techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > Graphics Cards

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Oct 31, 2007, 01:01 AM   #1
CDdude55
Crazy 4 TPU!!!
 
CDdude55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,437 (2.97/day)
Thanks: 3,511
Thanked 1,285 Times in 937 Posts

System Specs

Can a PCI-E 2.0 card work on a regular PCI-E slot?

Can it?
__________________
Currently playing: Team Fortress 2 (PC)

"And remember if you didn't build it yourself, it's not really yours."
CDdude55 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2007, 01:02 AM   #2
wazzledoozle
3500 Posts
 
wazzledoozle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,316 (1.34/day)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 166 Times in 89 Posts
Send a message via AIM to wazzledoozle Send a message via MSN to wazzledoozle

System Specs

yes
__________________
bellybuttons are great holes, their single purpose is to suck up pinkys
-DanTheBanjoman
wazzledoozle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2007, 01:05 AM   #3
ex_reven
2000 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,413 (1.38/day)
Thanks: 117
Thanked 181 Times in 166 Posts

System Specs

Could someone post a few graphics cards that use the 2.0 spec?
Ive been falling behind with my hardware of late lol.
ex_reven is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2007, 01:06 AM   #4
panchoman
Sold my stars!
 
panchoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,650 (3.07/day)
Thanks: 339
Thanked 1,227 Times in 1,036 Posts

System Specs

i think the r670 is a pci 2.0 card, correct me if im wrong.
__________________


Need any Graphics Made? Visit Graphic Artists United!
R.I.P Megan--Heaven has a new angel
panchoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2007, 01:08 AM   #5
Protius
500 Posts
 
Protius's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wonderful Ohio
Posts: 781 (0.30/day)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 19 Times in 15 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Protius

System Specs

8800gt
__________________
"If human beings don't keep exercising their lips, their brains might start working."
Protius is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2007, 01:10 AM   #6
francis511
2000 Posts
 
francis511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.Ireland
Posts: 2,363 (0.97/day)
Thanks: 145
Thanked 277 Times in 257 Posts

System Specs

Pci-e has been designed to be totally backwards compatible( I think)
__________________
francis511 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2007, 01:12 AM   #7
ex_reven
2000 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,413 (1.38/day)
Thanks: 117
Thanked 181 Times in 166 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by francis511 View Post
Pci-e has been designed to be totally backwards compatible( I think)
Yeah I think so to. Just like USB.
ex_reven is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2007, 01:18 AM   #8
patton45
75 Posts
 
patton45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 160 (0.07/day)
Thanks: 24
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts

System Specs

pci-e is totally back wards compatiable its bacically an increase in the current 2.5ghz bandwidth of pci but the current selection of cards including the ultras and 2900xtx dont even saturate the entire bandwidth of pci-e 1 so dont feel you have to go out and get a new mobo just for your new 8800gt cause it wont sautrate your 1.0 bandwidth and i think the rv670 will be the first pci-e2.0 and dx10.1 compatiable card if it beats the 9800 which as of now its way ahead of it
patton45 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2007, 01:24 AM   #9
GrapeApe
25 Posts
 
GrapeApe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Canadian Rockies
Posts: 32 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by CDdude55 View Post
Can it?
Yes, but there's reported early issues with some PCIe 1.0 spec setups, especially those that are PEG slots running at 4X etc, nut for a standard 16X slot the issue should be minimal as they are designed to be very bckwards compatbile by spec.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ex_reven
Could someone post a few graphics cards that use the 2.0 spec?
G92 and RV670 cards.

Also the R600 and other RV6xx cards have been shown to run on PCIe 2.0 boards, and at the very least benefit fromt the additional power if not the improved signalling.

The R600 showed it before launch running on an early PCIe2.0 board with the need of only 1 of the two power connectors (the other 75W coming fromt the PCIe2.0 slot).
__________________
You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp (or internet account) ! REDGREEN
GrapeApe is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GrapeApe For This Useful Post:
Old Oct 31, 2007, 01:37 AM   #10
CDdude55
Crazy 4 TPU!!!
 
