![]() |
|
|
#101 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,897 (3.30/day)
Thanks: 141
Thanked 462 Times in 364 Posts
|
You should be more specific when you quote and question.
"It does" is referred about what? The cache? |
|
|
|
|
|
#102 | |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Hunting for Prey
Posts: 287 (0.70/day)
Thanks: 60
Thanked 107 Times in 65 Posts
|
No one said its gonna be
, btw LGA1150 is mainstream Haswell 4core (8threads). Haswell-E will be something LGA20xx for sure. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to TheHunter For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#103 | |
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago burbs
Posts: 1,497 (1.02/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 330 Times in 270 Posts
|
Quote:
Ya sure about that LGA20XX, try socket R3. Rumor has it LGA2011 will be replaced so your for sure thing is not for sure as stated in your quote. Last edited by drdeathx; Dec 31, 2012 at 01:36 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#104 |
|
Overclocked quantum bit
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Quantumville UK
Posts: 8,648 (4.34/day)
Thanks: 4,178
Thanked 3,303 Times in 1,943 Posts
|
Haswell E: LGA 2013, 16 cores, 32 threads, 4GHz clock speed, awesome performance, reasonable price!
![]() Ok, I'll stop dreaming now.
__________________
Siggie in the post. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to qubit For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#105 |
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago burbs
Posts: 1,497 (1.02/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 330 Times in 270 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#106 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,897 (3.30/day)
Thanks: 141
Thanked 462 Times in 364 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to radrok For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#107 |
|
Overclocked quantum bit
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Quantumville UK
Posts: 8,648 (4.34/day)
Thanks: 4,178
Thanked 3,303 Times in 1,943 Posts
|
I was making up all those specs as just a bit of wishful thinking, especially that reasonable price.
I have no idea what socket it will be on.
__________________
Siggie in the post. |
|
|
|
|
|
#108 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: North of 49
Posts: 488 (0.80/day)
Thanks: 139
Thanked 124 Times in 90 Posts
|
Why would they release an 8 core i7 for, let's say, $1500, if they can market an 8 core Xeon for much more than that? Why waste the best cpu dies on an enthusiast/barely entry level workstation market when they can soak up a lot more profit from corporate/government/institutional customers?
__________________
"Stupidity is infinite" -- Umberto Eco |
|
|
|
|
|
#109 | |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,897 (3.30/day)
Thanks: 141
Thanked 462 Times in 364 Posts
|
Quote:
I'd probably buy a 2687w if it was unlocked. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#110 | |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Hunting for Prey
Posts: 287 (0.70/day)
Thanks: 60
Thanked 107 Times in 65 Posts
|
Quote:
LGA 2011, also called Socket R, is a CPU socket by Intel. From wiki, thus this new Haswell-E is still LGA20xx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#111 |
![]() Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago burbs
Posts: 1,497 (1.02/day)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 330 Times in 270 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#112 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I'm currently considering purchasing (in the next 3 months) a Sandy Bridge E 3820 quad core CPU along with an ASRock X79 Extreme 11 board (the ability to quad-SLI at x16/x16/x16/x16 was a big factor in this choice
) to replace my current AMD platform (Phenom II X4 965 BE).My intention is to eventually replace the SB-E chip with an IB-E later on, so that I don't need to replace the mobo. Given that the primary use for my PC is gaming, 4 cores are quite sufficient for my needs, so the fact that the IB-E chips will ship with 6 isn't a problem for me. Until games start taking advantage of more than 6 cores, there's no point me worrying about Intel disabling the extra 2. I'm also not too bothered about the longevity of the Socket 2011, if I can swap out the 3820 and drop an IB-E in there later on, I'll be happy. I've never upgraded just the CPU in any machine I've built - I've always replaced the mobo as well, so actually getting 2 CPU upgrades without having to swap out the rest of the system will be good for me. My question to you clever chaps is this: am I barking up the wrong tree with my plans above? I want a mobo that will give me the best possible performance from my graphics hardware (currently a pair of GTX680s) and I want a CPU that favours raw clock speed over lots of cores, since that's what's going to give me the smoothest framerates. Are there better ways to do this (or cheaper ways?), would I benefit from looking at a different platform? Interested to know your thoughts. Thanks. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Origin PC Ships Eon Laptops with Latest Intel Core "Ivy Bridge" Mobile Processors | btarunr | News | 1 | Sep 30, 2012 10:20 PM |
| Intel "Ivy Bridge" Core i3 Processors Start Shipping Ten Days From Now | btarunr | News | 8 | Jul 10, 2012 04:19 PM |
| Intel Core "Ivy Bridge" Processors Start Selling | btarunr | News | 33 | May 1, 2012 07:24 AM |
| Eurocom Adds Ivy Bridge Core Processors to its Lineup | btarunr | News | 0 | Apr 23, 2012 05:05 PM |
| Ivy Bridge Quad-Core to Have 77W TDP, Intel Plans for LGA1155 Ivy Bridge Entry | btarunr | News | 74 | Oct 20, 2011 12:40 AM |