![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Argentina (South America)
Posts: 749 (0.55/day)
Thanks: 132
Thanked 242 Times in 172 Posts
|
Which receiver is best
I'm planing on buying a 5.1 Home Theater, and i was going to buy this SONY HT-DDWG700. A friend of mine has one, so i have the chance to hear it and it sounds like s**t, so i decided to buy the receiver and the speakers separately. First i'll buy the receiver and later the speakers because i already have a pair but not the cash to buy both at the same time.
So which do you think is the best out of this 3: -Yamaha RX V371 -Denon Avr-1312 -Pioneer Vsx-521k Thanks!
__________________
TRUTH is subject to change without notice |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cybertron aka Canada
Posts: 4,083 (2.66/day)
Thanks: 827
Thanked 1,202 Times in 920 Posts
|
Pioneer.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to BumbleBee For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#3 | |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 768 (1.47/day)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 180 Times in 116 Posts
|
Quote:
Personally I've only had Yamaha and Denon receivers before and I'd be leaning towards the Yamaha as I've found that the sound from the Denon receivers sound a little flat and muddy imo. I can't comment on the pioneer i'm afraid though. If you can try and listen to them before buying, but I'd be leaning towards Yamaha if I were you.
__________________
<3 Citroen DS3
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to THE_EGG For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#4 |
|
TPU addict
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: US\ Uk Born
Posts: 8,793 (4.07/day)
Thanks: 1,674
Thanked 1,348 Times in 1,170 Posts
|
Yamaha
Denon Pioneer Maybe all so ONKYO SONY KENWOOD ( if available ) TEAC Technics ( if Available ) Speakers that come with his unit are most likely making it sound real bad ( most if not all do come with shit speakers ) as i have had a few SONY's and they have a nice true sound to them. JUst make sure you get one with enough HDMI inputs. Best way is to go a shop and try one or more of them if possible. In the end everyone hears differently so only you know and as Bumblebee said Pioneer but it would not be my option as i find them over bright and then i would try another Pioneer as they change to some degree in sound over time. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to AsRock For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#5 |
|
where the hell are my stars
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,021 (6.42/day)
Thanks: 457
Thanked 2,753 Times in 2,222 Posts
|
Out of that lot the pioneer would be my buy, but I rather like my Harmon/Kardon so would shop for one of those.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
TPU addict
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: US\ Uk Born
Posts: 8,793 (4.07/day)
Thanks: 1,674
Thanked 1,348 Times in 1,170 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to AsRock For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#7 |
![]() |
I currently own a Yamaha v471. It's a fairly decent AVR. Action movies and games are great, but musics are not its strong point.
If your usage is mainly non-action movies (like drama series), then Yamaha is not for you. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to silapakorn For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#8 | |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dover, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 4,243 (8.86/day)
Thanks: 1,265
Thanked 1,322 Times in 981 Posts
|
Quote:
I've had decent luck with JBL speakers but that isn't in your list. I have some Pioneer speakers myself that are kind of old but still work and sound good.
__________________
MyHeat |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Aquinus For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Argentina (South America)
Posts: 749 (0.55/day)
Thanks: 132
Thanked 242 Times in 172 Posts
|
Thanks all, i'll go for the Pionner then.
__________________
TRUTH is subject to change without notice |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Great, Cold North
Posts: 126 (0.66/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 55 Times in 35 Posts
|
Having played with both the Pioneer and Denon units recently (my friend couldn't decide either), I can say there is very, very little between the two of them in terms of features, specs or sound.
They both visually look nice, also, so it comes down (in my view) to whatever one you want OR is cheaper (mainly the second :P)... you'll like whatever one you go for.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ohio
Posts: 228 (0.54/day)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 29 Times in 29 Posts
|
Good choice
![]() I have a boatload of audio equipment, a lot of it "professional" but a fair amount of home theater type as well, and despite having some very "high end" receivers, and up to 11.3ch speaker placement (I swap speakers constantly), my "GO TO" receiver for TV, movies, and even some gaming (unless I need HDMI) is a Pioneer 509. It's an "old" receiver, "only" puts out 5.1ch, and doesn't have any type of HD pass-thru, but it also has absolutely incredibly pure sound and is the only receiver I have that can fully drive my "guilty pleasure speakers" which are Cerwin-Vega's (4-way towers with 12" woofers, 6.5" and 4.5" mids, and 1.25" tweeters; rated for >750W, and I have pushed them with 2 McIntosh Labs 2x500W Class-D amps for over 1100W without breaking them)... In this day and age, when product specs, much less electronics specs, are looked at as a joke, this one receiver beats not just one, but EVERY SINGLE ONE of its rated specifications. As I have access to fairly high end audio testing gear, as well as a trusty multimeter, I tested the receiver a while back to see how it compared to the newer stuff. It puts out 193W/ch in 2.1 (stereo) mode despite being rated at over 50W less per channel; it's SNR (using Def-Tech Monitors with a measured SNR of 123dB) is at least 119dB, a full 20dB over its rated specs! I don't buy any receivers other than Pioneer anymore, because while Onkyo/Denon/et al have a lot of nice features, the Pioneer ones are not only (typically) less expensive, they SOUND BETTER!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cybertron aka Canada
Posts: 4,083 (2.66/day)
Thanks: 827
Thanked 1,202 Times in 920 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Great, Cold North
Posts: 126 (0.66/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 55 Times in 35 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() Personally, I wouldnt go with any of them... but I guess thats just me lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cybertron aka Canada
Posts: 4,083 (2.66/day)
Thanks: 827
Thanked 1,202 Times in 920 Posts
|
rooms that large need to be measured and treated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Great, Cold North
Posts: 126 (0.66/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 55 Times in 35 Posts
|
For the sake of watching 4 movies (max) a month with sub-par speakers (still pretty decent for her needs, either way) due to budget restraints? And with the sofa being in a central position??
Sure, being anal about audio is nice to a certain extent.... but not with equipment that's really not the best in the first place OR when the person doesn't care. ![]() I'm not sure the difference once properly calibrated will make any noticeable or productive change to her listening/watching pleasure... she isn't that much of a sound freak in the first place and "just watching stuff" being the goal, I doubt she'd care so much, if at all.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Which is best? | tigger | Graphics Cards | 22 | Jul 5, 2009 11:38 PM |
| Which is Best??? | Soulkiller | NVIDIA | 4 | Jan 4, 2009 10:07 PM |
| which game is best? | kingofhakers | Games | 25 | Sep 2, 2008 12:38 AM |
| Best Wireless N Receiver | kureng | Networking & Security | 8 | Jun 23, 2008 03:50 PM |