 Times in 669 Posts

System Specs

Looks about right. Finally GK104 is where it should have been in the first place, mid-range. Too bad it had to be crippled.
Crap Daddy is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Crap Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 31, 2012, 05:10 PM   #5
Crap Daddy
2000 Posts
 
Crap Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,282 (2.45/day)
Thanks: 941
Thanked 961 Times in 669 Posts

System Specs

TweakTown facebook says:

This is with our 3960x @ 4.6GHz

GTX 660 Ti is clocked at 915 / 6004 QDR -Shane

Also they are benchmarking the card so stay tuned.
Crap Daddy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2012, 05:16 PM   #6
cmaxvt
75 Posts
 
cmaxvt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: CA
Posts: 127 (0.34/day)
Thanks: 18
Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts

System Specs

man this sure makes my 670 at $400 seem waaaaaay overpriced. I am right there with you crapdaddy. If only this card had come out at the mid-range price it was supposed to be and we were able to see an actual top end Nvidia product. I hate the idea that they just got to half-ass this one while twiddling their thumbs and charging double on a card they thought would only be a mid-range.
cmaxvt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2012, 05:25 PM   #7
Crap Daddy
2000 Posts
 
Crap Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,282 (2.45/day)
Thanks: 941
Thanked 961 Times in 669 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmaxvt View Post
man this sure makes my 670 at $400 seem waaaaaay overpriced.
To make it easier for you think of the guys who spent $450 on a 7950.
Crap Daddy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2012, 05:26 PM   #8
cmaxvt
75 Posts
 
cmaxvt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: CA
Posts: 127 (0.34/day)
Thanks: 18
Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crap Daddy View Post
To make it easier for you think of the guys who spent $450 on a 7950.
AAAAAAAND I'm better.
cmaxvt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2012, 05:29 PM   #9
DarkOCean
1000 Posts
 
DarkOCean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: on top of that big mountain on mars(e Eu)
Posts: 1,418 (0.90/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 272 Times in 234 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crap Daddy View Post
To make it easier for you think of the guys who spent $450 on a 7950.
early buyers alaways pay top dollar.

The difference between 660ti and 670 is bigger than between 680 and 670.
Wonder what the real core clock from autotune is.
DarkOCean is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2012, 05:33 PM   #10
Crap Daddy
2000 Posts
 
Crap Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,282 (2.45/day)
Thanks: 941
Thanked 961 Times in 669 Posts

System Specs

660 Ti review is up:

http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/486...iew/index.html
Crap Daddy is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Crap Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old Jul 31, 2012, 05:36 PM   #11
DarkOCean
1000 Posts
 
DarkOCean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: on top of that big mountain on mars(e Eu)
Posts: 1,418 (0.90/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 272 Times in 234 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crap Daddy View Post
doesnt work for me.
Anybody got any pictures from that review?
Edit: works now, 192bit/1344 card
DarkOCean is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2012, 06:20 PM   #12
Fluffmeister
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 278 (0.54/day)
Thanks: 120
Thanked 80 Times in 32 Posts

Wow, an extremely impressive card. Apparently priced around 7850/7870 levels whilst punching quite a bit higher too. The 7950 just can't catch a break!

Could be the perfect all round 1080P gaming card.
Fluffmeister is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2012, 06:40 PM   #13
Benetanegia
2000 Posts
 
Benetanegia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Reaching your left retina.
Posts: 2,683 (1.99/day)
Thanks: 125
Thanked 701 Times in 494 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crap Daddy View Post
Pretty much what expected. Not sure about the price tho. I'd expect $300 for the time being. Less than that doesn't make much sense right now, unless IDK, they did trully get a massive preference deal with TSMC and TSMC doing 70% more wafer starts this qurter than the previous (and getting better) has trully enabled them to release GK104 in a form/volume closer to originally intended. This card even at $250 would be very very profitable if they can sell them in high volumes, like GTX460 and 560 did. But of course until now that's been mission impossible, not even close.
Benetanegia is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2012, 06:42 PM   #14
Xzibit
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 608 (1.58/day)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 95 Times in 74 Posts

System Specs

If this turns out to be true then its a great gaming card in the sub 399 bracket.

