techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jan 3, 2008, 10:49 PM   #1
malware
Eligible for custom title
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 5,413 (1.72/day)
Thanks: 78
Thanked 986 Times in 497 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to malware Send a message via MSN to malware Send a message via Skype™ to malware

System Specs

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 Exclusive Pics and Specs

If you want a sneak peek at the GeForce 9800 GX2, [H]ard|OCP has exclusive pictures, specs and this time the source cited is trustworthy. The GeForce 9800 GX2 card unites two 65nm GeForce 8800 GPUs working in SLI configuration under one hood, I mean PCB. The card will feature 1GB Frame Buffer and 256 stream processors. The GeForce 9800 GX2 will launch in late February or early March as it now stands and will replace the 8800 Ultra (single GPU) card in NVIDIA's high-end product line up. The 9800 GX2 is said to be 30% faster than a 8800 Ultra. Now I give you the pictures:



Source: [H]ard|OCP
malware is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 3, 2008, 10:59 PM   #2
tvdang7
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 317 (0.12/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

System Specs

let the war begin! man ati needs something diff now.
__________________
ABIT AX8
amd 3200+ venice @ 2.65 ghz with 1.575
XP-90 with highspeed zalman.
2X1 gig of OCZ ddr500 pc4000 gold
ATI X1800 XL AIW 650/650 1.2/1.856/1.856 vf-700 cu
hitachi160 gig sata
ultra x-finity 600W dual rail
tvdang7 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 3, 2008, 11:00 PM   #3
SK-1
2000 Posts
 
SK-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 2,116 (0.72/day)
Thanks: 814
Thanked 330 Times in 263 Posts

System Specs

30% faster than an Ultra with 2 new GPU's? I would hope for 50% at least. Or am I being unrealistic?
__________________
Wilson-1996-2009 RIP My best friend ever.
SK-1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 3, 2008, 11:05 PM   #4
a111087
2000 Posts
 
a111087's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: US
Posts: 2,521 (1.11/day)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 190 Times in 157 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by SK-1 View Post
30% faster than an Ultra with 2 new GPU's? I would hope for 50% at least. Or am I being unrealistic?
its a die shrink = 8800 oc'ed, like a dual 3870
__________________
a111087 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 3, 2008, 11:05 PM   #5
DOM
Eligible for custom title
 
DOM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: TX, USA
Posts: 6,507 (2.52/day)
Thanks: 300
Thanked 812 Times in 720 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by SK-1 View Post
30% faster than an Ultra with 2 new GPU's? I would hope for 50% at least. Or am I being unrealistic?
Im thinking the same I bet there going to be like $900+
__________________
DOM is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 3, 2008, 11:09 PM   #6
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 32,292 (12.78/day)
Thanks: 2,817
Thanked 12,452 Times in 7,918 Posts

System Specs

The only thing missing from those pictures are the rays of sunshine, beaming down from heaven!
__________________
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to erocker For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 3, 2008, 11:14 PM   #7
Nex-
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 25 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

256 stream processors and only 30% faster than the almost 2 years old Ultra? i think i'll just wait to see wat the HD3870X2 is going to do with that beast (8800 Ultra). If the HD3870 X2 is over 30% faster than the 8800 Ultra, then it's not worth to wait two months more for the 9800 X2 if the performence is almost the samen but i doubt so. I think that the 9800 X2 will be at least 15% faster than the HD3870 X2 that come's in januarie.
__________________
My PC specs:
Processor: Q6600
Graphic card: 8800GTS 320 MB (I hope for a new card in 2008 @ 9800GTX for playing Crysis)
Motherboard: Asus P5B
PSU: 500 WATT Chieftec
Memory: 4GB DDR2-800
Nex- is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 3, 2008, 11:23 PM   #8
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 32,292 (12.78/day)
Thanks: 2,817
Thanked 12,452 Times in 7,918 Posts

System Specs

The 30% gain makes sense, since that's about what you get with a dual card Sli setup. I like this card a lot, but it's all up to Nvidia to get some really good drivers going for it. Remember, Nvidia tried this before with the 7950GX2 and failed with driver support. This card is Nvidia's top-end bridge to their next archetecture that will compete with ATi's R700.
__________________
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 4, 2008, 12:07 AM   #9
trog100
3500 Posts
 
trog100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,401 (1.61/day)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 260 Times in 233 Posts

System Specs

so in essence there is no new 9xxx wonder chip.. just a die shrink and copy of what ati are up to..

it seems yet again ati are leading and nvdia reacting.. its all down to drivers and power consumption i recon..

trog
trog100 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to trog100 For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 4, 2008, 12:08 AM   #10
a111087
2000 Posts
 
a111087's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: US
Posts: 2,521 (1.11/day)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 190 Times in 157 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by trog100 View Post
so in essence there is no new 9xxx wonder chip.. just a die shrink and copy of what ati are up to..

it seems yet again ati are leading and nvdia reacting.. its all down to drivers and power consumption i recon..

trog
yep, 30% out of dual oced card is kinda weak
__________________
a111087 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 4, 2008, 12:14 AM   #11
trog100
3500 Posts
 
trog100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,401 (1.61/day)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 260 Times in 233 Posts

System Specs

these will have to come out at prices similar or lower than the ultra did.. so if its just looked at as 30% from a new top end card its okay..

its only at double the price it aint okay.. the ati x2 will be cheapish so that will force nvidia prices down..

trog
trog100 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 4, 2008, 12:47 AM   #12
strick94u
1000 Posts
 
strick94u's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,308 (0.51/day)
Thanks: 80
Thanked 71 Times in 64 Posts

System Specs

Wonder if it will run 3 cards at once 6 graphic cores damn that should play crysis with no lag on eye candy setting
strick94u is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 4, 2008, 12:52 AM   #13
tkpenalty
Eligible for custom title
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia, Sydney
Posts: 5,023 (2.04/day)
Thanks: 412
Thanked 361 Times in 266 Posts

System Specs

30% more... not really what i'd want for such a high price.

Lets see which dual GPU will be faster >=D
__________________
AMD Radeon X1950~HD4000 Support Clubhouse

“Mac: "Woah, what are you doing?" Mac says as he levitates in the air. PC: "Playing Half-Life 2, this is my gravity gun." Mac: "Well I can sort of do that." PC: "Technically Mac, you have to become me first."” -From_Nowhere
tkpenalty is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 4, 2008, 01:06 AM   #14
reverze
1000 Posts
 
reverze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,271 (0.64/day)
Thanks: 86
Thanked 132 Times in 102 Posts

System Specs

Ermm that shouldn't really be a question if the Ultra already beats the 3870 in single card setups.. should it?
reverze is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 4, 2008, 01:17 AM   #15
pt
not a suicide-bomber
 
pt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Portugal
Posts: 5,877 (2.21/day)
Thanks: 106
Thanked 219 Times in 193 Posts
Send a message via MSN to pt

System Specs

but if 2x3870 is more efficient then nvidia solution then someone will get pwned
pt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 4, 2008, 01:21 AM   #16
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 32,292 (12.78/day)
Thanks: 2,817
Thanked 12,452 Times in 7,918 Posts

System Specs

It's all going to come down to who can make two chips on one board work the best. Nvidia has the advantage with more powerful GPU's, but ATi has had better luck getting two GPU's (and cards) to work together more efficiently and with better results than Sli.
__________________
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 4, 2008, 01:34 AM   #17
OnBoard
2000 Posts
 
OnBoard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,773 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 382 Times in 302 Posts

System Specs

You say 30% more is weak, what about 8800 Ultra versus 8800 GTX, was that 30% Isn't this basically the same as 8800GTS 512MB in SLI.
OnBoard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 4, 2008, 01:34 AM   #18
Rob!
75 Posts
 
Rob!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: East Taunton, MA, USA
Posts: 137 (0.07/day)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Rob!

System Specs

Anyone else find something wrong that the 9800 is just dual 8800s?
Rob! is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 4, 2008, 01:39 AM   #19
AphexDreamer
Eligible for custom title
 
AphexDreamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: C:\Program Files (x86)\Aphexdreamer\
Posts: 5,617 (2.56/day)
Thanks: 812
Thanked 888 Times in 674 Posts

System Specs

Hold up, I thought 65nm cores were much cheaper and faster to make then the larger dies???

So with that can we not expect it to be cheaper then the previous cards???

Just saying...
__________________
Sent from my PC using chrome.
AphexDreamer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 4, 2008, 01:52 AM   #20
EastCoasthandle
Eligible for custom title
 
EastCoasthandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,244 (2.09/day)
Thanks: 382
Thanked 1,528 Times in 865 Posts

System Specs

Wow some of you are either gullible or easily fooled. That's just 2 G92 renamed as part of the 9 series. Which brings the question: How can a G92 be considered part of the 9 series? It should be part of the 8 series...
EastCoasthandle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 4, 2008, 01:55 AM   #21
OnBoard
2000 Posts
 
OnBoard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,773 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 382 Times in 302 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by EastCoasthandle View Post
Which brings the question: How can a G92 be considered part of the 9 series? It should be part of the 8 series...
Same way ATI can make HD 3800 series with a die shrink from HD 2900
OnBoard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 4, 2008, 01:55 AM   #22
EastCoasthandle
Eligible for custom title
 
EastCoasthandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,244 (2.09/day)
Thanks: 382
Thanked 1,528 Times in 865 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by OnBoard View Post
Same way ATI can make HD 3800 series with a die shrink from HD 2900
The example you provided is not on par to the subject at hand. The 9800GTX2 is a dual G92s (with PCBs put together) nothing more.
Gee, I wonder where that 30% increase will fall under, Doom3? Wait, look at the current G92 SLI scores! We will see soon enough from this supposedly R680 killer, LOL!
EastCoasthandle is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to EastCoasthandle For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 4, 2008, 02:05 AM   #23
Dia01
200 Posts
 
Dia01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: QLD, Australia
Posts: 425 (0.17/day)
Thanks: 26
Thanked 54 Times in 46 Posts

System Specs

I personally think Nvidia is becoming ridiculous. Its gonna cost ya an arm and a leg with probalbly a lack of functioning driver support again.
Dia01 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 4, 2008, 02:11 AM   #24
EastCoasthandle
Eligible for custom title
 
EastCoasthandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,244 (2.09/day)
Thanks: 382
Thanked 1,528 Times in 865 Posts

System Specs

Didn't the 7950gtx2 reach end of line (EOL) in 3 months?
EastCoasthandle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 4, 2008, 02:28 AM   #25
P.C.b!=P.C.P
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Wasn't the majority if the problem with the 7950 the bridge chip that Nv used. I think I remember reading that in allot of cases the 7950 had some serious bottleneck issues and is the reason the card failed?
P.C.b!=P.C.P is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts