techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Oct 17, 2007, 07:35 PM   #1
malware
Eligible for custom title
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 5,413 (1.74/day)
Thanks: 78
Thanked 986 Times in 497 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to malware Send a message via MSN to malware Send a message via Skype™ to malware

System Specs

ATI RV670 is Radeon HD 3800 Series

According to VR-Zone, the official name for AMD/ATI's RV670 will be Radeon HD 3000 series. Previously codenamed Radeon HD 2950 series, today one of the AIB partners - GeCube has even listed out Radeon HD 3800 on their website. AMD has also decided to drop PRO, XT, GT, XTX from their future HD 3000 series graphics cards. The last 2 digits of the model name will determine the performance of the card. For example RV670PRO will be known as Radeon HD 3850 while RV670XT will be known as Radeon HD 3870 when they are launched on November 15th.

Source: VR-Zone

Last edited by malware; Oct 17, 2007 at 07:45 PM.
malware is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 17, 2007, 07:37 PM   #2
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,337 (2.17/day)
Thanks: 749
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

Some marketing people at AMD need to fall on their swords.

RV670 is only a small update. Hardly an order of magnitude difference! The X2950, if anything, was probably overstating it, and better to have X2920.

I fondly remember the days of Radeon 7500, 8500, 9700... each time doubling or tripling performance. And all the $millions spent on teaching people about Pro, XT, XTX... all being thrown to the wind for another naming convention!

I hope that the new GPU, R7xx or whatever they call it, will go back to a more sensible naming convention, and "reset" the counters.
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 17, 2007, 07:40 PM   #3
InfDamarvel
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 461 (0.19/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts

It would have been a good idea.....years ago. Now lets think about this Ati. You do still have products called the 9600 and 9800 and etc. You really have noobs out there confused because your horrible with your names.
InfDamarvel is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 17, 2007, 07:44 PM   #4
Jimmy 2004
Eligible for custom title
 
Jimmy 2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: England
Posts: 5,047 (1.66/day)
Thanks: 134
Thanked 276 Times in 185 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Jimmy 2004

System Specs

Maybe a typo on the GeCube site? It could easily have been supposed to be HD 2800 - which might make more sense considering AMD always used to have 9800, X800 ect, but if the RV670 does perform better then that would be misleading. AMD should really have released the HD 2800s first rather than HD 2900, and released the rest under 2900.
Jimmy 2004 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 17, 2007, 08:01 PM   #5
a111087
2000 Posts
 
a111087's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: US
Posts: 2,509 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 189 Times in 156 Posts

System Specs

i like that they dropped those XT, XTX... less confusion for new people
__________________
a111087 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 17, 2007, 08:03 PM   #6
mdm-adph
2000 Posts
 
mdm-adph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Your house.
Posts: 2,426 (1.08/day)
Thanks: 401
Thanked 344 Times in 247 Posts

System Specs

That's got to be a typo, right? I mean, it's only a revision...

I hope ATI/AMD aren't that eager to forget the HD 2000 line -- they're not that bad.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
mdm-adph is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 17, 2007, 08:47 PM   #7
jocksteeluk
1000 Posts
 
jocksteeluk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The 13th room on the 13th floor of the 13th building.
Posts: 1,427 (0.53/day)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 48 Times in 39 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdm-adph View Post
That's got to be a typo, right? I mean, it's only a revision...

I hope ATI/AMD aren't that eager to forget the HD 2000 line -- they're not that bad.
I think they already have forgotten about the 2000 products for the high end at least, mybe they will keep the 2000 for the lower end products.
__________________
XXXI III MCMLXXXII
jocksteeluk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 17, 2007, 09:09 PM   #8
WarEagleAU
Bird of Prey
 
WarEagleAU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gurley, AL
Posts: 9,994 (3.99/day)
Thanks: 3,810
Thanked 557 Times in 521 Posts
Send a message via AIM to WarEagleAU Send a message via Yahoo to WarEagleAU

System Specs

I think this might let on to say that maybe its not just a revision, but they added changes to it. Only thing I can see for the new naming scheme.
__________________
=-TheEagle-=



http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=62454
“You crazy? Surfing any website without an antivirus is like freaking with a dirty woman without protection” -OzzmanFloyd120
- Edited for content and clarity
WarEagleAU is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 17, 2007, 09:46 PM   #9
Easy Rhino
Linux Advocate
 
Easy Rhino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,218 (4.30/day)
Thanks: 1,206
Thanked 2,774 Times in 1,792 Posts

System Specs

if anything the new naming scheme makes it more complicated!
Easy Rhino is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 17, 2007, 10:23 PM   #10
Jizzler
2000 Posts
 
Jizzler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Geneva, FL, USA
Posts: 3,010 (1.43/day)
Thanks: 567
Thanked 606 Times in 487 Posts

System Specs

Very nice!

Death to the suffix!
Jizzler is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 17, 2007, 11:49 PM   #11
ccleorina
75 Posts
 
ccleorina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Overclocking Hell
Posts: 178 (0.08/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts

System Specs

WTF..... I just got 2 HD2900XT.... Now HD3000? DAMM....
ccleorina is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 18, 2007, 12:15 AM   #12
magibeg
1000 Posts
 
magibeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,367 (0.53/day)
Thanks: 126
Thanked 200 Times in 151 Posts

System Specs

Maybe ATI will just skip ahead to the next generation and surprise everyone with a full hd3000 series. hd3900 with 640 stream processors
__________________
Arguing with the moderators is like shaking your fist at God. There's nobody there; and if there is, he's not listening. And if he's listening, all you're doing is pissing him off
Fold for Tech Power Up!!
magibeg is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 18, 2007, 12:18 AM   #13
ccleorina
75 Posts
 
ccleorina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Overclocking Hell
Posts: 178 (0.08/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by magibeg View Post
Maybe ATI will just skip ahead to the next generation and surprise everyone with a full hd3000 series. hd3900 with 640 stream processors
I hope it with 640 SP + 4X8pin PCI-E Power.....
ccleorina is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 18, 2007, 01:06 AM   #14
a111087
2000 Posts
 
a111087's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: US
Posts: 2,509 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 189 Times in 156 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by ccleorina View Post
I hope it with 640 SP + 4X8pin PCI-E Power.....
no, PCI-E2.0 will provide more power to video card = no big need for additional connectors
__________________
a111087 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 18, 2007, 01:09 AM   #15
ccleorina
75 Posts
 
ccleorina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Overclocking Hell
Posts: 178 (0.08/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by a111087 View Post
no, PCI-E2.0 will provide more power to video card = no big need for additional connectors
Hope so man....... can wait see if HD3K can kick nvidia ass
ccleorina is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 18, 2007, 01:14 AM   #16
ccleorina
75 Posts
 
ccleorina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Overclocking Hell
Posts: 178 (0.08/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by magibeg View Post
Maybe ATI will just skip ahead to the next generation and surprise everyone with a full hd3000 series. hd3900 with 640 stream processors
Why don't make a dual core graphic card?
ccleorina is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 18, 2007, 09:08 AM   #17
eidairaman1
Eligible for custom title
 
eidairaman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: HTX
Posts: 10,078 (4.69/day)
Thanks: 1,359
Thanked 1,159 Times in 1,035 Posts
Send a message via MSN to eidairaman1

System Specs

ya know what too many of you are too harsh on the company for making a major step, Honestly in my opinion the Naming Conventions were getting too f!@#$%^ long for pronunciation.
eidairaman1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 18, 2007, 09:19 AM   #18
DanTheBanjoman
Señor Moderator
 
DanTheBanjoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.59/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to DanTheBanjoman Send a message via MSN to DanTheBanjoman

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by ccleorina View Post
Why don't make a dual core graphic card?
They already exist, in fact, they have for many years. Even 3DFX made them.
DanTheBanjoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 18, 2007, 10:32 AM   #19
Tatty_One
Senior Moderator
 
Tatty_One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 12,731 (4.75/day)
Thanks: 1,093
Thanked 1,931 Times in 1,435 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Tatty_One

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by a111087 View Post
no, PCI-E2.0 will provide more power to video card = no big need for additional connectors
Yep.....but we dont want any more power consumption, we want faster cards with higher speeds using less power and therefore producing less heat.....surely thats one of the main reasons for lowering the fabrication process, if every time you need to raise the power requirements to gain the speed with each generation then IMO that is nt really an advance in technology..........leading to the year 2050, when we all own our very own nuclear powerplant to power up our DX25 grapics cards!
__________________
Tatty_One is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 18, 2007, 02:45 PM   #20
Seany1212
200 Posts
 
Seany1212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: England, UK
Posts: 443 (0.18/day)
Thanks: 18
Thanked 13 Times in 11 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tatty_One View Post
Yep.....but we dont want any more power consumption, we want faster cards with higher speeds using less power and therefore producing less heat.....surely thats one of the main reasons for lowering the fabrication process, if every time you need to raise the power requirements to gain the speed with each generation then IMO that is nt really an advance in technology..........leading to the year 2050, when we all own our very own nuclear powerplant to power up our DX25 grapics cards!
agreed on sooo many levels (to gfx manufactures: )
Seany1212 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 18, 2007, 03:38 PM   #21
AsRock
TPU addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: US\ Uk Born
Posts: 8,785 (4.07/day)
Thanks: 1,669
Thanked 1,345 Times in 1,167 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by ccleorina View Post
I hope it with 640 SP + 4X8pin PCI-E Power.....
AsRock is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 18, 2007, 04:39 PM   #22
effmaster
1000 Posts
 
effmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rocket City, Alabama (Huntsville)
Posts: 1,013 (0.48/day)
Thanks: 91
Thanked 78 Times in 37 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to effmaster

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seany1212 View Post
agreed on sooo many levels (to gfx manufactures: )
If only they would listen to us and actually did create lower power requirements

For Shame Nvidea and for Shame ATI/AMD

More power means more connectors which means more space taken up on the graphics card which means less room to innovate. Im not sure but I do hope this is the 3000 series of cards from ATI/AMD since this will give them a head start on Nvidea since Nvidea wont be releasing their new series of cards until early 2008
__________________
“i'd wear tpu panties.” -Random Murderer
“Good to see that you have your issue resolved!!Can I have 700 dollars?” -3991vhtes
Mussels i only pissed on the electric fence after i was told not to - DONT DO THAT.)
Musselsif erotic thoughts made me have seizures, i'd stop looking at porn
How to clean your toilet: http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=40450
effmaster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 18, 2007, 04:59 PM   #23
Jizzler
2000 Posts
 
Jizzler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Geneva, FL, USA
Posts: 3,010 (1.43/day)
Thanks: 567
Thanked 606 Times in 487 Posts

System Specs

From what I've gathered...

PCIe 2.0 slot = 150w.

If a card has a greater demand, then a single 150w 8-pin connector will be present (they want to do away with the 6-pin for simplicity).

I guess you can call it the "300w soft cap" - that hasn't changed (6-pin + 8-pin + PCIe = 300w). They're just shifting more of it to the motherboard (PCIe 2.0 + 8-pin = 300w).


-edit-

And these days we know that isn't true...

Last edited by Jizzler; Apr 22, 2010 at 11:11 AM.
Jizzler is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 18, 2007, 07:01 PM   #24
Tatty_One
Senior Moderator
 
Tatty_One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 12,731 (4.75/day)
Thanks: 1,093
Thanked 1,931 Times in 1,435 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Tatty_One

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jizzler View Post
From what I've gathered...

PCIe 2.0 slot = 150w.

If a card has a greater demand, then a single 150w 8-pin connector will be present (they want to do away with the 6-pin for simplicity).

I guess you can call it the "300w soft cap" - that hasn't changed (6-pin + 8-pin + PCIe = 300w). They're just shifting more of it to the motherboard (PCIe 2.0 + 8-pin = 300w).
Very true.....but my point is....300W is wwwwwwwaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyy too much!
__________________
Tatty_One is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 18, 2007, 07:34 PM   #25
largon
2000 Posts
 
largon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Tre, Suomi Finland
Posts: 2,696 (0.92/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 437 Times in 335 Posts

System Specs

What's the talk about 300W?

This thing is also PCIe 1.1a compliant so the cards' spec has an absolute max. power consumption of 150W.
__________________
You were not supposed to see this.
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ

Suum cuique pulchrum est.
largon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts