![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() |
GTX 660 Ti 2GB -3DMark11 results
TT have posted 3DMark11 results on their FB page ... looks very promising ...
![]()
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Main Rig : Asus Sabertooth z77 , Intel i7 2700k, Corsair Vengeance 8GB , Corsair FORCE GT 120GB, Seasonic x650 GOLD , Acer G235H , SilverStone Raven RV02 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ![]() Last edited by afw; Jul 31, 2012 at 04:38 PM. |
|
|
|
| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to afw For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 572 (0.95/day)
Thanks: 1,853
Thanked 375 Times in 199 Posts
|
hope that TT hasn't mis-typed any scores!.. and also that 660Ti is priced not more than 300$.. then we have a winner
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: near Milan
Posts: 328 (0.67/day)
Thanks: 352
Thanked 41 Times in 36 Posts
|
i wanna see the result in gaming and vs the hd7950 ghz edition if comes out
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() |
Looks about right. Finally GK104 is where it should have been in the first place, mid-range. Too bad it had to be crippled.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Crap Daddy For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#5 |
![]() |
TweakTown facebook says:
This is with our 3960x @ 4.6GHz GTX 660 Ti is clocked at 915 / 6004 QDR -Shane Also they are benchmarking the card so stay tuned. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: May 2012
Location: CA
Posts: 127 (0.34/day)
Thanks: 18
Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts
|
man this sure makes my 670 at $400 seem waaaaaay overpriced. I am right there with you crapdaddy. If only this card had come out at the mid-range price it was supposed to be and we were able to see an actual top end Nvidia product. I hate the idea that they just got to half-ass this one while twiddling their thumbs and charging double on a card they thought would only be a mid-range.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Join Date: May 2012
Location: CA
Posts: 127 (0.34/day)
Thanks: 18
Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: on top of that big mountain on mars(e Eu)
Posts: 1,418 (0.90/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 272 Times in 234 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Crap Daddy For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#11 | |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: on top of that big mountain on mars(e Eu)
Posts: 1,418 (0.90/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 272 Times in 234 Posts
|
Quote:
Anybody got any pictures from that review? Edit: works now, 192bit/1344 card |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 278 (0.54/day)
Thanks: 120
Thanked 80 Times in 32 Posts
|
Wow, an extremely impressive card. Apparently priced around 7850/7870 levels whilst punching quite a bit higher too. The 7950 just can't catch a break!
Could be the perfect all round 1080P gaming card. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Reaching your left retina.
Posts: 2,683 (1.99/day)
Thanks: 125
Thanked 701 Times in 494 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Banned
|
If this turns out to be true then its a great gaming card in the sub 399 bracket.
Although something just doesnt seam right considering the GPU-Z screenshot with the 192bit bus and the ROP 24. There GPU-Z screens rumor to be GK104 wonder why he choose to photoshop it out. The performance hit should be more then differance to 680-670. Plus on some game results it keeps a similar fps decrease if not better then 680-670 and does better on higher Resolution % wise. From the graphs it seams the card performance % wise better at 1920x1200 & 2560x1600 compared to 1680x1050 results. In the AA results it does better % wise at 2560x1600 then at 1920x1200. Just odd. Have to wait for other reviews to give a better picture of whats what. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Reaching your left retina.
Posts: 2,683 (1.99/day)
Thanks: 125
Thanked 701 Times in 494 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
The other suppose leaked photo had different GPU-Z info. The two are at odds with one another All 3 contradict each other so far. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: on top of that big mountain on mars(e Eu)
Posts: 1,418 (0.90/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 272 Times in 234 Posts
|
Very few games were tested cant wait for wizz rewiew to see what's really going on with this card.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Patna, Bihar, India, Asia, Earth, Terron System, Milky way Galaxy, And Beyond
Posts: 990 (3.02/day)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 121 Times in 94 Posts
|
If it is going to be under 275$ then i have my order.
I am reading the whole review friends http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/486...iew/index.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
Who knows... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
![]() |
This is definitely not my card, 24 ROPs and 192 Bit, i know it delivers but its not a card i would be proud to buy.
In this gen if i cant get a GTX 680 at a good price then GTX 670 is as low as i would like to go, reason being i decided to stay away from crippled cards. The GTX 460 is the last crippled card i would like to have with me it had only 1 SM cut off, and its the reason GTX 670 is an option. But frankly i would like it if each card used a different GPU Chip eg GTX680-GK104, GTX670-GK106, GTX660-GK108,.... something along those lines, not a crippled chip. Oh and Nvidia should loose the TI variants and stick to numbers alone. Last edited by Protagonist; Jul 31, 2012 at 07:57 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Pekanbaru -Riau - Indonesia - Earth
Posts: 85 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Reaching your left retina.
Posts: 2,683 (1.99/day)
Thanks: 125
Thanked 701 Times in 494 Posts
|
Quote:
Personally, if there were no possible names and had to choose only 2, I would believe more on TweakTown's card being one of them, because they have been completely accurate in the recent previews. Ever since they are in bad terms with Nvidia they are just leaking the actual thing before anyone else because they didn't sign an NDA, Nvidia apparently doesn't even give them a choice. It's also entirely possible that Nvidia is simply on a hunt to catch up the leakers and that's why we got so many different specs so... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 88 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 24 Times in 13 Posts
|
i don't know if its important but arctic cooling is stating that their vga cooler are compatible with the gtx 660 Ti:
http://www.arctic.ac/en/p/cooling/vga.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
![]() Join Date: May 2012
Location: Northern NJ, USA
Posts: 228 (0.60/day)
Thanks: 44
Thanked 29 Times in 21 Posts
|
Quote:
Hopefully the price is $300, but I have a feeling it's closer to $330-350. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GeForce GTX 560, 550 Series Discontinuation to Quickly Follow GTX 660 Ti, 650 Launch | btarunr | News | 19 | Jul 31, 2012 05:38 PM |
| Nvidia GTX 660 Ti! | Aksh_47 | NVIDIA | 15 | Jul 31, 2012 02:15 PM |
| GTX 670 3DMark11 apparently | Crap Daddy | NVIDIA | 50 | May 10, 2012 12:26 AM |
| 7000+ 3DMark11 from a GTX 560Ti? | NdMk2o1o | General Software | 16 | Apr 9, 2012 09:19 PM |
| GTX 660 & 670Ti will have 2gb memory aswell? | puma99dk| | NVIDIA | 9 | Mar 25, 2012 01:46 AM |