Cinebench needs an upgrade?.

DayKnight · Dec 13, 2012, 01:26 PM

What does 3570K has over 2700K performance wise?. A bit more memory bandwidth and native support for 1600MHz rams?.

How can it beat 2700K!.

2700K:

3570K:

2500K: For Teh LULZ!.

I need some logical answers.

newtekie1 · Dec 13, 2012, 02:00 PM

The architecture is more mature, and hence more efficient. Intel improved the IPC.

DayKnight · Dec 13, 2012, 02:36 PM

I know that.

Maturating an architecture shouldn't give that much of a boost that it kills 2700K.

More cache, more clock speed and to top it of, HT!.

Lulz added. How it rapes the 2nd gen beast is just... sad.

cadaveca · Dec 13, 2012, 03:17 PM

let's see some stock results, m'kay? Because in my testing, stock 3570k gets 6.06 pts, not 7.8..and OC'd 3570K does, and then, the difference between these two CPUs when oc'ed to the same speed, is nearly all about cache.

Also, the board used will affect results, as not all CPUs get the same turbo profiling, FYI.

DayKnight · Dec 14, 2012, 06:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cadaveca

let's see some stock results, m'kay? Because in my testing, stock 3570k gets 6.06 pts, not 7.8..and OC'd 3570K does, and then, the difference between these two CPUs when oc'ed to the same speed, is nearly all about cache.

Also, the board used will affect results, as not all CPUs get the same turbo profiling, FYI.

Pretty sure they are stock. 2700K and 3570K.

Can you show me any examples?.

DayKnight · Jan 2, 2013, 06:16 AM

Yup. You are right.

Though, it's still crap when it comes to GPU points/utilization.

Dec 13, 2012, 01:26 PM	#1
DayKnight Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Lahore, Pakistan. Posts: 117 (0.58/day) Thanks: 18 Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts System Specs	Cinebench needs an upgrade?. What does 3570K has over 2700K performance wise?. A bit more memory bandwidth and native support for 1600MHz rams?. How can it beat 2700K!. 2700K: 3570K: 2500K: For Teh LULZ!. I need some logical answers. Last edited by DayKnight; Dec 13, 2012 at 02:41 PM.

System Name:	BLAM!.
Processor:	Intel Core i5-3570.
Motherboard:	Asus P8H67-M LE.
Cooling:	CM Hyper 212 Plus.
Memory:	2x4gB Corsair VS.
Video Card:	EVGA GTX 660 FTW Sig 2.
Hard Disk:	180gB Intel SSD 330 Series, WD Blue 500gB (AAKX).
Optical Drive:	HP 1270i.
CRT/LCD Model:	Samsung BX2031.
Case:	CM Elite 334.
PSU:	Corsair CX 430.

Dec 13, 2012, 02:00 PM	#2
newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Indiana Posts: 17,900 (6.47/day) Thanks: 785 Thanked 5,185 Times in 3,754 Posts System Specs	The architecture is more mature, and hence more efficient. Intel improved the IPC. __________________ Rig1: System Specs. Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5 Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate

Processor:	Intel Core i7 875K@4.0GHz(200x20)
Motherboard:	eVGA P55 FTW 200
Cooling:	Thermalright Ultra-120 Extreme w/ Corsair SP120 High Performance Edition
Memory:	8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 7-7-7-20
Video Card:	ASUS GTX 670 4GB DirectCU II @ 1015/3600
Hard Disk:	1TB Seagate 7200.12(OS), 3x 1.5TB Seagate 7200.11 in RAID 5
Optical Drive:	Lite-On Blu-Ray Combo Drive IHES108
CRT/LCD Model:	HP 25" 2509m 1080p LCD
Case:	Lian-Li Lancool Metal Boned K7 w/ Windowed Side Panel
Sound Card:	Onboard is good enough for me
PSU:	Corsair HX850
Software:	Windows 7 x64 Professional

Dec 13, 2012, 02:36 PM	#3
DayKnight Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Lahore, Pakistan. Posts: 117 (0.58/day) Thanks: 18 Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts System Specs	I know that. Maturating an architecture shouldn't give that much of a boost that it kills 2700K. More cache, more clock speed and to top it of, HT!. Lulz added. How it rapes the 2nd gen beast is just... sad. Last edited by DayKnight; Dec 13, 2012 at 02:42 PM.

Dec 13, 2012, 03:17 PM	#4
cadaveca My name is Dave Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: The Great White North Posts: 10,921 (4.16/day) Thanks: 4,704 Thanked 5,447 Times in 3,301 Posts System Specs	let's see some stock results, m'kay? Because in my testing, stock 3570k gets 6.06 pts, not 7.8..and OC'd 3570K does, and then, the difference between these two CPUs when oc'ed to the same speed, is nearly all about cache. Also, the board used will affect results, as not all CPUs get the same turbo profiling, FYI. __________________ Gadgets, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp -Only real men play games THIS way.

System Name:	Eyefinity Gamer
Processor:	Intel i5 3570K @ 4.6 GHz
Motherboard:	ASUS Maximmus V Formula
Cooling:	Corsair H100
Memory:	16 GB G.Skill F3-2666C11Q-16GTXD
Video Card:	AMD Radeon HD7950 3GB x2 w/AMD Catalyst 12.10
Hard Disk:	OCZ Nocti 60GB mSATA, Crucial M4 120GB x2
Optical Drive:	LG BluRay/HD-DVD
CRT/LCD Model:	3x Dell U2412M
Case:	LianLi T60
Sound Card:	N/A
PSU:	Silverstone Strider 750W GOLD
Software:	Windows 8 Pro
Benchmarks:	Benchmarking is for suckers. ;)

Jan 2, 2013, 06:16 AM	#6
DayKnight Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Lahore, Pakistan. Posts: 117 (0.58/day) Thanks: 18 Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts System Specs	Yup. You are right. Though, it's still crap when it comes to GPU points/utilization.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Which PC components needs firmware upgrade?	f0ku5	General Hardware	8	Oct 3, 2011 10:27 PM
Hi-Fi needs an upgrade.	<<Onafets>>	Audio, Video & Home Theater	0	Aug 24, 2011 12:06 PM
New Member ... Needs an opinion on an upgrade.	20mmrain	System Builder's Advice	25	Oct 15, 2009 03:35 PM
Friend needs some upgrade help	Bow	General Hardware	3	Jan 6, 2009 02:23 AM
Darth Flatulence needs an upgrade!	zekrahminator	Graphics Cards	30	May 20, 2006 02:34 AM