![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 5,413 (1.74/day)
Thanks: 78
Thanked 986 Times in 497 Posts
|
WD Launches the 640GB Caviar SE16 3.5-inch Hard Drives
WD announced today that it is now shipping in volume its WD Caviar SE16 640 GB 3.5-inch hard drives based on 320 GB-per-platter technology -- a platform that it has been shipping since January 2008 and is serving as the foundation of all of the company's 3.5-inch drive families. Ideal for data-intensive applications, high-performance computing and multimedia systems, the WD Caviar SE16 640 GB drives deliver high performance with their extreme areal density, 3 Gb/s transfer rate, and Native Command Queuing (NCQ). Its two-platter design promotes cool, quiet operation in a high-capacity drive.
![]() "The 640 GB capacity point will be an important one for our desktop customers, and WD is leading high-volume shipments to the channel and OEM customers," said Don Bennett, general manager and vice president of WD's desktop business unit. "Two-platter hard drives have always been the perfect balance of value, capacity and performance for many of our customers. Today's common two-platter drives are limited to 500 GB, but we are expanding capacity by 28 percent on the same design with WD's leading technology heads and disks." The 320 GB-per-platter technology is being deployed across WD's desktop, enterprise, consumer electronics and external hard drive product lines, including additional capacity points, throughout this calendar year. The WD Caviar family of 3.5-inch desktop hard drives delivers high performance with 3 Gb/s transfer rate, Native Command Queuing (NCQ), and cool operating temperatures and quiet operation, enabling customers to integrate WD products in the most demanding desktop and external storage environments. Price and Availability WD Caviar SE16 640 GB (model WD6400AAKS) hard drives may be ordered on the company's online store and through select distributors and resellers. Manufacturer's Suggest Retail Price (MSRP) for the WD Caviar SE16 640 GB is $139.99 USD. More information about WD Caviar desktop drives may be found on the company's Web site here. Source: WesternDigital |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Battosai
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In a library somewhere on this earth
Posts: 10,566 (5.15/day)
Thanks: 4,239
Thanked 3,047 Times in 2,493 Posts
|
mmm, sounds like a pretty good deal to me! Have to think about getting a hdd soon!!
__________________
The only way success is before work, is in the dictionary Support for the mind. Support for your hardware |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: AL
Posts: 80 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
These are great drives, relatively cheap and faster than Raptors in every aspect except for access time (seek time).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() |
why not just get a terabyte hd? hard drives are so cheap now, I'd rather just get that.
::edit:: oh ok theyre faster than raptors nvm
__________________
Lenovo U410 Core i3 8 GB of RAM 64GB SSD + 1TB HDD nVidia 610m OC -1.2Ghz when plugged in. killer n-1202 wifi |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: AL
Posts: 80 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() |
ya, i guess i didnt realize the performance benefits iwth these drives. wasn't really looking at the specs.
__________________
Lenovo U410 Core i3 8 GB of RAM 64GB SSD + 1TB HDD nVidia 610m OC -1.2Ghz when plugged in. killer n-1202 wifi |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Just South of Mars
Posts: 1,168 (0.59/day)
Thanks: 194
Thanked 287 Times in 248 Posts
|
Slightly less than .22 cents per gb, not too shabby!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() |
These have been on newegg for $130 for about 2 weeks now. I'm gonna pick one up pretty soon. Most terabyte drives are overpriced compared to this. You can get two of these for $260, slap em in raid 0, and you got yourself more than a terabyte at much faster speeds costing less than most terabyte drives. Sweet.
Now I'm looking on newegg and it looks like they don't have em on there anymore. Odd. But I'm sure they will be back, probably $140.
Last edited by farlex85; Mar 19, 2008 at 09:13 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coventry UNI England
Posts: 1,416 (0.56/day)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 23 Times in 23 Posts
|
looks like a good drive but pritty average to me! ive had an old version of this range 250gb raid edition and had both fail on me maybe a bad batch or maybe wd are just as reliable as other brands!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Bird of Prey
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gurley, AL
Posts: 9,994 (3.99/day)
Thanks: 3,810
Thanked 557 Times in 521 Posts
|
Oh oh oh, looks like I need to visit the egg again and upgrade my hdd
__________________
=-TheEagle-= ![]() http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=62454 “You crazy? Surfing any website without an antivirus is like freaking with a dirty woman without protection” -OzzmanFloyd120 - Edited for content and clarity
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Battosai
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In a library somewhere on this earth
Posts: 10,566 (5.15/day)
Thanks: 4,239
Thanked 3,047 Times in 2,493 Posts
|
Then wareagle, going to send me the one you take out!? lol.. That hdd is some great piece of property right there!
__________________
The only way success is before work, is in the dictionary Support for the mind. Support for your hardware |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,046 (2.22/day)
Thanks: 816
Thanked 904 Times in 738 Posts
|
Just bought a 500GB SE16 and intalled today! WD500AAKS - $99.99 OEM on Newegg. It rocks - though hotter to the touch than it's 250 GB cousin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Reno
Posts: 411 (0.21/day)
Thanks: 129
Thanked 17 Times in 17 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Power User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.48/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,825 Times in 3,123 Posts
|
That's the way marketing goes. All the drive manufacturers claim that, not just WD.
__________________
![]() Visit Ashentech “What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,631 (3.10/day)
Thanks: 1,361
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
|
I concur. Just like 64-bit processors. Almost nothing today truly takes advantage of 64-bit processing compared to the hype that 64-bit processors made. All processors now are 64-bit, and soon all hard drives will be 3GB/s SATA. It's simply a marketing hype until it's utilized.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Doctor Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,550 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,689 Times in 6,389 Posts
|
these drives arent faster than a raptor - they come close, but they arent FASTER. (they are definately better value for money, however)
The main point is that having only two platters is good for noise and power consumption - the 320GB was so popular because its got only the one platter, making it even quiter/cooler.
__________________
![]() Edumacational thread about PC Audio My external HDD's.5x samsung 1TB + 2x Seagate 1.5TB = 8 TB external storage 32 Bit OS vs 64 bit OS information How to get hardware accelerated H264 playback (DXVA) Netbook Owners United! |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,631 (3.10/day)
Thanks: 1,361
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
|
My Seagate 7200.11 750GB drive has a read transfer rate of about 75MB/s versus my 74GB Raptor at 54MB/s. The Raptor however has an 8ms seek time, while my Seagate is 13. I'm dumping my Raptor for the Seagate, because it's quieter, and it is noticably faster on bootup.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Power User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.48/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,825 Times in 3,123 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() Visit Ashentech “What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,631 (3.10/day)
Thanks: 1,361
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
|
It is the 8mb Cache version. And the drive's in the 90's % health.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Power User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.48/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,825 Times in 3,123 Posts
|
Still, something is up. Even the 8MB cache 36GB Raptors are faster than that.
__________________
![]() Visit Ashentech “What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,631 (3.10/day)
Thanks: 1,361
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
|
Maybe I'll start a thread. I'm selling it anyway, though. Too loud for my liking now that I've got such a quiet 750GB drive.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Doctor Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,550 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,689 Times in 6,389 Posts
|
indeed the raptors are loud - i should go test my raptor and see what it can do. Any benchies people want to see?
(its updating to SP1 atm, i'll just do this for comparison to danish)
__________________
![]() Edumacational thread about PC Audio My external HDD's.5x samsung 1TB + 2x Seagate 1.5TB = 8 TB external storage 32 Bit OS vs 64 bit OS information How to get hardware accelerated H264 playback (DXVA) Netbook Owners United! |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,631 (3.10/day)
Thanks: 1,361
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
|
Avg. Read & Write, Min. Read & Write, Latency (all from Everest), and XP Bootup (from PCMark) please
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 419 (0.16/day)
Thanks: 51
Thanked 47 Times in 31 Posts
|
My 74GB 8MB cache raptor does 64 mb/sec so something is wrong there.
My WD3200KS does about 56 mb/sec & WD7500AAKS does about 80mb/sec I find my Raptor to feel slightly quicker than the other drives in Windows XP. However, I dual boot and in Vista with the Caching and Readyboost running the raptor doesn't feel faster there. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ultra Aluminus Case | Darksaber | Reviews | 10 | Jan 6, 2008 06:06 AM |
| Hitachi Ships Three New Hard Drives | malware | News | 1 | Oct 24, 2006 01:26 PM |
| Seagate Introduces New Maxtor Desktop and Notebook Hard Drives | malware | News | 2 | Oct 4, 2006 12:45 AM |
| Cooler Master Centurion 540 | Darksaber | Reviews | 1 | Jun 26, 2006 09:04 PM |
| The Perpendicular Future of Hard Drives | grazzhoppa | News | 6 | Jun 20, 2005 01:54 PM |