![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Crazy 4 TPU!!!
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,437 (2.97/day)
Thanks: 3,511
Thanked 1,285 Times in 937 Posts
|
Can a PCI-E 2.0 card work on a regular PCI-E slot?
Can it?
__________________
Currently playing: Team Fortress 2 (PC) ![]() "And remember if you didn't build it yourself, it's not really yours." |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,316 (1.34/day)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 166 Times in 89 Posts
|
yes
__________________
bellybuttons are great holes, their single purpose is to suck up pinkys
-DanTheBanjoman |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() |
Could someone post a few graphics cards that use the 2.0 spec?
Ive been falling behind with my hardware of late lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Sold my stars!
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,650 (3.07/day)
Thanks: 339
Thanked 1,227 Times in 1,036 Posts
|
i think the r670 is a pci 2.0 card, correct me if im wrong.
__________________
![]() Need any Graphics Made? Visit Graphic Artists United! R.I.P Megan--Heaven has a new angel |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wonderful Ohio
Posts: 781 (0.30/day)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 19 Times in 15 Posts
|
8800gt
__________________
"If human beings don't keep exercising their lips, their brains might start working." |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.Ireland
Posts: 2,363 (0.97/day)
Thanks: 145
Thanked 277 Times in 257 Posts
|
Pci-e has been designed to be totally backwards compatible( I think)
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() |
pci-e is totally back wards compatiable its bacically an increase in the current 2.5ghz bandwidth of pci but the current selection of cards including the ultras and 2900xtx dont even saturate the entire bandwidth of pci-e 1 so dont feel you have to go out and get a new mobo just for your new 8800gt cause it wont sautrate your 1.0 bandwidth and i think the rv670 will be the first pci-e2.0 and dx10.1 compatiable card if it beats the 9800 which as of now its way ahead of it
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Canadian Rockies
Posts: 32 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
Yes, but there's reported early issues with some PCIe 1.0 spec setups, especially those that are PEG slots running at 4X etc, nut for a standard 16X slot the issue should be minimal as they are designed to be very bckwards compatbile by spec.
Quote:
Also the R600 and other RV6xx cards have been shown to run on PCIe 2.0 boards, and at the very least benefit fromt the additional power if not the improved signalling. The R600 showed it before launch running on an early PCIe2.0 board with the need of only 1 of the two power connectors (the other 75W coming fromt the PCIe2.0 slot).
__________________
You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp (or internet account) ! REDGREEN
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to GrapeApe For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#10 |
|
Crazy 4 TPU!!!
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,437 (2.97/day)
Thanks: 3,511
Thanked 1,285 Times in 937 Posts
|
Thanks everyone.
__________________
Currently playing: Team Fortress 2 (PC) ![]() "And remember if you didn't build it yourself, it's not really yours." |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wonderful Ohio
Posts: 781 (0.30/day)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 19 Times in 15 Posts
|
is there any benchmarks on the performance difference between regular and 2.0 yet?
__________________
"If human beings don't keep exercising their lips, their brains might start working." |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() |
no because there should be no current peformance difference until the 9800s are out which might actually use more of the avaliable bandwidth currently an 8800 uses only about 60-70% of the avaliable bandwidth so until the new gen cards with gpu that can use i doubt you will see any reviews on the performance differences
and i hear that pci-e is as future proof as you can get in the computer industry ie (agp will be the standard format for decades to come 3dfx said well that never really happened lol) can someone back that up but the rumor is there already working on a faster 3.0 and that its basically unlimited the future bandwiths |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() |
no those issuse are not hardware related its nvidias incompetence to release a good working drivers when the 7800 gx2 and 7950gx2 game out the two 7900gtx could beat the quad sli of the other two because of drivers . nvidia has not perfected there teq so instead they just add more cards hence tripple sli the pci-e 2 just increase the bandwith and in turn increaseing the watts its doesnt affect nvidias own chipset and driver incompetence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Severn, MD, USA.
Posts: 2,949 (1.26/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 189 Times in 185 Posts
|
Maybe, but that's more due to the fact that running multiple cards creates a large overhead. Because think about it, if you have one card rendering one frame and the other rendering the next, then you have to have something put them together send all to the same place and out put the images in different orders. I don't think they're running out of bandwidth.....yet.
__________________
Power User Teenager Club Laptop Overclocking club Thanks button....hit it if someone helped you, not a difficult concept really. [img disabled]http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?t=1&uid=8351&iehack=.jpg[/img] |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Canadian Rockies
Posts: 32 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
The main areas this should help near term are HyperMemory/TurboCache cards , those that use VirtualizedMemory (need WDDM support first though through DX10.1), and workstation cards which use large chunks of system and VRAM.
For most gaming situations you shouldn't see massive improvement in the current round of top gaming card because they're not as restricted by bus speed because the swaps don't happen as much as the information spend in the VRAM and in the VPU itself. You might see a jump in the GTS-320 in some situations where it runs out of VRAM, but even then the improvement will be limited. However you won't know until they're properly tested, while bandwidth doesn't seem to be an issue, improved latency could help alot of areas and we could se a small jump across the board, especially in min fps and texxture swaps. Heck, no one thought we used more than 8X bandwidth until they tested it and noticed that ther are a few occasions where it does make a difference. So since we couldn't test beyond the 8x->16X boost who knows, eh?
__________________
You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp (or internet account) ! REDGREEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() |
PCIe 2.0 video card such as 8800GT or RV670XT (3870) is only compatible with motherboards with PCIe 1.1, 1.0a not supported.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
![]() |
Quote:
Please share with us the reason you claim they are not compatable with 1.0a. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | ||
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 1,170 (0.45/day)
Thanks: 73
Thanked 168 Times in 144 Posts
|
Quite a few threads on XS mention that PCI-E 1.1 is required.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Fishfaced Nincompoop
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 8,051 (3.02/day)
Thanks: 1,100
Thanked 1,500 Times in 1,193 Posts
|
How can one tell which PCIe one has? I assume my motherboard has PCIe 1.1, but it would be nice to know.
__________________
"The 'gentle biker' look is overdone. I'm going for 'psycho hillbilly.' " |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() |
yeah, thats another example.
Last edited by hugz; Nov 1, 2007 at 05:52 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | ||
![]() |
Quote:
nForce4 PCIe 1.0a MCP67 PCIe 1.1 MCP61 1.0a RD580 PCIe 1.0a RS600 PCIe 1.0a RS690 PCIe 1.0a P35/P31/Q33/Q35/G35/G31 1.1 P965 and X975 1.0a yet another example: Quote:
Last edited by hugz; Nov 1, 2007 at 05:53 PM. |
||
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to hugz For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#24 |
![]() |
Finnally, someone who does back up their posts with information. I am curious what motherboards have this issue, is it all older motherboards, or just ones with a older xfire/sli chipset.
I want to know why they are not compatable. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Fishfaced Nincompoop
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 8,051 (3.02/day)
Thanks: 1,100
Thanked 1,500 Times in 1,193 Posts
|
I wasn't concerned about my motherboard having PCIe 1.0a.
![]() What I am concerned about is this: RD580 PCIe 1.0a RS600 PCIe 1.0a RS690 PCIe 1.0a P965 PCIe 1.0a That means a lot of people with kickass motherboards (say a good p965-board) cannot upgrade their graphic cards.. And that's a real shame IMO.
__________________
"The 'gentle biker' look is overdone. I'm going for 'psycho hillbilly.' " |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|