techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Mar 18, 2007, 05:05 PM   #1
zekrahminator
McLovin
 
zekrahminator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: My house.
Posts: 6,280 (2.33/day)
Thanks: 105
Thanked 340 Times in 246 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to zekrahminator Send a message via AIM to zekrahminator Send a message via MSN to zekrahminator

System Specs

Corsair redefines power supply efficiency at CeBIT

Corsair, known for making quite good RAM among other things, is apparently really getting serious about the power supply business. Most power supplies on the market today are anywhere between 50 and 85% efficient, with the vast majority of power supplies being between 75 and 85% efficient under load. Corsair had a brilliant power supply at their CeBIT booth, which had an impressive 90% load efficiency. This allowed it to power an AMD QuadFX system with G80 SLI, 4GB of PC2-8000 DDR2 RAM, and a 150GB hard drive with a 620W power supply (most people at the show expected an 850W-1kW PSU to be required). To be honest, Corsair has actually had this power supply on the market for a while, and probably couldn't wait for CeBIT to make it available. You can get this extremely efficient power supply here (oh look it's on sale).


Source: The Inquirer
zekrahminator is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 18, 2007, 05:40 PM   #2
EviLZeD
500 Posts
 
EviLZeD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 649 (0.26/day)
Thanks: 30
Thanked 48 Times in 44 Posts

System Specs

WOW quad core 8800gtx sli and 4gb ram on 620 watt psu thats crazy
EviLZeD is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 18, 2007, 06:32 PM   #3
WeStSiDePLaYa
75 Posts
 
WeStSiDePLaYa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 83 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

too bad that psu has already be independently tested and shown that it has a max efficiency of 83%.

And im not suprised that this psu could run that. It does have 50amps on the 12v rails.

The question is how long could it run that load...
__________________
DFI LANPARTY UT NF590 SLI-M2R/G
X2 3800+EE AM2
2x1GB OCZ PC2-6400 Platinum XTC
XFX 7900GS
Maxtor 6L250S0
Maxtor 6V300F0
Western Digital WD2500JS
WeStSiDePLaYa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 18, 2007, 07:03 PM   #4
Dippyskoodlez
3500 Posts
 
Dippyskoodlez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,349 (1.49/day)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 237 Times in 194 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Dippyskoodlez

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by WeStSiDePLaYa View Post
too bad that psu has already be independently tested and shown that it has a max efficiency of 83%.

And im not suprised that this psu could run that. It does have 50amps on the 12v rails.

CRAP

my secret is revealed!
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
Dippyskoodlez is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 18, 2007, 07:23 PM   #5
RickyG512
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Croydon, England
Posts: 473 (0.17/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

System Specs

wait so u mean this is a fake
__________________
3D mark 05 13400
3D mark 06 6800

I have a dream that one day everyone will have water cooling
RickyG512 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 18, 2007, 07:57 PM   #6
OnBoard
2000 Posts
 
OnBoard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,773 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 382 Times in 302 Posts

System Specs

Don't know where they get that 90% as it's 86% max in their own page and tests show the same. (230V user have an 3,3% advantage)

http://www.corsairmicro.com/corsair/...efficiency.jpg

But I wouldn't mind owning the 520W version right now :P

http://www.corsairmicro.com/corsair/...er_supply.html
and some efficiency testing
http://www.silentpcreview.com/article692-page4.html
OnBoard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 18, 2007, 08:05 PM   #7
zekrahminator
McLovin
 
zekrahminator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: My house.
Posts: 6,280 (2.33/day)
Thanks: 105
Thanked 340 Times in 246 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to zekrahminator Send a message via AIM to zekrahminator Send a message via MSN to zekrahminator

System Specs

Regardless of how efficient it REALLY is, the point is, it can power that system with relative ease .
__________________
“Just because you're hung like a moose doesn't mean you should do porn.”
zekrahminator is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 18, 2007, 09:20 PM   #8
RickyG512
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Croydon, England
Posts: 473 (0.17/day)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

System Specs

its all about the pc power and cooling which i cant find it on any store/retailer/website in england, if i could i would buy one right now
__________________
3D mark 05 13400
3D mark 06 6800

I have a dream that one day everyone will have water cooling
RickyG512 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 18, 2007, 09:22 PM   #9
WeStSiDePLaYa
75 Posts
 
WeStSiDePLaYa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 83 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by zekrahminator View Post
Regardless of how efficient it REALLY is, the point is, it can power that system with relative ease .
Buy, how do you know it did it with ease? I mean they most likely ran it stock, without vmods. Who in their right mind would do that!!?!?!
__________________
DFI LANPARTY UT NF590 SLI-M2R/G
X2 3800+EE AM2
2x1GB OCZ PC2-6400 Platinum XTC
XFX 7900GS
Maxtor 6L250S0
Maxtor 6V300F0
Western Digital WD2500JS
WeStSiDePLaYa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 18, 2007, 09:50 PM   #10
WarEagleAU
Bird of Prey
 
WarEagleAU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gurley, AL
Posts: 9,994 (3.94/day)
Thanks: 3,810
Thanked 557 Times in 521 Posts
Send a message via AIM to WarEagleAU Send a message via Yahoo to WarEagleAU

System Specs

Looks like someone was reading my posts and took notice of how I wish we had PSUs that were more than 85% efficient. Ill probably wind up getting me one of these as well
__________________
=-TheEagle-=



http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=62454
“You crazy? Surfing any website without an antivirus is like freaking with a dirty woman without protection” -OzzmanFloyd120
- Edited for content and clarity
WarEagleAU is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 18, 2007, 10:26 PM   #11
EastCoasthandle
Eligible for custom title
 
EastCoasthandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,244 (2.09/day)
Thanks: 382
Thanked 1,528 Times in 865 Posts

System Specs

It's probably ideal for those that want modular but I still prefer PC P&C Silencer. I think they changed the name for it now to include a quad or something.
EastCoasthandle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 18, 2007, 11:47 PM   #12
NamesDontMatter
500 Posts
 
NamesDontMatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Connecticut, United States
Posts: 758 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 27 Times in 19 Posts
Send a message via AIM to NamesDontMatter Send a message via MSN to NamesDontMatter Send a message via Yahoo to NamesDontMatter

System Specs

I think intel was developing or developed capacitors or somethin that allow PSU's with greater then 90& efficiency(real efficiency)
NamesDontMatter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 19, 2007, 05:17 AM   #13
niko084
Eligible for custom title
 
niko084's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 6,398 (2.68/day)
Thanks: 193
Thanked 740 Times in 600 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to niko084 Send a message via AIM to niko084 Send a message via Skype™ to niko084

System Specs

Either way I have come across many 3rd party examinations and comparisons of Corsair PSU's to other HIGH end psu's... And it is normally the corsair that comes out on top. Especially for being modular, they hold voltage better than some other larger more expensive psus from high end companies.

So maybe its not a 90% efficient psu, its still a darn nice unit, and I would recomend it to anyone looking for a psu in that price range.
__________________
This electronic post is encrypted in the 'English language method', any attempt to decipher meaning from these symbols is a violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998. This includes, but is not limited to: interpreting the symbols through use of biological, visual decryption devices, translating the symbols into another language encryption scheme, and digital processing the symbols into a form conducive to oral interpretation.
HWBOT HEATWARE
niko084 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 19, 2007, 11:04 AM   #14
WeStSiDePLaYa
75 Posts
 
WeStSiDePLaYa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 83 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by WarEagleAU View Post
Looks like someone was reading my posts and took notice of how I wish we had PSUs that were more than 85% efficient. Ill probably wind up getting me one of these as well
Too bad the only testing that shows its efficiency being that high is their OWN testing, lol, and i think more efficient psu's is a no brainer.
__________________
DFI LANPARTY UT NF590 SLI-M2R/G
X2 3800+EE AM2
2x1GB OCZ PC2-6400 Platinum XTC
XFX 7900GS
Maxtor 6L250S0
Maxtor 6V300F0
Western Digital WD2500JS
WeStSiDePLaYa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 19, 2007, 09:49 PM   #15
justdc
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Too bad efficiency is only affecting AC to DC conversion, and does not make 620W psu 1KW. If they made it work on 620W psu, then it was working out of specs (and is not 620W psu), or the system actually needed less than 620W.
justdc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2007, 01:28 AM   #16
WeStSiDePLaYa
75 Posts
 
WeStSiDePLaYa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 83 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by justdc View Post
Too bad efficiency is only affecting AC to DC conversion, and does not make 620W psu 1KW. If they made it work on 620W psu, then it was working out of specs (and is not 620W psu), or the system actually needed less than 620W.


That is common knowledge.

The system wouldnt need 620w.
__________________
DFI LANPARTY UT NF590 SLI-M2R/G
X2 3800+EE AM2
2x1GB OCZ PC2-6400 Platinum XTC
XFX 7900GS
Maxtor 6L250S0
Maxtor 6V300F0
Western Digital WD2500JS
WeStSiDePLaYa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2007, 04:30 AM   #17
Dippyskoodlez
3500 Posts
 
Dippyskoodlez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,349 (1.49/day)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 237 Times in 194 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Dippyskoodlez

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by WeStSiDePLaYa View Post
That is common knowledge.

The system wouldnt need 620w.
ppsst heres a hint for everyone.


Most systems don't need the PSU you're powering it with.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
Dippyskoodlez is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2007, 03:08 PM   #18
justdc
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by zekrahminator View Post
Corsair had a brilliant power supply at their CeBIT booth, which had an impressive 90% load efficiency. This allowed it to power an AMD QuadFX system with G80 SLI, 4GB of PC2-8000 DDR2 RAM, and a 150GB hard drive with a 620W power supply
This is false, psu efficiency does not change what can it support, only the output wattage. If this psu would be 50% efficient everything would work fine too. I think newsman should correct this.
justdc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21, 2007, 03:40 AM   #19
Poisonsnak
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Saskatoon, SK
Posts: 363 (0.12/day)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by justdc View Post
If this psu would be 50% efficient everything would work fine too.
I don't agree.

With 620W out at 90% that means 689W in and therefore 69W of heat in the PSU.

620W at 50% means 1240W in and 620W of heat in the PSU. I don't believe you can dissipate that kind of heat inside that kind of area while keeping the PSU below maximum operating temperature.
Poisonsnak is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21, 2007, 10:16 AM   #20
justdc
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poisonsnak View Post
I don't agree.

With 620W out at 90% that means 689W in and therefore 69W of heat in the PSU.

620W at 50% means 1240W in and 620W of heat in the PSU. I don't believe you can dissipate that kind of heat inside that kind of area while keeping the PSU below maximum operating temperature.
How does a 2000W psu with 80% efficiency does it then? Remember that maximum efficiency is achieved only in certain conditions i.e. temperature. Still most psus have operating range 0-50 C. It also means they can deal with lower efficiency than "rated".

Efficiency itself is not a requirement to power any kind of system, it's just a bonus on the power bill and some silence. Implying that efficiency is allowing psu to power some components is just false.
justdc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts