![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 1,985 (0.80/day)
Thanks: 131
Thanked 295 Times in 275 Posts
|
Pre-overclocked cards
I'm not sure where I read this, but I distinctly remember someone saying that pre-overclocked cards are more likely to have more problems than cards the user overclocks to the same speed. Am I just making this up by myself or what? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
My stars went supernova
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma T-Town
Posts: 10,337 (4.16/day)
Thanks: 1,449
Thanked 1,477 Times in 1,113 Posts
|
Hmm not all cards make it in the OC market. They test those before they sell them, but yes sometimes they do burn up faster than the non-oced ones.
It's a luck of the draw with all ocing and with it lasting. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to DaMulta For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 1,985 (0.80/day)
Thanks: 131
Thanked 295 Times in 275 Posts
|
OK, thanks m8. Mine is OC'ed and I've only had a few problems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() |
I read an article a while back, that said some cards tested that can't reach much higher speeds (than stock) become overclocked a few Mhz, then are sold as Pre-Overclocked cards. They're Pre-Overclocked, but won't go much higher than the speeds they already have.
Not too sure on this, but it was on an article I read. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Azn Tr14dZ For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|