CDdude55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,437 (2.97/day)
Thanks: 3,511
Thanked 1,285 Times in 937 Posts

System Specs

Thanks everyone.
__________________
Currently playing: Team Fortress 2 (PC)

"And remember if you didn't build it yourself, it's not really yours."
CDdude55 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2007, 01:44 AM   #11
Protius
500 Posts
 
Protius's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wonderful Ohio
Posts: 781 (0.30/day)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 19 Times in 15 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Protius

System Specs

is there any benchmarks on the performance difference between regular and 2.0 yet?
__________________
"If human beings don't keep exercising their lips, their brains might start working."
Protius is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2007, 01:58 AM   #12
patton45
75 Posts
 
patton45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 160 (0.07/day)
Thanks: 24
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts

System Specs

no because there should be no current peformance difference until the 9800s are out which might actually use more of the avaliable bandwidth currently an 8800 uses only about 60-70% of the avaliable bandwidth so until the new gen cards with gpu that can use i doubt you will see any reviews on the performance differences

and i hear that pci-e is as future proof as you can get in the computer industry ie (agp will be the standard format for decades to come 3dfx said well that never really happened lol) can someone back that up but the rumor is there already working on a faster 3.0 and that its basically unlimited the future bandwiths
patton45 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2007, 02:09 AM   #13
ex_reven
2000 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,413 (1.38/day)
Thanks: 117
Thanked 181 Times in 166 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by patton45 View Post
no because there should be no current peformance difference until the 9800s are out which might actually use more of the avaliable bandwidth currently an 8800 uses only about 60-70% of the avaliable bandwidth so until the new gen cards with gpu that can use i doubt you will see any reviews on the performance differences
They say that like 40-60% of performance of two cards is lost in SLI though. Will PCIE help that? Or is it unrelated?
ex_reven is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2007, 02:27 AM   #14
patton45
75 Posts
 
patton45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 160 (0.07/day)
Thanks: 24
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts

System Specs

no those issuse are not hardware related its nvidias incompetence to release a good working drivers when the 7800 gx2 and 7950gx2 game out the two 7900gtx could beat the quad sli of the other two because of drivers . nvidia has not perfected there teq so instead they just add more cards hence tripple sli the pci-e 2 just increase the bandwith and in turn increaseing the watts its doesnt affect nvidias own chipset and driver incompetence.
patton45 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2007, 02:34 AM   #15
kwchang007
2000 Posts
 
kwchang007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Severn, MD, USA.
Posts: 2,949 (1.26/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 189 Times in 185 Posts
Send a message via AIM to kwchang007

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by ex_reven View Post
They say that like 40-60% of performance of two cards is lost in SLI though. Will PCIE help that? Or is it unrelated?
Maybe, but that's more due to the fact that running multiple cards creates a large overhead. Because think about it, if you have one card rendering one frame and the other rendering the next, then you have to have something put them together send all to the same place and out put the images in different orders. I don't think they're running out of bandwidth.....yet.
__________________
Power User
Teenager Club
Laptop Overclocking club


Thanks button....hit it if someone helped you, not a difficult concept really.

[img disabled]http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?t=1&uid=8351&iehack=.jpg[/img]
kwchang007 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2007, 03:51 AM   #16
GrapeApe
25 Posts
 
GrapeApe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Canadian Rockies
Posts: 32 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

System Specs

The main areas this should help near term are HyperMemory/TurboCache cards , those that use VirtualizedMemory (need WDDM support first though through DX10.1), and workstation cards which use large chunks of system and VRAM.
For most gaming situations you shouldn't see massive improvement in the current round of top gaming card because they're not as restricted by bus speed because the swaps don't happen as much as the information spend in the VRAM and in the VPU itself.

You might see a jump in the GTS-320 in some situations where it runs out of VRAM, but even then the improvement will be limited.

However you won't know until they're properly tested, while bandwidth doesn't seem to be an issue, improved latency could help alot of areas and we could se a small jump across the board, especially in min fps and texxture swaps. Heck, no one thought we used more than 8X bandwidth until they tested it and noticed that ther are a few occasions where it does make a difference. So since we couldn't test beyond the 8x->16X boost who knows, eh?
__________________
You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp (or internet account) ! REDGREEN
GrapeApe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 1, 2007, 05:18 PM   #17
hugz
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 134 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts

System Specs

PCIe 2.0 video card such as 8800GT or RV670XT (3870) is only compatible with motherboards with PCIe 1.1, 1.0a not supported.
hugz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 1, 2007, 05:22 PM   #18
KennyT772
2000 Posts
 
KennyT772's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,933 (1.07/day)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 103 Times in 98 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by hugz View Post
PCIe 2.0 video card such as 8800GT or RV670XT (3870) is only compatible with motherboards with PCIe 1.1, 1.0a not supported.
According to what? PCI-E v2 is fully backwards compatable. The two changes are signaling frequency 100mhz to 200mhz, and the specifications for the 8pin power plug.

Please share with us the reason you claim they are not compatable with 1.0a.
__________________
Xfire Heatware
KennyT772 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 1, 2007, 05:24 PM   #19
hugz
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 134 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by KennyT772 View Post
According to what? PCI-E v2 is fully backwards compatable. The two changes are signaling frequency 100mhz to 200mhz, and the specifications for the 8pin power plug.

Please share with us the reason you claim they are not compatable with 1.0a.
http://support.asus.com/faq/faq.aspx...Language=en-us

Quote:
As PCI express 1.0/1.0a standard is not compatible with PCI express 2.0 specification, installing PCI express 2.0 cards onto PCIEX16_2 slot will result in system fail to detect expension cards installed on both PCIEX16_1 and PCIEX16_2 slot.
hugz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 1, 2007, 05:24 PM   #20
ghost101
1000 Posts
 
ghost101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 1,170 (0.45/day)
Thanks: 73
Thanked 168 Times in 144 Posts

System Specs

Quite a few threads on XS mention that PCI-E 1.1 is required.
ghost101 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 1, 2007, 05:28 PM   #21
Frick
Fishfaced Nincompoop
 
Frick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 8,051 (3.02/day)
Thanks: 1,100
Thanked 1,500 Times in 1,193 Posts

System Specs

How can one tell which PCIe one has? I assume my motherboard has PCIe 1.1, but it would be nice to know.
__________________
"The 'gentle biker' look is overdone. I'm going for 'psycho hillbilly.' "
Frick is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 1, 2007, 05:29 PM   #22
hugz
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 134 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by ghost101 View Post
Quite a few threads on XS mention that PCI-E 1.1 is required.
yeah, thats another example.

Last edited by hugz; Nov 1, 2007 at 05:52 PM.
hugz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 1, 2007, 05:30 PM   #23
hugz
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 134 (0.06/day)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frick View Post
How can one tell which PCIe one has? I assume my motherboard has PCIe 1.1, but it would be nice to know.
As far as I know all P35 chipsets got 1.1, 680i got it too

nForce4 PCIe 1.0a
MCP67 PCIe 1.1
MCP61 1.0a
RD580 PCIe 1.0a
RS600 PCIe 1.0a
RS690 PCIe 1.0a
P35/P31/Q33/Q35/G35/G31 1.1
P965 and X975 1.0a

yet another example:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fudzilla.com
PCI Express 1.0/1.0a not compatible with 2.0 spec.
With Asus latests P35 gaming boards, the Blitz Extreme and Blitz Formula, which are using an IDT chip to give you two x8 PCI Express slots instead of the normal x16 and x4 configuration of the P35 chipset, a problem has occured on the Asus FAQ.

It seems that the second slot is PCI Express 1.0/1.0a only and according to Asus, this older PCI Express standard isn't compatible with PCI Express 2.0.

The primary slot is PCI Express 1.1 and it doesn't have this problem as this version of PCI Express is compatible with the upcoming 2.0 standard.

So what's the significance of this? Well, it means that you won't be able to use newer PCI Express 2.0 cards with several motherboard, not just these ones, as if your board has a 1.0 or 1.0a PCI Express slot, a PCI Express 2.0 card won't work in those slots.

So much for the new standard being backwards compatible...
Your motherboard has got the 1.1 pcie

Last edited by hugz; Nov 1, 2007 at 05:53 PM.
hugz is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to hugz For This Useful Post:
Old Nov 1, 2007, 07:47 PM   #24
KennyT772
2000 Posts
 
KennyT772's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,933 (1.07/day)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 103 Times in 98 Posts

System Specs

Finnally, someone who does back up their posts with information. I am curious what motherboards have this issue, is it all older motherboards, or just ones with a older xfire/sli chipset.

I want to know why they are not compatable.
__________________
Xfire Heatware
KennyT772 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 1, 2007, 08:42 PM   #25
Frick
Fishfaced Nincompoop
 
Frick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 8,051 (3.02/day)
Thanks: 1,100
Thanked 1,500 Times in 1,193 Posts

System Specs

I wasn't concerned about my motherboard having PCIe 1.0a.

What I am concerned about is this:

RD580 PCIe 1.0a
RS600 PCIe 1.0a
RS690 PCIe 1.0a
P965 PCIe 1.0a

That means a lot of people with kickass motherboards (say a good p965-board) cannot upgrade their graphic cards.. And that's a real shame IMO.
__________________
"The 'gentle biker' look is overdone. I'm going for 'psycho hillbilly.' "
Frick is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts