techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jan 20, 2008, 09:47 PM   #1
malware
Eligible for custom title
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 5,413 (1.74/day)
Thanks: 78
Thanked 986 Times in 497 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to malware Send a message via MSN to malware Send a message via Skype™ to malware

System Specs

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 Benchmarked

German hardware site PCGH had the opportunity to benchmark the upcoming Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 processor through various performance benchmarks. The 45nm Core 2 Quad Q9300 CPU is yet to be relased and features 2,5GHz (333x7.5) clock speed, 6MB L2 shared cache and only 1.2V default voltage. See all the tests here.



Source: PCGH
malware is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2008, 09:56 PM   #2
ShadowFold
Eligible for custom title
 
ShadowFold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 12,855 (6.50/day)
Thanks: 1,381
Thanked 1,681 Times in 1,498 Posts
Send a message via MSN to ShadowFold Send a message via Skype™ to ShadowFold

System Specs

So its better than a Qx9550?? Where did they get Phenom X2's and X3's???
ShadowFold is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2008, 09:58 PM   #3
tofu
200 Posts
 
tofu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: GTA
Posts: 460 (0.17/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts

System Specs

Simulated.

Must've disabled one or two of the cores.
tofu is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2008, 09:59 PM   #4
ShadowFold
Eligible for custom title
 
ShadowFold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 12,855 (6.50/day)
Thanks: 1,381
Thanked 1,681 Times in 1,498 Posts
Send a message via MSN to ShadowFold Send a message via Skype™ to ShadowFold

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by tofu View Post
Simulated.

Must've disabled one or two of the cores.
Is that what that means? Man AMD is gonna have a rough launch with those X2's and X3's then
ShadowFold is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2008, 10:03 PM   #5
CrAsHnBuRnXp
Eligible for custom title
 
CrAsHnBuRnXp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 5,087 (2.49/day)
Thanks: 452
Thanked 640 Times in 526 Posts

System Specs

No Q9450 comparison eh?
CrAsHnBuRnXp is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2008, 10:04 PM   #6
tofu
200 Posts
 
tofu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: GTA
Posts: 460 (0.17/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts

System Specs

The simulated X2's and X3's are a poor performing bunch.

But if there as cheap as potato chips ~$50 lol, count me in
tofu is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2008, 10:19 PM   #7
jbizzler
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 80 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts

How come they say MHz, not GHz?
jbizzler is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2008, 10:21 PM   #8
Nanyang
5 Posts
 
Nanyang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 14 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

System Specs

Wow.... that nice oc cpu... Izit at stock cooling?
Nanyang is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2008, 10:44 PM   #9
CrAsHnBuRnXp
Eligible for custom title
 
CrAsHnBuRnXp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 5,087 (2.49/day)
Thanks: 452
Thanked 640 Times in 526 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbizzler View Post
How come they say MHz, not GHz?
Because for instance 3500MHz is roughly 3.5GHz. 2500MHz is roughly 2.5GHz, etc, etc.
CrAsHnBuRnXp is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2008, 11:12 PM   #10
jbizzler
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 80 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts

Well, the QX9650 says 3.000 MHz, when I assume it should be 3.000 GHz.
jbizzler is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2008, 11:14 PM   #11
ShadowFold
Eligible for custom title
 
ShadowFold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 12,855 (6.50/day)
Thanks: 1,381
Thanked 1,681 Times in 1,498 Posts
Send a message via MSN to ShadowFold Send a message via Skype™ to ShadowFold

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbizzler View Post
Well, the QX9650 says 3.000 MHz, when I assume it should be 3.000 GHz.
Maybe they downclocked it lol im still hoping for a Q2200
ShadowFold is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2008, 11:17 PM   #12
Weer
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New York / Israel
Posts: 1,293 (0.61/day)
Thanks: 60
Thanked 95 Times in 73 Posts

System Specs

Well, we can clearly see where the extra 4 threads brought by HyperThreading make a difference.
Weer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2008, 11:21 PM   #13
CrAsHnBuRnXp
Eligible for custom title
 
CrAsHnBuRnXp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 5,087 (2.49/day)
Thanks: 452
Thanked 640 Times in 526 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbizzler View Post
Well, the QX9650 says 3.000 MHz, when I assume it should be 3.000 GHz.
3000MHz is 3GHz.
CrAsHnBuRnXp is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2008, 11:23 PM   #14
kwchang007
2000 Posts
 
kwchang007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Severn, MD, USA.
Posts: 2,949 (1.28/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 189 Times in 185 Posts
Send a message via AIM to kwchang007

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weer View Post
Well, we can clearly see where the extra 4 threads brought by HyperThreading make a difference.
Uh I thought they were bringing back hyperthreading with nehlam, not penryn.
__________________
Power User
Teenager Club
Laptop Overclocking club


Thanks button....hit it if someone helped you, not a difficult concept really.

[img disabled]http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?t=1&uid=8351&iehack=.jpg[/img]
kwchang007 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2008, 11:39 PM   #15
Duxx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

I just want my Q9450... too impatient.
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2008, 11:40 PM   #16
[I.R.A]_FBi
Eligible for custom title
 
[I.R.A]_FBi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: c:\programs\kitteh.exe
Posts: 6,152 (2.80/day)
Thanks: 724
Thanked 556 Times in 461 Posts

System Specs

phenom just got raped ... no hope ..
__________________
Rig 1+1
Athlon XP 2200+, MSI KM2M Combo, ATI 9200SE 128 MB DDR, 2 X 512 MB DDR333, 250GB + 80 HDD?

“try intel cpu, amd is only good for going to nude sites” -firehawkxd
“go for the 5850 now and play games while the nvidiots wait for the ceo to show an actual working product” -W1zzard
“An MSI logo? This offends my retina. I await your apology.” -MRCL

www.autolounge.com.jm
[I.R.A]_FBi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2008, 11:42 PM   #17
ShadowFold
Eligible for custom title
 
ShadowFold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 12,855 (6.50/day)
Thanks: 1,381
Thanked 1,681 Times in 1,498 Posts
Send a message via MSN to ShadowFold Send a message via Skype™ to ShadowFold

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by [I.R.A]_FBi View Post
phenom just got raped ... no hope ..
brutally at that.. I really dont think AMD can survive much longer if they dont step up and release some good chips I cant even imagine how high intels prices would go if there wasnt a competitor
ShadowFold is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2008, 11:42 PM   #18
CrAsHnBuRnXp
Eligible for custom title
 
CrAsHnBuRnXp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 5,087 (2.49/day)
Thanks: 452
Thanked 640 Times in 526 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duxx View Post
I just want my Q9450... too impatient.
As do I.
CrAsHnBuRnXp is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2008, 11:53 PM   #19
Duxx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadowFold View Post
brutally at that.. I really dont think AMD can survive much longer if they dont step up and release some good chips I cant even imagine how high intels prices would go if there wasnt a competitor
They would produce a new chip every 5 years for 1000$.
hah
 
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2008, 12:09 AM   #20
a111087
2000 Posts
 
a111087's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: US
Posts: 2,520 (1.12/day)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 189 Times in 156 Posts

System Specs

look at how single core cpu performs in World in Conflict, lol
__________________
a111087 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2008, 04:33 AM   #21
jbizzler
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 80 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by CrAsHnBuRnXp View Post
3000MHz is 3GHz.
Yeah, but it doesn't say 3000, it says 3.000, i.e. 3 with 3 significant zeroes following the decimal point.

I know it doesn't matter, but I think it's just kind of funny to think of any processor released within the last decade would operate at only 3 MHz. maybe those are just really difficult-to-see commas.

It' so odd the way the CPU market is going. Before we're used to the performance one new core gives us, we get another crazy performance boost. I find myself wishing it would slow down soon.
jbizzler is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2008, 04:41 AM   #22
Drash
5 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 13 (0.00/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbizzler View Post
Yeah, but it doesn't say 3000, it says 3.000, i.e. 3 with 3 significant zeroes following the decimal point.

I know it doesn't matter, but I think it's just kind of funny to think of any processor released within the last decade would operate at only 3 MHz. maybe those are just really difficult-to-see commas.
:
Maybe that's because they're German - they write 3 thousand as 3.000 and 3 point zero as 3,0. French do this as well as a few other Eu countries.
Drash is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2008, 04:59 AM   #23
PVTCaboose1337
Graphical Hacker
 
PVTCaboose1337's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 7,478 (2.80/day)
Thanks: 798
Thanked 1,174 Times in 834 Posts

System Specs

Seems my 3800+ is aging...
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
PVTCaboose1337 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2008, 05:12 AM   #24
kakazza
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 470 (0.19/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts

Comma is a deciamal seperator.
Most English-speaking countries use a period tho, no idea why.

Quote:
however ISO standards recommend the use of comma instead of points also in English speaking countries
kakazza is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2008, 05:13 AM   #25
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 31,919 (12.77/day)
Thanks: 2,783
Thanked 12,296 Times in 7,821 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbizzler View Post
Yeah, but it doesn't say 3000, it says 3.000, i.e. 3 with 3 significant zeroes following the decimal point.
What's the point?! Who cares!
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The ScienceMark thread (Score list inside) pt Overclocking & Cooling 417 Aug 22, 2010 06:26 PM
HOWTO: Overclock C2Q (Quads) and C2D (Duals) - A Guide v1.1 graysky Overclocking & Cooling 38 Jun 8, 2008 12:43 PM
Intel Details Upcoming New Processor Generations malware News 3 Apr 4, 2007 02:14 PM
IDF Prague: Quad-Core W1zzard Reviews 1 Oct 18, 2006 04:49 PM
Intel 3rd quarter revenue: $8.5B W1zzard News 0 Oct 13, 2004 08:58 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts