![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() |
Suggestions for good SATA2 HDD to run RAID
Can anyone recommend any good hard drives with at least 16mb cache to run RAID with 250GB capacity???
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Power User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.39/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,826 Times in 3,124 Posts
|
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16822148155
That's my suggestion. Perpendicular recording, and it's optimized for RAID arrays.
__________________
![]() Visit Ashentech “What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() |
I'll be running my comp for long periods of time do you think the HDD will be able to handle the stress
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Power User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.39/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,826 Times in 3,124 Posts
|
Yes. It's intended for enterprise use. (Servers)
__________________
![]() Visit Ashentech “What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 2,056 (0.84/day)
Thanks: 214
Thanked 679 Times in 516 Posts
|
Second Wile E suggestion,I have two of those in raid0 and no problems with them at all.
My comp runs 24/7 and have had no worries with them,also they are quite cheap and relatively quiet. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Posts: 320 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
|
well depending on how much storage you want/ need.. I have these, and they CREAM raptors even in RAID-0... and I've left my computer running 24x7 for over a month with no problems... http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16822148140
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() |
Oh ok what about the NS and SV series, what do you think of them...i heard there pretty good too....do you guys know anything about them???
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Posts: 320 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
|
i honestly haven't tried them or heard anything on them, however seagate drives are usually awesome no matter what model you get.. i have an older sata1.5gb drive still running no problems, over 3 years old
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() |
I'm just afraid that if i get an oem HDD, and it blows or whatever on me in 6 months i cant return it.....i havent had much luck this year hahaha...anyways back to the subject, are there any other brands that manufacture HDDs that are good....although i'm leaning towards the seagate but good to have some choices available
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Power User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.39/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,826 Times in 3,124 Posts
|
OEM just means that it doesn't come in a retail box, and doesn't include a SATA cable. The OEM Seagates still carry their 5yr warranty. I only buy OEM drives. I'm not paying extra money, just to have a cable I don't need and a fancy box.
Western Digital is another manufacturer to consider, tho the Seagates outperform them at this point.
__________________
![]() Visit Ashentech “What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() |
Ok thanks heaps, i dont know which one yet but i'll take into consideration all your suggestions....probably end up buying the one you guys suggested haha...thanks heaps everybody...if there are anymore suggestions feel free to add.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Señor Moderator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.56/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() |
I was going to run 3 HDDs but not for awhile...it would set me back to much....so at the moment i'm going with only 2 HDDs with RAID 0.
RAID 5 is using 3 HDDs...correct me if i'm wrong not to familiar with RAID......but they are all mirroring so if 1 of 3 HDD failed then the system will allow time for the failed HDD to be replaced right...and the data will not be vulnerable until a second HDD fails and definitely both drives must be replaced before data lost....but can i ask how does it make the system quicker...are they striping on all 3 drives???? I think i'm way off base hahaha, correct me if i'm worng please. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() |
http://www.acnc.com/04_01_05.html
RAID 5, very well illustrated and explained. Btw I third (or fourth) the reccomendation of the Seagate 7200.10, Ive got two atm and im about to get a third. Im very impressed with them .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Señor Moderator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.56/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
|
Quote:
RAID 5 doesn't mirror, it uses 1 (or more) disks as parity disk. 3 is the minimal amount of drives you'd need. Basically data is read and written from/to multiple drives at once, thats how it improves performance as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Blighty
Posts: 1,983 (0.82/day)
Thanks: 96
Thanked 187 Times in 166 Posts
|
has anyone seen any good performance comparisons between raid 3 and raid 5? ( i got a dirt cheap netcell based xfx raid card that does raid 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Señor Moderator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.56/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
|
Quote:
RAID 3 and 5 are technically the same, the only difference being that the parity is on a single disk with RAID3 and with RAID5 it is spread across disks. Just stick with RAID5 |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to DanTheBanjoman For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#18 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 4,129 (1.54/day)
Thanks: 616
Thanked 494 Times in 424 Posts
|
I am going to 3rd Wile E as I am using them also in raid-0.
__________________
Asus P6T Deluxe Intel X58/ i7-920CO@4.2GHZ 24/7 <> CORSAIR DOMINATOR 6GB (3 x 2GB) DDR3 1600.<> ThermalTake ToughPower 1200 WATT PSU
2X ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 2GB DDR5 <> Asetek Liquid CPU Cooling System 320GBx4 Perpendicular RAID-0/BLU-RAY/HD-DVD Reader / DVD±R/±RW Writer LG 50" 50PK550 1080p 600Hz Plasma/WestingHouse 37 inch @1920X1080/Windows 7 Pro/64 |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() |
Oh thanks ex_reven but i was pretty way off base hahaha oh wells i tries lol....so your impressed with the seagate 7200.10 too aye....if you guys think its good i might go with...better to hear it from people who have it then to read specs lol
So thats RAID 5 aye, hmmm ok for now i'll run with the 0 until i can afford a 3rd drive ahahaha...so poor....so whats with RAID 5+0?? |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cyprus
Posts: 807 (0.32/day)
Thanks: 27
Thanked 43 Times in 43 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
Nothing is crap. Just boost it and it would be fine [img disabled]http://www.hwbot.org/signatures/u6725.jpg[/img] Also join HwBot. TechPowerUp needs you now!!! Click on thank you if someone helped you |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Blighty
Posts: 1,983 (0.82/day)
Thanks: 96
Thanked 187 Times in 166 Posts
|
cheers dan, however this raid card (xfx revo 64, 3 port) only does raid 0, 1 and 3, i'll be giving it a go (raid 3) once my new drive turns up as i have 3 identical 250g drives, but ones in use atm
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
![]() |
Quote:
![]() Sometimes its the simple things that work best. My onboard does 0, 1, 10 and 5...its pretty damn nifty. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|