techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > Motherboards & Memory

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Oct 25, 2007, 05:37 PM   #1
Fallap
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Denmark, Scandinavia
Posts: 41 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

4 RAM sticks will make my system slowere?

I was talking with a friend of mine today, about my future build-my-self gaming PC.

I said I was gonna buy 4GB (4x1024)Crucial Ballistix Dual Channel 2048MB PC8500 DDR2 1066MHz Memory (2 x 1024MB) http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=3116812&Sku=C19-6012 (Your welcome to come with better RAM alternatives, as long as theyr found on that side )

He then told me that having 4 sticks would cause my system to run slowere, can anyone in here confirm or disconfirm that statement?

Thanks in advance!

- Philip

Last edited by Fallap; Oct 31, 2007 at 02:59 PM.
Fallap is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 05:39 PM   #2
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,751 (6.48/day)
Thanks: 780
Thanked 5,115 Times in 3,706 Posts

System Specs

It depends on the rest of your system, but yes sometimes having 4 sticks can cause the timings to be slower, and can hurt performance of the system vs. using 2 sticks.
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to newtekie1 For This Useful Post:
Old Oct 25, 2007, 05:42 PM   #3
freeboy
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 576 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 38
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts

System Specs

It does depend on the application, for instance are you doing Cad or vid rendering? Gaming Vista..?
For a new vista system used for gaming, that may be a tossup, get a testing freeware and see by adding two chips and doing side by side tests.. For xp gaming rigs commen thought and experince is two gigs are enough and four slows down performance. Is it all about software? No, but the apps that need big memory definately do recieve a benifit to their speed using more ram, rendering, cad etc.

What operating sys and application?
freeboy is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freeboy For This Useful Post:
Old Oct 25, 2007, 05:42 PM   #4
Fallap
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Denmark, Scandinavia
Posts: 41 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

Im gonna have:

Intel Duo E6850 3 GHZ
XFX 8800 GTX
Samsung Spinpoint T166

And Im gonna play on Vista
------------------------------------

Will it go slower then?
Fallap is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 05:45 PM   #5
freeboy
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 576 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 38
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts

System Specs

what are you using it for? games? vista needs alot of memory, so it would be an easy check, first test at 2 giog and then at four.
freeboy is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freeboy For This Useful Post:
Old Oct 25, 2007, 06:04 PM   #6
Fallap
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Denmark, Scandinavia
Posts: 41 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

Games, games and yet more games
Fallap is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 06:20 PM   #7
freeboy
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 576 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 38
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts

System Specs

tests.. try ati tool, on my sys runnig this gives me a real time frames per second in the corner.. it may work with your video card.. free from this sight too!/ test at two and at four.. or simply use a benchmarking program, also free...
freeboy is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freeboy For This Useful Post:
Old Oct 25, 2007, 06:21 PM   #8
Fallap
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Denmark, Scandinavia
Posts: 41 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

Okay¨, thanks for reply
Fallap is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 06:25 PM   #9
freeboy
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 576 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 38
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts

System Specs

no problem, feel free to ask any ? these really are the best boards!
freeboy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 06:26 PM   #10
Fallap
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Denmark, Scandinavia
Posts: 41 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

I also forgot to add the mainboard il be uptaining:

Gigabyte GA-X38-DQ6, X38, Socket-775, ATX, Silent Pipe, DDR2, 2xPCI-Ex(2.0)x16
Fallap is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 06:35 PM   #11
AsRock
TPU addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: US\ Uk Born
Posts: 8,794 (4.07/day)
Thanks: 1,675
Thanked 1,348 Times in 1,170 Posts

System Specs

You wont get to use 4GIG if your using a 32bit OS. Not sure if you considered it or not with 4GIG you be better of with 64bit OS.
AsRock is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AsRock For This Useful Post:
Old Oct 25, 2007, 06:37 PM   #12
Fallap
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Denmark, Scandinavia
Posts: 41 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

So if I want 4GB of RAM, I need to get a 64bit Vista?
Fallap is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 25, 2007, 06:37 PM   #13
Darknova
3500 Posts
 
Darknova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manchester, United Kingdom
Posts: 4,342 (1.82/day)
Thanks: 113
Thanked 551 Times in 514 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Darknova

System Specs

It may do, but not enough to make a noticeable difference (except in benchmarks) over the increased memory available.

Just do it.
Darknova is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Darknova For This Useful Post:
Old Oct 25, 2007, 06:38 PM   #14
freeboy
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 576 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 38
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts

System Specs

even in vista? glad you said that , Ithought you could always use 4 gig in 32 or 64 bit vista, only over 4 to 8 in vista 64 bit.. very interesting thanks
freeboy is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freeboy For This Useful Post:
Old Oct 25, 2007, 06:40 PM   #15
Darknova
3500 Posts
 
Darknova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manchester, United Kingdom
Posts: 4,342 (1.82/day)
Thanks: 113
Thanked 551 Times in 514 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Darknova

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by freeboy View Post
even in vista? glad you said that , Ithought you could always use 4 gig in 32 or 64 bit vista, only over 4 to 8 in vista 64 bit.. very interesting thanks
In a 32-bit OS the maximum register size if 4Gb, but all your add-on cards (Graphics included) take up space in that register. So you only get ACCESS to about 3.25-3.5Gb of your RAM.

In 64-bit you get access to all of it, and a theoretical maximum of 128Gb
Darknova is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Darknova For This Useful Post:
Old Oct 25, 2007, 06:41 PM   #16
Fallap
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Denmark, Scandinavia
Posts: 41 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

Okay, il buy 4GB and try my way forward (as we say in Denmark lol )

Im first gonna buy it after my birthday (29 november) But im the very impatient type
Fallap is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 26, 2007, 12:17 AM   #17
EviloneX
 
EviloneX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Guaynabo PR
Posts: 1 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

System Specs

Well it can have a negative effect on your command rate . Usually you use 1T with 2 sticks of ram and 2T with 4 sticks, i generally found the bandwidth difference to be around 800MB\s+ between 1T and 2T command rates. Use Progs like Everest to see if theres really much of a difference.
__________________
"There are far too manypeople and few human beings in this world" - Masami Obari
"Bah weep granah weep ninni bong" - Kup
EviloneX is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 26, 2007, 06:23 AM   #18
Darknova
3500 Posts
 
Darknova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manchester, United Kingdom
Posts: 4,342 (1.82/day)
Thanks: 113
Thanked 551 Times in 514 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Darknova

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by EviloneX View Post
Well it can have a negative effect on your command rate . Usually you use 1T with 2 sticks of ram and 2T with 4 sticks, i generally found the bandwidth difference to be around 800MB\s+ between 1T and 2T command rates. Use Progs like Everest to see if theres really much of a difference.
The command rate doesn't have that much of an effect on DDR2. If you mean DDR then yes I would agree with you.
Darknova is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 26, 2007, 06:52 AM   #19
VulkanBros
1000 Posts
 
VulkanBros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: At the Pico Mundo grille
Posts: 1,088 (0.36/day)
Thanks: 249
Thanked 206 Times in 147 Posts

System Specs

.....hmmm I have a ASUS CROSSHAIR ROG mobo with 4 x 1 GB af mem
(Corsair XMS2 Xtreme Performance TwinX Matched 2 GB ( 2 x 1024 MB ) DDR II − 800 MHz / PC2−6400C4 − CL4 − 2.1 V) ( se my system specs. )

The BIOS tells me I have 4096 MB memory - but Windows ( Vista Ultimate 32 bit DK )
is only reporting 3,5 GB memory....anyone knows why ??

And yes...I did a test like freeboy suggested....the system is a slight faster with only 2 GIG...
I dont understand that...is there a reasonable explanation for that behavior ???

Last edited by VulkanBros; Oct 26, 2007 at 07:04 AM.
VulkanBros is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 26, 2007, 07:05 AM   #20
Darknova
3500 Posts
 
Darknova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manchester, United Kingdom
Posts: 4,342 (1.82/day)
Thanks: 113
Thanked 551 Times in 514 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Darknova

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by VulkanBros View Post
.....hmmm I have a ASUS CROSSHAIR ROG mobo with 4 x 1 GB af mem
(Corsair XMS2 Xtreme Performance TwinX Matched 2 GB ( 2 x 1024 MB ) DDR II − 800 MHz / PC2−6400C4 − CL4 − 2.1 V) ( se my system specs. )

The BIOS tells me I have 4096 MB memory - but Windows ( Vista Ultimate 32 bit DK )
is only reporting 3,5 GB memory....anyone knows why ??

And yes...I did a test like freeboy suggested....the system is a slight faster with only 2 GIG...
I dont understand that...is there a reasonable explanation for that behavior ???
That's been explained earlier in the thread mate
Darknova is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 26, 2007, 07:21 AM   #21
VulkanBros
1000 Posts
 
VulkanBros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: At the Pico Mundo grille
Posts: 1,088 (0.36/day)
Thanks: 249
Thanked 206 Times in 147 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darknova View Post
That's been explained earlier in the thread mate
okay...fair enough....


BECAUSE IE SUCKS
VulkanBros is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts