techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Nov 21, 2007, 10:26 PM   #1
zekrahminator
McLovin
 
zekrahminator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: My house.
Posts: 6,280 (2.35/day)
Thanks: 105
Thanked 340 Times in 246 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to zekrahminator Send a message via AIM to zekrahminator Send a message via MSN to zekrahminator

System Specs

AMD: 'Why Don’t We Buy Ageia?'

When Intel announced plans to buy out Havok back in September, AMD began talking to Havok themselves to try and get the physics company in their hands. Talks faltered when Intel offered Havok $100 Million USD, and Intel acquired Havok and a lot of Intellectual Property. Not one to be left in the dust, AMD is currently in talks with Ageia. If Ageia offers AMD a reasonable price, they will be more than happy to acquire it. After all, according to AMD's head of developer relations, "I would say that they [Ageia] would probably grind themselves out of business in a year or so, but now they have an opportunity to sell themselves for a lot of money instead". If AMD does end up acquiring Ageia, they will get quite a lot of Intellectual Property, a new market segment, and an advantage for AMD developers. If talks falter, though, Ageia would more likely than not receive offers from the likes of NVIDIA, Sony, and several other hardware/software developers.

Source: CustomPC
zekrahminator is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2007, 10:27 PM   #2
freaksavior
To infinity ... and beyond!
 
freaksavior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: H-Town Texas
Posts: 6,780 (2.88/day)
Thanks: 1,031
Thanked 852 Times in 581 Posts
Send a message via AIM to freaksavior Send a message via MSN to freaksavior Send a message via Yahoo to freaksavior

System Specs

by by amd.....

Since AMD bought ATI it almost killed them, so if they buy ageia, i wouldn't be surprised if they go bankrupt
freaksavior is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2007, 10:28 PM   #3
panchoman
Sold my stars!
 
panchoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,650 (3.11/day)
Thanks: 339
Thanked 1,227 Times in 1,036 Posts

System Specs

they're right about ageia, physx didn't really take off, and it'd be better off becoming part of the spider platform, etc. etc.
__________________


Need any Graphics Made? Visit Graphic Artists United!
R.I.P Megan--Heaven has a new angel
panchoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2007, 10:32 PM   #4
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
 
cdawall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,025 (6.42/day)
Thanks: 457
Thanked 2,755 Times in 2,224 Posts
Send a message via AIM to cdawall Send a message via Yahoo to cdawall Send a message via Skype™ to cdawall

System Specs

it would be really cool if they bought them and integrated the card into there mobos that would sell very well since it well came with the mobo
__________________
cdawall is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2007, 10:40 PM   #5
X-TeNDeR
75 Posts
 
X-TeNDeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sharpening The Underdog's Teeth
Posts: 110 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to X-TeNDeR

System Specs

I'm not exactly in-the-know where it comes to Ageia's products and technology, but i think that AMD guy is right. they don't have too many options in the visible future.
I'm not sure about the need for PPU, but i guess AMD could turn it into a more viable solution, if they manage to buy them.
X-TeNDeR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2007, 10:47 PM   #6
insider
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

The Physx chip is nothing special in comparison to what nVidia/ATI has, the software and driver that handles it ain't half bad though, perhaps it's more the software patents they are interested in, either way sell up or face being bust in under 12 months for Ageia.
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2007, 10:49 PM   #7
panchoman
Sold my stars!
 
panchoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,650 (3.11/day)
Thanks: 339
Thanked 1,227 Times in 1,036 Posts

System Specs

i think ati might be implementing physx right onto their cards, and having the concept of physx would be good really good for CFX hybrid, where good physx processing elements would be a good thing
__________________


Need any Graphics Made? Visit Graphic Artists United!
R.I.P Megan--Heaven has a new angel
panchoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2007, 10:58 PM   #8
insider
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

You might be right, since Intel has bought Havoc with their software physics engine is pretty much industry standard for games developers now, software physics is always going to be faster on Intel chips now since they optimize the Havoc engine in favour of Intel chips, AMD can't really do much about that.
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2007, 11:02 PM   #9
JacKz5o
200 Posts
 
JacKz5o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 456 (0.20/day)
Thanks: 49
Thanked 100 Times in 38 Posts
Send a message via AIM to JacKz5o

System Specs

Maybe AMD will take Ageia's physics technology and integrate it directly into its CPU or GPUs?
JacKz5o is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2007, 11:14 PM   #10
PVTCaboose1337
Graphical Hacker
 
PVTCaboose1337's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 7,478 (2.80/day)
Thanks: 798
Thanked 1,174 Times in 834 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by JacKz5o View Post
Maybe AMD will take Ageia's physics technology and integrate it directly into its CPU or GPUs?
That would be cool!
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
PVTCaboose1337 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2007, 11:29 PM   #11
Ketxxx
Eligible for custom title
 
Ketxxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kingdom of gods
Posts: 6,380 (2.42/day)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 580 Times in 412 Posts

System Specs

Integrating Physics operations into a mobo chipset whould be my hazard guess for AMD considering this. Putting it into a graphics chip is far too predictable, and seems more viable integrating into a mobo. That way even if you dont have a geat graphics card, the physics processing is still there to help. In all honesty though, unless AMD are planning a paid installments plan, buying Ageia will bankrupt them, their bleeding cash at a disturbing rate already.
__________________
WARNING: I am cracking down on stupidity in the forums. Anyone caught making a dumb statement clearly not knowing many, if any of the facts, will promptly be directed to xtremesystems.

Sig edited. If anyone wants to know about the E4400 (E7200 sold) drop me a PM
Ketxxx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2007, 11:33 PM   #12
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,337 (2.17/day)
Thanks: 749
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

AMD will probably buy Ageia... as a integration cover-up for their overpriced acquisition, and poor management, of ATI take-over.
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2007, 11:48 PM   #13
freaksavior
To infinity ... and beyond!
 
freaksavior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: H-Town Texas
Posts: 6,780 (2.88/day)
Thanks: 1,031
Thanked 852 Times in 581 Posts
Send a message via AIM to freaksavior Send a message via MSN to freaksavior Send a message via Yahoo to freaksavior

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by freaksavior View Post
by by amd.....

Since AMD bought ATI it almost killed them, so if they buy ageia, i wouldn't be surprised if they go bankrupt
............^............
freaksavior is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 21, 2007, 11:50 PM   #14
Ketxxx
Eligible for custom title
 
Ketxxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kingdom of gods
Posts: 6,380 (2.42/day)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 580 Times in 412 Posts

System Specs

Bit of speculation, what if (yes its a "what if...") AMD has been working with Ageia behind closed doors on something and that something is almost ready to go, but AMD want to buy them for future development under the AMD name. IMO IF this is the case, its very clever, leaves everybody thinking wtf, while giving absolutely zero heads up to the competition.
__________________
WARNING: I am cracking down on stupidity in the forums. Anyone caught making a dumb statement clearly not knowing many, if any of the facts, will promptly be directed to xtremesystems.

Sig edited. If anyone wants to know about the E4400 (E7200 sold) drop me a PM
Ketxxx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2007, 12:23 AM   #15
WarEagleAU
Bird of Prey
 
WarEagleAU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gurley, AL
Posts: 9,994 (3.98/day)
Thanks: 3,810
Thanked 557 Times in 521 Posts
Send a message via AIM to WarEagleAU Send a message via Yahoo to WarEagleAU

System Specs

Agreed Ketxxx. Not to mention, this could be a nice ace in the hole for AMD. Granted, they probably wont have to pay as much as intel did, but the software, patents and integration into the spider platform could potentially pay off huge dividends.
__________________
=-TheEagle-=



http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=62454
“You crazy? Surfing any website without an antivirus is like freaking with a dirty woman without protection” -OzzmanFloyd120
- Edited for content and clarity
WarEagleAU is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2007, 12:38 AM   #16
Ketxxx
Eligible for custom title
 
Ketxxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kingdom of gods
Posts: 6,380 (2.42/day)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 580 Times in 412 Posts

System Specs

Also, combine that with running a Phenom with an FSB of 333MHz or faster, suddenly seems quite tasty eh? I bet a Phenom with an FSB to match a C2D at a comparable clock to a C2D would see both CPUs neck and neck. People all too easily forget Phenom is running on a lousy 200MHz.
__________________
WARNING: I am cracking down on stupidity in the forums. Anyone caught making a dumb statement clearly not knowing many, if any of the facts, will promptly be directed to xtremesystems.

Sig edited. If anyone wants to know about the E4400 (E7200 sold) drop me a PM
Ketxxx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2007, 12:42 AM   #17
insider
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

Yes but Nehalem with Intel's integrated memory controller due out in around 6 months time would totally blow Phenom away, unfortunately for everyone, except Intel
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2007, 12:46 AM   #18
Ketxxx
Eligible for custom title
 
Ketxxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kingdom of gods
Posts: 6,380 (2.42/day)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 580 Times in 412 Posts

System Specs

Who cares? If Phenom performance is comparable, and OCs well for much less, I can see where most people will jump.
__________________
WARNING: I am cracking down on stupidity in the forums. Anyone caught making a dumb statement clearly not knowing many, if any of the facts, will promptly be directed to xtremesystems.

Sig edited. If anyone wants to know about the E4400 (E7200 sold) drop me a PM
Ketxxx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2007, 12:47 AM   #19
insider
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

The bad news is it's far from comparable to Nehalem, it'll have to slash the reported prices significantly to compete in a time when they need to making large profits!

Early indications are even the penryn Yorkfield chips beats the Phenom with ease.
 
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2007, 12:51 AM   #20
Ketxxx
Eligible for custom title
 
Ketxxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kingdom of gods
Posts: 6,380 (2.42/day)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 580 Times in 412 Posts

System Specs

I still havent seen a single reviewer with enough sence to reduce the multi on a Phenom and increase FSB, then compare it to the closest multi\FSB match C2D, hence, I will not buy into anything until someone does.
__________________
WARNING: I am cracking down on stupidity in the forums. Anyone caught making a dumb statement clearly not knowing many, if any of the facts, will promptly be directed to xtremesystems.

Sig edited. If anyone wants to know about the E4400 (E7200 sold) drop me a PM
Ketxxx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2007, 01:26 AM   #21
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,337 (2.17/day)
Thanks: 749
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

The Ageia hardware isnt anything unique... there are dozens of specialist floating point math chips that do this sort of stuff. The only thing Ageia has really got is their SDK and tie in with "games". Not much there for AMD really. Better to just go any buy a REAL math team, and pawn the SuperPi benchmarks by having some true vector math co-pro built into their CPUs.

Ageia is NOT NEEDED to get AMD out of the doldrums. Sounds like a bit of diversionary tactic to me.

AMD board should fall on their swords.
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2007, 01:49 AM   #22
AsRock
TPU addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: US\ Uk Born
Posts: 8,796 (4.07/day)
Thanks: 1,676
Thanked 1,348 Times in 1,170 Posts

System Specs

That be cool if it's added to the GPU of a ATI card. BUT all i have heard is people getting lower FPS while using one of these cards. So my question is would this slow down ATI cards ?. Due to CPU or what ever but slower in the end.
AsRock is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2007, 01:56 AM   #23
Fuse-Wire
500 Posts
 
Fuse-Wire's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Scotland, Far away from normality as possible
Posts: 624 (0.29/day)
Thanks: 42
Thanked 43 Times in 40 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Fuse-Wire Send a message via MSN to Fuse-Wire

System Specs

I think AMD are buying all these companies up to develop the ultimate system. mind you i think Bill Gates is trying to take over the world how surreal!!!
__________________
Great thing about getting older is that you try harder and harder to stay young
Fuse-Wire is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2007, 01:59 AM   #24
[I.R.A]_FBi
Eligible for custom title
 
[I.R.A]_FBi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: c:\programs\kitteh.exe
Posts: 6,152 (2.80/day)
Thanks: 724
Thanked 556 Times in 461 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by AsRock View Post
That be cool if it's added to the GPU of a ATI card. BUT all i have heard is people getting lower FPS while using one of these cards. So my question is would this slow down ATI cards ?. Due to CPU or what ever but slower in the end.
this is because all physx cards currently do is generate extra detail to be rendered.
__________________
Rig 1+1
Athlon XP 2200+, MSI KM2M Combo, ATI 9200SE 128 MB DDR, 2 X 512 MB DDR333, 250GB + 80 HDD?

“try intel cpu, amd is only good for going to nude sites” -firehawkxd
“go for the 5850 now and play games while the nvidiots wait for the ceo to show an actual working product” -W1zzard
“An MSI logo? This offends my retina. I await your apology.” -MRCL

www.autolounge.com.jm
[I.R.A]_FBi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2007, 02:01 AM   #25
imperialreign
3500 Posts
 
imperialreign's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sector ZZ₉ Plural Z Alpha
Posts: 4,001 (1.87/day)
Thanks: 272
Thanked 953 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

well, seeing as how ATI has stouted that their GPUS are supposedly superior to nVidia's when it comes to physics processing . . . this could put ATI into a niche in the GPU realm . . .

granted, we've yet to see anything in the real world yet.

physics will be a big thing a couple of years down the road, as I see it, and AMD aquiring Ageia might help them out in the long run . . . if they can survive the initial fallout of the merger.
__________________

<Guide: Understanding audio specifications and hardware> <X-Fi Support Syndicate>
Hit me up on Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/imperialreign
{THERE IS MADNESS TO MY METHODS}
imperialreign is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts