techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > Storage

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Dec 16, 2012, 03:56 PM   #26
Mindweaver
Moderato®™
 
Mindweaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Statesville, NC
Posts: 3,672 (2.45/day)
Thanks: 4,329
Thanked 2,322 Times in 1,153 Posts

System Specs

Yea, I always liked to put my boot drive in raid 0 using mechanical drives. The one thing most users overlook is finding a drive that is RAID specific like WD RE drives or Seagate's Enterprise drives. I still have 3x WD RE2 250Gb drives in RAID 0 (180 read, 170 write) that have been working great with out failure for over 5 years. Since, I've bought a SSD I use it as a boot drive now, and only use the RAID 0 for Steam games.
__________________
“As long as I feel the warmth from the sun and breathe precious air…. I must ask questions to feed the Mind!”

Battletag: Mindweaver#1523
Mindweaver is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mindweaver For This Useful Post:
Old Dec 16, 2012, 04:11 PM   #27
Aquinus
3500 Posts
 
Aquinus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dover, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 4,275 (8.85/day)
Thanks: 1,283
Thanked 1,333 Times in 989 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mindweaver View Post
Yea, I always liked to put my boot drive in raid 0 using mechanical drives. The one thing most users overlook is finding a drive that is RAID specific like WD RE drives or Seagate's Enterprise drives. I still have 3x WD RE2 250Gb drives in RAID 0 (180 read, 170 write) that have been working great with out failure for over 5 years. Since, I've bought a SSD I use it as a boot drive now, and only use the RAID 0 for Steam games.
I do something similar. I have a RAID-0 of SSDs for boot and applications and a RAID-5 for music, video, and files. I do nightly backups of my RAID-0 to my RAID-5 and along with that I have an external backup that I backup the RAID-5 to once a week.
__________________
MyHeat
Aquinus is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Aquinus For This Useful Post:
Old Dec 16, 2012, 04:22 PM   #28
Mindweaver
Moderato®™
 
Mindweaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Statesville, NC
Posts: 3,672 (2.45/day)
Thanks: 4,329
Thanked 2,322 Times in 1,153 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquinus View Post
I do something similar. I have a RAID-0 of SSDs for boot and applications and a RAID-5 for music, video, and files. I do nightly backups of my RAID-0 to my RAID-5 and along with that I have an external backup that I backup the RAID-5 to once a week.
Nice! I have a hardware RAID 5 with BBU using 4x WD Raptor 10,000 rpm drives for my SQL Server. The higher rpm drives are nice and quick, but the failure rate is higher than a lower rpm drive. I lose a couple Raptor drives a year. I have the RAID 0 drives in a software array. I maintain 9x arrays total (6x hardware arrays, 3x software arrays).
__________________
“As long as I feel the warmth from the sun and breathe precious air…. I must ask questions to feed the Mind!”

Battletag: Mindweaver#1523
Mindweaver is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 16, 2012, 04:25 PM   #29
Sinzia
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 705 (0.73/day)
Thanks: 88
Thanked 184 Times in 135 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Sinzia Send a message via MSN to Sinzia Send a message via Yahoo to Sinzia Send a message via Skype™ to Sinzia

System Specs

SSD raid 0 here, and a raid 0 with momentus XT's for steam, backed up every other night to an external that's rotated out of the house every month.

Data backup is important, you can loose it very, VERY easily.
__________________
http://tpucdn.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic88947_1.gif
Sinzia is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 17, 2012, 04:35 PM   #30
Wrigleyvillain
3500 Posts
 
Wrigleyvillain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,507 (2.20/day)
Thanks: 1,527
Thanked 1,579 Times in 1,122 Posts

System Specs

Yeah I saw a great analogy once: RAID 0 is like flying down the highway on a crotch rocket wearing zero safety gear. Man it's fast and quite a rush but if any one little thing goes wrong...you're dead.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mindweaver View Post
Nice! I have a hardware RAID 5 with BBU using 4x WD Raptor 10,000 rpm drives for my SQL Server. The higher rpm drives are nice and quick, but the failure rate is higher than a lower rpm drive. I lose a couple Raptor drives a year. I have the RAID 0 drives in a software array. I maintain 9x arrays total (6x hardware arrays, 3x software arrays).
Just bought a server-pulled, never-used IBM M1015 for only $75 on eBay which is a rebranded LSI 9200i. Doesn't do RAID 5 with out an add-in chip but that is just fine for my present needs. There are more available around the same price form other seller(s).

And sure "RAID Edition" drives are better with error handling (TLER) and have anti-vibration protections and stuff but they really aren't any more physically reliable than other 7200 RPM mechanical.
__________________
“i dont care what consoles have they dont have mouse and keyboard” -crazyeyesreaper

Last edited by Wrigleyvillain; Dec 17, 2012 at 05:09 PM.
Wrigleyvillain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 18, 2012, 08:01 AM   #31
_Zod_
75 Posts
 
_Zod_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 159 (0.12/day)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 33 Times in 25 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquinus View Post
That's incorrect. Get your facts straight. JBOD concatenates disks, it doesn't stripe them like RAID-0 does. RAID-0 and JBOD do two very different things. The only thing they have in common is that they don't offer redundancy.
We are both wrong, so get your facts straight as well. JBOD does not concatenate disks, SPAN and BIG do.
__________________
Recommended software:

Windows 7 Classic Shell

Open Hardware Monitor

Truecrypt

Last edited by _Zod_; Dec 18, 2012 at 05:02 PM.
_Zod_ is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 18, 2012, 08:39 AM   #32
Aquinus
3500 Posts
 
Aquinus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dover, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 4,275 (8.85/day)
Thanks: 1,283
Thanked 1,333 Times in 989 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Zod_ View Post
We are both wrong, so get your facts straight as well. JBOD does not concatenate disks, SPAN and BIG do.
A: You don't know what you're talking about.

B: The only place that says this is an uncited wikipedia page so learn how to do real research before you start spitting out crap that isn't true.

C: Being a system admin I like to think that I know a little bit about managing servers and what RAID controllers can do and I hate to say it but the "SPAN and BIG" thing is crap because I don't have a single RAID controller that has the option of using "SPAN or BIG" but every one of them will do JBOD.

D: If you really did any research you would fine that these terms don't find there way past wikipedia. Also If you also checked the sources on that page, no a single mention of this is made. Some idiot just added this to wikipedia without having any sources because there are none...

Aka: Don't use Wikipedia then pretend you know everything then act like your hot shit.
__________________
MyHeat

Last edited by Aquinus; Dec 18, 2012 at 08:59 AM.
Aquinus is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Aquinus For This Useful Post:
Old Dec 18, 2012, 02:32 PM   #33
Wrigleyvillain
3500 Posts
 
Wrigleyvillain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,507 (2.20/day)
Thanks: 1,527
Thanked 1,579 Times in 1,122 Posts

System Specs

You should fix that wiki page yourself.
__________________
“i dont care what consoles have they dont have mouse and keyboard” -crazyeyesreaper
Wrigleyvillain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 18, 2012, 02:37 PM   #34
3870x2
3500 Posts
 
3870x2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Joplin, Mo
Posts: 4,543 (2.37/day)
Thanks: 175
Thanked 691 Times in 557 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to 3870x2

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Zod_ View Post
Bingo! Raid 0 is not raid, it's JBOD. I hate that it gets tagged as a Raid option.
I guess if you wanted to be technical about it.
__________________
A+, N+, S+, MCSE.
Heatware
STEAM ID Name: furi0nst0rmrage (0s are zeros)
M O D E R N||W A R F A R E || 2 || CLUBHOUSE // TEAM
The amount exaltation of the processor cores can brings amazing floating” -sparkle
3870x2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 18, 2012, 02:55 PM   #35
Mindweaver
Moderato®™
 
Mindweaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Statesville, NC
Posts: 3,672 (2.45/day)
Thanks: 4,329
Thanked 2,322 Times in 1,153 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrigleyvillain View Post
And sure "RAID Edition" drives are better with error handling (TLER) and have anti-vibration protections and stuff but they really aren't any more physically reliable than other 7200 RPM mechanical.
Not sure if I follow what you are saying here? Are you saying a non RAID-Specific 7200rpm drive is as physically reliable as a RAID-specific 7200rpm drive? if so I agree, or are you saying a non RAID-Specific 7200rpm drive is as physically reliable as a RAID-Specific 10,000rpm drive? If so then I have to disagree, because a higher rpm drive has a higher chance of failure then a lower rpm drive due to the higher write speeds. You don't buy a 10k or 15k drive for reliability, you buy them for speed.
__________________
“As long as I feel the warmth from the sun and breathe precious air…. I must ask questions to feed the Mind!”

Battletag: Mindweaver#1523
Mindweaver is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 18, 2012, 03:25 PM   #36
Aquinus
3500 Posts
 
Aquinus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dover, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 4,275 (8.85/day)
Thanks: 1,283
Thanked 1,333 Times in 989 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrigleyvillain View Post
You should fix that wiki page yourself.
There was already a debate. I added to the page discussion and marked it as disputed before I delete it. I want knowledgeable people to have the chance to chime in before I actually remove it.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Mindweaver View Post
You don't buy a 10k or 15k drive for reliability, you buy them for speed.
For speed and write endurance. SSDs are faster but you'll wear them out faster in write-heavy environments.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	disputed.PNG
Views:	66
Size:	6.1 KB
ID:	49448  
__________________
MyHeat
Aquinus is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 18, 2012, 03:55 PM   #37
Mindweaver
Moderato®™
 
Mindweaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Statesville, NC
Posts: 3,672 (2.45/day)
Thanks: 4,329
Thanked 2,322 Times in 1,153 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquinus View Post
For speed and write endurance. SSDs are faster but you'll wear them out faster in write-heavy environments.
Yea, I plan to buy a few SSD's next year to RAID. I've not jumped in due to price, but with prices dropping that will change soon. Plus, I want a few more SATAIII RAID Controller Cards on the market. I want the prices to drop on them as well.
__________________
“As long as I feel the warmth from the sun and breathe precious air…. I must ask questions to feed the Mind!”

Battletag: Mindweaver#1523
Mindweaver is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 18, 2012, 04:10 PM   #38
Wrigleyvillain
3500 Posts
 
Wrigleyvillain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,507 (2.20/day)
Thanks: 1,527
Thanked 1,579 Times in 1,122 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mindweaver View Post
Are you saying a non RAID-Specific 7200rpm drive is as physically reliable as a RAID-specific 7200rpm drive?
Yes, generally-speaking and in and of themselves. Not comparing to higher RPM, that's apples to oranges. Why I stated "7200 RPM" specifically.
__________________
“i dont care what consoles have they dont have mouse and keyboard” -crazyeyesreaper
Wrigleyvillain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 18, 2012, 05:13 PM   #39
_Zod_
75 Posts
 
_Zod_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 159 (0.12/day)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 33 Times in 25 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquinus View Post
A: You don't know what you're talking about.

B: The only place that says this is an uncited wikipedia page so learn how to do real research before you start spitting out crap that isn't true.

C: Being a system admin I like to think that I know a little bit about managing servers and what RAID controllers can do and I hate to say it but the "SPAN and BIG" thing is crap because I don't have a single RAID controller that has the option of using "SPAN or BIG" but every one of them will do JBOD.

D: If you really did any research you would fine that these terms don't find there way past wikipedia. Also If you also checked the sources on that page, no a single mention of this is made. Some idiot just added this to wikipedia without having any sources because there are none...

Aka: Don't use Wikipedia then pretend you know everything then act like your hot shit.
Fyi I'm not the one trying to come off as hot shit. Lose the attitude mister big shot sys admin
__________________
Recommended software:

Windows 7 Classic Shell

Open Hardware Monitor

Truecrypt
_Zod_ is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 18, 2012, 05:24 PM   #40
Wrigleyvillain
3500 Posts
 
Wrigleyvillain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,507 (2.20/day)
Thanks: 1,527
Thanked 1,579 Times in 1,122 Posts

System Specs

In his defense, there has been whole lot of misinformation flying around this thread. And when the subject is something like RAID, that can be disastrous.
__________________
“i dont care what consoles have they dont have mouse and keyboard” -crazyeyesreaper
Wrigleyvillain is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Wrigleyvillain For This Useful Post:
Old Dec 18, 2012, 05:30 PM   #41
jihadjoe
200 Posts
 
jihadjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 262 (0.45/day)
Thanks: 158
Thanked 68 Times in 51 Posts

System Specs

^ plus the fact that the failure OP is experiencing has nothing to do with RAID.
OP made a mistake and messed up the filesystem. Even with RAID 5, or RAID 1 his array is still fubar.
jihadjoe is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jihadjoe For This Useful Post:
Old Dec 18, 2012, 05:32 PM   #42
_Zod_
75 Posts
 
_Zod_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 159 (0.12/day)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 33 Times in 25 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrigleyvillain View Post
In his defense, there has been whole lot of misinformation flying around this thread. And when the subject is something like RAID, that can be disastrous.
The main point was that when a RAID 0 dies, it's dead, there is no recovery. I think that made it through the noise which I apologize for being part of.
__________________
Recommended software:

Windows 7 Classic Shell

Open Hardware Monitor

Truecrypt
_Zod_ is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SSD RAID0 RoundUp 2012: RAID0 strikes back GoriLLakoS Storage 2 Oct 23, 2012 02:34 AM
RAID0 questions dark2099 Storage 1 Nov 15, 2010 02:52 PM
setting up a raid0 Glazierman Storage 5 Jul 23, 2010 09:04 AM
raid0? SpiriteH! Storage 2 Jun 25, 2009 12:43 AM
GPs in RAID0 Franklinwallbrown Storage 10 Aug 20, 2008 11:33 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts