techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jun 1, 2007, 01:19 PM   #1
Jimmy 2004
Eligible for custom title
 
Jimmy 2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: England
Posts: 5,047 (1.66/day)
Thanks: 134
Thanked 276 Times in 185 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Jimmy 2004

System Specs

Apple’s DRM-free music has a twist

Now that Apple has finally led the way and launched its DRM-free downloads for EMI music, you could be forgiven for thinking music fans should be happy. Unfortunately, Apple has removed the protection only to give downloaders another surprise: the tracks still contain data about who bought them. Apple launched the DRM-free service two days ago, which allows iTunes users to download higher quality music without DRM-protection (the technology that prevents music from being played on certain devices in an attempt to combat file sharing) for a higher price of $1.29. However, even tracks without any DRM have the user’s account information, including the buyer’s email address, embedded into them. Apple hasn’t given any comment yet, but music fans fear that Apple is not respecting their privacy and are worried it could be used to identify them if the songs end up on file sharing sites. Obviously this would be useful to prevent illegal sharing, but if the data could be easily spoofed then it may lead to people being wrongly accused of sharing music.

Source: BBC News
Jimmy 2004 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 1, 2007, 01:49 PM   #2
rhythmeister
500 Posts
 
rhythmeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Belfast...N. Ireland mate!
Posts: 822 (0.28/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 32 Times in 28 Posts

System Specs

Idiots, they need a good slap the lot of them. It's called file sharing not stealing, apple you muppets!
__________________
My xbox360 says:http://www.360voice.com/tag/lof666

Feel free to add me then get cut in two with a Lancer WOOT WOOT
rhythmeister is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 1, 2007, 02:42 PM   #3
WarEagleAU
Bird of Prey
 
WarEagleAU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gurley, AL
Posts: 9,994 (3.98/day)
Thanks: 3,810
Thanked 557 Times in 521 Posts
Send a message via AIM to WarEagleAU Send a message via Yahoo to WarEagleAU

System Specs

Yeah, they only call it that so as to lessen the naming burden on the pirates. If you share files, chances are, its an illegal file sharing. Otherwise, the whole industry, music and movies, wouldnt even care.


I dont see this as being really a bad thing, only those who may pirate the music (though I dont see anyone paying $1.29 a song and giving it away for free, just doesnt make sense) could complain.
__________________
=-TheEagle-=



http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=62454
“You crazy? Surfing any website without an antivirus is like freaking with a dirty woman without protection” -OzzmanFloyd120
- Edited for content and clarity
WarEagleAU is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 1, 2007, 02:57 PM   #4
Bob The Fish
75 Posts
 
Bob The Fish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Posts: 117 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

System Specs

I new it would have a catch.
__________________
Bob The Fish is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 1, 2007, 04:59 PM   #5
Benpi
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 415 (0.18/day)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

System Specs

The other catch is, the files are .M4A files. If your MP3 player doesn't accept AAC files, then it DEFINATELY won't accept .M4A files. This whole Plus DRM-free program is shit. If it sold high res .MP3 files, that'd be a different story. Amazon FTW!
Benpi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 1, 2007, 05:44 PM   #6
Nemesis881
200 Posts
 
Nemesis881's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dawsonville, GA
Posts: 467 (0.18/day)
Thanks: 187
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts

System Specs

Ipods suck, Itunes suck, APPLE SUCKS!!! hahaha

Seriously though, if you're gonna pay $1.29 a song, you should be able to do what you want with it.
__________________
“Nemesis is supposed to be badass.” -Metal-Head
Nemesis881 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 1, 2007, 06:12 PM   #7
pnice
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Jhymm Anybody?
pnice is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 1, 2007, 06:48 PM   #8
GJSNeptune
1000 Posts
 
GJSNeptune's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,743 (0.79/day)
Thanks: 24
Thanked 112 Times in 103 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benpi View Post
If it sold high res .MP3 files, that'd be a different story.
High bitrate mp3s are still compressed.

If you want higher quality, you'll need to look to another format.
GJSNeptune is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 1, 2007, 06:49 PM   #9
GJSNeptune
1000 Posts
 
GJSNeptune's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,743 (0.79/day)
Thanks: 24
Thanked 112 Times in 103 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nemesis881 View Post
Ipods suck, Itunes suck, APPLE SUCKS!!! hahaha
Bandwagon or actual experience? You don't need iTunes for an iPod, so hating one because of the other is silly.
GJSNeptune is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 1, 2007, 06:54 PM   #10
d44ve
1000 Posts
 
d44ve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,878 (0.84/day)
Thanks: 79
Thanked 322 Times in 152 Posts
Send a message via MSN to d44ve

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nemesis881 View Post
Ipods suck, Itunes suck, APPLE SUCKS!!! hahaha

Seriously though, if you're gonna pay $1.29 a song, you should be able to do what you want with it.

Shht, I love my ipod and I do not use Itunes.
d44ve is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 1, 2007, 06:57 PM   #11
GJSNeptune
1000 Posts
 
GJSNeptune's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,743 (0.79/day)
Thanks: 24
Thanked 112 Times in 103 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by d44ve View Post
Shht, I love my ipod and I do not use Itunes.
Ditto.
GJSNeptune is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 1, 2007, 07:25 PM   #12
zekrahminator
McLovin
 
zekrahminator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: My house.
Posts: 6,280 (2.35/day)
Thanks: 105
Thanked 340 Times in 246 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to zekrahminator Send a message via AIM to zekrahminator Send a message via MSN to zekrahminator

System Specs

When will they learn that people will only be want to pirate music more if they make it harder to own legal music... .
__________________
“Just because you're hung like a moose doesn't mean you should do porn.”
zekrahminator is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 1, 2007, 10:19 PM   #13
Dippyskoodlez
3500 Posts
 
Dippyskoodlez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,349 (1.51/day)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 237 Times in 194 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Dippyskoodlez

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by zekrahminator View Post
When will they learn that people will only be want to pirate music more if they make it harder to own legal music... .
srsly, people act like the ITMS is already hard to bypass the drm.

If this is a simple M4a... and not DRM protected... how long do you think it'll take for a program to come out that just strips the information out and converts it to whatever you want?


Think smarter not harder people, come on.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
Dippyskoodlez is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 2, 2007, 12:03 AM   #14
Benpi
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 415 (0.18/day)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by GJSNeptune View Post
High bitrate mp3s are still compressed.

If you want higher quality, you'll need to look to another format.

Yes. So are AACs, WMAs ATRACs, WAVs etc.etc.etc. 192kb/s MP3s sound great. A 192kb/s MP3 is worth more than a 128kb/s DRMd AAC or AAC with your name imprinted on it.
Benpi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 2, 2007, 02:46 AM   #15
XooM
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Close to FrozenCPU.com
Posts: 478 (0.15/day)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Send a message via AIM to XooM

System Specs

FLAC for lossless plz. ogg vorbis for lossy. Oh, and iTunes sucks because its clumsy, awkward, and limiting. iPods suck because they're of a mediocre build quality and scratch like a mofo, but with rockbox are a moderately respectable player. apple is not a lousy company, though i dislike their advertising and loathe their obnoxiously loud fanbase.
__________________
“yeah i'm sorry .. i'm not so good at programming.. i just started” -W1zzard
XooM is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 2, 2007, 02:51 AM   #16
wazzledoozle
3500 Posts
 
wazzledoozle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,316 (1.35/day)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 166 Times in 89 Posts
Send a message via AIM to wazzledoozle Send a message via MSN to wazzledoozle

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benpi View Post
Yes. So are AACs, WMAs ATRACs, WAVs etc.etc.etc. 192kb/s MP3s sound great. A 192kb/s MP3 is worth more than a 128kb/s DRMd AAC or AAC with your name imprinted on it.
These (sort of) DRM-Less AAC files are 256kbps.
AAC and WMA are far superior codecs to MP3, which has long outlived its time.

The industry just needs to get together on a modern, standardized, and open codec. AAC is a good start, the Zune and 360 play it along with iPod hardware. But it still has licensing fees...
OGG is alright. I havent used it much, but it isn't going to be adopted by any major music store because of its open source nature; hectic and always changing.

Personally, I rip cd's to FLAC and then transcode that to 128kbps AAC for my ipod.
__________________
bellybuttons are great holes, their single purpose is to suck up pinkys
-DanTheBanjoman
wazzledoozle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 2, 2007, 03:07 AM   #17
GJSNeptune
1000 Posts
 
GJSNeptune's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,743 (0.79/day)
Thanks: 24
Thanked 112 Times in 103 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benpi View Post
Yes. So are AACs, WMAs ATRACs, WAVs etc.etc.etc. 192kb/s MP3s sound great. A 192kb/s MP3 is worth more than a 128kb/s DRMd AAC or AAC with your name imprinted on it.
WAVs are typically uncompressed. Just sayin', someday there'll be a FLAC music service or something.

Someday...when everyone has at least 1TB.
GJSNeptune is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jun 2, 2007, 04:18 AM   #18
Wile E
Power User
 
Wile E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.47/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,826 Times in 3,124 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wile E Send a message via Yahoo to Wile E

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by wazzledoozle View Post
These (sort of) DRM-Less AAC files are 256kbps.
AAC and WMA are far superior codecs to MP3, which has long outlived its time.
Agreed, 100%. I no longer use mp3's myself. I hate them. FLAC and AAC, FTW!
__________________

Visit Ashentech
“What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
Wile E is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts