![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 5,413 (1.74/day)
Thanks: 78
Thanked 986 Times in 497 Posts
|
ATI RV670 is Radeon HD 3800 Series
According to VR-Zone, the official name for AMD/ATI's RV670 will be Radeon HD 3000 series. Previously codenamed Radeon HD 2950 series, today one of the AIB partners - GeCube has even listed out Radeon HD 3800 on their website. AMD has also decided to drop PRO, XT, GT, XTX from their future HD 3000 series graphics cards. The last 2 digits of the model name will determine the performance of the card. For example RV670PRO will be known as Radeon HD 3850 while RV670XT will be known as Radeon HD 3870 when they are launched on November 15th.
Source: VR-Zone Last edited by malware; Oct 17, 2007 at 07:45 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Eligible for custom title
|
Some marketing people at AMD need to fall on their swords.
RV670 is only a small update. Hardly an order of magnitude difference! The X2950, if anything, was probably overstating it, and better to have X2920. I fondly remember the days of Radeon 7500, 8500, 9700... each time doubling or tripling performance. And all the $millions spent on teaching people about Pro, XT, XTX... all being thrown to the wind for another naming convention! I hope that the new GPU, R7xx or whatever they call it, will go back to a more sensible naming convention, and "reset" the counters. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 461 (0.19/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
|
It would have been a good idea.....years ago. Now lets think about this Ati. You do still have products called the 9600 and 9800 and etc. You really have noobs out there confused because your horrible with your names.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: England
Posts: 5,047 (1.66/day)
Thanks: 134
Thanked 276 Times in 185 Posts
|
Maybe a typo on the GeCube site? It could easily have been supposed to be HD 2800 - which might make more sense considering AMD always used to have 9800, X800 ect, but if the RV670 does perform better then that would be misleading. AMD should really have released the HD 2800s first rather than HD 2900, and released the rest under 2900.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: US
Posts: 2,509 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 189 Times in 156 Posts
|
i like that they dropped those XT, XTX... less confusion for new people
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Your house.
Posts: 2,426 (1.08/day)
Thanks: 401
Thanked 344 Times in 247 Posts
|
That's got to be a typo, right? I mean, it's only a revision...
I hope ATI/AMD aren't that eager to forget the HD 2000 line -- they're not that bad.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The 13th room on the 13th floor of the 13th building.
Posts: 1,427 (0.53/day)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 48 Times in 39 Posts
|
I think they already have forgotten about the 2000 products for the high end at least, mybe they will keep the 2000 for the lower end products.
__________________
XXXI III MCMLXXXII
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Bird of Prey
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gurley, AL
Posts: 9,994 (3.99/day)
Thanks: 3,810
Thanked 557 Times in 521 Posts
|
I think this might let on to say that maybe its not just a revision, but they added changes to it. Only thing I can see for the new naming scheme.
__________________
=-TheEagle-= ![]() http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=62454 “You crazy? Surfing any website without an antivirus is like freaking with a dirty woman without protection” -OzzmanFloyd120 - Edited for content and clarity
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Linux Advocate
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,218 (4.30/day)
Thanks: 1,206
Thanked 2,774 Times in 1,792 Posts
|
if anything the new naming scheme makes it more complicated!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Geneva, FL, USA
Posts: 3,010 (1.43/day)
Thanks: 567
Thanked 606 Times in 487 Posts
|
Very nice!
Death to the suffix! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Overclocking Hell
Posts: 178 (0.08/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
WTF..... I just got 2 HD2900XT.... Now HD3000? DAMM....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() |
Maybe ATI will just skip ahead to the next generation and surprise everyone with a full hd3000 series. hd3900 with 640 stream processors
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Overclocking Hell
Posts: 178 (0.08/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: US
Posts: 2,509 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 189 Times in 156 Posts
|
no, PCI-E2.0 will provide more power to video card = no big need for additional connectors
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Overclocking Hell
Posts: 178 (0.08/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Overclocking Hell
Posts: 178 (0.08/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HTX
Posts: 10,078 (4.69/day)
Thanks: 1,359
Thanked 1,159 Times in 1,035 Posts
|
ya know what too many of you are too harsh on the company for making a major step, Honestly in my opinion the Naming Conventions were getting too f!@#$%^ long for pronunciation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Señor Moderator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.59/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 12,731 (4.75/day)
Thanks: 1,093
Thanked 1,931 Times in 1,435 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: England, UK
Posts: 443 (0.18/day)
Thanks: 18
Thanked 13 Times in 11 Posts
|
Quote:
(to gfx manufactures: )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
TPU addict
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: US\ Uk Born
Posts: 8,785 (4.07/day)
Thanks: 1,669
Thanked 1,345 Times in 1,167 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rocket City, Alabama (Huntsville)
Posts: 1,013 (0.48/day)
Thanks: 91
Thanked 78 Times in 37 Posts
|
If only they would listen to us and actually did create lower power requirements
For Shame Nvidea and for Shame ATI/AMD More power means more connectors which means more space taken up on the graphics card which means less room to innovate. Im not sure but I do hope this is the 3000 series of cards from ATI/AMD since this will give them a head start on Nvidea since Nvidea wont be releasing their new series of cards until early 2008
__________________
“i'd wear tpu panties.” -Random Murderer
“Good to see that you have your issue resolved!!Can I have 700 dollars?” -3991vhtes
Mussels i only pissed on the electric fence after i was told not to - DONT DO THAT.)Musselsif erotic thoughts made me have seizures, i'd stop looking at porn How to clean your toilet: http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=40450 |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Geneva, FL, USA
Posts: 3,010 (1.43/day)
Thanks: 567
Thanked 606 Times in 487 Posts
|
From what I've gathered...
PCIe 2.0 slot = 150w. If a card has a greater demand, then a single 150w 8-pin connector will be present (they want to do away with the 6-pin for simplicity). I guess you can call it the "300w soft cap" - that hasn't changed (6-pin + 8-pin + PCIe = 300w). They're just shifting more of it to the motherboard (PCIe 2.0 + 8-pin = 300w). -edit- And these days we know that isn't true... Last edited by Jizzler; Apr 22, 2010 at 11:11 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 12,731 (4.75/day)
Thanks: 1,093
Thanked 1,931 Times in 1,435 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Tre, Suomi Finland
Posts: 2,696 (0.92/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 437 Times in 335 Posts
|
What's the talk about 300W?
This thing is also PCIe 1.1a compliant so the cards' spec has an absolute max. power consumption of 150W.
__________________
You were not supposed to see this. ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ Suum cuique pulchrum est. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|