CPU Database

[imperialreign]

Originally Posted by Polaris573

The person who was keeping the databased updated has left us. Malware and I are now responsible for keeping the GPU and CPU database updated. However, he will be primarily responsible for the GPU database, while I will keep the CPU database updated. I will try to update most of it this afternoon, however please continue to post missing CPUs or pictures of them here in the future. Thanks.

cool - I'll post that Celeron in the near future

[der_eismann]

Hey everyone, the CPU database is revived
I'm the new guy from Germany and at first I'll try to complete and arrange the AMD CPUs, I already finished with socket A, 754 and 939.
If you find a mistake or you miss any processor, just PM me (but please not until next week).

So, best regards, eismann

[der_eismann]

seems like no one really cares

[BarbaricSoul]

actually, I'm using the chart right now

[der_eismann]

thanks, that's a motivation.

i would be pleased if anyone has photos of some cpus.... and if you miss something, just write it down here or PM me.

[Sugarush]

Pentium Dual Core all missing

[newfellow]

Core I5-6xx cores are 32nm not 45nm.

http://ark.intel.com/ProductCollecti...x?series=43131

[n-ster]

a number of cores column would be nice

[jmcslob]

Sure has been a lot of Necrothreading today

[StillLearning]

You are missing this i7 from your list ( I own one):

Name: Intel Core i7-960
Codename: Bloomfield
Package: FC-LGA6
Socket: 1366
Process: 45nm
Clock: 3200 MHz
Multi: 25x
Voltage: 1.375V
Cache: 256K / 1024K / 8192K
TDP: 130W

You need columns for turbo boost speed, architecture type (HT, BD), normal idle and load @ ambient temps and gate type (high-k, silicon on insulator, etc)

[Maban]

Bumping to show that this thread exists. Don't be afraid to necro this. Suggestions, missing items, etc are welcomed.

[jhony2]

Hey,
The CPUDb is really great.
Is it possible to add a column of each processor's critical temperature as reported by the manufacturer?
That would be awesome.

Thanks,
Johnny

[dorsetknob]

Originally Posted by der_eismann

thanks, that's a motivation.

i would be pleased if anyone has photos of some cpus.... and if you miss something, just write it down here or PM me.

is it possible the Photo Can be coded to show Front/rear view ?

What size photo's ?

Got an extensive collection of CPU's
See list here
http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/sh...&postcount=383
only got a 2.0mp camera phone for taking pictures
pm me if i can help with photo's and a list of candidate Cpu's that need Front/rear shots

[Maban]

Originally Posted by jhony2

Hey,
The CPUDb is really great.
Is it possible to add a column of each processor's critical temperature as reported by the manufacturer?
That would be awesome.

Thanks,
Johnny

If I remember to, I'll run that by Wiz. I'm pretty sure the values I will find will all be for TCaseMax. Isn't TjMax the one people are usually concerned about?

Originally Posted by dorsetknob

is it possible the Photo Can be coded to show Front/rear view ?

What size photo's ?

Got an extensive collection of CPU's
See list here
http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/sh...&postcount=383
only got a 2.0mp camera phone for taking pictures
pm me if i can help with photo's and a list of candidate Cpu's that need Front/rear shots

The other side of the CPU really isn't important enough for each entry to have one. The images are 320x320 JPG. The pictures should be clear enough so the important markings are legible. If you think they will be high enough quality when scaled down to 320x320 then send them my way.

There's currently 996 CPUs in the database. Currently the fastest way for me to tell which ones have/need images in bulk is inefficient with that many entries. If you want to send me whatever you've got, I will sort through them.

[jhony2]

Originally Posted by Maban

If I remember to, I'll run that by Wiz. I'm pretty sure the values I will find will all be for TCaseMax. Isn't TjMax the one people are usually concerned about?

Well, for Intel processors TCaseMax will be awesome.
If you already have the raw data and can send it to me that would be much appreciated as well.

For AMD - as I understand the situation is a bit different, so any data regarding manufacturer definitions would be good.

I've seen this table, but i'm not sure to what value it refers to...
http://www.pantherproducts.co.uk/ind...PUtemperatures

Thanks!

[Maban]

Originally Posted by jhony2

Well, for Intel processors TCaseMax will be awesome.
If you already have the raw data and can send it to me that would be much appreciated as well.

For AMD - as I understand the situation is a bit different, so any data regarding manufacturer definitions would be good.

I've seen this table, but i'm not sure to what value it refers to...
http://www.pantherproducts.co.uk/ind...PUtemperatures

Thanks!

I just took a look in a power and thermal datasheet and it looks like AMD uses TCaseMax also. I should be able to find TCaseMax for most if not all modern CPUs.

[jihadjoe]

First off I'd like to say your work on the CPU DB is much appreciated, I've been using it as a reference from time to time.

Anyways, I noticed a few time-travelling CPUs. Both Core2 chips linked below show up as "2001" year parts in the DB. Also pretty sure you meant Q6700 with the first one.

http://www.techpowerup.com/cpudb/669...uad_Q7600.html
http://www.techpowerup.com/cpudb/621...Duo_E8600.html

[Maban]

Originally Posted by jihadjoe

First off I'd like to say your work on the CPU DB is much appreciated, I've been using it as a reference from time to time.

Anyways, I noticed a few time-travelling CPUs. Both Core2 chips linked below show up as "2001" year parts in the DB. Also pretty sure you meant Q6700 with the first one.

http://www.techpowerup.com/cpudb/669...uad_Q7600.html
http://www.techpowerup.com/cpudb/621...Duo_E8600.html

Q7600 is intentional. It's a distinctly separate product. 2001-01-01 is/was a default date. There are a number of them that erroneously list 2001-01-01 as a launch date. T4C Fantasy or I will fix those eventually.