![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 6 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Raid Card Overriding Motherboard Raid (Highpoint 2300)
Hey guys. I've been looking to build a surveillance/file server for my office, but I am running into issues with the raid controller overriding my motherboard's raid controller. The controller I am using is a Highpoint 2300 that controllers 4 HDs at SATA II speeds. Since the explanation of configurations is somewhat of a length process, I copied what I have already sent to Highpoint to describe the issue. I have read many testimonies that Highpoint doesn't ever respond to support requests, so I am posting here as well.
================================ Problem Description: BIOS/Firmware Version: _v2.2__ Driver version: _N/A___ WebGUI version: _N/A___ Serial No: _XXXXXXXXXXXX_ Purhcase Date: _12-26-2012_ Purhcase From: _Newegg.com_ Operating System: _Windows Server 2008 r2_ Motherboard Model: _Gigabyte GA-A75-UD4H_ System BIOS version: _F7_ System memory size: _8 GB - 1866 MHZ DDR 3_ HDD Model: _4 - Western Digital Red 3TB- WD30EFRX-68AX9N0__ HDD Firmware version: _Unknown_ RAID Configuration: __Raid 5 (4 Disks - 4 WD Reds)_ Other configuration information: 2 additional 120 GB SSD HD OCZ Vertex 2 (Raid 1) - OS Drives Intended Configuration: Surveillance/File Server OS is installed on Raid 1 SSD HDs. Raid for this configuration is controlled by the on board raid controller. File/Media Storage will be utilized in a Raid 5 sequence. The raid configuration is Raid 5 and is controlled by the Highpoint 2300 card. Both controller configurations have already been programmed separately and correctly. Both configurations are able to function apart from one another. Problem: All signs indicate that the Highpoint Raid card is overriding the motherboard's raid/hd controller when both controllers are enabled. The SSD raid 1 configuration runs smoothly until the card with the raid 5 is inserted back the system board. Typically, without the Highpoint raid card, the motherboard runs through a controller initialization prompt similar to Highpoint's bios menu. Also, the SSDs are recognized within the motherboard bios. After inserting the pre-configured (Raid 5) Highpoint card into the PCI-E slot and rebooting, the raid 1 SSDs are not recognized within the motherboard's bios, nor does the motherboard raid controller prompt become apparent. The system then hangs looking for an operating system ("Loading Operating System") upon which it never does. I then attempted to remove the raid initialization setting within the motherboard's bios. The 2 SSD hard drives are recognized individually but only when I disable the onboard SATA(or AHCI) and run the SATA SSDs in IDE Native mode (which generates much lower speeds). I suppose the main cause would have to do with Highpoint's invasive bios management system. It seems to pop up around the same time that the motherboard's raid management pops up. ========================== I'm kind of surprised I wasn't able to find much documentation on this sort of problem, but haven't. Please let me know if anyone has ran into a similar issue. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Geneva, FL, USA
Posts: 3,010 (1.42/day)
Thanks: 567
Thanked 606 Times in 487 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,506 (2.20/day)
Thanks: 1,526
Thanked 1,577 Times in 1,120 Posts
|
Yeah that should be it.
__________________
“i dont care what consoles have they dont have mouse and keyboard” -crazyeyesreaper
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 6 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Unfortunately, my raid card's bios does not contain these shut off features. Unless I'm not going into the BIOS? It's the (Ctrl+H) bios utility with version 2.2. The only options I see available other than making arrays is setting the boot device from the card or enabling staggered spin.
I'll look more into this. Maybe the BIOS need to be upgraded. Or it could be possible that Highpoint is referring to another cards BIOS. Thanks for the speedy replies. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Geneva, FL, USA
Posts: 3,010 (1.42/day)
Thanks: 567
Thanked 606 Times in 487 Posts
|
http://www.highpoint-tech.com/USA_ne...ies_rr2300.htm
Yup, it's up to version 2.5 and according to a thread in another forum, that's the version that allows you to turn off INT13/EBDA. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 6 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Awesome, I'm going to try it then. Kind of odd that Highpoint would release a card that won't let you boot into your PC's OS out of the box. No big. I'll let you know if I run into any other snags.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 6 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Alright, so check this out. Highpoint provides a means to flash the bios of the raid card through DOS. Copied the files on my USBDOS Flash drive and loaded them up. Went back into the pre-OS Raid BIOS Prompt (Ctrl+H) and my options didn't change.
Apparently what Highpoint was mentioning when turning off the INT13/EDBA was actually flasher utility that creates a customized bios file from the stock version downloaded off of their website. The bios file comes with a flasher called hptflash.exe which will then allow me to create the custom .v25 file I want to flash. Mind you these features are not available for enable/disable through any other means. This is kind of backwards considering (those w/ a Windows setup) that you have to get into the OS, install the drivers for the OS to recognize the card's presence, then run the hptflash and make your file. Then flash the card outside of windows and hope that it doesn't interfere with your mobo's raid scheme. In my case, I had a fresh install of windows that I could not access b/c the card was blocking the setup. So I had to install the OS on a singular drive to flash the card with the correct customized bios. Now that everything is good to go on the card end, I will probably have to re-install the OS once I get it to work in RAID 1 as well :/. I wonder if a pricier would have made me waste so much time? Learning all this and going through this oddly ordered process has, undoubtedly, cost me more than the price difference is worth. Oh well, now I know and can share my battle scares with the world . Thanks for the help guys!
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Omgea740 For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#8 |
|
Semi-Retired Folder
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,754 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,116 Times in 3,707 Posts
|
I'd just like to point out that this isn't really a case of Highpoint having an agressive BIOS that is overriding the onboard card.
However, what is happening is actually a fault of the motherboard. The traditional BIOS can only address so many pieces of hardware a boot time. UEFI can address a lot more. And while the board you are using uses "HybridEFI", that is really just a fancy name for a traditional BIOS that has been patched to read drives larger than 2TB. So what is happening is that when you put in the Highpoint card, there is no more room to address extra hardware, so the board has to make a decision to either address the onboard RAID card or the dedicated RAID card. It makes the decision to address the dedicated RAID card, because it assumes you want to use that over the onboard.
__________________
Rig1: System Specs. Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5 Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 6 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Interesting input. What still is bugging me about this is that the Raid card was released in 2008. A time period when UEFI bios based mobos were not the prominent yet. It may be the case that my mobo is severely limited to the amount of addresses that it can tap into in the boot up sequence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Semi-Retired Folder
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,754 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,116 Times in 3,707 Posts
|
The card has nothing to do with it, if you added in any RAID card that has the option to boot the motherboard would do the same thing.
The problem is that so many devices have been integrated into the motherboard these days the traditional BIOS just can't handle it.
__________________
Rig1: System Specs. Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5 Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 6 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Oh my. Not good. I tried the flashing the card with INT13 & EDBA disabled and the configuration still does the same thing. I wonder if there is any hardware on the motherboard that I can disable through the bios in order to open an additional slot for the second raid controller...Although that sounds kind of idealistic. Probably can't do that.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| HighPoint Announces RocketRAID 4500 RAID-on-Chip HBA | btarunr | News | 0 | Oct 22, 2012 02:50 AM |
| Raid on a NONE raid motherboard | AsRock | General Hardware | 0 | Nov 21, 2011 02:40 AM |
| HighPoint Announces Industry's 1st PCI-Express 2.0 x4 Native SATA 6Gb/s RAID Card | btarunr | News | 9 | Feb 17, 2010 02:09 AM |
| Raid control card vs on board raid? | drumsonly2002 | Storage | 27 | Jan 3, 2010 05:25 AM |
| Motherboard RAID v RAID Controller any difference? | Xazax | Storage | 16 | Sep 2, 2009 08:42 AM |