Although something just doesnt seam right considering the GPU-Z screenshot with the 192bit bus and the ROP 24. There GPU-Z screens rumor to be GK104 wonder why he choose to photoshop it out.

The performance hit should be more then differance to 680-670. Plus on some game results it keeps a similar fps decrease if not better then 680-670 and does better on higher Resolution % wise. From the graphs it seams the card performance % wise better at 1920x1200 & 2560x1600 compared to 1680x1050 results.

In the AA results it does better % wise at 2560x1600 then at 1920x1200.

Just odd. Have to wait for other reviews to give a better picture of whats what.
Xzibit is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2012, 06:46 PM   #15
Benetanegia
2000 Posts
 
Benetanegia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Reaching your left retina.
Posts: 2,683 (1.99/day)
Thanks: 125
Thanked 701 Times in 494 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xzibit View Post
wonder why he choose to photoshop it out.
They say why in the preview. They don't have NDA and there's no retail cards. So as they state this is an engineering sample by one of Nvidia's partners and they don't want to give any clues as to which one.
Benetanegia is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2012, 06:50 PM   #16
Xzibit
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 608 (1.58/day)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 95 Times in 74 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benetanegia View Post
They say why in the preview. They don't have NDA and there's no retail cards. So as they state this is an engineering sample by one of Nvidia's partners and they don't want to give any clues as to which one.
I read that but unless they were the only one who got a GK1xx thats odd..

The other suppose leaked photo had different GPU-Z info. The two are at odds with one another

All 3 contradict each other so far.
Xzibit is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2012, 06:51 PM   #17
DarkOCean
1000 Posts
 
DarkOCean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: on top of that big mountain on mars(e Eu)
Posts: 1,418 (0.90/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 272 Times in 234 Posts

System Specs

Very few games were tested cant wait for wizz rewiew to see what's really going on with this card.
DarkOCean is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2012, 06:53 PM   #18
Crap Daddy
2000 Posts
 
Crap Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,282 (2.45/day)
Thanks: 941
Thanked 961 Times in 669 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benetanegia View Post
Pretty much what expected. Not sure about the price tho. I'd expect $300 for the time being. Less than that doesn't make much sense right now, unless IDK, they did trully get a massive preference deal with TSMC and TSMC doing 70% more wafer starts this qurter than the previous (and getting better) has trully enabled them to release GK104 in a form/volume closer to originally intended. This card even at $250 would be very very profitable if they can sell them in high volumes, like GTX460 and 560 did. But of course until now that's been mission impossible, not even close.
Sweclockers seem to be right. You remember the 2 leaked GPU-z shots with a part with 1152 shaders, one 192bit the other 256? That would be the 660 and...?
Crap Daddy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2012, 06:54 PM   #19
gopal
500 Posts
 
gopal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Patna, Bihar, India, Asia, Earth, Terron System, Milky way Galaxy, And Beyond
Posts: 990 (3.02/day)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 121 Times in 94 Posts
Send a message via MSN to gopal Send a message via Skype™ to gopal

System Specs

If it is going to be under 275$ then i have my order.

I am reading the whole review friends
http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/486...iew/index.html
gopal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2012, 07:03 PM   #20
Xzibit
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 608 (1.58/day)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 95 Times in 74 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crap Daddy View Post
Sweclockers seem to be right. You remember the 2 leaked GPU-z shots with a part with 1152 shaders, one 192bit the other 256? That would be the 660 and...?
Since there all contradicting each other. Photophop gallore... GK106 ? and there just photoshoping GK104 info since its not showing up properly.

Who knows...
Xzibit is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2012, 07:27 PM   #21
Protagonist
500 Posts
 
Protagonist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 673 (0.68/day)
Thanks: 18
Thanked 112 Times in 86 Posts

System Specs

This is definitely not my card, 24 ROPs and 192 Bit, i know it delivers but its not a card i would be proud to buy.

In this gen if i cant get a GTX 680 at a good price then GTX 670 is as low as i would like to go, reason being i decided to stay away from crippled cards. The GTX 460 is the last crippled card i would like to have with me it had only 1 SM cut off, and its the reason GTX 670 is an option.

But frankly i would like it if each card used a different GPU Chip eg GTX680-GK104, GTX670-GK106, GTX660-GK108,.... something along those lines, not a crippled chip.

Oh and Nvidia should loose the TI variants and stick to numbers alone.

Last edited by Protagonist; Jul 31, 2012 at 07:57 PM.
Protagonist is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2012, 07:37 PM   #22
Rahmat Sofyan
75 Posts
 
Rahmat Sofyan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Pekanbaru -Riau - Indonesia - Earth
Posts: 85 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to Rahmat Sofyan

System Specs

Tweaktown already review it...

Some GTX 660 Ti Review from TT..Nice!
Rahmat Sofyan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2012, 09:05 PM   #23
Benetanegia
2000 Posts
 
Benetanegia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Reaching your left retina.
Posts: 2,683 (1.99/day)
Thanks: 125
Thanked 701 Times in 494 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crap Daddy View Post
Sweclockers seem to be right. You remember the 2 leaked GPU-z shots with a part with 1152 shaders, one 192bit the other 256? That would be the 660 and...?
660 SE is always an option. So is 670 SE for the 1152 SP 256 bit card. It's happened in the past with SE and LE parts.

Personally, if there were no possible names and had to choose only 2, I would believe more on TweakTown's card being one of them, because they have been completely accurate in the recent previews. Ever since they are in bad terms with Nvidia they are just leaking the actual thing before anyone else because they didn't sign an NDA, Nvidia apparently doesn't even give them a choice.

It's also entirely possible that Nvidia is simply on a hunt to catch up the leakers and that's why we got so many different specs so...
Benetanegia is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2012, 09:36 PM   #24
Fatal1ty39
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 88 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 24 Times in 13 Posts

i don't know if its important but arctic cooling is stating that their vga cooler are compatible with the gtx 660 Ti:
http://www.arctic.ac/en/p/cooling/vga.html
Fatal1ty39 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2012, 09:56 PM   #25
Hilux SSRG
200 Posts
 
Hilux SSRG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Northern NJ, USA
Posts: 228 (0.60/day)
Thanks: 44
Thanked 29 Times in 21 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmaxvt View Post
man this sure makes my 670 at $400 seem waaaaaay overpriced. I am right there with you crapdaddy. If only this card had come out at the mid-range price it was supposed to be and we were able to see an actual top end Nvidia product. I hate the idea that they just got to half-ass this one while twiddling their thumbs and charging double on a card they thought would only be a mid-range.
Don't rush judgement yet. Glancing at the review it looks good but not the great value you got for 670 vs 680. I'm happy I bought my Gigabyte 670 in May.

Hopefully the price is $300, but I have a feeling it's closer to $330-350.
Hilux SSRG is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GeForce GTX 560, 550 Series Discontinuation to Quickly Follow GTX 660 Ti, 650 Launch btarunr News 19 Jul 31, 2012 05:38 PM
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti! Aksh_47 NVIDIA 15 Jul 31, 2012 02:15 PM
GTX 670 3DMark11 apparently Crap Daddy NVIDIA 50 May 10, 2012 12:26 AM
7000+ 3DMark11 from a GTX 560Ti? NdMk2o1o General Software 16 Apr 9, 2012 09:19 PM
GTX 660 & 670Ti will have 2gb memory aswell? puma99dk| NVIDIA 9 Mar 25, 2012 01:46 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts