techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > Graphics Cards > NVIDIA

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Sep 23, 2012, 04:00 PM   #1
gopal
500 Posts
 
gopal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Patna, Bihar, India, Asia, Earth, Terron System, Milky way Galaxy, And Beyond
Posts: 990 (2.99/day)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 121 Times in 94 Posts
Send a message via MSN to gopal Send a message via Skype™ to gopal

System Specs

GTX 650 Vs. GTX 550 Ti

you know i was on an forums when an uses buged me that GTX 550 Ti is better, as i believe that GTX 650 is better then GTX 550 TI.

That starts from here: http://forums.pcsx2.net/Thread-GTX-6...1680#pid261680
See from that post to last post.
harsh60 = gopal
hallmark = who buged me about it.


Please post that which is better
gopal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2012, 04:40 PM   #2
crazyeyesreaper
Chief Broken Rig
 
crazyeyesreaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 04578
Posts: 6,011 (3.96/day)
Thanks: 760
Thanked 2,220 Times in 1,556 Posts

System Specs

they are equal
crazyeyesreaper is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to crazyeyesreaper For This Useful Post:
Old Sep 23, 2012, 04:48 PM   #3
gopal
500 Posts
 
gopal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Patna, Bihar, India, Asia, Earth, Terron System, Milky way Galaxy, And Beyond
Posts: 990 (2.99/day)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 121 Times in 94 Posts
Send a message via MSN to gopal Send a message via Skype™ to gopal

System Specs

Thanks, but GTX 650 is 1% better :d
gopal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2012, 04:49 PM   #4
brandonwh64
Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!
 
brandonwh64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Chatsworth, GA
Posts: 13,562 (10.02/day)
Thanks: 2,146
Thanked 5,341 Times in 3,696 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to brandonwh64 Send a message via AIM to brandonwh64 Send a message via MSN to brandonwh64 Send a message via Yahoo to brandonwh64

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by gopal View Post
Thanks, but GTX 650 is 1% better :d
which would get ZERO noticeable difference in gaming.
__________________
Cruncher's:
All GPU's
GPU's:
7970 3GB *Unlocked* = 8 Threads
5770 1GB OCed = 2 Threads
brandonwh64 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to brandonwh64 For This Useful Post:
Old Sep 23, 2012, 04:51 PM   #5
gopal
500 Posts
 
gopal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Patna, Bihar, India, Asia, Earth, Terron System, Milky way Galaxy, And Beyond
Posts: 990 (2.99/day)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 121 Times in 94 Posts
Send a message via MSN to gopal Send a message via Skype™ to gopal

System Specs

ahh, what is this?

Which one is right?
gopal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2012, 04:54 PM   #6
brandonwh64
Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!
 
brandonwh64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Chatsworth, GA
Posts: 13,562 (10.02/day)
Thanks: 2,146
Thanked 5,341 Times in 3,696 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to brandonwh64 Send a message via AIM to brandonwh64 Send a message via MSN to brandonwh64 Send a message via Yahoo to brandonwh64

System Specs

I would believe this

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/M...dition/27.html
__________________
Cruncher's:
All GPU's
GPU's:
7970 3GB *Unlocked* = 8 Threads
5770 1GB OCed = 2 Threads
brandonwh64 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2012, 05:06 PM   #7
gopal
500 Posts
 
gopal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Patna, Bihar, India, Asia, Earth, Terron System, Milky way Galaxy, And Beyond
Posts: 990 (2.99/day)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 121 Times in 94 Posts
Send a message via MSN to gopal Send a message via Skype™ to gopal

System Specs

even more confused now
gopal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2012, 05:53 PM   #8
crazyeyesreaper
Chief Broken Rig
 
crazyeyesreaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 04578
Posts: 6,011 (3.96/day)
Thanks: 760
Thanked 2,220 Times in 1,556 Posts

System Specs

TPU tests games at max settings

Toms hardware tested that GPU at low settings,

simple a case of reading the graph and review.

1920x1080 high / max settings overall performance avg
crazyeyesreaper is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to crazyeyesreaper For This Useful Post:
Old Sep 24, 2012, 04:51 AM   #9
Horrux
500 Posts
 
Horrux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 641 (0.89/day)
Thanks: 335
Thanked 132 Times in 101 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by gopal View Post
ahh, what is this?
http://media.bestofmicro.com/T/X/352...Perf%20LOW.png
Which one is right?
Tom's tests at 1080p on low, whereas the other chart is for tests at high / max settings.

So I think they are both correct, but Tom's chart is less of an accurate measurement of pure video card performance, whereas the other chart reflects that more accurately.

So it would seem that the 550ti and the 650 are actually really equal. Which makes a lot of sense given nV's history of inter-generation performance differentials.

EDIT: Oh, and nice edit, Crazyeyes, putting the content of my post into yours after the fact!
__________________
The head honcho at the Serious Gamers' Association

Criticism
“However, the Intel CPU dispatcher does not only check which instruction set is supported by the CPU, it also checks the vendor ID string. If the vendor string is "GenuineIntel" then it uses the optimal code path. If the CPU is not from Intel then, in most cases, it will run the slowest possible version of the code, even if the CPU is fully compatible with a better version. ”

Last edited by Horrux; Sep 24, 2012 at 12:45 PM.
Horrux is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2012, 06:36 AM   #10
Ghost
200 Posts
 
Ghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Unknown
Posts: 201 (0.20/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 64 Times in 36 Posts

System Specs

TPU chart is more accurate because more games are tested.
Ghost is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2012, 07:20 AM   #11
eidairaman1
Eligible for custom title
 
eidairaman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HTX
Posts: 10,078 (4.69/day)
Thanks: 1,359
Thanked 1,159 Times in 1,035 Posts
Send a message via MSN to eidairaman1

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Horrux View Post
Tom's tests at 1080p on low, whereas the other chart is for tests at high / max settings.

So I think they are both correct, but Tom's chart is less of an accurate measurement of pure video card performance, whereas the other chart reflects that more accurately.

So it would seem that the 550ti and the 650 are actually really equal. Which makes a lot of sense given nV's history of inter-generation performance differentials.
Both Companies have taken prev Gen boards and rebagged them to meet the lower market demand, plus get rid of old stock.

Example would be the 5770-6770 conundrum.
__________________
Athlon XP USERS with COD 4 FIX
http://www.techsupportforum.com/foru...ls-202011.html
http://www.howorks.com/2011/02/24/ho...-memory-limit/
“Sometimes my level of fail is unprecedented.” -TheMailMan78
“This is what the force of a thousand suns looks like.” -3870x2
eidairaman1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to eidairaman1 For This Useful Post:
Old Sep 24, 2012, 12:43 PM   #12
Horrux
500 Posts
 
Horrux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 641 (0.89/day)
Thanks: 335
Thanked 132 Times in 101 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by eidairaman1 View Post
Both Companies have taken prev Gen boards and rebagged them to meet the lower market demand, plus get rid of old stock.

Example would be the 5770-6770 conundrum.
Ah, well that explains that!

However, what of the fairly large difference on Tom's chart? That's a bit weird for what would be essentially a rebadge, IMO.
__________________
The head honcho at the Serious Gamers' Association

Criticism
“However, the Intel CPU dispatcher does not only check which instruction set is supported by the CPU, it also checks the vendor ID string. If the vendor string is "GenuineIntel" then it uses the optimal code path. If the CPU is not from Intel then, in most cases, it will run the slowest possible version of the code, even if the CPU is fully compatible with a better version. ”
Horrux is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2012, 05:09 PM   #13
crazyeyesreaper
Chief Broken Rig
 
crazyeyesreaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 04578
Posts: 6,011 (3.96/day)
Thanks: 760
Thanked 2,220 Times in 1,556 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Horrux View Post
Tom's tests at 1080p on low, whereas the other chart is for tests at high / max settings.

So I think they are both correct, but Tom's chart is less of an accurate measurement of pure video card performance, whereas the other chart reflects that more accurately.

So it would seem that the 550ti and the 650 are actually really equal. Which makes a lot of sense given nV's history of inter-generation performance differentials.

EDIT: Oh, and nice edit, Crazyeyes, putting the content of my post into yours after the fact!
wtf are you talking about the post was never edited i posted nearly 12 hours before you did.
crazyeyesreaper is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2012, 06:35 PM   #14
Ghost
200 Posts
 
Ghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Unknown
Posts: 201 (0.20/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 64 Times in 36 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Horrux View Post
Ah, well that explains that!

However, what of the fairly large difference on Tom's chart? That's a bit weird for what would be essentially a rebadge, IMO.
What? There are no rebadged cards in that chart.
Ghost is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2012, 06:41 PM   #15
KainXS
3500 Posts
 
KainXS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,689 (2.27/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 464 Times in 381 Posts

System Specs

The GTX550 to GTX650 was not a rehash, rebrand, rebadge or re-anything in that matter, its a different board and gpu
KainXS is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2012, 06:41 PM   #16
brandonwh64
Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!
 
brandonwh64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Chatsworth, GA
Posts: 13,562 (10.02/day)
Thanks: 2,146
Thanked 5,341 Times in 3,696 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to brandonwh64 Send a message via AIM to brandonwh64 Send a message via MSN to brandonwh64 Send a message via Yahoo to brandonwh64

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Horrux View Post
Tom's tests at 1080p on low, whereas the other chart is for tests at high / max settings.

So I think they are both correct, but Tom's chart is less of an accurate measurement of pure video card performance, whereas the other chart reflects that more accurately.

So it would seem that the 550ti and the 650 are actually really equal. Which makes a lot of sense given nV's history of inter-generation performance differentials.

EDIT: Oh, and nice edit, Crazyeyes, putting the content of my post into yours after the fact!
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazyeyesreaper View Post
wtf are you talking about the post was never edited i posted nearly 12 hours before you did.
X2 he posted WAY before you did and also if he edited his post it would have an edit time LIKE your post does.
__________________
Cruncher's:
All GPU's
GPU's:
7970 3GB *Unlocked* = 8 Threads
5770 1GB OCed = 2 Threads
brandonwh64 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2012, 06:44 PM   #17
Horrux
500 Posts
 
Horrux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 641 (0.89/day)
Thanks: 335
Thanked 132 Times in 101 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghost View Post
What? There are no rebadged cards in that chart.
I never said it was, it's edairaman who did... I did raise the question, though.
__________________
The head honcho at the Serious Gamers' Association

Criticism
“However, the Intel CPU dispatcher does not only check which instruction set is supported by the CPU, it also checks the vendor ID string. If the vendor string is "GenuineIntel" then it uses the optimal code path. If the CPU is not from Intel then, in most cases, it will run the slowest possible version of the code, even if the CPU is fully compatible with a better version. ”
Horrux is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2012, 06:54 PM   #18
de.das.dude
3500 Posts
 
de.das.dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Wild Wild East
Posts: 4,550 (4.24/day)
Thanks: 2,322
Thanked 1,332 Times in 912 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to de.das.dude

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Horrux View Post
Ah, well that explains that!

However, what of the fairly large difference on Tom's chart? That's a bit weird for what would be essentially a rebadge, IMO.
i never trusted toms charts. they seem biased to me.
__________________
my wallet isnt hashwell compatiple *sad face*
de.das.dude is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2012, 06:56 PM   #19
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 31,919 (12.78/day)
Thanks: 2,783
Thanked 12,281 Times in 7,820 Posts

System Specs

If you're considering purchasing one of these cards, just get the less expensive card. The performance difference between the two aren't worth the argument/conversation.
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2012, 07:29 PM   #20
redeye
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: mississauga, on, Canada
Posts: 124 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 21 Times in 21 Posts

System Specs

a 650 is not a re-badge... see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GeForce_600_Series

it is closer to the oem gt640 with ddr5 memory.

i have the gt640 2GB gigabyte , and a tested the gtx650 on 3dmark11, and 3dmark06 on my system (see system specs... 4GHZ, 88824 8GB 1600 ddr3)

the gigabyte 2GB (1040/900ddr3) on
3dmark06 gets 14291 (www.3dmark.com/3dm06/16841337)
3dmark11 gets P2521 (www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4199555)
the msi power edition (the one reviewed on techpowerup) gtx650 (1124/1250ddr5) on
3dmark06 gets 18470 (www.3dmark.com/3dm06/16888382)
3dmark11 gets p3314 (www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4426373)

the difference is 30% on 3dmark06, and 31% on 3dmark11...
of course the 650 is about 30% more expensive (but i bought the 640 at 105, and have seen the 650 at 115 after rebate... i bought and returned the gtx650 at 130..)

the gt640 seemed "snappier" on the desktop than the gtx650... odd yes.

will be looking at the gtx660... (not the gtx650)

Last edited by redeye; Sep 24, 2012 at 07:30 PM. Reason: more facts
redeye is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 24, 2012, 07:34 PM   #21
Easy Rhino
Linux Advocate
 
Easy Rhino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,222 (4.29/day)
Thanks: 1,206
Thanked 2,775 Times in 1,793 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by erocker View Post
If you're considering purchasing one of these cards, just get the less expensive card. The performance difference between the two aren't worth the argument/conversation.
If you're considering purchasing one of these cards, just get a console
Easy Rhino is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Easy Rhino For This Useful Post:
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Origin PC Adds GeForce GTX 660 and GTX 650 Graphics Options btarunr News 0 Sep 13, 2012 01:55 PM
Palit Announces GeForce GTX 660 and GTX 650 Graphics Cards btarunr News 0 Sep 13, 2012 01:06 PM
EVGA GeForce GTX 660 SuperClocked and GTX 650 Pictured btarunr News 21 Sep 10, 2012 06:04 PM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 and GTX 650 Launch Together on September 12 btarunr News 9 Sep 3, 2012 08:36 PM
GeForce GTX 560, 550 Series Discontinuation to Quickly Follow GTX 660 Ti, 650 Launch btarunr News 19 Jul 31, 2012 05:38 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts