techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > Graphics Cards > AMD / ATI

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Aug 5, 2012, 05:53 PM   #26
Omar24Kobe
5 Posts
 
Omar24Kobe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 17 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via Yahoo to Omar24Kobe

System Specs

sexy card ... i like it
Omar24Kobe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2012, 11:20 PM   #27
Shurakai
200 Posts
 
Shurakai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia, SA
Posts: 232 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 61
Thanked 19 Times in 14 Posts

System Specs

Love the card, but it looks like the text on the back plate is upside down, going to look a little odd on the case. Seems Sapphire is the only company this gen making that mistake
Shurakai is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 9, 2012, 03:04 AM   #28
Melvis
2000 Posts
 
Melvis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,929 (1.55/day)
Thanks: 602
Thanked 459 Times in 381 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by pantherx12 View Post
My 7850 completely outguns my last card*, a hd 6970 that had a pretty high OC



* In direct x 11 games I can get up to a 50% performance increase over the 6970, in other games such as GTA I went from stuttery 25 fps average to a far more tolerable 33 fps average.
Yea but thats to be expected as the 7 series had a good performance boost over the 6 series, unlike the 6 over the 5 series.

And who's to know how it will be with the 7 series to the 8 series? it might be a good jump in performance or it could be like the 6 series and not be any improvement (like the 6850-6870) that actually went backwards in performance.
Melvis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 9, 2012, 07:14 AM   #29
LordJummy
1000 Posts
 
LordJummy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: US of A
Posts: 1,346 (1.82/day)
Thanks: 352
Thanked 250 Times in 220 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Melvis View Post
Yea but thats to be expected as the 7 series had a good performance boost over the 6 series, unlike the 6 over the 5 series.

And who's to know how it will be with the 7 series to the 8 series? it might be a good jump in performance or it could be like the 6 series and not be any improvement (like the 6850-6870) that actually went backwards in performance.
Just FYI the 6870 and 6850 did not go backwards. They simply changed the numbering scheme. The 6K series made some serious improvements, but overall performance of the equivalent cards wasn't as big as 6k to 7k

Just wanted to correct you on that though, because that's incorrect.
__________________
if you build it, they will hate
LordJummy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 9, 2012, 10:11 AM   #30
Melvis
2000 Posts
 
Melvis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,929 (1.55/day)
Thanks: 602
Thanked 459 Times in 381 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by LordJummy View Post
Just FYI the 6870 and 6850 did not go backwards. They simply changed the numbering scheme. The 6K series made some serious improvements, but overall performance of the equivalent cards wasn't as big as 6k to 7k

Just wanted to correct you on that though, because that's incorrect.
Well the 6950 and the 6970 are totally different cards, you cant put them against the 5870 unlike the 6870 and 6850, and everyone knows that we was NOT expecting the 6870 or 6850 to perform UNDER the old gen which they did. And as you just said yourself the equivalent cards wasnt as big as the 6k to 7k and thats just my point.

So iam correct sorry, the 6870 which took the place of the 5870 was infact a weaker card regardless of the 6950 or 6970, if you want to put those cards against there equivalent from the last gen, that be the 5970 and we both know the answer to that question lol
Melvis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 9, 2012, 10:26 AM   #31
20mmrain
2000 Posts
 
20mmrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 2,407 (1.82/day)
Thanks: 477
Thanked 736 Times in 451 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Melvis View Post
Well the 6950 and the 6970 are totally different cards, you cant put them against the 5870 unlike the 6870 and 6850, and everyone knows that we was NOT expecting the 6870 or 6850 to perform UNDER the old gen which they did. And as you just said yourself the equivalent cards wasnt as big as the 6k to 7k and thats just my point.

So iam correct sorry, the 6870 which took the place of the 5870 was infact a weaker card regardless of the 6950 or 6970, if you want to put those cards against there equivalent from the last gen, that be the 5970 and we both know the answer to that question lol
I'm sorry I would also disagree about the HD6870 going backwards from the HD5870. I owned at one time 2x HD5870's and 2x HD6870's and 2 x HD6950's while I will say that the HD 6900 series was a bit of a disappointment..... the HD6870's were not. The HD 6870 was not only just as powerful as the HD 5870 IMO it was also more efficient. I also could beat the HD 5870 in a lot of benchmarks (especially when the drivers became mature.) However..... I would still consider it more of a side ways move then a full upgrade. But that would really depend on what you consider an upgrade..... Power?, Performance?, or Thermals?

The HD 6850 though I will agree was not a upgrade from the HD5850 or HD5870. While that card could overclock like a bat out of hell....and achieve almost on par with the HD 6870 it was not an upgrade from the previous gen.
__________________
Heatware 35 + 0 | 0 -
20mmrain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 9, 2012, 11:11 AM   #32
Aquinus
3500 Posts
 
Aquinus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dover, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 4,242 (8.86/day)
Thanks: 1,264
Thanked 1,322 Times in 981 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Melvis View Post
So iam correct sorry, the 6870 which took the place of the 5870 was infact a weaker card regardless of the 6950 or 6970, if you want to put those cards against there equivalent from the last gen, that be the 5970 and we both know the answer to that question lol
Actually, after the naming change the 6870 was primarily intended to replace the 5770, not the 5870. The 6870's performance is somewhere between the 5850 and 5870 at stock speeds, but it isn't what it was targeted to replace. I'm not sure where you get your information from, but you might want to double check your sources.

The naming shift worked like this and there actually were vast improvements over 5xxx series, including shader speed and efficiency, faster memory, and better crossfire scaling and honestly going from the 6000-series to 7000-series did the same kind of improvements, but didn't have the same amount of improvement.

5750 -> 6850
5770 -> 6870
5850 -> 6950
5870 -> 6970
__________________
MyHeat
Aquinus is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 9, 2012, 11:39 AM   #33
Melvis
2000 Posts
 
Melvis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,929 (1.55/day)
Thanks: 602
Thanked 459 Times in 381 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by 20mmrain View Post
I'm sorry I would also disagree about the HD6870 going backwards from the HD5870. I owned at one time 2x HD5870's and 2x HD6870's and 2 x HD6950's while I will say that the HD 6900 series was a bit of a disappointment..... the HD6870's were not. The HD 6870 was not only just as powerful as the HD 5870 IMO it was also more efficient. I also could beat the HD 5870 in a lot of benchmarks (especially when the drivers became mature.) However..... I would still consider it more of a side ways move then a full upgrade. But that would really depend on what you consider an upgrade..... Power?, Performance?, or Thermals?

The HD 6850 though I will agree was not a upgrade from the HD5850 or HD5870. While that card could overclock like a bat out of hell....and achieve almost on par with the HD 6870 it was not an upgrade from the previous gen.
Im just going by what the benchmarks where like when the card was released and it showed that the 6870 was indeed slower then the 5870 (in most games) but not by much, very little to be honest. I think you might find the reason why your 6870's beat the 5870's was well crossfire, the 6 series improved crossfire alot over the 5 series this i think is why your 6870's beat the 5870's? That would be my guess anyway.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquinus View Post
Actually, after the naming change the 6870 was primarily intended to replace the 5770, not the 5870. The 6870's performance is somewhere between the 5850 and 5870 at stock speeds, but it isn't what it was targeted to replace. I'm not sure where you get your information from, but you might want to double check your sources.

The naming shift worked like this and there actually were vast improvements over 5xxx series, including shader speed and efficiency, faster memory, and better crossfire scaling and honestly going from the 6000-series to 7000-series did the same kind of improvements, but didn't have the same amount of improvement.

5750 -> 6850
5770 -> 6870
5850 -> 6950
5870 -> 6970
Yea but who realy believed that? honestly, primarily intended doesnt mean it did, the whole naming scheme (for me) was a bit of a joke and for most of us users made it very confusing. For "us" computer savy people we get it and understand, but for the majority it was a wtf? Why bother changing the naming scheme when in fact it doesnt make any sense at all, they should never of changed it IMO.

Anyway i get what you mean and i understand that, but in my eyes if you name a card thats the same name as the previous gen and add a 6 to the start of it, you would "expect" an improvement??

I think we sorta got off track here, my point been from the start is that none of us know how much the 8 series card will be over this Gen card (his 7970) in performance and this is why i said it is future proof and that the 5 to 6 series wasn't much of a jump compared to the 6 to 7 series, am i wrong? and does anyone one got any proof that the 8 series will be just as big of a jump in performance over the 7 series? please post away.
Melvis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 9, 2012, 11:54 AM   #34
DOM
Eligible for custom title
 
DOM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: TX, USA
Posts: 6,466 (2.54/day)
Thanks: 292
Thanked 790 Times in 706 Posts

System Specs

cool mike isnt so cool he just posted and never came back
__________________
DOM is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 9, 2012, 08:10 PM   #35
andaberk
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 2 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via ICQ to andaberk Send a message via Skype™ to andaberk

System Specs



Sapphire HD7970 Toxic@1320/1880 max/t.-66




Last edited by andaberk; Aug 14, 2012 at 05:34 PM.
andaberk is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to andaberk For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 9, 2012, 08:17 PM   #36
T4C Fantasy
CPU & GPU DB Maintainer
 
T4C Fantasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA, Rhode Island
Posts: 871 (2.30/day)
Thanks: 207
Thanked 363 Times in 213 Posts
Send a message via AIM to T4C Fantasy Send a message via MSN to T4C Fantasy Send a message via Skype™ to T4C Fantasy

System Specs

I already have hd8000 series info in my GPU-CN list check my sig for amd link and click the GPU_CN List sea islands is on bottom, have rops transistors everything on the upcoming tech
__________________
GPU Database <-- Want Me To Add A Specific Non-Reference GPU Model Not Listed? Send Me A PM
GPU Database Thread
Rare GPUs / Unreleased GPUs
List Your Favorite GPU
GPU-Z 0.6.7+ Screenshots!

CPU Database
T4C Fantasy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 13, 2012, 01:45 AM   #37
Cool Mike
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Carolina, USA
Posts: 206 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 24
Thanked 33 Times in 13 Posts

System Specs

Hello guys,

Sorry I havent been back. I was at NI(National Instruments) week in Austin, TX all last week.

Was missing my Toxic badly. Spend some time today benchmarking. Card running well. Since my last post I was hitting 1315 core 1900 memory with ease. I few guys over on Overclockers.net could not believe I was hitting 1900 memory without slowing down my benchmark. My Heaven benchmarks increased all the way to 1900Mhz. It was good to see Amdaberk hitting close to the same numbers. I was able to hit 1325 on a few runs, but not stable enough. 1320 core 1900 memory seems to work for my sample. Just a heads up, I am running Trixx overclocking software, the maximum core voltage allowed is a very high 1.5 Volts. 1.281V will allow you to hit 1310 core. 1.299 I can hit 1320 core.
I noticed Newegg doesnt have them listed any more. I'm sure they will recieve more...
Cool Mike is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 13, 2012, 01:57 AM   #38
radrok
1000 Posts
 
radrok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,889 (3.30/day)
Thanks: 140
Thanked 458 Times in 360 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to radrok

System Specs

Thanks for the update

I hope my retailer will get some stock in a reasonable timeframe.

May I ask you how VRM temps are?
radrok is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 14, 2012, 02:04 AM   #39
SIGSEGV
200 Posts
 
SIGSEGV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Bandung, Indonesia
Posts: 363 (0.87/day)
Thanks: 103
Thanked 73 Times in 45 Posts

System Specs

OMG, sweet card, i want this one for sureeeeee.... Toxic with Ghz Edition (better binning?) and with huge size of gpu vram..
__________________


And if you hear me talking on the wind
You've got to understand
We must remain perfect strangers
[Deep Purple - Perfect Strangers]
SIGSEGV is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 14, 2012, 03:58 PM   #40
NAVI_Z
200 Posts
 
NAVI_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 214 (0.21/day)
Thanks: 405
Thanked 37 Times in 33 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by NHKS View Post
Congrats on ur new card cool mike.. good looking card indeed..

& dont forget to try this with ur card!!..
me wants two in x-fire baby!!
NAVI_Z is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 14, 2012, 05:32 PM   #41
andaberk
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 2 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via ICQ to andaberk Send a message via Skype™ to andaberk

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by andaberk View Post
http://img.maryno.net/preview/5bfe0d...7b5485f988.gif

Sapphire HD7970 Toxic@1320/1880 max/t.-66


andaberk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2012, 04:14 AM   #42
SIGSEGV
200 Posts
 
SIGSEGV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Bandung, Indonesia
Posts: 363 (0.87/day)
Thanks: 103
Thanked 73 Times in 45 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by NAVI_Z View Post
me wants two in x-fire baby!!
this is disaster, according to videocardz.com,it's reported that sapphire cancels toxic HD7970 6Gb
__________________


And if you hear me talking on the wind
You've got to understand
We must remain perfect strangers
[Deep Purple - Perfect Strangers]
SIGSEGV is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2012, 01:35 PM   #43
radrok
1000 Posts
 
radrok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,889 (3.30/day)
Thanks: 140
Thanked 458 Times in 360 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to radrok

System Specs

The source in that article is OBR (), whoever takes that site's news as true must be a fool.
radrok is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to radrok For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 15, 2012, 04:50 PM   #44
Zubasa
3500 Posts
 
Zubasa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hong Kong, China
Posts: 3,700 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 586
Thanked 451 Times in 387 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by SIGSEGV View Post
this is disaster, according to videocardz.com,it's reported that sapphire cancels toxic HD7970 6Gb
According to that site:
Quote:
Update
Sapphire HD 7970 Toxic 6GB has not been cancelled
__________________
ʃ( ◕ ‿‿ ◕ )ʅ
“but oh ze noes! i can't convert my porn to iphone so i can watch in the bus .. it doesnt support cuda / badaboom.” -W1zzard
Zubasa is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Zubasa For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 15, 2012, 05:00 PM   #45
radrok
1000 Posts
 
radrok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,889 (3.30/day)
Thanks: 140
Thanked 458 Times in 360 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to radrok

System Specs

My point has been proven, OBR is biased and full of BS.
radrok is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to radrok For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 15, 2012, 06:22 PM   #46
the54thvoid
2000 Posts
 
the54thvoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,053 (1.64/day)
Thanks: 329
Thanked 854 Times in 504 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by radrok View Post
My point has been proven, OBR is biased and full of BS.
Your point? How dare you take ownership of that Most people know that OBR is nothing more than a blogger with an ego and an insatiable appetite for spreading shite.

Yes, for any legit tech site to quote OBR is akin to the The Guardian quoting the scribblings of a 12 year old with learning difficulties.
__________________
My Heatware: http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=75854
the54thvoid is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2012, 06:32 PM   #47
radrok
1000 Posts
 
radrok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,889 (3.30/day)
Thanks: 140
Thanked 458 Times in 360 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to radrok

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by the54thvoid View Post
Your point? How dare you take ownership of that Most people know that OBR is nothing more than a blogger with an ego and an insatiable appetite for spreading shite.

Yes, for any legit tech site to quote OBR is akin to the The Guardian quoting the scribblings of a 12 year old with learning difficulties.
Quote:
Originally Posted by radrok View Post
whoever takes that site's news as true must be a fool.
I meant this point
radrok is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to radrok For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 15, 2012, 06:36 PM   #48
the54thvoid
2000 Posts
 
the54thvoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,053 (1.64/day)
Thanks: 329
Thanked 854 Times in 504 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by radrok View Post
I meant this point
I know dude! And i wholeheartedly agree.
__________________
My Heatware: http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=75854
the54thvoid is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to the54thvoid For This Useful Post:
Old Aug 15, 2012, 06:43 PM   #49
radrok
1000 Posts
 
radrok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,889 (3.30/day)
Thanks: 140
Thanked 458 Times in 360 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to radrok

System Specs

Sorry mate, I thought you skipped that line!
radrok is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2012, 07:34 PM   #50
Recus
200 Posts
 
Recus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 349 (0.51/day)
Thanks: 165
Thanked 144 Times in 74 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zubasa View Post
According to that site:
And who say it's not canceled? Kitguru, pro-AMD site.

Sapphire HD7970 Toxic 6GB limited edition? Please. Asus made 1000 Mars II. Sapphire? 10 maybe 12.
Recus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sapphire HD 7970 6GB Toxic Edition Jetster AMD / ATI 1 Jul 20, 2012 07:32 AM
HD7970 - My Review (BF3 Eyefinity vs HD7970) Xaser04 AMD / ATI 35 Mar 13, 2012 12:28 PM
Sapphire Toxic Radeon HD 7970 with 6GB Memory Showcased btarunr News 34 Mar 7, 2012 07:41 AM
Flash Sapphire 5850 Toxic BIOS on Sapphire 5850 1GB? 20mmrain AMD / ATI 34 Aug 8, 2010 10:15 PM
[Case Gallery] 939 and lovin it i_am_mustang_man Case Mod Gallery 4 Jun 18, 2007 04:29 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts