techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Mar 28, 2008, 11:08 PM   #1
malware
Eligible for custom title
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 5,413 (1.72/day)
Thanks: 78
Thanked 986 Times in 497 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to malware Send a message via MSN to malware Send a message via Skype™ to malware

System Specs

TSMC Readies 40nm Semiconductor Manufacturing Process

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) recently unveiled the foundry’s first 40 nanometer (nm) manufacturing process technology. The new node supports a performance-driven general purpose (40G) technology and a power-efficient low power (40LP) technology. It features a full design service package and a design ecosystem that covers verified third party IP, third party EDA tools, TSMC-generated SPICE models and foundation IPs. First wafers out are expected in the second quarter of 2008.


Highlights:
  • A 2.35 times raw gate density improvement over 65nm
  • Active power down-scaling of up to 15% over 45nm
  • Smallest SRAM cell size and macro size in the industry
  • General Purpose and Low Power versions for broad product applications
  • Dozens of customers in the design pipeline today
  • Frequent and regular CyberShuttle, MPW prototyping running

Following successful tapeouts and customer announcements of its 45nm process technology in 2007, TSMC has moved forward quickly and developed an enhanced 40LP and 40G process that delivers industry-leading performance with 40nm density. The 45nm node provided double the gate density of 65nm, while the new 40nm node features manufacturing innovations that enable its LP and G processes to deliver a 2.35 raw gate density improvement of the 65nm offering. The transition from 45nm to 40nm low power technology reduces power scaling up to 15 percent.

“Our design flow can take designs started at 45nm and target it toward the advantages of 40nm,” said John Wei, senior director of Advanced Technology Marketing at TSMC. “A lot of TSMC development work has gone into ensuring that this transition is truly transparent. Designers need only concentrate on achieving their performance objectives,” he said.

TSMC has developed the 40LP for leakage-sensitive applications such as wireless and portable devices and its 40G variant targeting performance applications including CPU, GPU (Graphic Processing Unit), game console, networking and FPGA designs and other high-performance consumer devices. The 40nm footprint is linearly shrunk and the SRAM performance is fully maintained when compared to its 45nm counterpart, its SRAM cell size is now the smallest in the industry at 0.242µm2.

A full range of mixed signal and RF options accompany the 40G and 40LP processes along with Embedded DRAM, to match the breath of applications that can take advantage of the new node’s unbeatable size and performance combination.

The 40nm process employs a combination of 193nm immersion photolithography and extreme low-k (ELK) material. The logic family includes a low-power triple gate oxide (LPG) option to support high performance wireless and portable applications. Both the G and the LP processes offer multiple Vt core devices and 1.8V, 2.5V I/O options to meet different product requirements.

TSMC’s CyberShuttle prototyping service can be booked for 40nm designs in April, June, August, October and December this year and first wave 45/40nm customers have already used above 200 blocks on completed multi-project wafer runs. The 40G and LP processes will initially run in TSMC’s 12" wafer Fab 12 and will be transferred to Fab 14 as demand ramps.

Source: TSMC
malware is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 29, 2008, 01:19 AM   #2
Wetbehindtheears
200 Posts
 
Wetbehindtheears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Salisbury UK
Posts: 255 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 61
Thanked 26 Times in 24 Posts

System Specs

So who will be the first on tpu with 40nm chips then?
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
Wetbehindtheears is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 29, 2008, 01:21 AM   #3
panchoman
Sold my stars!
 
panchoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,650 (3.07/day)
Thanks: 339
Thanked 1,227 Times in 1,036 Posts

System Specs

i guess amd, but you never know

interesting... i was expecting a more drastic jump in the size of chips but this is still good
__________________


Need any Graphics Made? Visit Graphic Artists United!
R.I.P Megan--Heaven has a new angel
panchoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 29, 2008, 02:40 AM   #4
WarEagleAU
Bird of Prey
 
WarEagleAU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gurley, AL
Posts: 9,994 (3.94/day)
Thanks: 3,810
Thanked 557 Times in 521 Posts
Send a message via AIM to WarEagleAU Send a message via Yahoo to WarEagleAU

System Specs

Thatd be sweet. Go from 45nm to 40 nm. I was thinking itd be 30 nm next, not 40.
__________________
=-TheEagle-=



http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=62454
“You crazy? Surfing any website without an antivirus is like freaking with a dirty woman without protection” -OzzmanFloyd120
- Edited for content and clarity
WarEagleAU is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 29, 2008, 02:40 AM   #5
ShadowFold
Eligible for custom title
 
ShadowFold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 12,855 (6.41/day)
Thanks: 1,381
Thanked 1,681 Times in 1,498 Posts
Send a message via MSN to ShadowFold Send a message via Skype™ to ShadowFold

System Specs

Just in time for my HD 4850
ShadowFold is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 29, 2008, 02:53 AM   #6
a111087
2000 Posts
 
a111087's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: US
Posts: 2,521 (1.11/day)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 190 Times in 157 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by WarEagleAU View Post
Thatd be sweet. Go from 45nm to 40 nm. I was thinking itd be 30 nm next, not 40.
I think its just for AMD, not Intel.
__________________
a111087 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 29, 2008, 05:19 AM   #7
tkpenalty
Eligible for custom title
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia, Sydney
Posts: 5,023 (2.04/day)
Thanks: 412
Thanked 361 Times in 266 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by a111087 View Post
I think its just for AMD, not Intel.
I agree on that
__________________
AMD Radeon X1950~HD4000 Support Clubhouse

“Mac: "Woah, what are you doing?" Mac says as he levitates in the air. PC: "Playing Half-Life 2, this is my gravity gun." Mac: "Well I can sort of do that." PC: "Technically Mac, you have to become me first."” -From_Nowhere
tkpenalty is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 29, 2008, 07:26 AM   #8
farlex85
3500 Posts
 
farlex85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,114 (1.81/day)
Thanks: 369
Thanked 647 Times in 612 Posts

System Specs

Yea I think intel's next shrink is going to be to 32nm mid-nahalem time, 2009 sometime. Must be amd, although could it maybe be just for gpus?
farlex85 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
IBM Pioneers Process to Turn Waste into Solar Energy zekrahminator News 10 Jun 24, 2009 11:27 AM
Micron Shrinks DRAM Process Technology, Achieving the World’s Smallest 1Gb DDR2 Chip malware News 5 Dec 12, 2007 10:53 PM
TSMC Reports Foundry’s First 32nm Functional SRAM malware News 2 Dec 11, 2007 10:50 PM
process affinity performance influence monohouse General Software 0 Sep 21, 2007 11:22 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts