techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Mar 19, 2008, 07:56 PM   #1
malware
Eligible for custom title
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 5,413 (1.74/day)
Thanks: 78
Thanked 986 Times in 497 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to malware Send a message via MSN to malware Send a message via Skype™ to malware

System Specs

WD Launches the 640GB Caviar SE16 3.5-inch Hard Drives

WD announced today that it is now shipping in volume its WD Caviar SE16 640 GB 3.5-inch hard drives based on 320 GB-per-platter technology -- a platform that it has been shipping since January 2008 and is serving as the foundation of all of the company's 3.5-inch drive families. Ideal for data-intensive applications, high-performance computing and multimedia systems, the WD Caviar SE16 640 GB drives deliver high performance with their extreme areal density, 3 Gb/s transfer rate, and Native Command Queuing (NCQ). Its two-platter design promotes cool, quiet operation in a high-capacity drive.




"The 640 GB capacity point will be an important one for our desktop customers, and WD is leading high-volume shipments to the channel and OEM customers," said Don Bennett, general manager and vice president of WD's desktop business unit. "Two-platter hard drives have always been the perfect balance of value, capacity and performance for many of our customers. Today's common two-platter drives are limited to 500 GB, but we are expanding capacity by 28 percent on the same design with WD's leading technology heads and disks."

The 320 GB-per-platter technology is being deployed across WD's desktop, enterprise, consumer electronics and external hard drive product lines, including additional capacity points, throughout this calendar year.

The WD Caviar family of 3.5-inch desktop hard drives delivers high performance with 3 Gb/s transfer rate, Native Command Queuing (NCQ), and cool operating temperatures and quiet operation, enabling customers to integrate WD products in the most demanding desktop and external storage environments.

Price and Availability
WD Caviar SE16 640 GB (model WD6400AAKS) hard drives may be ordered on the company's online store and through select distributors and resellers. Manufacturer's Suggest Retail Price (MSRP) for the WD Caviar SE16 640 GB is $139.99 USD. More information about WD Caviar desktop drives may be found on the company's Web site here.

Source: WesternDigital
malware is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 19, 2008, 08:09 PM   #2
Cold Storm
Battosai
 
Cold Storm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In a library somewhere on this earth
Posts: 10,566 (5.15/day)
Thanks: 4,239
Thanked 3,047 Times in 2,493 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Cold Storm

System Specs

mmm, sounds like a pretty good deal to me! Have to think about getting a hdd soon!!
__________________
The only way success is before work, is in the dictionary

Support for the mind. Support for your hardware
Cold Storm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 19, 2008, 08:27 PM   #3
Nicksterr
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: AL
Posts: 80 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

These are great drives, relatively cheap and faster than Raptors in every aspect except for access time (seek time).
Nicksterr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 19, 2008, 08:28 PM   #4
AsphyxiA
500 Posts
 
AsphyxiA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 559 (0.20/day)
Thanks: 57
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to AsphyxiA

why not just get a terabyte hd? hard drives are so cheap now, I'd rather just get that.
::edit:: oh ok theyre faster than raptors nvm
__________________
Lenovo U410
Core i3
8 GB of RAM
64GB SSD + 1TB HDD
nVidia 610m OC -1.2Ghz when plugged in.
killer n-1202 wifi
AsphyxiA is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 19, 2008, 08:36 PM   #5
Nicksterr
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: AL
Posts: 80 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by AsphyxiA View Post
why not just get a terabyte hd? hard drives are so cheap now, I'd rather just get that.
This particular WD 320GB platter line doesn't come in the near ~ 1TB range yet. I know that they have both 320gb and 640gb models, both on Newegg.
Nicksterr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 19, 2008, 08:45 PM   #6
AsphyxiA
500 Posts
 
AsphyxiA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 559 (0.20/day)
Thanks: 57
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to AsphyxiA

ya, i guess i didnt realize the performance benefits iwth these drives. wasn't really looking at the specs.
__________________
Lenovo U410
Core i3
8 GB of RAM
64GB SSD + 1TB HDD
nVidia 610m OC -1.2Ghz when plugged in.
killer n-1202 wifi
AsphyxiA is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 19, 2008, 09:02 PM   #7
thoughtdisorder
1000 Posts
 
thoughtdisorder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Just South of Mars
Posts: 1,168 (0.59/day)
Thanks: 194
Thanked 287 Times in 248 Posts

System Specs

Slightly less than .22 cents per gb, not too shabby!
thoughtdisorder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 19, 2008, 09:08 PM   #8
farlex85
3500 Posts
 
farlex85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,114 (1.83/day)
Thanks: 369
Thanked 647 Times in 612 Posts

System Specs

These have been on newegg for $130 for about 2 weeks now. I'm gonna pick one up pretty soon. Most terabyte drives are overpriced compared to this. You can get two of these for $260, slap em in raid 0, and you got yourself more than a terabyte at much faster speeds costing less than most terabyte drives. Sweet.


Now I'm looking on newegg and it looks like they don't have em on there anymore. Odd. But I'm sure they will be back, probably $140.

Last edited by farlex85; Mar 19, 2008 at 09:13 PM.
farlex85 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 19, 2008, 09:36 PM   #9
regan1985
1000 Posts
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coventry UNI England
Posts: 1,416 (0.56/day)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 23 Times in 23 Posts
Send a message via MSN to regan1985

System Specs

looks like a good drive but pritty average to me! ive had an old version of this range 250gb raid edition and had both fail on me maybe a bad batch or maybe wd are just as reliable as other brands!
regan1985 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 19, 2008, 10:32 PM   #10
WarEagleAU
Bird of Prey
 
WarEagleAU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gurley, AL
Posts: 9,994 (3.99/day)
Thanks: 3,810
Thanked 557 Times in 521 Posts
Send a message via AIM to WarEagleAU Send a message via Yahoo to WarEagleAU

System Specs

Oh oh oh, looks like I need to visit the egg again and upgrade my hdd
__________________
=-TheEagle-=



http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=62454
“You crazy? Surfing any website without an antivirus is like freaking with a dirty woman without protection” -OzzmanFloyd120
- Edited for content and clarity
WarEagleAU is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2008, 01:33 AM   #11
Cold Storm
Battosai
 
Cold Storm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In a library somewhere on this earth
Posts: 10,566 (5.15/day)
Thanks: 4,239
Thanked 3,047 Times in 2,493 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Cold Storm

System Specs

Then wareagle, going to send me the one you take out!? lol.. That hdd is some great piece of property right there!
__________________
The only way success is before work, is in the dictionary

Support for the mind. Support for your hardware
Cold Storm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2008, 02:45 AM   #12
Sasqui
Eligible for custom title
 
Sasqui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,046 (2.22/day)
Thanks: 816
Thanked 904 Times in 738 Posts

System Specs

Just bought a 500GB SE16 and intalled today! WD500AAKS - $99.99 OEM on Newegg. It rocks - though hotter to the touch than it's 250 GB cousin.
Sasqui is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2008, 02:53 AM   #13
farlex85
3500 Posts
 
farlex85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,114 (1.83/day)
Thanks: 369
Thanked 647 Times in 612 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasqui View Post
Just bought a 500GB SE16 and intalled today! WD500AAKS - $99.99 OEM on Newegg. It rocks - though hotter to the touch than it's 250 GB cousin.
Aw you should've gone w/ this 640gb drive. I keep trying to recommend it to people and nobody seems to want it. Its faster than the 500gb, and bigger, for not much more money. Oh well.
farlex85 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2008, 05:42 AM   #14
Dangle
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Reno
Posts: 411 (0.21/day)
Thanks: 129
Thanked 17 Times in 17 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by malware View Post
drives delivers high performance with 3 Gb/s transfer rate
So deceiving!!! That's the transfer rate of the SATA port. The Drive won't be able to read or write at anywhere near that speed.
Dangle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2008, 06:44 AM   #15
Wile E
Power User
 
Wile E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.48/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,825 Times in 3,123 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wile E Send a message via Yahoo to Wile E

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dangle View Post
So deceiving!!! That's the transfer rate of the SATA port. The Drive won't be able to read or write at anywhere near that speed.
That's the way marketing goes. All the drive manufacturers claim that, not just WD.
__________________

Visit Ashentech
“What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
Wile E is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2008, 06:46 AM   #16
DanishDevil
Eligible for custom title
 
DanishDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,631 (3.10/day)
Thanks: 1,361
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DanishDevil Send a message via MSN to DanishDevil

System Specs

I concur. Just like 64-bit processors. Almost nothing today truly takes advantage of 64-bit processing compared to the hype that 64-bit processors made. All processors now are 64-bit, and soon all hard drives will be 3GB/s SATA. It's simply a marketing hype until it's utilized.
DanishDevil is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2008, 07:33 AM   #17
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,550 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,689 Times in 6,389 Posts

System Specs

these drives arent faster than a raptor - they come close, but they arent FASTER. (they are definately better value for money, however)

The main point is that having only two platters is good for noise and power consumption - the 320GB was so popular because its got only the one platter, making it even quiter/cooler.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2008, 07:47 AM   #18
DanishDevil
Eligible for custom title
 
DanishDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,631 (3.10/day)
Thanks: 1,361
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DanishDevil Send a message via MSN to DanishDevil

System Specs

My Seagate 7200.11 750GB drive has a read transfer rate of about 75MB/s versus my 74GB Raptor at 54MB/s. The Raptor however has an 8ms seek time, while my Seagate is 13. I'm dumping my Raptor for the Seagate, because it's quieter, and it is noticably faster on bootup.
DanishDevil is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2008, 07:49 AM   #19
Wile E
Power User
 
Wile E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.48/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,825 Times in 3,123 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wile E Send a message via Yahoo to Wile E

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanishDevil View Post
My Seagate 7200.11 750GB drive has a read transfer rate of about 75MB/s versus my 74GB Raptor at 54MB/s. The Raptor however has an 8ms seek time, while my Seagate is 13. I'm dumping my Raptor for the Seagate, because it's quieter, and it is noticably faster on bootup.
Then there's something amiss with your Raptor. Most get 75MB/s+.
__________________

Visit Ashentech
“What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
Wile E is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2008, 07:50 AM   #20
DanishDevil
Eligible for custom title
 
DanishDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,631 (3.10/day)
Thanks: 1,361
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DanishDevil Send a message via MSN to DanishDevil

System Specs

It is the 8mb Cache version. And the drive's in the 90's % health.
DanishDevil is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2008, 07:53 AM   #21
Wile E
Power User
 
Wile E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.48/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,825 Times in 3,123 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wile E Send a message via Yahoo to Wile E

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanishDevil View Post
It is the 8mb Cache version. And the drive's in the 90's % health.
Still, something is up. Even the 8MB cache 36GB Raptors are faster than that.
__________________

Visit Ashentech
“What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
Wile E is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2008, 07:55 AM   #22
DanishDevil
Eligible for custom title
 
DanishDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,631 (3.10/day)
Thanks: 1,361
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DanishDevil Send a message via MSN to DanishDevil

System Specs

Maybe I'll start a thread. I'm selling it anyway, though. Too loud for my liking now that I've got such a quiet 750GB drive.
DanishDevil is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21, 2008, 01:55 AM   #23
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,550 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,689 Times in 6,389 Posts

System Specs

indeed the raptors are loud - i should go test my raptor and see what it can do. Any benchies people want to see?

(its updating to SP1 atm, i'll just do this for comparison to danish)
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21, 2008, 02:06 AM   #24
DanishDevil
Eligible for custom title
 
DanishDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,631 (3.10/day)
Thanks: 1,361
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DanishDevil Send a message via MSN to DanishDevil

System Specs

Avg. Read & Write, Min. Read & Write, Latency (all from Everest), and XP Bootup (from PCMark) please
DanishDevil is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21, 2008, 06:32 AM   #25
Makaveli
200 Posts
 
Makaveli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 419 (0.16/day)
Thanks: 51
Thanked 47 Times in 31 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Makaveli

System Specs

My 74GB 8MB cache raptor does 64 mb/sec so something is wrong there.

My WD3200KS does about 56 mb/sec & WD7500AAKS does about 80mb/sec

I find my Raptor to feel slightly quicker than the other drives in Windows XP.

However, I dual boot and in Vista with the Caching and Readyboost running the raptor doesn't feel faster there.
Makaveli is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ultra Aluminus Case Darksaber Reviews 10 Jan 6, 2008 06:06 AM
Hitachi Ships Three New Hard Drives malware News 1 Oct 24, 2006 01:26 PM
Seagate Introduces New Maxtor Desktop and Notebook Hard Drives malware News 2 Oct 4, 2006 12:45 AM
Cooler Master Centurion 540 Darksaber Reviews 1 Jun 26, 2006 09:04 PM
The Perpendicular Future of Hard Drives grazzhoppa News 6 Jun 20, 2005 01:54 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts