How's my memory bandwidth? Phenom II rig

itsakjt · Jan 7, 2013, 02:58 PM

How's my memory bandwidth guys?

drdeathx · Jan 7, 2013, 03:31 PM

In General. terrible...... LOL AMD platforms have terrible scores...

itsakjt · Jan 7, 2013, 04:01 PM

They are not terrible. I have seen AMD platforms have much lesser latency than high end Intel systems. Their architectures are different. Overall, performance is competitive.

drdeathx · Jan 7, 2013, 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by itsakjt

They are not terrible. I have seen AMD platforms have much lesser latency than high end Intel systems. Their architectures are different. Overall, performance is competitive.

LOL, Intel pushes as low as 30ns for Latencies and almost double read/write and copy speeds..... Where did you see this? I did respond in general BTW. If he wants comparisons to a 955 he can search the internet... Memory speeds and latencies are not AMD's strong point.

de.das.dude · Jan 7, 2013, 04:16 PM

there is an alternate to these individual "hows my ...". if you take time to go through the forums, there are already threads to discuss your cable management, overclocks, Memory performance and pc in general threads.

3870x2 · Jan 7, 2013, 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by de.das.dude

there is an alternate to these individual "hows my ...". if you take time to go through the forums, there are already threads to discuss your cable management, overclocks, Memory performance and pc in general threads.

If we grouped everything up into existing threads, there would be no new threads.

itsakjt · Jan 7, 2013, 04:27 PM

@drdeathx - Well how can you compare a say 900 USD Intel CPU to a 200 USD AMD CPU. Everyone knows high end Intels perform way better than the highest end AMD but costs thrice or even quad of the AMD systems. The reason I posted this was to know how much it is good for my system and to the systems which are similarly spec'd. We are not talking about outright performance here.

drdeathx · Jan 7, 2013, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by itsakjt

@drdeathx - Well how can you compare a say 900 USD Intel CPU to a 200 USD AMD CPU. Everyone knows high end Intels perform way better than the highest end AMD but costs thrice or even quad of the AMD systems. The reason I posted this was to know how much it is good for my system and to the systems which are similarly spec'd. We are not talking about outright performance here.

he asked a question and I answered it(my opinion).......

if my answer is not up to your standards state your opinion... Hehehehehehe

de.das.dude · Jan 7, 2013, 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3870x2

If we grouped everything up into existing threads, there would be no new threads.

threads are supposed to be there for people asking help

. not for asking "hows my system etc"

brandonwh64 · Jan 7, 2013, 04:38 PM

This will give you a hint on what you are up against with a budget intel system

itsakjt · Jan 7, 2013, 04:41 PM

Ok.

Thanks for the info.

Jack1n · Jan 7, 2013, 04:42 PM

Well for a Deneb i would have it say its really good.

drdeathx · Jan 7, 2013, 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brandonwh64

This will give you a hint on what you are up against with a budget intel system

http://img.techpowerup.org/120420/maxmem2120.png

Maxmemm scores higher compared to Aida and not comparing apples to apples.

itsakjt · Jan 7, 2013, 04:58 PM

Well I just found something weird!

I tested my desktop with MaxMemm and the score is 10 GBPS along with latency of 59 ns.
I tested my Pentium Dual Core B960 laptop(2nd gen SandyB) with Maxmemm and the score is 11 GBPS with latency of 18 ns.

However, SiSoftware Sandra tells a completely different result. On my desktop, it says 16.5 GBPS and on my laptop, it says 12.5 GBPS!!

Please justify. If possible, please try an Intel Core i3, i5, i7 system with SiSoft Sandra-memory bandwidth.

drdeathx · Jan 7, 2013, 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by itsakjt

Well I just found something weird!

I tested my desktop with MaxMemm and the score is 10 GBPS along with latency of 59 ns.
I tested my Pentium Dual Core B960 laptop(2nd gen SandyB) with Maxmemm and the score is 11 GBPS with latency of 18 ns.

However, SiSoftware Sandra tells a completely different result. On my desktop, it says 16.5 GBPS and on my laptop, it says 12.5 GBPS!!

Please justify. If possible, please try an Intel Core i3, i5, i7 system with SiSoft Sandra-memory bandwidth.

The OP used Aida and your throwing up different benchmarks.... Use Aida to keep it consistent.

itsakjt · Jan 7, 2013, 05:02 PM

I am the OP and I used both AIDA and SiSoft Sandra in my pic. Please check it again.

drdeathx · Jan 7, 2013, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by itsakjt

I am the OP and I used both AIDA and SiSoft Sandra in my pic. Please check it again.

Aida is easier to read all on one screen. Sandra does not have latencies shown .. Just sayn

itsakjt · Jan 7, 2013, 05:07 PM

Latencies are shown well, they are in too much detail. :P

Jan 7, 2013, 02:58 PM	#1
itsakjt Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Kolkata Posts: 415 (0.43/day) Thanks: 254 Thanked 103 Times in 73 Posts System Specs	How's my memory bandwidth? Phenom II rig How's my memory bandwidth guys?

System Name:	Phenom
Processor:	AMD Phenom II X4 955 running at 3.833 GHz 1.3375V and NB at 2.847 GHz 1.3125V 24*7 LLC on
Motherboard:	Asus M4A88TD-M EVO/USB3
Cooling:	Stock AMD copper base 4 heatpipe cooler
Memory:	2*2 GB Kingston DDR3 1333 MHz RAM running at 1752 MHz 8-9-8-24
Video Card:	Sapphire Radeon HD6770 1GB DDR5 copper base cooler-core 970MHz and mem 1295MHz
Hard Disk:	Western Digital Caviar Green 1TB SATA II-WD10EARS-22Y5B1, Seagate 80 GB SATA I-ST380817AS
Optical Drive:	LG GH22N-S50
CRT/LCD Model:	LG-E2042TC 20" wide screen LCD-1600*900
Case:	I-Ball Grabit(somewhat uncommon but average case)
Sound Card:	Realtek ALC892 8 channel audio onboard
PSU:	Zebronics Platinum series 600W Power Supply
Software:	Windows 7 Ultimate x64 sp1 with all latest updates
Benchmarks:	Intel Burn Test - 52 GFlops. 3D Mark Vantage - 12000+ 3D Mark 11 - 3080

System Name:	Halloween Boo!
Processor:	Intel Core i7 3770K
Motherboard:	Gigabyte Z77-Up7
Cooling:	Custom Water/ Thermalchill TA 120.3/ Swiftech Apogeee XT/ MCP655/ Swiftech M icrores/ XSPC RX 240
Memory:	16G G.Skill trident 2400MHz
Video Card:	3 x Radeon 7970
Hard Disk:	OCZ Revo Drive 240G
Optical Drive:	Asus
CRT/LCD Model:	24 inch Viewsonic
Case:	Phobia WayCoolIt Test Bench
PSU:	Nexus 1100 watt

System Name:	Phenom
Processor:	AMD Phenom II X4 955 running at 3.833 GHz 1.3375V and NB at 2.847 GHz 1.3125V 24*7 LLC on
Motherboard:	Asus M4A88TD-M EVO/USB3
Cooling:	Stock AMD copper base 4 heatpipe cooler
Memory:	2*2 GB Kingston DDR3 1333 MHz RAM running at 1752 MHz 8-9-8-24
Video Card:	Sapphire Radeon HD6770 1GB DDR5 copper base cooler-core 970MHz and mem 1295MHz
Hard Disk:	Western Digital Caviar Green 1TB SATA II-WD10EARS-22Y5B1, Seagate 80 GB SATA I-ST380817AS
Optical Drive:	LG GH22N-S50
CRT/LCD Model:	LG-E2042TC 20" wide screen LCD-1600*900
Case:	I-Ball Grabit(somewhat uncommon but average case)
Sound Card:	Realtek ALC892 8 channel audio onboard
PSU:	Zebronics Platinum series 600W Power Supply
Software:	Windows 7 Ultimate x64 sp1 with all latest updates
Benchmarks:	Intel Burn Test - 52 GFlops. 3D Mark Vantage - 12000+ 3D Mark 11 - 3080

System Name:	Halloween Boo!
Processor:	Intel Core i7 3770K
Motherboard:	Gigabyte Z77-Up7
Cooling:	Custom Water/ Thermalchill TA 120.3/ Swiftech Apogeee XT/ MCP655/ Swiftech M icrores/ XSPC RX 240
Memory:	16G G.Skill trident 2400MHz
Video Card:	3 x Radeon 7970
Hard Disk:	OCZ Revo Drive 240G
Optical Drive:	Asus
CRT/LCD Model:	24 inch Viewsonic
Case:	Phobia WayCoolIt Test Bench
PSU:	Nexus 1100 watt

Jan 7, 2013, 03:31 PM	#2
drdeathx Join Date: May 2009 Location: Chicago burbs Posts: 1,461 (1.00/day) Thanks: 39 Thanked 324 Times in 264 Posts System Specs	In General. terrible...... LOL AMD platforms have terrible scores...

Jan 7, 2013, 04:01 PM	#3
itsakjt Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Kolkata Posts: 415 (0.43/day) Thanks: 254 Thanked 103 Times in 73 Posts System Specs	They are not terrible. I have seen AMD platforms have much lesser latency than high end Intel systems. Their architectures are different. Overall, performance is competitive.

Jan 7, 2013, 04:16 PM	#5
de.das.dude Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Wild Wild East Posts: 4,537 (4.23/day) Thanks: 2,312 Thanked 1,327 Times in 908 Posts System Specs	there is an alternate to these individual "hows my ...". if you take time to go through the forums, there are already threads to discuss your cable management, overclocks, Memory performance and pc in general threads. __________________ my wallet isnt hashwell compatiple sad face

System Name:	SuperDuperUberComputer
Processor:	AMD Phenom II 945 X4 3.0Ghz
Motherboard:	ASRock 990FX Extreme 4
Cooling:	CM Hyper 212 EVO push:pull+ 1 panaflow 113CFM + 2 x 120mm NZXTs
Memory:	2x4GB DDR3 Corsair Vengeance 1600MHz CL9
Video Card:	GIGABYTE GTS450 OC2
Hard Disk:	SATA II 80GB Hitachi 7200RPM,W.D 500GB Green \|\| 4GB int + random SD cards
Optical Drive:	ASUS DVD drive
CRT/LCD Model:	Samsung Sync Master 793s CRT\|
Case:	NZXT Guardian 921RB
Sound Card:	Realtek ALC892 with THX True Studio
PSU:	Corsair GS600
Software:	Windows 7 64bit
Benchmarks:	real men dont need to bench :p

System Name:	Ultrabeast GX2
Processor:	Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 @ 4.0GHZ 24/7
Motherboard:	Gigabit P35-DS3L
Cooling:	Rosewill RX24, Dual Slot Vid, Fan control
Memory:	2x1gb 1066mhz@850MHZ DDR2
Video Card:	9800GX2 @ 690/1040
Hard Disk:	750/250/250/200 all WD 7200
Optical Drive:	BD/DVDRW, DVDRW/CDRW
CRT/LCD Model:	24" DCLCD 2ms 1200p
Case:	Apevia
Sound Card:	7.1 Digital on-board, 5.1 digital hooked up
PSU:	700W RAIDMAXXX SLI
Software:	winXP Pro
Benchmarks:	17749 3DM06

Jan 7, 2013, 04:27 PM	#7
itsakjt Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Kolkata Posts: 415 (0.43/day) Thanks: 254 Thanked 103 Times in 73 Posts System Specs	@drdeathx - Well how can you compare a say 900 USD Intel CPU to a 200 USD AMD CPU. Everyone knows high end Intels perform way better than the highest end AMD but costs thrice or even quad of the AMD systems. The reason I posted this was to know how much it is good for my system and to the systems which are similarly spec'd. We are not talking about outright performance here.

Jan 7, 2013, 04:38 PM	#10
brandonwh64 Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!! Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Chatsworth, GA Posts: 13,562 (10.03/day) Thanks: 2,146 Thanked 5,338 Times in 3,695 Posts System Specs	This will give you a hint on what you are up against with a budget intel system __________________ Cruncher's: All GPU's GPU's: 7970 3GB Unlocked = 8 Threads 5770 1GB OCed = 2 Threads

System Name:	The StarCrunch Defender!
Processor:	I7 2600K @ 4.5ghz 1.32V
Motherboard:	Gigabyte Z68X-UD3H-B3
Cooling:	Corsair A70 Push/Pull
Memory:	G-Skill Ripjaws 2x4GB DDR3 1866mhz
Video Card:	Gigabyte 7970 3GB Reference Card at boost clocks
Hard Disk:	2x 500GB WD Blue Raid 0 / 1TB WD Black
Optical Drive:	Samsung DVD/R/RW SATA
CRT/LCD Model:	ViewSonic VG2227wm 1080P
Case:	NZXT Tempest 410 Elite
Sound Card:	Onboard Realtek (Azalia)
PSU:	Corsair 750TX
Software:	Windows 7 Home X64

Jan 7, 2013, 04:41 PM	#11
itsakjt Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Kolkata Posts: 415 (0.43/day) Thanks: 254 Thanked 103 Times in 73 Posts System Specs	Ok. Thanks for the info.

Jan 7, 2013, 04:42 PM	#12
Jack1n Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: Israel Posts: 616 (2.74/day) Thanks: 32 Thanked 128 Times in 121 Posts System Specs	Well for a Deneb i would have it say its really good. __________________

Processor:	Intel Core i5 3570K @ 4.5Ghz
Motherboard:	Gigabyte Z77X UD5H
Cooling:	Antec H20 920
Memory:	Corsair Dominator Platinum DDR3 2x4GB 2000mhz 9-11-10-24 CR-1
Video Card:	Sapphire AMD Radeon 7950 1050/1400 1075mv(1043 after V-drop)
Hard Disk:	WD Velociraptor 150GB/Hitachi Deskstar 7K3 2TB
Optical Drive:	Samsung DVD Writer
CRT/LCD Model:	Samsung T220P 1920x1200
Case:	Coolermaster 690
Sound Card:	Creative X-FI Titanium + Sennheiser PC360
PSU:	Corsair TX850 (2009 version)
Software:	Win 7 Ultimate 64bit SP1

Jan 7, 2013, 04:58 PM	#14
itsakjt Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Kolkata Posts: 415 (0.43/day) Thanks: 254 Thanked 103 Times in 73 Posts System Specs	Well I just found something weird! I tested my desktop with MaxMemm and the score is 10 GBPS along with latency of 59 ns. I tested my Pentium Dual Core B960 laptop(2nd gen SandyB) with Maxmemm and the score is 11 GBPS with latency of 18 ns. However, SiSoftware Sandra tells a completely different result. On my desktop, it says 16.5 GBPS and on my laptop, it says 12.5 GBPS!! Please justify. If possible, please try an Intel Core i3, i5, i7 system with SiSoft Sandra-memory bandwidth.

Jan 7, 2013, 05:02 PM	#16
itsakjt Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Kolkata Posts: 415 (0.43/day) Thanks: 254 Thanked 103 Times in 73 Posts System Specs	I am the OP and I used both AIDA and SiSoft Sandra in my pic. Please check it again.

Jan 7, 2013, 05:07 PM	#18
itsakjt Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Kolkata Posts: 415 (0.43/day) Thanks: 254 Thanked 103 Times in 73 Posts System Specs	Latencies are shown well, they are in too much detail. :P

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
How's my overclock?? AMD Phenom II rig	itsakjt	Overclocking & Cooling	14	Dec 31, 2012 03:38 PM
NEW RIG ! AMD Phenom II x4 960T how to see if its can be unlocked ?	StanMen	Overclocking & Cooling	10	Jun 9, 2012 09:20 PM
Incorrect memory bandwidth ?	chaotic_uk	GPU-Z	11	Mar 27, 2010 05:20 PM
ATI M97 Already Using 5 GT/s GDDR5 Memory, Highest Memory Bandwidth for Any mGPU	btarunr	News	13	Mar 8, 2009 08:28 AM
Extreme Memory Bandwidth!!	infrared	Overclocking & Cooling	15	Mar 9, 2007 02:07 AM